Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What to do for upcoming riots and coop

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Oct 25, 2010, 6:21:38 AM10/25/10
to
What can one do for the upcoming coop/riots other than have food storage,
silver coins coins for barter, a wheel barrel for cash, own your assets,
guns and ammo, family plan of action, praying, saying of rosary, etc? etc.
I feel that we will not win both houses in the election and "president"
Obama will be assassanated, but then I think the negros will riot and
marshall law will be declared. I am so scaird for our country.

Meanwhile we wait for the government to figure out a way to restore
confidence...
1. by issuing a new currency at a million to one(?)
2. do nothing and let the country fall apart(?)
3. require all to hand over assets for redistribution(?)

deepdudu

unread,
Oct 25, 2010, 6:41:44 AM10/25/10
to
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:21:38 -0500, "Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com>
wrote:

>What can one do for the upcoming coop/riots other than have food storage,
>silver coins coins for barter, a wheel barrel for cash, own your assets,
>guns and ammo, family plan of action, praying, saying of rosary, etc? etc.
>I feel that we will not win both houses in the election and "president"
>Obama will be assassanated, but then I think the negros will riot and
>marshall law will be declared. I am so scaird for our country.
>

yer a scaird of the negros? o deer.

Martha ! 'nother Peckerwood bein' a scaird of the neeeeeeegroooosss!!

Marshall law, eh? Is that when Marshall takes over?

Stormin Mormon

unread,
Oct 25, 2010, 8:23:01 AM10/25/10
to
I was some what similar concerned when Clinton was near the end of his
term. I figured no way he was going to walk off into the sunset. He'd
find some kind of crisis, to suspend elections.

Who knows? Might be rough, if one group or other gets inflamed to the
point of riots. Could be blacks, could be Muslims. Either one have a
history of rioting, when they don't get their way.

Marshall law. Do you realize that's a college in Georgia? They have a
web site and everything. Being in the south, they may have a chicken
coop some where.

Issuing a new currency would be interesting. Of course, some agency
would be given the power to decide who gets new money, and who
doesn't.

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.


"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:ia3lna$cmv$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

DogDiesel

unread,
Oct 25, 2010, 8:51:34 AM10/25/10
to

"Stormin Mormon" <cayoung61**spamblock##@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ia3sue$nlr$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

>I was some what similar concerned when Clinton was near the end of his
> term. I figured no way he was going to walk off into the sunset. He'd
> find some kind of crisis, to suspend elections.
>
> Who knows? Might be rough, if one group or other gets inflamed to the
> point of riots. Could be blacks, could be Muslims. Either one have a
> history of rioting, when they don't get their way.
>
> Marshall law. Do you realize that's a college in Georgia? They have a
> web site and everything. Being in the south, they may have a chicken
> coop some where.
>
> Issuing a new currency would be interesting. Of course, some agency
> would be given the power to decide who gets new money, and who
> doesn't.

It would be very very very bad. Americans would probably have their bank
accounts frozen. Then when you starve for a week or two. Or 6 months. The
Federal government would issue the NEW currency on about 10 cents on the
dollar.And you would have to take it or lose everything.

Its not good.

At that point, we would probably get carbon currency. And currency would
end. The UN would then be in charge of the carbon currency. The US is now a
slave state.

robert bowman

unread,
Oct 25, 2010, 10:01:07 AM10/25/10
to
Deep Dudu wrote:

> Marshall law, eh?  Is that when Marshall takes over?

Not again! That Federalist bastard did enough damage the first time around.
Let him stay buried.

Rufus Levin

unread,
Oct 25, 2010, 7:56:01 PM10/25/10
to

<Deep Dudu> wrote in message news:4cc55e6...@news.newsguy.com...>>

> yer a scaird of the negros? o deer.
>

We are not scaired of Negros but our Nation as an entire population is
exhausted from CARRYING an ungrateful and unappreciative and an
uncooperative race of victims who demand more and more as their RIGHTS
because simple they are negros. Being free and doing your work and takeing
responsibility are not the same. The negro shoud get down on their knee's
that they were brought to America ....but truth is, your RACE had squandered
all these opportinity's. You have only to FEAR accountability for your OWN
race's actions or lack there of. You only have to be willing to be MEASURED
for your CONTRIBUTION, not given MORE for whatever sins and grievances of
the past occurred. That was then, and you allowed yourselves to wallow in
self pitty and TAKE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S SLAVE WAGES OF WELFARE and
"special programs". You took opportunities more deserved by other races, yet
forfeit FOR you and yours, and you DID NOTHING of VALUE in RETURN. When
members of your race did become successful, they ABANDONED you and wanted
nothing to do with those of their own race that brough SHAME and
EMBARASSMENT for stupidity and anti-social dress, morals, music, habits,
drug usage, drunkeness, spousal and child abuse and rape...you name it, and
the Sucessful negros ran away and left you filling the Ghettos you created
and maintain. You cannot even bend over to pick up beer cans and sandwich
wrappers you throw to the ground.

You should be FEARFUL of the FAILURE of the negro as it is finally SHOWN to
have SQUANDERED the generosity of a Nation and the memory of 500,000
citizens that gave their lives in a massive war that brought you freedom.

Nicholas

unread,
Oct 25, 2010, 8:10:38 PM10/25/10
to

I agree with this message, and my name is Lawrence R Glickman

Charles Finly

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 4:56:12 PM10/26/10
to

what an asshole!

Charles Finly

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 4:59:45 PM10/26/10
to
On Oct 25, 4:56 pm, "Rufus Levin" <le...@stormfront.org> wrote:
> <Deep Dudu> wrote in messagenews:4cc55e6...@news.newsguy.com...>>

What generosity do you refer? The one where they were enslaved for
generations, or discriminated against for generations? Why don't you
just eat shit and die, racist asshole!

James Bratigan

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 7:19:03 PM10/26/10
to
Every GOP guiding light has been speaking hate and fear with their every
word for the last 2 years, then they decry violence when those who hang on
their every word become violent.

The GOP can no longer sell a majority on voting for them no matter what they
promise, so they have instead adopted a policy of enraging to violence the
minority who support them as a path to power in America.

Welcome to the new GOP vision for America. An America where disagreement
with the GOP will win you a bloody beating from the party faithful.

Stormin Mormon

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 7:50:04 PM10/26/10
to
I think that the GOP you mention are called Democrats.

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.


"James Bratigan" <brat...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ia7nkv$t5j$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

greylock

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 8:25:19 PM10/26/10
to
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:50:04 -0400, "Stormin Mormon"
<cayoung61**spamblock##@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I think that the GOP you mention are called Democrats.


Precisely..............

Stormin Mormon

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 10:21:29 PM10/26/10
to
I've been meaning to ask. Would that be a chicken coop?

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.

Beanie

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 11:41:14 PM10/26/10
to

"Charles Finly" <xchuck...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:15e604af-5800-469a...@m7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

>What generosity do you refer? The one where they were enslaved for
generations, or discriminated against for generations? Why don't you
just eat shit and die, racist asshole!

The billions, if not a trillion dollars squandered on trying to civilize those
subhuman porch monkeys.
They can't be educated.
They refuse to stop committing crimes.
They breed like cockroaches.
Every area they live in turns into a dangerous slum, no matter how good a
neighborhood it was until the darkies got there.
Why don't YOU eat shit and die, you nigger loving wigger?


deepdudu

unread,
Oct 27, 2010, 4:54:33 AM10/27/10
to
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:25:19 -0500, greylock <greyl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

You people are morons.

Gunner Asch

unread,
Oct 30, 2010, 6:37:30 PM10/30/10
to
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:19:03 -0500, "James Bratigan"
<brat...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>The GOP can no longer sell a majority on voting for them no matter what they
>promise,

We will see how accurate your statement is, in 3 days.

Do you have a good sharp razor blade handy in case you are wrong?

Remember..length wise, not across.

I am the Sword of my Family
and the Shield of my Nation.
If sent, I will crush everything you have built,
burn everything you love,
and kill every one of you.
(Hebrew quote)

Dereck Christian

unread,
Oct 30, 2010, 7:41:51 PM10/30/10
to
Our 4 year national nightmear that saw our rights taken away, our economy
destroyed, our people put at the back of the bus with Obama repayations. .
We are taking back our country on Tuesday, Obongo will be impeached, his
laws will be repealed, and we will have the freedom and properity we had
before this disaster occupied the white house with election fraud and
intimidating voters


"Nicholas" <Lawrence...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:v27cc6livte9da97e...@4ax.com...

Stormin Mormon

unread,
Oct 31, 2010, 4:27:17 PM10/31/10
to
Would be nice, to send the socialists back where they were before.

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.


"Dereck Christian" <nou...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:iaiag0$gmp$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

robert bowman

unread,
Oct 31, 2010, 9:32:41 PM10/31/10
to
Stormin Mormon wrote:

> Would be nice, to send the socialists back where they were before.

They tried that in 1919:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Raids

They raids ignored most of the civil liberties enumerated in the
Constitution, but Wilson never cared too much for that document anyway.

deepdudu

unread,
Oct 31, 2010, 10:54:11 PM10/31/10
to
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:41:51 -0500, "Dereck Christian"
<nou...@invalid.com> wrote:

>Our 4 year national nightmear that saw our rights taken away, our economy
>destroyed, our people put at the back of the bus with Obama repayations. .

"Repayations".

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAA

>We are taking back our country on Tuesday, Obongo will be impeached, his
>laws will be repealed, and we will have the freedom and properity we had
>before this disaster occupied the white house with election fraud and
>intimidating voters

The irony ! The irony !

Message has been deleted

Stormin Mormon

unread,
Nov 3, 2010, 3:14:55 AM11/3/10
to
I'm still curious if there will be riots. And where is the coop. Would
that be chicken coop?

HarryTuttle

unread,
Nov 17, 2010, 7:12:43 PM11/17/10
to
There's some brown stuff on your nose there buddy.

"James Bratigan" <brat...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ia7nkv$t5j$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

Jo FLECK

unread,
Nov 18, 2010, 5:51:21 AM11/18/10
to
Your <back of the bus> analogy is an offensive reference to Rosa Parks and
all the other people of colour who have been discriminated against in
America. Your reference to <Obongo> is an obvious slur to those Americans
of African heritage <bongo drums.>

Thos who oppose President Obama on ideological grounds lose all credibility
when they use racist language. That is the standard mode for most of the
<tea party> Americans.

"Dereck Christian" <nou...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:iaiag0$gmp$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

Stormin Mormon

unread,
Nov 18, 2010, 8:27:00 AM11/18/10
to
Dear Jo, that's typical leftist liberal approach. Accuse your opponent
of being racist. Straight from the liberal playbook.

I'm still curious what kind of coop. Chicken coop maybe?

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.


"Jo FLECK" <kuukad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ic30eo$sdl$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

Offbreed

unread,
Nov 18, 2010, 9:48:58 PM11/18/10
to
On Nov 18, 1:51 am, "Jo FLECK" <kuukadogis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your <back of the bus> analogy is an offensive reference to Rosa Parks and

Lack wit. You have been suckered by a troll.

The great majority of the cross posting trolls I've been able to track
are also Moby's. (They agree with you and want people to hate
conservatives, so they post trash like what you are responding to.)

Wade

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 12:57:02 PM11/20/10
to
This might sound crazy to you because I don't know what your spiritual roots
are but a lot of what Obama has been doing has not only done what you
suggest above but also prepared America for survival post-rapture of The
Church.
1. Place pagans in high offices and courts.
2. Lessen dependence on self-sufficiency, free market forces and more on
govt. programs.
3. Increase pagan and homosexual emphasis in all areas of society especially
the armed forces by 'embracing diversity' to the fullest extent possible
without being noticed.
4. Debase the Jewish state and embrace relationships with foreign
dictatorships.
5. Population control not from a moral base but from a cold basis of
survival ie. abortion, euthenasia, a system of denying medicine to
undesireable cases. Survival of the Correct not survival of the fittest.

Obama does not know this but one day all nations will be judged by God and
Christians and some Jews will rule with authority over the nations.
See Revelation 2:25-27 and also Psalm 2 is encouraging.


http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com

j-rod

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 2:40:49 PM11/20/10
to

Quoting from a book of ignorant myths is no way to legitimize your silly
fantasy.

JAM

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 3:31:58 PM11/20/10
to
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:51:21 -0600, "Jo FLECK" <kuukad...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Your <back of the bus> analogy is an offensive reference to Rosa Parks and
>all the other people of colour who have been discriminated against in
>America. Your reference to <Obongo> is an obvious slur to those Americans
>of African heritage <bongo drums.>
>
>Thos who oppose President Obama on ideological grounds lose all credibility
>when they use racist language. That is the standard mode for most of the
><tea party> Americans.

Given that most Democrats are racist bigot homophobes..your spittle is
viewed by normal people as funny propaganda.

Say...are you a KKK member? Afterall..the Klan has been a Democrat
organization for most of its long long history.

http://biggovernment.com/mzak/2010/07/16/the-ku-klux-klan-terrorist-wing-of-the-democratic-party/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Was_the_democratic_party_associated_with_the_KKK

History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the
Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in
the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers,
Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian who is the
DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. As a further
testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is only the
second person to serve as president of the three major professional
organizations: the Organization of American Historians, American
Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.

Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku
Klux Klan. Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of
the Klan's The Kourier Magazine: "I have never voted for any man who was
not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was not
a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in
reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat…. My
great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic
party."

Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux
Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by
Democrats against Republicans, black and white.

On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: "Founded in 1866 as a
Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every
Southern state, launching a 'reign of terror' against Republican leaders
black and white." Page 184 of his book contains the definitive
statements: "In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the
interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who
desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy the
Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state,
reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial
subordination in every aspect of Southern life."

Heartbreaking are Professor Foner's recitations of the horrific acts of
terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted
on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: "Jack Dupree, a
victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi -
assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his
wife, who had just given birth to twins - was 'president of a republican
club' and known as a man who 'would speak his mind.'"

"White gangs roamed New Orleans, intimidating blacks and breaking up
Republican meetings," wrote Dr. Foner on page 146 of his book. On page
186, he wrote: "An even more extensive 'reign of terror' engulfed
Jackson, a plantation county in Florida's panhandle. 'That is where
Santa has his seat,' remarked a black clergyman; all told over 150
persons were killed, among them black leaders and Jewish merchant Samuel
Fleischman, resented for his Republican views and for dealing fairly
with black customers."

The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks.
The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law
beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with
the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s. During the civil rights
era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the
school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let
loose vicious dogs. Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a
proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil
Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And
after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on
Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who
was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty.
Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI
on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn.,
after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert
Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a
"trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble
is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was
assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats"
did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that
they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican
because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today,
some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as
Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a
"Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who
put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the
governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat
Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a
great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats
denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen.
Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and
defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes
imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during
the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.


--
"Confiscating wealth from those who have earned it, inherited it,
or got lucky is never going to help 'the poor.' Poverty isn't
caused by some people having more money than others, just as obesity
isn't caused by McDonald's serving super-sized orders of French fries
Poverty, like obesity, is caused by the life choices that dictate
results." - John Tucci,

Frank Provasek

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 4:43:18 PM11/20/10
to
On Nov 20, 2:31 pm, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
associated_with_th...

>
> History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the
> Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in
> the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers,
> Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian who is the
> DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. As a further
> testament to his impeccable credentials,...


Why don't we look at recent history, say in the past half century?

In Dr. King's own words:


"In 1964 the meaning of so-called Negro revolution became clear for
all to see and was given legislative recognition in the civil rights
law. Yet, immediately following the passage of this law, a series of
events shook the nation, compelling the grim realization that the
revolution would continue inexorably until total slavery had been
replaced by total freedom.

The new events to which I refer were: the Republican Convention held
in San Francisco; the hideous triple lynchings in Mississippi; and the
outbreak of riots in several Northern cities.

The Republican Party geared its appeal and program to racism,
reaction, and extremism. All people of goodwill viewed with alarm and
concern the frenzied wedding at the Cow Palace of the KKK with the
radical right. The "best man" at this ceremony was a senator whose
voting record, philosophy, and program were anathema to all the hard-
won achievements of the past decade.

It was both unfortunate and disastrous that the Republican Party
nominated Barry Goldwater as its candidate for President of the United
States. In foreign policy Mr. Goldwater advocated a narrow
nationalism, a crippling isolationism, and a trigger-happy attitude
that could plunge the whole world into the dark abyss of annihilation.
On social and economic issues, Mr. Goldwater represented an
unrealistic conservatism that was totally out of touch with the
realities of the twentieth century. The issue of poverty compelled the
attention of all citizens of our country. Senator Goldwater had
neither the concern nor the comprehension necessary to grapple with
this problem of poverty in the fashion that the historical moment
dictated. On the urgent issue of civil rights, Senator Goldwater
represented a philosophy that was morally indefensible and socially
suicidal. While not himself a racist, Mr. Goldwater articulated a
philosophy which gave aid and comfort to the racist. His candidacy and
philosophy would serve as an umbrella under which extremists of all
stripes would stand. In the light of these facts and because of my
love for America, I had no alternative but to urge every Negro and
white person of goodwill to vote against Mr. Goldwater and to withdraw
support from any Republican candidate that did not publicly
disassociate himself from Senator Goldwater and his philosophy.

While I had followed a policy of not endorsing political candidates, I
felt that the prospect of Senator Goldwater being President of the
United States so threatened the health, morality, and survival of our
nation, that I could not in good conscience fail to take a stand
against what he represented.

The celebration of final enactment of the civil rights bill curdled
and soured. Rejoicing was replaced by a deep and frightening concern
that the counter-forces to Negro liberation could flagrantly nominate
for the highest office in the land one who openly clasped the racist
hand of Strom Thurmond. A cold fear touched the hearts of twenty
million Negroes. They had only begun to come out of the dark land of
Egypt where so many of their brothers were still in bondage-still
denied elementary dignity. The forces to bar the freedom road, to
drive us back to Egypt, seemed so formidable, so high in authority,
and so determined."

j-rod

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 8:09:22 PM11/20/10
to

Actually, after the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act and
forced integration of the south by Democrats, all the ignorant hate
filled racists left the Democrat Party and joined the Republican Party.

JAM

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 9:51:44 PM11/20/10
to
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 13:43:18 -0800 (PST), Frank Provasek
<fr...@frankcoins.com> wrote:

>
>
>Why don't we look at recent history, say in the past half century?
>
>In Dr. King's own words:
>
>
>"In 1964 the meaning of so-called Negro revolution became clear for
>all to see and was given legislative recognition in the civil rights
>law. Yet, immediately following the passage of this law, a series of
>events shook the nation, compelling the grim realization that the
>revolution would continue inexorably until total slavery had been
>replaced by total freedom.

You do know that Dr King was...a Republican, do you not?

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican
by Frances Rice
08/16/2006
Trackback Link (Loading. . .)


It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a
Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans.
Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today,
the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks.
And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it
always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession,
segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the
discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the


Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to
prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil
rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of
the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the
Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire

hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President
Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and
sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower
also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court,
which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending
school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's
issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not
mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to
effectively end segregation in the military.


Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil
rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while
he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became
President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr.
King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black
Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert
Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on
suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn.,
after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert
Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a
"trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble
is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was
assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King
was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from
slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th
Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th
Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s,
including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of
1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the
Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also
started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President
Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art
Fletcher) that set the nation's fist goals and timetables. Although
affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair
quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm
caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked
all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the
Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact
that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the
passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not
mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting
Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill.
Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which
prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not
have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of
Republicans.

Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President
against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force
the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus
end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson,
in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965,
mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were
devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting
rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against
the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that Nigger preacher."

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats"
did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that
they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican
because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today,
some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as
Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a
"Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who
put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the
governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat
Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a
great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats
denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen.
Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and
defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes
imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during
the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began
in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," which
was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to
stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still
discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black.
Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including
Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to
keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how
egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase
was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3 kept their promise and
killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29. The
blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years
that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans.
Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004, blocked passage of a bill to renew
the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed
twice by President Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the
welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six
extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the
Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help
black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform,
even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because
of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5
years for whites).

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40
years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More
than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since
Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty.
Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the
deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a
protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats' stranglehold on the black vote and free
black Americans from the Democrat Party's economic plantation, we must
shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the
Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government
handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles
of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and
ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity.

Ms. Rice is chairman of the National Black Republican Association (NBRA)
and may be contacted at www.NBRA.info.

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 9:52:29 PM11/20/10
to

Your lies are noted with amused contempt

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican
by Frances Rice
08/16/2006
Trackback Link (Loading. . .)


It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a
Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans.
Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today,
the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks.
And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it
always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession,
segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the

discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the


Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to
prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil
rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of
the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the
Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire

hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President
Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and
sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower
also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court,
which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending
school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's
issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not
mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to
effectively end segregation in the military.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil
rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while
he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became
President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr.
King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black
Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert
Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on
suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn.,
after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert
Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a
"trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble
is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was
assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats"


did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that
they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican
because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today,
some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as
Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a
"Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who
put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the
governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat
Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a
great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats
denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen.
Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and
defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes
imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during
the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began

j-rod

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 10:07:22 PM11/20/10
to

Your denial of well known facts marks you as a fool.

JAM

Frank Provasek

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 11:11:18 PM11/20/10
to
On Nov 20, 8:51 pm, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You do know that Dr King was...a Republican, do you not?
>
> Why Martin Luther King Was Republican
> by Frances Rice
> 08/16/2006

Absolute garbage.

http://www.tampabay.com/multimedia/archive/00029/b4s_billboard070508_29614c.jpg

TALLAHASSEE — A black Republican group has put up billboards around
Florida — including Pinellas and Hillsborough counties — and in South
Carolina saying the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican.

Black leaders say the claim is ridiculous.

The National Black Republican Association's billboards show the civil
rights leader and the words "Martin Luther King Jr. was REPUBLICAN."

Told of the billboards, the Rev. Joseph Lowery let out a soft chuckle
that grew stronger as he began to think more about the idea.

"These guys never give up, do they?" said Lowery, who co-founded the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference with King. "Lord have mercy."

The King Center in Atlanta says there is no proof that King was ever a
Republican. Rice stands by her claim. She said she was asked by the
King Center to take down the billboards, but she refused. "I said, 'If
you want us to stop, sue us.' But they don't want to come into court
because they know they'll have to tell the truth," Rice said.

Rice said the group plans more radio ads in the areas where the
billboards are as well as a mail campaign, and T-shirts and buttons
with the message.

In Tampa, Clarissa Robinson, sat in her car directly under the
billboard and looked up at it.

"Why'd they put that up there?" said Robinson, 22, who is black and a
Democrat. "So nobody (will) vote for (Democrat Barack) Obama. They're
trying to make us vote for the other guy."

Lowery, who knew King well, said there is no reason why anyone would
think King was a Republican. He said King most certainly voted for
President John Kennedy, and the only time he openly talked about
politics was when he criticized Republican Barry Goldwater during the
1964 presidential campaign.

"It's purely propaganda and poppycock," Lowery said. "Even if he was,
he would have nothing to do with what the Republican Party stands for
today. Do they think Martin would support George W. Bush and the war
in Iraq?"

In The Autobiography of Martin Luther King Jr., published after his
death from his written material and records, King called the
Republican national convention that nominated Goldwater a "frenzied
wedding … of the KKK and the radical right."

The Republican Party of Florida refused to discuss the billboards.


Bremick

unread,
Nov 20, 2010, 11:26:01 PM11/20/10
to
For those of us who don't give a shit about this tired extremist political
crap, please eliminate the RCC header if you want to keep the discussion
going. For God's sake, thanks!


Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 21, 2010, 12:46:59 AM11/21/10
to
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 20:11:18 -0800 (PST), Frank Provasek
<fr...@frankcoins.com> wrote:

>On Nov 20, 8:51�pm, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You do know that Dr King was...a Republican, do you not?
>>
>> Why Martin Luther King Was Republican
>> by Frances Rice
>> 08/16/2006
>
>Absolute garbage.
>

<VBG>

Seems you are badmouthing blacks..so your bias, bigotry and Klanish
behavior again comes to the fore in lies and buffoonery.

You do know Dr. Kings daughter herself says he was a Republican, right?

Somebody wrote that..but it was obviously not Dr. King.

The KKK was indeed a Democrat organization. The three most notorious
opponents of school integration were all Democrats:
- Orval Faubus, Democrat Governor of Arkansas and one of Bill Clinton's
political heroes
- George Wallace, Democrat Governor of Alabama
- Lester Maddox, Democrat Governor of Georgia

>The Republican Party of Florida refused to discuss the billboards.

Im sure they did. Why bother discussing anything with racists from your
party?

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/09/genuine_institutionalized_raci.html

http://gopcapitalist.tripod.com/democratrecord.html


The Democrat Party's Long and Shameful History of Bigotry and Racism

A common attack upon conservatives and republicans by the ultra left is
to engage in what has come to be known as "playing the race card" but is
more accurately described as racial McCarthyism. Hardly a day goes by
without a member of the far left wing falsely accusing conservatives of
racism, bigotry, and a wide array of similar nasty things. They are not
only dishonest, but they often border on the absurd, as in NAACP leader
and hyper bigot Julian Bond's recent implication to his organization
that Bush administration officials supported confederate slavery.
Amazingly, Bond's statements went without condemnation from the radical
Democrat party or others in his organization.

Not surprisingly, in all the lies and accusations of racism by the
radical left wing, the truth becomes distorted not only about the
Republicans but also the Democrats who make these accusations
themselves. For instance, you may or may not have heard Democrat Senator
Robert Byrd's outburst of racist bigoted slurs, more specifically the
"n-word," on national television in March of 2001. Amazingly, this
incident of blatant racism on national television drew barely a peep
from the NAACP, Jesse Jackson, Julian Bond, Mary Frances Berry, or any
of the other ambulance chasers who purport themselves to be the leaders
of the civil rights movement. In contrast, the main source of well
deserved criticism for Byrd's racist outburst came not from any of the
so called leaders of the civil rights movement but from from Republican
Majority Leader Dick Armey (source). The race hustlers Jackson, Mfume et
al turned a blind eye towards this act of racism by one of their own
party, at most issuing an unpublicized slap on the wrist, or, as was
more often the case, making not a peep. But where the race hustlers turn
a blind eye and spew their lies, it is up to conservatives to set the
record straight with the truth.

In response to the growing practice of racial McCarthyism by prominent
left wing Democrats, it is necessary to expose the truth about the
Democrat Party's record on Civil Rights:

I. Acts of Bigotry by Prominent Democrats and Leftists:

Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Franklin Roosevelt, the long time hero and
standard bearer of the Democrat Party, headed up and implemented one of
the most horrible racist policies of the 20th Century � the Japanese
Internment Camps during World War II. Roosevelt unilaterally and
knowingly enacted Japanese Internment through the use of presidential
Executive Orders 9066 and 9102 during the early years of the war. These
orders single-handedly led to the imprisonment of an estimated 120,000
law abiding Americans of Japanese ancestry, the overwhelming majority of
them natural born second and third generation American citizens.
Countless innocents lost their property, fortunes, and, in the case of
an unfortunate few, even their lives as a result of Roosevelt's
internment camps, camps that have been accurately described as America's
concentration camps. Perhaps most telling about the racist nature of
Roosevelt's order was his clearly expressed intention to apply it almost
entirely to Japanese Americans, even though America was also at war with
Germany and Italy. In 1943, Roosevelt wrote regarding concerns of German
and Italian Americans that they t0o would share in the fate of the
interned Japanese Americans, noting that "no collective evacuation of
German and Italian aliens is contemplated at this time." Despite this
assertion, Roosevelt did exhibit his personal fears about Italian and
German Americans, and in his typical racist form he used an ethnic
stereotype to make his point. Expressing about his position on German
and Italian Americans during World War II, Roosevelt stated �I don�t
care so much about the Italians, they are a lot of opera singers, but
the Germans are different. They may be dangerous.�

Roosevelt also appointed two notorious segregationists to the United
States Supreme Court. Roosevelt appointed South Carolina segregationist
Democrat Jimmy Byrnes to the court. Roosevelt later made Byrnes a top
advisor, where the segregationist earned the nickname �assistant
president.� Byrnes was Roosevelt�s second choice behind Harry Truman for
the VP nod in his 1944 reelection bid. Roosevelt also appointed
segregationist Democrat Senator Hugo Black of Alabama to the court.
Black was a former member of the Ku Klux Klan with a notorious record of
racism himself.

Hugo Black: A former Democrat Senator from Alabama and liberal U.S.
Supreme Court Justice appointed by FDR, Hugo Black had a lengthy history
of hate group activism. Black was a member of the Ku Klux Klan in the
1920's and gained his legal fame defending Klansmen under prosecution
for racial murders. In one prominent case, Black provided legal
representation to Klansman Edwin Stephenson for the hate-induced murder
of a Catholic priest in Birmingham. A jury composed of several Klan
members acquited Stephenson of the murder, reportedly after Black
expressed Klan gestures to the jury during the trial. In 1926 Black
sought and won election as a Democrat to the United States Senate after
campaigning heavily to Klan membership. He is said to have told one Klan
audience "I desire to impress upon you as representatives of the real
Anglo-Saxon sentiment that must and will control the destinies of the
stars and stripes, that I want your counsel." In the Senate Black became
a stauch supporter of the liberal New Deal initiatives of FDR and a
solid opponent of civil rights legislation, including a filibuster of an
anti-lynching measure. Black led the push for several New Deal programs
and was a key participant in FDR's court packing scandal. Roosevelt
appointed Black, a loyal ally, to the U.S. Supreme Court. During the
Senate confirmation of Black's nomination, the issue of his strong Klan
affiliations caused a public controversy over his appointment. Following
the confirmation Roosevelt claimed ignorance of Black's Klan past,
though this claim was dubious at best. Black's first Senate election,
which occurred with Klan support, had been covered nationally a decade
earlier in 1926. Black's Klan affiliations were a well known part of his
political background and recieved heavy coverage in the newspapers at
the time of his appointment. On the court, Black became a liberal
stalwart. He also continued his career of supporting racism by authoring
the opinion in favor of FDR's Japanese internment program in the
infamous Korematsu ruling.

Senator Robert Byrd, D-WV: Byrd is a former member of the Ku Klux Klan
and is currently the only national elected official with a history in
the Klan, a well known hate group. Byrd was extremely active in the Klan
and rose to the rank of �Kleagle,� an official Klan membership
recruiter. Byrd once stated that he joined the Klan because it was
effective in "promoting traditional American values" (Source). Byrd's
choice of words speak volumes about his bigotry considering the fact
that the Klan is a notorious hate group, and the racist "values" it
promotes are anything but American. One of the earliest criticisms of
Byrd's Klan ties came in 1952 when he was running for Congress. Byrd
responded by claiming that he had left the Klan in 1943 while noting
that "(d)uring the nine years that have followed, I have never been
interested in the Klan." Byrd was lying, however, as he engaged in
correspondence with a Klan Imperial Wizard long after he claims to have
ended his ties with the hate group.

In a letter to the Klan leadership (Source) dated 3 years after he
purported to have ended his ties with them, Byrd wrote "I am a former
kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan in Raleigh County and the adjoining counties
of the state. The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious
to see its rebirth here in West Virginia." Byrd continued his racist
diatribe "It is necessary that the order be promoted immediately and in
every state of the Union" and followed with a request for assistance
from the hate group's leadership in "rebuilding the Klan in the realm"
of West Virginia.

Byrd's racism extends far beyond his Klan membership. In a letter he
wrote on the subject of desegregating the armed forces, Byrd escalated
his racist rhetoric to an appalling level. In the letter, Byrd vowed
that he would never fight in an integrated armed services noting
"(r)ather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in
the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours
become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen
from the wilds" (Source).

Byrd's racist opinions have shown their ugly face in his behavior in the
Senate. Byrd led the filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and,
according to the United States Senate's own website, filibustered the
legislation to the bitter end appearing as one of the last opponents to
the act before a coalition of civil rights proponents led by Republican
Minority Leader Everett Dirksen invoked cloture so that the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 could pass. At the time, Byrd was in the the midst of a 14
hour and 13 minute filibuster diatribe against the key civil rights
measure (Source). Throughout the 1960's, Byrd was was one of the
staunchest opponents to civil rights in the U.S. Senate. Byrd�s racist
history drew attention recently when he went on national television and
repeatedly used the n-word, one of the most vicious racial slurs in
existence, in an appearance on national television. Byrd uttered the
slur on Fox News Sunday with Tony Snow on March 5, 2001. Despite the
appalling nature of the remark, it went largely ignored by the
mainstream media and the self appointed "civil rights" leadership.
Whereas a similar remark by anyone other than a leading Democrat Senator
would assuredly prompt the likes of Jesse Jackson to assemble protest
rallies demanding resignations, the Jackson crowd was eerily quiet
following Byrd's remarks, issuing only low key suggestions that Byrd
should avoid making such bigoted remarks.

In a sickening recognition of Byrd's appalling political career, the
national Democrat party has done nothing but embrace the West Virginia
senator with leadership roles and practically every honor imaginable. To
this very day the Democrats call former Klansman turned U.S. Senator
Robert Byrd the "conscience of the Senate." They have embraced him as
their party's central pillar in all ways possible. Byrd has been
reelected more times than any other Democrat senator, has served as a
Democrat in Congress, a Democrat State Senator in West Virginia, and a
Democrat State Delegate in West Virginia. Democrats have made repeatedly
elected Byrd into their national party leadership and into the U.S.
Senate leadership. He became secretary of the Senate Democrat Caucus in
1967, and Senate Democrat Whip in 1971. The Democrats elected former
Klansman Byrd as their Senate Majority Leader from 1977-1980 and as
their Senate Minority Leader from 1981-1986. Byrd was again elected
Democrat Majority Leader from 1987-1988. Democrats made Byrd the
chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee and President Pro
Tempore of the Senate from 1989 until the Republicans won control of the
Senate in November 1994. Following the defection of Jim Jeffords in June
2001, the Democrats again made Byrd the chairman of the Appropriations
Committee and elected him to the highest ranking office in the Senate:
the President Pro Tempore, a position which also put this former
Klansman 4th in line for the presidency. Byrd lost his position when
Republicans retook the Senate in late 2002, but continues to serve as
one of the highest ranking members of the Democrat Senate leadership
today.

Senator Ernest Hollings, D-SC: Hollings is liberal Democrat Senator from
South Carolina who is also notorious for his use of racial slurs. He
rose out of the Democrat Party's segregationist wing in the 1960's as
governor of South Carolina. While in office as governor, Hollings
personally led the opposition to lunch counter integration in his state.
The New York Times reported on March 17, 1960 that then-governor
Hollings "warned today that South Carolina would not permit 'explosive'
manifestations in connection with Negro demands for lunch-counter
services." According to the article, Hollings gave a speech in which he
"challenged President Eisenhower's contention that minorities had the
right to engage in certain types of demonstrations" against segregation.
In the speech Hollings described the Republican president as "confused"
and asserted that Eisenhower had done "great damage to peace and good
order" by supporting the rights of minorities to protest segregation at
the lunch counters.

Governor Hollings' support for segregation continued throughout his term
and included his attendance at a July 23, 1961 meeting of segregationist
Democrats to organize their opposition to the civil rights movement.
Hollings was one of four governors in attendence, all of them Democrats.
The others included rabid segregationists Orval Faubus of Arkansas and
Ross Barnett of Mississippi. The New York Times reported on the meeting,
noting that among the strategies discussed were using the segregationist
White Citizens Council organization to mobilize political opposition to
desegregation.

In more recent years Hollings, a senior Democrat senator, has made
disparaging racial remarks and slurs against minorities. Senator
Hollings, who was a contender for his party's presidential nomination in
1984, blamed his defeat in the primaries by using a racial slur against
Hispanics. After losing the Iowa Straw Poll, Hollings stated "You had
wetbacks from California that came in here for Cranston," referring to
one of his opponents, Alan Cranston. A few years later Hollings
reportedly used the slur "darkies" to derogatorily refer to blacks. He
also once disparagingly referred to the Rainbow PUSH Coalition as the
"Blackbow Coalition," and called former Senator Howard Metzenbaum, who
is Jewish, "the Senator from B'nai B'rith." Hollings gained
international criticism for his remarks about the African Delegation to
the 1993 Geneva GATT conference, where he crudely remarked "you'd find
these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each
other, they'd just come up and get a good square meal in Geneva."
Hollings was also the Governor of South Carolina who raised the
confederate flag over the state capitol in the early 1960's in what was
considered at the time to be an act of defiance to civil rights. The
press ignored Hollings and his role in the flag issue at the same time
the political correctness police were smearing George W. Bush during his
campaign after Bush correctly remarked that the flag was a state issue
to be decided upon by South Carolina and not the national government.

Jesse Jackson: Jackson was the featured prime time speaker at the 2000
Democrat Convention. Jackson has a history of using anti-Semitic slurs
and derogatorily calling New York City �Hymietown.� Jackson, a prominent
self proclaimed "civil rights leader," is himself guilty of the same
bigotry he dishonestly purports to oppose.

Dan Rather: Rather, the well known television anchor for CBS, is also a
liberal Democrat who has spoken at fundraisers for the Democrat party in
the past. The notoriously left wing reporter appeared on the Don Imus
radio show on July 19, 2001 where he was interviewed about his long term
refusal to cover the Gary Condit (D-CA) scandal involving an affair with
a missing intern despite the scandal's national prominence. Rather noted
on the air that CBS had basically forced him to cover the story that was
on every other network and on the front page of all the major
newspapers, all this after Rather avoided it for months. Rather stated
on the air, refering to CBS, that "they got the Buckwheats" and made him
cover the Condit scandal. The term "Buckwheat" is considered an
offensive racial stereotype that stems from an easily frightened black
character named "Buckwheat" on the Little Rascals comedies. It is
widely regarded as a racial epithet and has long been condemned as an
offensive stereotype by several civil rights organizations. In several
past incidents (see here and here) the use of the epithet "Buckwheat"
has recieved condemnation by the NAACP, Al Sharpton and other left wing
organizations. These left wing organizations and personalities have
demanded that other media personalities be fired over using the epithet,
and even staged a protest at a school over the mere allegation that the
racist stereotype had been used by a teacher. Yet these same liberal
groups have, to date, remained completely silent now that one of their
own, Dan Rather, is guilty of using the same offensive racial stereotype
they have condemned elsewhere on a national radio show. It's just more
proof of how the left wingers who cry the loudest with accusations of
racism against others turn a blind eye when somebody of their own left
wing ideology is the undeniable culprit of a blatantly racist act or
statement!

Cragg Hines: Hines is one of the most rabidly partisan DC based Democrat
editorial columnists to work for a major newspaper, and he makes no
attempts to hide it. To Hines, pro-lifers are "neanderthals," as is
often the case with those who differ in opinion with him. Ironically,
Hines, a columnist who regularly touts himself as an enlightened
progressive, is also known for racial remarks and religious intolerance.
He attacked Senator Jesse Helms in an August 26, 2001 editorial with not
only the usual liberal name calling, but also with a racial epithet.
Hines used the racial slur "cracker" to attack Helms. He used the
epithet not only within the article's text, but he even included it in
the piece's title. In a sense of heavy irony, Hines' article accused
Helms of bigotry for, among other things, opposing liberal policies like
affirmative action. He didn't seem to object to himself for his own
bigotted language in the same article. Hines has also drawn heavy
criticism from Catholics including a letter to the editor from the
former President of the U.S. Catholic Bishop's Conference for his
seemingly agenda-driven criticisms of Catholicism and its religious
leaders, often based on little or no historical evidence, which he has
expressed in numerous editorial columns.

Al Sharpton: Sharpton, a perrenial Democrat candidate and one of the
rumored candidates for the Democrat's 2004 presidential nomination, has
a notorious racist past. Sharpton was a central figure who fanned the
1991 Crown Heights race riot, where a mob shouting anti-semetic slurs
murdered an innocent Jewish man. Sharpton also incited a 1995 protest of
a Jewish owned store in Harlem where protesters used several
anti-semetic slurs. During the protests, a Sharpton lieutenant called
the store's owner a "bloodsucker" and declared an intent to "loot the
Jews." A member of the protest mob later set fire to the store,
resulting in the death of seven (source).

Representative Dick Gephardt, D-MO: Gephardt, the former Democrat
Minority Leader in the U.S. House of Representatives, gave several
speeches to a St. Louis area hate group during his early years as a
representative. According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Gephardt spoke
before the Metro South Citizens Council, a now defunct white supremacist
organization, during his early years as a congressman. Newsmax.com
further reported that Gephardt had openly asked the group for an
endorsement of his candidacy during one of his many visits with the
organization. Gephardt has long avoided questions about his past
affiliation with this group.

Andrew Cuomo: Cuomo, Bill Clinton's former Housing Secretary and a
prominent Democrat political player in New York, was tape recorded using
racially inflamatory rhetoric to build opposition to a potential
Democrat primary opponent while speaking to a Democrat group. Cuomo
stated that voting for his rival for the New York Democrat gubernatorial
nomination Carl McCall, who is black, would create a "racial contract"
between Black and Hispanic Democrats "and that can't happen." Upon
initial reports, Cuomo denied the statement but later a tape recording
surfaced. Cuomo later dropped out of the race for governor (source).

Lee P. Brown: Brown, Bill Clinton's former drug czar and Democrat mayor
of Houston, engaged in racist campaigning designed to suppress Hispanic
voter turnout during his 2001 reelection bid. Brown faced challenger
Orlando Sanchez, a Hispanic Republican who drew heavy support from the
Hispanic community during the general election. Two weeks prior to the
runoff, Brown's campaign printed racist signs designed to intimidate
Hispanic voters. The signs featured a photograph of Sanchez and the
words "Anti-Hispanic." The signs drew harsh criticism from Hispanic
leaders as their message was designed to intimidate and confuse Hispanic
voters. Around the same time the signs were being used, Brown supporter
and city councilman Carol Alvarado made a series of racially charged
attacks on Sanchez, implying a desire to see the supression of Hispanic
voter turnout in the runoff. Brown staffers also went on record claiming
that Sanchez was not a true Hispanic. The racist anti-Hispanic
undertones of Brown's reelection bid were so great that liberal Democrat
city councilman John Castillo, himself Hispanic, retracted his
endorsement of Brown in disgust and became a Sanchez supporter in the
final week of the campaign. Following the harsh condemnation of the
racist signs and tactics, Brown purported that his campaign was removing
them even though many still lingered around Houston up until the
election. When election day came along, Brown placed more of the racist
signs at polling places, despite his claim to have stopped using them.
The large campaign billboard style election day signs featured, in
Spanish, the word "Danger!" on them followed by Sanchez's name with a
large red circle and slash through it. The signs identified the Brown
campaign as their owner on the bottom. Brown's racially charged
reelection effort barely squeeked by Sanchez on election day, winning
51% to 49% following a series of racially motivated advertisements in
which the Brown campaign appealed to the fear of black voters by
invoking images of the gruesome lynching death of James Byrd, Jr. and by
attempting to pit them against Hispanics. While Brown had the audacity
to declare himself a mayor for all people and all ethnicities at his
victory party, many in Houston fear the racial wounds inflicted by his
campaign will take years to heal.

Mary Frances Berry: Berry is the Democrat chair of the US Commission on
Civil Rights (USCCR). She purports herself to be an "independent" in her
political affiliation in order to hold her job on the civil rights
commission where partisan membership may not exceed 4 for either party,
but is in fact a dedicated liberal Democrat who openly supported Al Gore
for president and has given a total of $20,000 in personal contributions
to the Democrat Party, Al Gore for President, and other Democrat
candidates over the last decade. Berry is an open racist who is
affiliated with the far-left Pacifica radio network, a group with ties
to black nationalist causes. Berry once stated "Civil rights laws were
not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them,"
indicating that she believes the USCCR should only look out for civil
rights violations against persons of certain select skin colors.

Billy McKinney: Former Democrat State Representative Billy McKinney of
Georgia, who is also the father of former Democrat congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney of the same state. During his daughter's failed 2002 reelection
bid, McKinney appeared on television where he blamed his daughter's
difficulties on a Jewish conspiracy. McKinney unleashed a string of
anti-semitic sentiments, stating "This is all about the Jews" and
spelling out "J-E-W-S." McKinney lost his own seat in a runoff a few
weeks later.

The Democrat Party and the Ku Klux Klan: Aside from the multiple Klan
members who have served in elected capacity within the high ranks of the
Democrat Party, the political party itself has a lengthy but often
overlooked history of involvement with the Ku Klux Klan. Though it has
been all but forgotten by the media, the Democrat National Convention of
1924 was host to one of the largest Klan gatherings in American history.
Dubbed the "Klanbake convention" at the time, the 1924 Democrat National
Convention in New York was dominated by a platform dispute surrounding
the Ku Klux Klan. A minority of the delegates to the convention
attempted to condemn the hate group in the party's platform, but found
their proposal shot down by Klan supporters within the party. As
delegates inside the convention voted in the Klan's favor, the Klan
itself mobilized a celebratory rally outside. On July 4, 1924 one of the
largest Klan gatherings ever occurred outside the convention on a field
in nearby New Jersey. The event was marked by speakers spewing racial
hatred, celebrations of their platform victory in the Democrat
Convention, and ended in a cross burning.

II. Democrat opposition to the Civil Rights Movement:

A little known fact of history involves the heavy opposition to the
civil rights movement by several prominent Democrats. Similar historical
neglect is given to the important role Republicans played in supporting
the civil rights movement. A calculation of 26 major civil rights votes
from 1933 through the 1960's civil rights era shows that Republicans
favored civil rights in approximately 96% of the votes, whereas the
Democrats opposed them in 80% of the votes! These facts are often
intentionally overlooked by the left wing Democrats for obvious reasons.
In some cases, the Democrats have told flat out lies about their
shameful record during the civil rights movement.

Democrat Senators organized the record Senate filibuster of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. Included among the organizers were several prominent
and well known liberal Democrat standard bearers including:
- Robert Byrd, current senator from West Virginia
- J. William Fulbright, Arkansas senator and political mentor of Bill
Clinton
- Albert Gore Sr., Tennessee senator, father and political mentor of Al
Gore. Gore Jr. has been known to lie about his father's opposition to
the Civil Rights Act.
- Sam Ervin, North Carolina senator of Watergate hearings fame
- Richard Russell, famed Georgia senator and later President Pro Tempore

The complete list of the 21 Democrats who opposed the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 includes Senators:

- Hill and Sparkman of Alabama
- Fulbright and McClellan of Arkansas
- Holland and Smathers of Florida
- Russell and Talmadge of Georgia
- Ellender and Long of Louisiana
- Eastland and Stennis of Mississippi
- Ervin and Jordan of North Carolina
- Johnston and Thurmond of South Carolina
- Gore Sr. and Walters of Tennessee
- H. Byrd and Robertson of Virginia
- R. Byrd of West Virginia

Democrat opposition to the Civil Rights Act was substantial enough to
literally split the party in two. A whopping 40% of the House Democrats
VOTED AGAINST the Civil Rights Act, while 80% of Republicans SUPPORTED
it. Republican support in the Senate was even higher. Similar trends
occurred with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was supported by 82%
of House Republicans and 94% of Senate Republicans. The same Democrat
standard bearers took their normal racists stances, this time with
Senator Fulbright leading the opposition effort.

It took the hard work of Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett
Dirksen and Republican Whip Thomas Kuchel to pass the Civil Rights Act
(Dirksen was presented a civil rights accomplishment award for the year
by the head of the NAACP in recognition of his efforts). Upon breaking
the Democrat filibuster of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Republican Dirksen
took to the Senate floor and exclaimed "The time has come for equality
of opportunity in sharing in government, in education, and in
employment. It will not be stayed or denied. It is here!" (Full text of
speech). Sadly, Democrats and revisionist historians have all but
forgotten (and intentionally so) that it was Republican Dirksen, not the
divided Democrats, who made the Civil Rights Act a reality. Dirksen also
broke the Democrat filibuster of the 1957 Civil Rights Act that was
signed by Republican President Eisenhower.

Outside of Congress, the three most notorious opponents of school
integration were all Democrats:
- Orval Faubus, Democrat Governor of Arkansas and one of Bill Clinton's
political heroes
- George Wallace, Democrat Governor of Alabama
- Lester Maddox, Democrat Governor of Georgia

The most famous of the school desegregation standoffs involved Governor
Faubus. Democrat Faubus used police and state forces to block the
integration of a high school in Little Rock, Arkansas. The standoff was
settled and the school was integrated only after the intervention of
Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Even the Democrat Party organization resisted integration and refused to
allow minority participation for decades. Exclusion of minorities was
the general rule of the Democrat Party of many states for decades,
especially in Texas. This racist policy reached its peak under the New
Deal in the southern and western states, often known as the New Deal
Coalition region of FDR. The Supreme Court in Nixon v. Herndon declared
the practice of "white primaries" unconstitutional in 1927 after states
had passed laws barring Blacks from participating in Democrat primaries.
But the Democrat Parties did not yield to the Court�s order. After Nixon
v. Herndon, Democrats simply made rules within the party's individual
executive committees to bar minorities from participating, which were
struck down in Nixon v. Condon in 1932. The Democrats, in typical racist
fashion, responded by using state parties to pass rules barring blacks
from participation. This decision was upheld in Grovey v. Townsend,
which was not overturned until 1944 by Smith v. Allwright. The Texas
Democrats responded with their usual ploys and turned to what was known
as the "Jaybird system" which used private Democrat clubs to hold
white-only votes on a slate of candidates, which were then transferred
to the Democrat party itself and put on their primary ballot as the only
choices. Terry v. Adams overturned the Jaybird system, prompting the
Democrats to institute blocks of unit rule voting procedures as well as
the infamous literacy tests and other Jim Crow regulations to
specifically block minorities from participating in their primaries. In
the end, it took 4 direct Supreme Court orders to end the Democrat's
"white primary" system, and after that it took countless additional
orders, several acts of Congress, and a constitutional amendment to tear
down the Jim Crow codes that preserved the Democrat's white primary for
decades beyond the final Supreme Court order ruling it officially
unconstitutional.

Hispanics in South Texas were treated especially poorly by the Democrat
Party, which relied heavily on a system of political bosses to coerce
and intimidate Hispanics into voting for Democrat primary candidates of
choice. Though coercion is illegal, this system, known as the Patron
system, is still in use to this day by local Democrat parties in some
heavy Hispanic communities of the southwest.

The next time Democrats take to the national airwaves to dishonestly
accuse Republicans of racial hatred, remember who the historical record
up until this very day points to as the real bigots: The Democrat Party.
In all possible ways, the Democrat Party is built around the pillars of
ultra leftists, many of whom are known participants in racism and/or
affiliates of racist hate groups. Consider the Democrat Party of today's
heroes and leaders:

- Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Democrat icon and orchestrator of Japanese
Internment
- Ex-House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt, former affiliate of a St.
Louis area racist group
- Ex-Senate President Pro Tempore Robert Byrd, former Ku Klux Klansman
known for making bigoted slurs on national television
- Rev. Jesse Jackson, Democrat keynote speaker and race hustler known
for making anti-Semitic slurs
- Rev. Al Sharpten, Democrat activist and perennial candidate and race
hustler known inciting anti-Semitic violence in New York City
- Sen. Ernest Hollings, leading Democrat Senator known for use of racial
slurs against several minority groups
- Lee P. Brown, former Clinton cabinet official and Democrat mayor of
Houston who won reelection using racial intimidation against Hispanic
voters
- Andrew Cuomo, former Clinton cabinet official and Democrat candidate
for NY Governor who made racist statements about a black opponent.

- Dan Rather, Democrat CBS news anchor and editorialist known for using
anti-black racial epithets on a national radio broadcast

- Donna Brazile, former Gore campaign manager known for making
anti-white racial attacks. Brazile has also worked for Jackson,
Gephardt, and Michael Dukakis

The simple truth is that the Democrat Party's history during this
century is one closely aligned to bigotry in a record stemming largely
out of the liberal New Deal era up until the modern day. Bigots are at
the center of the Democrat party's current leadership and role models.
And in a striking display of hypocrisy, many of the same Democrats who
dishonestly shout accusations of "bigotry" at conservatives are
practicing bigots of the most disgusting and disreputable kind
themselves.

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 21, 2010, 12:47:53 AM11/21/10
to

Your denial of well PROVEN facts marks you as a Democrat

--

Tom Rogers

unread,
Nov 21, 2010, 9:10:03 AM11/21/10
to

On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:44:12 -0600, "Wade" <inv...@invalid.com>
wrote:

>This might sound crazy to you because I don't know what your spiritual
>roots
>are but a lot of what Obama has been doing has not only done what you
>suggest above but also prepared America for survival post-rapture of The
>Church.

Yah, religious superstitions kill a LOT of people.

>1. Place pagans in high offices and courts.

Define "pagan". Would this be someone that is not a snake-handler
like you?

>2. Lessen dependence on self-sufficiency, free market forces and more on
>govt. programs.

Well, the totalitarian promoters like Obammao want dependency. But I
don't think he's "possessed of the devil".

>3. Increase pagan and homosexual emphasis in all areas of society
>especially
>the armed forces by 'embracing diversity' to the fullest extent possible
>without being noticed.

See snake handler comment above.

>4. Debase the Jewish state and embrace relationships with foreign
>dictatorships.

Huh?

>5. Population control not from a moral base but from a cold basis of
>survival ie. abortion, euthenasia, a system of denying medicine to
>undesireable cases. Survival of the Correct not survival of the fittest.

Holy, Holy, Holy,.... Are you a JOOOOO!


>
>Obama does not know this but one day all nations will be judged by God and
>Christians and some Jews will rule with authority over the nations.
>See Revelation 2:25-27 and also Psalm 2 is encouraging.

WOO HOO! "Allah" is going to "save" someone YOU agree with. Big
news. Hope you aren't WRONG!

Frantisek Baltiska

unread,
Nov 21, 2010, 12:22:05 PM11/21/10
to

"Wade" <inv...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:ic925d$qio$1...@speranza.aioe.org

> Obama does not know this but one day all nations will be judged by God and
> Christians and some Jews will rule with authority over the nations.
> See Revelation 2:25-27 and also Psalm 2 is encouraging.
>
>
> http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com
>
>
Why does America risk losing her greatness by embrasing religious myth as a
guiding
objective? President Obama is the greatness leader America has had since
John Kennedy.

----
Inhalt der M�nzhauptseite zum Thema M�nzen sammeln
http://sammler.com/

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 21, 2010, 1:35:39 PM11/21/10
to
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:22:05 -0600, "Frantisek Baltiska"
<mai...@tuebingen.mpg.de> wrote:

>
>"Wade" <inv...@invalid.com> wrote in message
>news:ic925d$qio$1...@speranza.aioe.org
>> Obama does not know this but one day all nations will be judged by God and
>> Christians and some Jews will rule with authority over the nations.
>> See Revelation 2:25-27 and also Psalm 2 is encouraging.
>>
>>
>> http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com
>>
>>
>Why does America risk losing her greatness by embrasing religious myth as a
>guiding
>objective? President Obama is the greatness leader America has had since
>John Kennedy.

The same John Kennedy who was a promiscious fucker of many women, loved
parties where pot and booze flowed freely for himself and his friends,
and involved the US in the Vietnam War...10,000 days of bloodshed,
maiming, murder and massive payments to the military industrial complex
and was ultimately assasinated?

That John Kennedy?


>
>----
>Inhalt der M�nzhauptseite zum Thema M�nzen sammeln
>http://sammler.com/

robert bowman

unread,
Nov 21, 2010, 7:49:50 PM11/21/10
to
Gunner Asch wrote:

> The same John Kennedy who was a promiscious fucker of many women, loved
> parties where pot and booze flowed freely for himself and his friends,
> and involved the US in the Vietnam War...10,000 days of bloodshed,
> maiming, murder and massive payments to the military industrial complex
> and was ultimately assasinated?

In truth, Eisenhower started playing footsie with Diem, another stellar US
pick of the litter, and was following the Truman Doctrine. Maybe Kennedy
thought it would help to recoup US prestige after the Bay of Pigs and
Berlin Wall.

Like Jimi Hendrix, dying young was a good career move.

Pete Smith

unread,
Nov 21, 2010, 9:59:37 PM11/21/10
to

"j-rod" <j-...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:4CE87142...@nospam.net...

> Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> Actually, after the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act and
> forced integration of the south by Democrats, all the ignorant hate
> filled racists left the Democrat Party and joined the Republican Party.
>
> JAM


African Americans have long been surpressed by groups such as the NAACP,
the ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center, and most of all, the Democrat Party..
Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, Allen West, Michael Steele, and Armstrong
Williams are just a handful of black Americans who are marginalized by
"mainstream"
black culture as not "being black."

There are many in this country with a vested interest in perpetuating
racism. Groups
like the NAACP, inner-city politicians, "Reverend" Jesse Jackson, Al
Sharpton, etc all
*need* the perception of racism to stay alive - or else they have no reason
to stay
in the limelight any longer.

In the days of Dr. King, a lifelong republican, by the way -- one would say:
"I am
human just like you - so treat me like one."

Now a days, the politicially correct and somehow accepted thing to say is
for the blacks to
say "I am black - so treat me special." What? We all have the same color
blood running
through us. We're all the same race - the human race. Dr. King would hang
his head in
shame if the could of lived to see what had of become of his hard work. He
would of been
embarrassed to see the kinds of causes his children have gotten involved
with, and how
poorly they have carried on his legacy.

Those who insist on referring to "black America" and "black culture" only
serve to perpetuate
racial seperation and racist thought. This applies to others as well, such
as Latinos,
Asians, etc. While I am White, I have many times suffered more than blacks
could of ever
imagined, because of quotas and "equal opportunity" law that keep the white
man at
a disadvantage. I have often found myself in situations where others of my
skin color
expect me to be like them, and to accept the liberal goose steppers ,
stereotypes and
stereotypical beliefs. No, why? I am human. I am American. I accept no other
fake,
artificial labels.

Message has been deleted

j-rod

unread,
Nov 22, 2010, 11:12:45 PM11/22/10
to

Old news

JAM

j-rod

unread,
Nov 22, 2010, 11:13:59 PM11/22/10
to

What a load of crap from the Bizarro World!

JAM

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 23, 2010, 1:07:04 AM11/23/10
to


ROFLMAO!!! Old news ......laugh laugh laugh

I just handed you your ass, now at least...suck it up and slink out of
the room, dragging your pride behind you.

Sigh..but no...you mentally ill leftwingers never do what any normal
self respecting human being would do when they get their nuts cracked so
badly. So I expect you to blither, whine, jack yourself off and shout
at everyone around you in a pyschotic episode of buffoonery while
pounding your pigeon chest in some deranged effort to prove to one and
all you are not just gay, but a Man!!

Piss off, ok?

Gunner

Peter

unread,
Nov 23, 2010, 4:39:04 PM11/23/10
to

FYI:
There are all sorts of claims about Martin Luther King Jr.'s political
affiliation. Finding a voter records of how he registered to vote
might be a bit more credible than the links below. Even so, these are
some of the claims.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/18/AR2006101801754.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/byron-williams/martin-luther-king-jrs-le_b_30454.html

How one registers and how one votes are often very different. There
should never be a record of how someone votes. It would seem that
there is evidence about how his father registered (as a Republican --
the party of Lincoln). The sobriquet, "party of Lincoln", is easy to
use carelessly and may even be showing signs of tarnish.

Shaukat

unread,
Nov 23, 2010, 6:05:03 PM11/23/10
to
The NAACP was founded primarily by wealthy German Jews, with a Dr Henry
Moscowitz, educated in Germany, being the principal founder. Although
non-Jewish whites and some blacks such as W.E.B. DuBois were enlisted as
co-founders so as to give the organization a broader racial presentation,
the Jewish role was predominant in both the founding and development of the
NAACP.

By 1915, the NAACP had something of the aspect of B'nai B'rith and the
American Jewish Committee, with the brothers Joel and Arthur Spingarn, part
of the German-Jewish aristocracy, serving as board chairman and legal
counsel respectively. The German Jews, Jacob Schiff, the chief financier of
the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and Paul Warburg, the chief architect of
the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank, were the financial angels.

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=472
"Peter" <w2...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:20f2954f-cb4d-4d3f...@j9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...

Jud

unread,
Nov 23, 2010, 6:06:24 PM11/23/10
to
GASP!!! Someone call Guinness, I have a record for them. I actually
agree with that Huffington Post article , the very first time ever.
Of course you are referencing 2 of the most liberal outlets, and as
always one should consider the source. Other than overtly dismissing
the Democratic origins of the KKK, it was a well thought out and
written article, much better than the Washington Post article IMHO


Jerry Dennis

unread,
Nov 23, 2010, 7:18:21 PM11/23/10
to

Jud, JUD!!! Quick! Somebody! Oxygen for Jud! He's temporarily
delusional!!! HELP!!!

Jerry
Always glad to help.

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 23, 2010, 7:40:22 PM11/23/10
to
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:39:04 -0800 (PST), Peter <w2...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>FYI:
>There are all sorts of claims about Martin Luther King Jr.'s political
>affiliation. Finding a voter records of how he registered to vote
>might be a bit more credible than the links below. Even so, these are
>some of the claims.
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/18/AR2006101801754.html
>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/byron-williams/martin-luther-king-jrs-le_b_30454.html
>
>How one registers and how one votes are often very different. There
>should never be a record of how someone votes. It would seem that
>there is evidence about how his father registered (as a Republican --
>the party of Lincoln). The sobriquet, "party of Lincoln", is easy to
>use carelessly and may even be showing signs of tarnish.

Then on the other hand..there is known facts..

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16500
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Sr.


Gunner

CanopyCo

unread,
Nov 24, 2010, 9:39:56 AM11/24/10
to
On Nov 3, 1:14 am, "Stormin Mormon"
<cayoung61**spambloc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still curious if there will be riots. And where is the coop. Would
> that be chicken coop?
>
> --
> Christopher A. Young
> Learn more about Jesus
> www.lds.orgo
> .

Could be, considering that only chickens would resort to illegal means
such as a coop instead of doing things the correct way, fearing that
the majority vote would go against them and they wouldn’t get there
way.

The thing I noticed was the thing about “saying a rosary”.
I’ve said (and now even typed) “A rosary”, with little results.
Personally, I prefer to say “Halt, or I will shoot you again!”.

;-)


robert bowman

unread,
Nov 24, 2010, 10:10:31 AM11/24/10
to
CanopyCo wrote:

> The thing I noticed was the thing about “saying a rosary”.
> I’ve said (and now even typed) “A rosary”, with little results.
> Personally, I prefer to say “Halt, or I will shoot you again!”.

Tune into EWTN and they'll teach you the right way.

Edward2012

unread,
Nov 27, 2010, 2:07:59 AM11/27/10
to

"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote


I just went and read all your comments that you have posted and I have come
to the conclusion that you are without a doubt...the dumbest person I have
ever-ran across. Plus you are a dumb-ass racist....who can't even read the
constitution. You are no more a patriot than Hitler was the savior of
Germany

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 27, 2010, 3:04:04 AM11/27/10
to
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 01:07:59 -0600, "Edward2012" <edwar...@aol.com>
wrote:

come to the conclusion that YOU are without a doubt..smack in the middle
of the Stupid Range of Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kooks and as
such..have no intention of following the Constitution.

As for being a racist..how can I be? Im not white. So you lied about
reading all my comments..Ive mentioned it several times to your fellow
racist bigot homophobe buddies in the last day or two.

So its been established that you are 1. A liar. 2. Racist. 3. Bigot. 4.
Homophobe. 5 Stupid as hell (for trying to make the above claims) and in
fact...6...lied about stupid people you have met. That had to be an
utter lie, unless you live in a cave by yourself. If you had met ANY
leftwinger...you would have found the dumbist, most pinheaded, reckless,
stupid, ignorant, buffoonish, utter dumbfucks this side of Lower
Slobovia

Now please hold still while I scrape you off my boot, here on the edge
of the curb.....scrub scrub...pry...grind....kick...

Now be off and tell your masters in the DNC that they really shouldnt
send out Useful Idiots to do their dirty work.

Gunner

Stormin Mormon

unread,
Nov 27, 2010, 8:29:26 AM11/27/10
to
You should see his web site. After decades of smoking, the taxpayers
of California bought him a heart rebuilding surgery operation.

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org

.


"Edward2012" <edwar...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:icqao7$k36$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

Gunner Asch

unread,
Nov 27, 2010, 1:55:01 PM11/27/10
to
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:29:26 -0500, "Stormin Mormon"
<cayoung61**spamblock##@hotmail.com> wrote:

>You should see his web site. After decades of smoking, the taxpayers
>of California bought him a heart rebuilding surgery operation.

Ayup. And I thank them for it. As do the millions of illegal aliens the
State has done the same thing for.

<VBG>

Gunner

No User

unread,
Nov 27, 2010, 9:35:21 PM11/27/10
to
All the filithy Democrats need to do is take their hands off yourself, off
your wallet, off your property, off your kids, off your diet, off your
healthcare, off your household appliances, off your car, off your bank
account, off your weapons of self-defense, off your liberty, off your light
bulbs, off your childrens sex organs, and off your freedom of speech. Insist
on all these good things - and that qualifies you to be spat upon by nasty,
mean-spirited Democrats -- a gang of lying, thieving, dope-smoking,
pill-popping, coke-snorting, sticky-fingered, bloodsucking, tax-eating,
homosexualty-advancing, baby kinning, gun-stealing, predatory humanitarian
thugs No political party in the history of America more profoundly deserves
absolute and outright destruction.

CanopyCo

unread,
Nov 28, 2010, 10:47:23 AM11/28/10
to
On Nov 27, 12:55 pm, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:29:26 -0500, "Stormin Mormon"
>
> <cayoung61**spambloc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >You should see his web site. After decades of smoking, the taxpayers
> >of California bought him a heart rebuilding surgery operation.
>
> Ayup.  And I thank them for it. As do the millions of illegal aliens the
> State has done the same thing for.
>
> <VBG>
>
> Gunner
>
> --
> "Confiscating wealth from those who have earned it, inherited it,
>  or got lucky is never going to help 'the poor.' Poverty isn't
>  caused by some people having more money than others, just as obesity
> isn't caused by McDonald's serving super-sized orders of French fries
> Poverty, like obesity, is caused by the life choices that dictate
> results." - John Tucci,

So, you are saying that you are no better then a illegal alien?

They do armed robbery as well.
We should expect that from you next?

The quality of a person is completely based on his actions.

For example, a worthless peace of crap is considered to be a worthless
peace of crap because his actions have no value.

I also find it interesting that your tag line shows a lack of
agreement with taking something that you don’t earn from those that
did earn it, despite the fact that you do exactly the same thing when
you stiff people on your bills.

Your poverty is not a excuse based on your own tag line.

This is hypocrisy.

0 new messages