The Dick is back.

[F.O.A.D.]

Former Vice President Dick Cheney stepping into the Benghazi fray to
make a statement that is just breathtaking:

�I think it�s one of the worst incidents, frankly, that I can recall in
my career.�

Yup, because four dead ranks right up there with thre 3,000+ who died on
9-11 during Cheney's watch, the Katrina disaster on Cheney's watch, and,
of course, the two wars Cheney lied us into.

Why wasn't Cheney prosecuted?

[Eisboch]

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
news:nqOdnUbv5fvw6g7M...@earthlink.com...

------------------------------------------------------

Sometimes it is hard to take some of your comments seriously Harry
because you are so adamantly opposed to anything other than the
liberal way.
Like the ultra right crackpots who see things only through self
designed filters, you seem to view politics, big business and social
issues through your own set of filters. If there's no room for
reconsideration from time to time as things change or for the serious
consideration of other points of view, then you are no more open
minded than the republican lunatics that you detest so much.

[F.O.A.D.]

On 5/15/13 8:17 AM, Eisboch wrote:
>
>
> "F.O.A.D." wrote in message
> news:nqOdnUbv5fvw6g7M...@earthlink.com...
>
>
> Former Vice President Dick Cheney stepping into the Benghazi fray to
> make a statement that is just breathtaking:
>

> “I think it’s one of the worst incidents, frankly, that I can recall in
> my career.”

>
> Yup, because four dead ranks right up there with thre 3,000+ who died on
> 9-11 during Cheney's watch, the Katrina disaster on Cheney's watch, and,
> of course, the two wars Cheney lied us into.
>
> Why wasn't Cheney prosecuted?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sometimes it is hard to take some of your comments seriously Harry
> because you are so adamantly opposed to anything other than the liberal
> way.
> Like the ultra right crackpots who see things only through self designed
> filters, you seem to view politics, big business and social issues
> through your own set of filters. If there's no room for
> reconsideration from time to time as things change or for the serious
> consideration of other points of view, then you are no more open minded
> than the republican lunatics that you detest so much.
>
>

The subject under discussion is a comment Dick Cheney made. Is there
something in that statement that rings true? How can he rank the deaths
of four Americans, a tragedy to be sure, but a minor one, as one of the
"worst" incidents he can recall in his career, when his career included
a number of "incidents" in which he was involved that make the deaths of
four people little more than a sad blip?

I blame Cheney far more than Bush for our foreign policy "misadventures"
in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush is a simple man who was brought up by
decent parents, and I am sure Cheney saw that and lied and misled Bush
to the best of his ability. I don't think that it is my "liberalism"
that makes me feel Cheney is disgusting.

[Hank©]

I don't think Harry ever said he was open minded or ever even tried to
think outside the box his handlers built around him.

[Hank©]

On 5/15/2013 8:36 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
> On 5/15/13 8:17 AM, Eisboch wrote:
>>
>>
>> "F.O.A.D." wrote in message
>> news:nqOdnUbv5fvw6g7M...@earthlink.com...
>>
>>
>> Former Vice President Dick Cheney stepping into the Benghazi fray to
>> make a statement that is just breathtaking:
>>

>> �I think it�s one of the worst incidents, frankly, that I can recall in
>> my career.�

Why do you continue to try to pick Cheeny's bones while there is fresh
meat on the table?

[*e#c]

On May 15, 8:17 am, "Eisboch" <no...@jose.com> wrote:
> "F.O.A.D."  wrote in message
>
> news:nqOdnUbv5fvw6g7M...@earthlink.com...
>
> Former Vice President Dick Cheney stepping into the Benghazi fray to
> make a statement that is just breathtaking:
>

> I think it s one of the worst incidents, frankly, that I can recall
> in
> my career.
>

> Yup, because four dead ranks right up there with thre 3,000+ who died
> on
> 9-11 during Cheney's watch, the Katrina disaster on Cheney's watch,
> and,
> of course, the two wars Cheney lied us into.
>
> Why wasn't Cheney prosecuted?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sometimes it is hard to take some of your comments seriously Harry
> because you are so adamantly opposed to anything other than the
> liberal way.
> Like the ultra right crackpots who see things only through self
> designed filters,  you seem to view politics, big business and social
> issues through your own set of filters.   If there's no room for
> reconsideration from time to time as things change or for the serious
> consideration of other points of view, then you are no more open
> minded than the republican lunatics  that you detest so much.

Why you keep replying to the cunt is the real mystery here......DICK !!

[True North]

On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 11:40:14 UTC-3, *e#c wrote:
>
>
> Why you keep replying to the cunt is the real mystery here......DICK !!

Maybe because he wants to, jackass.
It's supposed to be 'a free country' down there.

[jps]

On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:17:07 -0400, "Eisboch" <no...@jose.com> wrote:

>
>
>"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
>news:nqOdnUbv5fvw6g7M...@earthlink.com...
>
>
>Former Vice President Dick Cheney stepping into the Benghazi fray to
>make a statement that is just breathtaking:
>

>�I think it�s one of the worst incidents, frankly, that I can recall
>in
>my career.�

>
>Yup, because four dead ranks right up there with thre 3,000+ who died
>on
>9-11 during Cheney's watch, the Katrina disaster on Cheney's watch,
>and,
>of course, the two wars Cheney lied us into.
>
>Why wasn't Cheney prosecuted?
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>
>Sometimes it is hard to take some of your comments seriously Harry
>because you are so adamantly opposed to anything other than the
>liberal way.
>Like the ultra right crackpots who see things only through self
>designed filters, you seem to view politics, big business and social
>issues through your own set of filters. If there's no room for
>reconsideration from time to time as things change or for the serious
>consideration of other points of view, then you are no more open
>minded than the republican lunatics that you detest so much.

Do you take issue with the statement that Cheney is as close to the
anti-Christ as we've witnessed in American politics in the last 100
years?

Sub-human piece of shit who should be tried for war crimes at the
Hague.

[Boating All Out]

In article <q62dnewbW6Ja4Q7M...@giganews.com>,
no...@jose.com says...

>
>
> Sometimes it is hard to take some of your comments seriously Harry
> because you are so adamantly opposed to anything other than the
> liberal way.

Thinking Cheney is trash is hardly "liberal."
No more than thinking Al Sharpton is trash is "conservative."
You can defend either if you wish. Pick one.

[Eisboch]

"Boating All Out" wrote in message
news:MPG.2bfdcb8d9...@news.eternal-september.org...

---------------------------------------

If you haven't, read up on Sharpton's past.

[F.O.A.D.]

Sharpton is a piker compared to Cheney.

[Boating All Out]

In article <2a-dnXA_TIq2jwnM...@giganews.com>,
no...@jose.com says...

I just did that. Turns out he's cleaner than I thought. Don't care for
him much, as he's a "race man." Not into that. And he's too loud.
But I see only misdemeanor convictions related to protests. Didn't come
off well in the Brawley incident either, maligning people, then not
paying up in the civil suit. But nothing like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-FfXmhmj5E
War, death and destruction.
So what's your exact beef with little Al Sharpton? Too uppity?

[Earl]

The Benghazi attack was preventable and warnings were ignored. Security
was reduced. Maybe Obama could have stopped the hurricane or the 9-11
attacks.

[F.O.A.D.]

Compared to Cheney, Spiro Agnew was a saint.

[Wayne B]

On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:13:42 -0500, Boating All Out
<boa...@boating.com> wrote:

>So what's your exact beef with little Al Sharpton?

=======

Way too quick to play the race card on virtually every issue in my
opinion, not to mention being an incurable grand stander.

On another matter, he has no visible means of support and has never
paid a dime in income taxes according to some reports. How does he
do that?

[JustWaitAFrekinMinute]

On 5/15/2013 8:20 PM, Earl wrote:
> F.O.A.D. wrote:
>> On 5/15/13 8:17 AM, Eisboch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "F.O.A.D." wrote in message
>>> news:nqOdnUbv5fvw6g7M...@earthlink.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> Former Vice President Dick Cheney stepping into the Benghazi fray to
>>> make a statement that is just breathtaking:
>>>

>>> �I think it�s one of the worst incidents, frankly, that I can recall in
>>> my career.�

He and billary froze at the wheel, it was an election year, there was no
way they were going to get into a skirmish with AlQueda. They were
hoping it would all just go away...

[JustWaitAFrekinMinute]

Only in the minds of unreasonable people like you.

[JustWaitAFrekinMinute]

His job is spewing hate, his paycheck comes from the left...

[Eisboch]

"Boating All Out" wrote in message

news:MPG.2bfde0b42...@news.eternal-september.org...

------------------------------------------

No, not too "uppity". I think he's a phony and a racist who uses
his credentials as a "Reverend" to influence and persuade people in
political matters.
He was ordained as a child as a Pentecostal minister. The type of
"ordination" he received in this faith is not main stream Christianity
unless you believe in speaking in tongues and the ability to heal the
sick and raise the dead. It's not based on any formal education in
theology. Sharpton attended college but dropped out after two years.

I watch his show "Politics Nation" from time to time mainly because
he can be quite funny sometimes. But usually I have to switch off to
the History Channel or Discovery Channel after a while because he
starts to get under my skin with some of his biased comments. I
thought it was interesting that in a recent advertisement for MSNBC,
the "Reverend" recites part of the Pledge of Allegiance, purposely
leaving out the "under God" part. Thought that was interesting for
someone who claims to be a minister in a Christian faith. But,
that's just me.

[Eisboch]

"Wayne B" wrote in message
news:s0d8p8tigkaaakd0r...@4ax.com...

-------------------------------------------

I am sure he receives a good salary for his MSNBC gig and is probably
careful to pay his taxes now, based on previous run ins with the IRS.
But, he's also a one man church with an "official" ordination and
title as a "Reverend" which he received when he was 9 years old.
Games can be played with such credentials. As a gag on a friend of
mine, I sent $70 to an Internet based "ministry" several years ago
for their deluxe ordination package. I received all the legal
paperwork and "official" title of being a minister and member of the
clergy. Much to my surprise, it permits me to conduct legal weddings
(as long as I registered with my home state ... which I never did)
and many other church related "services". It also allows me (if so
motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I might
engage in under the guise of them being part of my "ministry" or
church.
Obviously, I've never even thought of trying anything like that and I
certainly don't consider myself a "Reverend" or minister.

[Tim]

On May 15, 11:01 pm, "Eisboch" <no...@jose.com> wrote:

> Obviously, I've never even thought of trying anything like that and I
> certainly don't consider myself a "Reverend" or minister.

Evangelist?

[Hank©]

Sharpton is Wright's mentor and Wright is Obama's mentor. All three are
the Anti-Christ. All three hate America. None of them have the pedigree
to even pose as Christians.

[Hank©]

When Sharpton went to Florida to stir up the natives over the Martin
case, he spent 90% of his time there fundraising for himself.

[Hank©]

Don't give Krause any ideas. It's probably too late though. The wheels
in his head are probably already turning.

[F.O.A.D.]

The pledge was written by a socialist minister and then spoken for many
years without the "under god" bullshit. That phrase wasn't said during
my grammar school days in New Haven, either, when in 1954 Congress
moronically worked those two words into the pledge.

In fact, by 1957, the pledge was dropped from recitation entirely in
junior high because of those two words, which many, even those who
claimed to be religious, found offensive for any number of reasons.

We didn't have "school prayer," either, for the same reasons.

[345...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
>
> It also allows me (if so
> motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I might

> engage in...

Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out so well, eh?

[iBoaterer]

In article <kn1ejp$5ai$2...@dont-email.me>, justwaitaf...@gmail.com
says...

Please give examples of your stance.

[iBoaterer]

In article <kn1enf$5ai$3...@dont-email.me>, justwaitaf...@gmail.com
says...

Idiot. FOX is one of his biggest employers, oh, and of course, he's a
Christian!

[iBoaterer]

In article <e999p81ipinnsjomp...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...

> 501(C)(4) abuse

Cite?

http://tinyurl.com/7hfygw2

[iBoaterer]

In article <naSdnScXqJ11ywnM...@giganews.com>,

While I agree that Sharpton is a phony and a hack, he is no more that
than say, O'Reilly, Limbaugh, or Hannity. He makes his money the same
way they do.

[Eisboch]

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
news:5_adnWsR69BNUwnM...@earthlink.com...

--------------------------------------------------

So, you figure that the "Rev" dropped the phrase because he found it
offensive?

[Eisboch]

wrote in message
news:afc4f8b4-a188-418f...@googlegroups.com...

----------------------------------------------------

Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free
activity.

[F.O.A.D.]

Al hosts a weeknight show on MSNBC and earns more doing that than you
ever did as a bankster facilitator in the IT department. I watch Al
about once a week. He is the sharpest dresser on TV, I think.

[F.O.A.D.]

I don't know. I always found it offensive.

[F.O.A.D.]

The morons here try so hard and fail completely.

Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who
Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense."

[iBoaterer]

In article <e4q9p8dq837cuucag...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...

>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:51:03 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <e999p81ipinnsjomp...@4ax.com>,
> >gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> >>

> >> 501(C)(4) abuse
> >
> >Cite?
> >
> >http://tinyurl.com/7hfygw2
>

> Until fairly recently Sharpton's main source of income was the
> National Action Network a 501(C)(4).
>
> Both the IRS and the State of New York went after him for about a
> million dollars worth of taxes because of irregularities in his
> reporting

Not true at all and you have NO data to back that up. He's scum but this
is just not true. He works for FOX, MSNBC, etc.

[345...@gmail.com]

Not sure who *you* are, since google shows you both to be foad/eisboch interchangeably. The statement, obviously, was about him.

[345...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:24:43 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
> On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > wrote in message
>
> > news:afc4f8b4-a188-418f...@googlegroups.com...
>
> >
>
> > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> It also allows me (if so
>
> >> motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I might
>
> >> engage in...
>
> >
>
> > Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out so
>
> > well, eh?
>
> >
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------
>
> >
>
> > Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free
>
> > activity.
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> The morons here try so hard and fail completely.

The records show it is *you* who has failed.

[iBoaterer]

In article <ajt9p8h093a8p57tq...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:54:47 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >In article <e4q9p8dq837cuucag...@4ax.com>,
> >gfre...@aol.com says...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:51:03 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <e999p81ipinnsjomp...@4ax.com>,
> >> >gfre...@aol.com says...
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 501(C)(4) abuse
> >> >
> >> >Cite?
> >> >
> >> >http://tinyurl.com/7hfygw2
> >>
> >> Until fairly recently Sharpton's main source of income was the
> >> National Action Network a 501(C)(4).
> >>
> >> Both the IRS and the State of New York went after him for about a
> >> million dollars worth of taxes because of irregularities in his
> >> reporting
> >
> >Not true at all and you have NO data to back that up. He's scum but this
> >is just not true. He works for FOX, MSNBC, etc.
>

> He started working for them fairly recently, certainly less than 10
> years ago.
>
> Most of his life was funded by several dodgy "non-profits" that used
> racial blackmail to lever up contributions from companies that did not
> want trouble from him.
>
> <http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_aqIhGdMti9wDeM4k4dMvZJ;jsessionid=C58FE1DF981839B7BCE471FD5494737C>
>
> <http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_83CBBYgMujzxLtqgHzPAuN;jsessionid=F4E688C1DE817ABB113FC81B634D3D9E>
>
> <http://pohdiaries.com/al-sharptons-tax-problems-just-got-bigger/>
>
> The list goes on.

These URL's prove that Sharpton hasn't had legitimate income (and quite
a bit of it) HOW?

[F.O.A.D.]

On 5/16/13 11:21 AM, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:54:47 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>> In article <e4q9p8dq837cuucag...@4ax.com>,
>> gfre...@aol.com says...
>>>
>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:51:03 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <e999p81ipinnsjomp...@4ax.com>,
>>>> gfre...@aol.com says...
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 501(C)(4) abuse
>>>>
>>>> Cite?
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/7hfygw2
>>>
>>> Until fairly recently Sharpton's main source of income was the
>>> National Action Network a 501(C)(4).
>>>
>>> Both the IRS and the State of New York went after him for about a
>>> million dollars worth of taxes because of irregularities in his
>>> reporting
>>
>> Not true at all and you have NO data to back that up. He's scum but this
>> is just not true. He works for FOX, MSNBC, etc.
>

> He started working for them fairly recently, certainly less than 10
> years ago.
>
> Most of his life was funded by several dodgy "non-profits" that used
> racial blackmail to lever up contributions from companies that did not
> want trouble from him.
>
> <http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_aqIhGdMti9wDeM4k4dMvZJ;jsessionid=C58FE1DF981839B7BCE471FD5494737C>
>
> <http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_83CBBYgMujzxLtqgHzPAuN;jsessionid=F4E688C1DE817ABB113FC81B634D3D9E>
>
> <http://pohdiaries.com/al-sharptons-tax-problems-just-got-bigger/>
>
> The list goes on.
>

Nothing Al did financially comes close to equaling what any given
bankster has done.

[iBoaterer]

In article <5vu9p8tj97msq5031...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 11:28:26 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>

> This sounds like blackmail to me.
> If you pay him, you are suddenly not a racist company.
>
> **************
>
>
>
> Anheuser-Busch gave him six figures, Colgate-Palmolive shelled out
> $50,000 and Macy's and Pfizer have contributed thousands to the Rev.
> Al Sharpton's charity.
>
> Almost 50 companies - including PepsiCo, General Motors, Wal-Mart,
> FedEx, Continental Airlines, Johnson & Johnson and Chase - and some
> labor unions sponsored Sharpton's National Action Network annual
> conference in April.
>
> Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or
> eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks,
> critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of
> African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a
> consultant.
>
> The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been
> conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances.

There are corporations upon corporations donating to causes much more
than Sharptons. Are they all crooks? Red Cross? United Way? Muscular
Dystrophy? Alzheimer's Foundation?

[F.O.A.D.]

On 5/16/13 1:53 PM, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:18:48 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In article <5vu9p8tj97msq5031...@4ax.com>,
>> gfre...@aol.com says...

>>>
>
>>>
>>> Anheuser-Busch gave him six figures, Colgate-Palmolive shelled out
>>> $50,000 and Macy's and Pfizer have contributed thousands to the Rev.
>>> Al Sharpton's charity.
>>>
>>> Almost 50 companies - including PepsiCo, General Motors, Wal-Mart,
>>> FedEx, Continental Airlines, Johnson & Johnson and Chase - and some
>>> labor unions sponsored Sharpton's National Action Network annual
>>> conference in April.
>>>
>>> Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or
>>> eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks,
>>> critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of
>>> African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a
>>> consultant.
>>>
>>> The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been
>>> conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances.
>>
>> There are corporations upon corporations donating to causes much more
>> than Sharptons. Are they all crooks? Red Cross? United Way? Muscular
>> Dystrophy? Alzheimer's Foundation?
>

> As usual, you miss the point. The donors are not crooks but they are
> blackmailed into donating so as not to be declared racist by a guy who
> used those unfounded claims to make a living for 3 decades.
>


Blackmail? Is PsychoSnotty involved?

[iBoaterer]

In article <d47ap89cdvodhcr28...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:18:48 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <5vu9p8tj97msq5031...@4ax.com>,
> >gfre...@aol.com says...

> >>
>
> >>
> >> Anheuser-Busch gave him six figures, Colgate-Palmolive shelled out
> >> $50,000 and Macy's and Pfizer have contributed thousands to the Rev.
> >> Al Sharpton's charity.
> >>
> >> Almost 50 companies - including PepsiCo, General Motors, Wal-Mart,
> >> FedEx, Continental Airlines, Johnson & Johnson and Chase - and some
> >> labor unions sponsored Sharpton's National Action Network annual
> >> conference in April.
> >>
> >> Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or
> >> eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks,
> >> critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of
> >> African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a
> >> consultant.
> >>
> >> The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been
> >> conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances.
> >
> >There are corporations upon corporations donating to causes much more
> >than Sharptons. Are they all crooks? Red Cross? United Way? Muscular
> >Dystrophy? Alzheimer's Foundation?
>

> As usual, you miss the point. The donors are not crooks but they are
> blackmailed into donating so as not to be declared racist by a guy who
> used those unfounded claims to make a living for 3 decades.

Horseshit. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

[iBoaterer]

In article <_9-dnfc087WBgwjM...@earthlink.com>,
no...@jose.com says...

Scotty's the victim, as always!

[Eisboch]

wrote in message
news:8df5abe9-2ae4-4236...@googlegroups.com...

------------------------------------------------

We both happen to share the same fake email reply address, that's all.
He can buy me out if he wants. :-)

[iBoaterer]

In article <z-udnaBOAMsd2QjM...@giganews.com>,
no...@jose.com says...

His fishing skills seem to be about as good as Scotty's!

[iBoaterer]

In article <abhap89e99fl4s8p6...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:42:23 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>

> The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
> sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
> Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

[Wayne B]

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
wrote:

>So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
>avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

===

Of course not but it is well understood that Sharpton operates a bit
differently than the Red Cross.

[345...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:06:02 PM UTC-4, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >In article <abhap89e99fl4s8p6...@4ax.com>,
>
> >gfre...@aol.com says...

>
>
>
> >> >Horseshit. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
>
> >> >blackmailed too!
>
> >>
>
> >> The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
>
> >> sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
>
> >> Are you denying the tax fraud too?
>
> >
>
> >Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
>
> >scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
>
> >avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?
>
>
>

> The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
>
> send them a check.

Give it up. iIdiot's reasoning and logic skills are no better than a toad's.

[345...@gmail.com]

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 4:41:30 PM UTC-4, Eisboch wrote:
> wrote in message
>
> news:8df5abe9-2ae4-4236...@googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:48:09 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
>
> > wrote in message
>
> >
>
> > news:afc4f8b4-a188-418f...@googlegroups.com...
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > It also allows me (if so
>
> >
>
> > > motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I
>
> > > might
>
> >
>
> > > engage in...
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out
>
> > so
>
> >
>
> > well, eh?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free
>
> >
>
> > activity.
>
>
>
> Not sure who *you* are, since google shows you both to be foad/eisboch
>
> interchangeably. The statement, obviously, was about him.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> We both happen to share the same fake email reply address, that's all.
>
> He can buy me out if he wants. :-)

If that ever happened, you'll wind up in court to get your money and he'll claim bankruptcy. :->

[F.O.A.D.]

On 5/17/13 8:27 AM, Gogarty wrote:
> In article <tf2dnedUwc62cQnM...@earthlink.com>,
> no...@jose.com says...

>>
>>
>> On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:
>

> (Snip)

>
>>
>> Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who
>> Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense."
>

> That's almost as good as my Church of Cosmic Energy.
>


Perhaps we can merge the two and form "The Church of Universal
Stuporstitious Cosmic Religious Nonsense."

[Eisboch]

"Gogarty" wrote in message
news:PfGdncckgd-vvwvM...@bway.net...

In article <tf2dnedUwc62cQnM...@earthlink.com>,
no...@jose.com says...
>
>

>On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:

(Snip)

>
>Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who
>Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense."

That's almost as good as my Church of Cosmic Energy.

---------------------------------

Funny. BTW, I don't use Googlenews and don't have a clue how it
works but again, the above quote in incorrectly attributed.
I didn't say that. Harry did.

[F.O.A.D.]

That's right. *I* said it. :) C'est moi. Ich bin der Schuldige!

[iBoaterer]

In article <i0map8h234drd2g5p...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <abhap89e99fl4s8p6...@4ax.com>,
> >gfre...@aol.com says...

>
> >> >Horseshit. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
> >> >blackmailed too!
> >>
> >> The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
> >> sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
> >> Are you denying the tax fraud too?
> >
> >Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
> >scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
> >avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?
>

> The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
> send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

[iBoaterer]

In article <1vgcp8p92gdjclen6...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 09:49:13 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >In article <i0map8h234drd2g5p...@4ax.com>,
> >gfre...@aol.com says...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <abhap89e99fl4s8p6...@4ax.com>,
> >> >gfre...@aol.com says...
> >>
> >> >> >Horseshit. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
> >> >> >blackmailed too!
> >> >>
> >> >> The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
> >> >> sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
> >> >> Are you denying the tax fraud too?
> >> >
> >> >Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
> >> >scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
> >> >avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?
> >>
> >> The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
> >> send them a check.
> >
> >Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
> >someone "didn't send them a check".
>

> Read the second article I linked

I did, and I sure didn't see THAT!

[BAR]

In article <MPG.2bffff65a...@news.eternal-september.org>, iB...@grmail.com says...

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

[iBoaterer]

In article <MPG.2c03e2e86...@news.giganews.com>, sc...@you.com
says...

Cite?

[BAR]

In article <MPG.2c03f010f...@news.eternal-september.org>, iB...@grmail.com says...

http://staugustine.com/stories/091100/sta_20000911.018.shtml

http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-threatens-Knicks-boycott-warranted/AnswerViewer.do?
requestId=4839951

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1527

http://www.soulciti.com/african_american_opinion_polls.php?view=1&pollid=63

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/02/1080017/-Al-Sharpton-is-wrong-to-call-for-a-boycott-
of-Sanford-businesses

[iBoaterer]

In article <MPG.2c03fa093...@news.giganews.com>, sc...@you.com

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".
>
> http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-threatens-Knicks-boycott-warranted/AnswerViewer.do?
> requestId=4839951

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".
>
> http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1527

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".
>
> http://www.soulciti.com/african_american_opinion_polls.php?view=1&pollid=63

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".
>
> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/02/1080017/-Al-Sharpton-is-wrong-to-call-for-a-boycott-
> of-Sanford-businesses

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

Wrong on ALL counts.

[BAR]

In article <MPG.2c04012eb...@news.eternal-september.org>, iB...@grmail.com says...

You don't know Shartpon didn't get a check. Maybe the IRS should audit him.

[iBoaterer]

In article <MPG.2c0406dab...@news.giganews.com>, sc...@you.com

YOU said he got a check from them. Prove it, liar.

[Hank©]

It's hard to imagine that Loogie is in such a fog that he's never seen
the rev. Al at work collecting money.

[iBoaterer]

In article <519a659d$0$7523$c3e8da3$12bc...@news.astraweb.com>, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

Please show me in each and every single one of those cites, or ANY of
those cites where there is ANY evidence that Sharpton collected monies
from them....... Come on, balls in your court.

[iBoaterer]

In article <pi3lp8l3d5r0ba97n...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...

>
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:00 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Please show me in each and every single one of those cites, or ANY of
> >those cites where there is ANY evidence that Sharpton collected monies
> >from them....... Come on, balls in your court.
>

> I gave you a cite with several examples and you just ignored it

You NEVER gave me a cite that stated that Sharpton demanded money from
anyone.

[iBoaterer]

In article <1p0np85h9hnkjtm3g...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...

> Bullshit

You gave me cites that showed nothing of the sort.

[*e#c]

On May 15, 11:22 am, True North <princecraf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 11:40:14 UTC-3, *e#c  wrote:
>
> > Why you keep replying to the cunt is the real mystery here......DICK !!
>
> Maybe because he wants to, jackass.
> It's supposed to be 'a free country' down there.

You want to suck on Dicks Herpes-infected dick as well, huh COCKHOLE?

That figures. Now, you , Harry, and Dick can have a 3 some.....with
you as the " bitch".....LMAO

[*e#c]

On May 15, 8:13 pm, Boating All Out <boa...@boating.com> wrote:
> In article <2a-dnXA_TIq2jwnMnZ2dnUVZ_sSdn...@giganews.com>,
> no...@jose.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Boating All Out"  wrote in message
> >news:MPG.2bfdcb8d9...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> > In article <q62dnewbW6Ja4Q7MnZ2dnUVZ_rGdn...@giganews.com>,
> > no...@jose.com says...
>
> > > Sometimes it is hard to take some of your comments seriously Harry
> > > because you are so adamantly opposed to anything other than the
> > > liberal way.
>
> > Thinking Cheney is trash is hardly "liberal."
> > No more than thinking Al Sharpton is trash is "conservative."
> > You can defend either if you wish.  Pick one.
>
> > ---------------------------------------
>
> > If you haven't, read up on Sharpton's past.
>
> I just did that.  Turns out he's cleaner than I thought.  Don't care for
> him much, as he's a "race man."  Not into that.  And he's too loud.
> But I see only misdemeanor convictions related to protests.  Didn't come
> off well in the Brawley incident either, maligning people, then not
> paying up in the civil suit.   But nothing like this.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-FfXmhmj5E
> War, death and destruction.
> So what's your exact beef with little Al Sharpton?  Too uppity?

Too much of a Nigger for Harry.....

[*e#c]

On May 16, 4:41 pm, "Eisboch" <no...@jose.com> wrote:
> wrote in messagenews:8df5abe9-2ae4-4236...@googlegroups.com...

>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:48:09 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
> > wrote in message
>
> >news:afc4f8b4-a188-418f...@googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
>
> > > It also allows me (if so
>
> > > motivated)  to declare a tax-free status for many activities I
> > > might
>
> > > engage in...
>
> > Ah, so that explains the Duval County records.  It didn't work out
> > so
>
> > well, eh?
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------
>
> > Harry didn't say that.   I did, and I've never declared a tax-free
>
> > activity.
>
> Not sure who *you* are, since google shows you both to be foad/eisboch
> interchangeably.  The statement, obviously, was about him.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> We both happen to share the same fake email reply address, that's all.
> He can buy me out if he wants.   :-)

Cowards do that........

[*e#c]

On May 17, 8:47 am, "F.O.A.D." <no...@jose.com> wrote:
> On 5/17/13 8:42 AM, Eisboch wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Gogarty"  wrote in message
> >news:PfGdncckgd-vvwvM...@bway.net...
>

> > In article <tf2dnedUwc62cQnMnZ2dnUVZ_qSdn...@earthlink.com>,

> > no...@jose.com says...
>
> >> On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:
>
> > (Snip)
>
> >> Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who
> >> Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense."
>
> > That's almost as good as my Church of Cosmic Energy.
>
> > ---------------------------------
>
> > Funny.   BTW,  I don't use Googlenews and don't have a clue how it works
> > but again, the above quote in incorrectly attributed.
> > I didn't say that.   Harry did.
>
> That's right. *I* said it.   :)  C'est moi. Ich bin der Schuldige!

Grosse arschloch !!!

[*e#c]

On May 20, 2:04 pm, Hank© <han...@socialworker.net> wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 10:15 AM, BAR wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > In article <MPG.2c03f010f1d3367598d...@news.eternal-september.org>, iB...@grmail.com says...
>
> >> In article <MPG.2c03e2e86af7a1e1989...@news.giganews.com>, sc...@you.com
> >> says...
>
> >>> In article <MPG.2bffff65a363750d98d...@news.eternal-september.org>, iB...@grmail.com says...
>
> >>>> In article <i0map8h234drd2g5pr95vkgrak2tug9...@4ax.com>,
> >>>> gfretw...@aol.com says...

>
> >>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
>

> >>>>>> In article <abhap89e99fl4s8p6gmkk3k9oitlf01...@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>> gfretw...@aol.com says...

>
> >>>>>>>> Horseshit. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
> >>>>>>>> blackmailed too!
>
> >>>>>>> The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
> >>>>>>> sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
> >>>>>>> Are you denying the tax fraud too?
>
> >>>>>> Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
> >>>>>> scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
> >>>>>> avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?
>
> >>>>> The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
> >>>>> send them a check.
>
> >>>> Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
> >>>> someone "didn't send them a check".
>
> >>> Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
> >>> like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.
>
> >> Cite?
>
> >http://staugustine.com/stories/091100/sta_20000911.018.shtml
>

> >http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-threatens-Knicks-boycott-warrante...
> > requestId=4839951
>
> >http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1527
>
> >http://www.soulciti.com/african_american_opinion_polls.php?view=1&pol...
>
> >http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/02/1080017/-Al-Sharpton-is-wron...

> > of-Sanford-businesses
>
> It's hard to imagine that Loogie is in such a fog that he's never seen
> the rev. Al at work collecting money.

Its the Steroids he eats....... They're burning out his already addled
brain.

[iBoaterer]

In article <19onp81p7fpmcv15b...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 12:51:22 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >In article <1p0np85h9hnkjtm3g...@4ax.com>,
> >gfre...@aol.com says...
> >>
> >> On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:01:24 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <pi3lp8l3d5r0ba97n...@4ax.com>,
> >> >gfre...@aol.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:00 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >Please show me in each and every single one of those cites, or ANY of
> >> >> >those cites where there is ANY evidence that Sharpton collected monies
> >> >> >from them....... Come on, balls in your court.
> >> >>
> >> >> I gave you a cite with several examples and you just ignored it
> >> >
> >> >You NEVER gave me a cite that stated that Sharpton demanded money from
> >> >anyone.
> >>
> >> Bullshit
> >
> >You gave me cites that showed nothing of the sort.
>
>

> What part of this confuses you
>
> >> >> Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or
> >> >> eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks,
> >> >> critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of
> >> >> African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a
> >> >> consultant.
> >> >>
> >> >> The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been
> >> >> conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances.

That is speculation and someone's view ONLY. That is not PROOF of
anything, and you know it.

[iBoaterer]

In article <2qrpp8hh4o54ltrfm...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 08:58:24 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>

> That same article goes on with a half dozen other examples but if you
> love Sharpton there will be no proof good enough to convince you.

Again, there is NO proof. One person's view is not proof.

[iBoaterer]

In article <705qp8trv4acl18n4...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:10:19 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <2qrpp8hh4o54ltrfm...@4ax.com>,
> >gfre...@aol.com says...

> >>
>
> >> >That is speculation and someone's view ONLY. That is not PROOF of
> >> >anything, and you know it.
> >>
> >> That same article goes on with a half dozen other examples but if you
> >> love Sharpton there will be no proof good enough to convince you.
> >
> >Again, there is NO proof. One person's view is not proof.
>

> If I found 10 more articles you would reject them too. I am out.
>
> If you think Sharpton is a valuable contributor to society, go for it.
>
> Send him a check

I never said he was anything. I don't like him, BUT the fact remains
that you have nothing but opinion, not fact.

[345...@gmail.com]

~snerk~ This from the guy that linked a vision statement as proof of something.

[iBoaterer]

In article <k2lsp8tud8j29eorj...@4ax.com>,
gfre...@aol.com says...
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:14:59 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >In article <705qp8trv4acl18n4...@4ax.com>,
> >gfre...@aol.com says...
> >>
> >> On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:10:19 -0400, iBoaterer <iB...@grmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <2qrpp8hh4o54ltrfm...@4ax.com>,
> >> >gfre...@aol.com says...
> >> >>
> >>
> >> >> >That is speculation and someone's view ONLY. That is not PROOF of
> >> >> >anything, and you know it.
> >> >>
> >> >> That same article goes on with a half dozen other examples but if you
> >> >> love Sharpton there will be no proof good enough to convince you.
> >> >
> >> >Again, there is NO proof. One person's view is not proof.
> >>
> >> If I found 10 more articles you would reject them too. I am out.
> >>
> >> If you think Sharpton is a valuable contributor to society, go for it.
> >>
> >> Send him a check
> >
> >I never said he was anything. I don't like him, BUT the fact remains
> >that you have nothing but opinion, not fact.
>

> So all of those CEOs are lying?

No CEO's stated ANYTHING of the like and you know it.