Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
196X Dime Date Error
59 views
Skip to first unread message
wyea...@gmail.com
May 19, 2014, 9:35:13 PM5/19/14
to
I found this Dime in circulation, and was wondering if anyone has some information on the Date etc.. I can not find and common errors that look like it.
http://prntscr.com/3kt7qk
Thanks,
Wayne
http://prntscr.com/3kt7qk
Thanks,
Wayne
Hugh Jass
May 25, 2014, 11:40:56 AM5/25/14
to
wrote in message news:4120d952-70c5-42c7...@googlegroups.com...
Jerry Dennis
May 30, 2014, 1:46:59 AM5/30/14
to
Jerry
wyea...@gmail.com
Jun 1, 2014, 10:46:18 PM6/1/14
to
Message has been deleted
Jason Burke
Jun 3, 2014, 12:56:21 AM6/3/14
to
On 6/2/2014 9:41 PM, Bob Rudd wrote:
> It's been a LONG time since: Ira Stein, Barry, Christa, Bill Krummel
> and many others (including myself) have been regulars here. :-)
>
Yup. Old Finnan did his job, which I'm sure he was quite proud of.
> and many others (including myself) have been regulars here. :-)
>
Yup. Old Finnan did his job, which I'm sure he was quite proud of.
Jud
Jun 4, 2014, 9:25:20 PM6/4/14
to
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 12:41:40 AM UTC-4,
>
> It's been a LONG time since: Ira Stein, Barry, Christa, Bill Krummel
>
> and many others (including myself) have been regulars here. :-)
Very true Bob. I check every day, but see little need to respond. Sad, this used to be a pretty good site.
> It's been a LONG time since: Ira Stein, Barry, Christa, Bill Krummel
>
> and many others (including myself) have been regulars here. :-)
Message has been deleted
Michael Benveniste
Jun 7, 2014, 6:38:28 AM6/7/14
to
On 6/6/2014 7:33 PM, Bob Rudd wrote:
> I think the lawsuit effectively fractured this ng, in retrospect.
It certainly didn't help, but the malaise that's fallen over
newsgroups is far more general than RCC. Many ISP's (including
mine) no longer offer Usenet access as standard.
In my own opinion, there were several reasons for this. Some
were technological; as available bandwidth increased and digital
imaging technology became mainstream, a text-only group like RCC
became less appealing. But in my opinion the "social contract"
required by an unmoderated and untraceable model eventually
broke down and the signal-to-noise level became too low.
I decided to keep paying for Usenet a couple of months ago, but
it was a very near thing even at about 4-5 cents a day. I still
take a peek here every few days, but if I post about coins it'll
be probably be elsewhere.
--
Mike Benveniste -- m...@murkyether.com (Clarification Required)
You don't have to sort of enhance reality. There is nothing
stranger than truth. -- Annie Leibovitz
> I think the lawsuit effectively fractured this ng, in retrospect.
It certainly didn't help, but the malaise that's fallen over
newsgroups is far more general than RCC. Many ISP's (including
mine) no longer offer Usenet access as standard.
In my own opinion, there were several reasons for this. Some
were technological; as available bandwidth increased and digital
imaging technology became mainstream, a text-only group like RCC
became less appealing. But in my opinion the "social contract"
required by an unmoderated and untraceable model eventually
broke down and the signal-to-noise level became too low.
I decided to keep paying for Usenet a couple of months ago, but
it was a very near thing even at about 4-5 cents a day. I still
take a peek here every few days, but if I post about coins it'll
be probably be elsewhere.
--
Mike Benveniste -- m...@murkyether.com (Clarification Required)
You don't have to sort of enhance reality. There is nothing
stranger than truth. -- Annie Leibovitz
Jerry Dennis
Jun 15, 2014, 7:57:27 AM6/15/14
to
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 12:41:40 AM UTC-4, Bob Rudd wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 19:46:18 -0700 (PDT), wyea...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 19:46:18 -0700 (PDT), wyea...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> It's been a LONG time since: Ira Stein, Barry, Christa, Bill Krummel
>
> and many others (including myself) have been regulars here. :-)
Seems all of us die-hards still come in every so often only to find Finnan and his ilk have destroyed what used to be a good group. I'm sure Mr. Hardy Boys is breaking his arm patting himself on the back.
>
> and many others (including myself) have been regulars here. :-)
Jerry
Frank Provasek
Sep 27, 2014, 12:18:02 PM9/27/14
to
On Saturday, June 7, 2014 5:38:28 AM UTC-5, Michael Benveniste wrote:
> On 6/6/2014 7:33 PM, Bob Rudd wrote:
>
>
>
> > I think the lawsuit effectively fractured this ng, in retrospect.
>
>
>
> It certainly didn't help, but the malaise that's fallen over
>
> newsgroups is far more general than RCC. Many ISP's (including
>
> mine) no longer offer Usenet access as standard.
>
>
>
> In my own opinion, there were several reasons for this. Some
>
> were technological; as available bandwidth increased and digital
>
> imaging technology became mainstream, a text-only group like RCC
>
> became less appealing. But in my opinion the "social contract"
>
> required by an unmoderated and untraceable model eventually
>
> broke down and the signal-to-noise level became too low.
>
>
>
> I decided to keep paying for Usenet a couple of months ago, but
>
> it was a very near thing even at about 4-5 cents a day. I still
>
> take a peek here every few days, but if I post about coins it'll
>
> be probably be elsewhere.
>
RCC is available through Google without Usenet access
> On 6/6/2014 7:33 PM, Bob Rudd wrote:
>
>
>
> > I think the lawsuit effectively fractured this ng, in retrospect.
>
>
>
> It certainly didn't help, but the malaise that's fallen over
>
> newsgroups is far more general than RCC. Many ISP's (including
>
> mine) no longer offer Usenet access as standard.
>
>
>
> In my own opinion, there were several reasons for this. Some
>
> were technological; as available bandwidth increased and digital
>
> imaging technology became mainstream, a text-only group like RCC
>
> became less appealing. But in my opinion the "social contract"
>
> required by an unmoderated and untraceable model eventually
>
> broke down and the signal-to-noise level became too low.
>
>
>
> I decided to keep paying for Usenet a couple of months ago, but
>
> it was a very near thing even at about 4-5 cents a day. I still
>
> take a peek here every few days, but if I post about coins it'll
>
> be probably be elsewhere.
>
http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rec.collecting.coins
Michael Benveniste
Sep 27, 2014, 7:52:45 PM9/27/14
to
On 9/27/2014 12:18 PM, Frank Provasek wrote:
> RCC is available through Google without Usenet access
>
> http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rec.collecting.coins
If I'm going to bother reading Usenet, the 10 euros a year
> RCC is available through Google without Usenet access
>
> http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rec.collecting.coins
I pay for individual.net is more than worth the cost of not
having to deal with Google's interface or even of having to
shift to one of the free providers.
But the fact that this thread is 3 months old and hasn't
scrolled off the first "page" of my newsreader is pretty
good evidence that it's not worth the effort.
0 new messages