On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00:38 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
> How is another robbery in Oakland "news".
> Does anyone really care?
This is a blue city in a blue state. The Democrat's voting base, performing smash and grabs on news crews in the street. That should make the liberals in this NG proud.
At least news crews here in red, backward, hickville South Carolina don't need armed guards.
In article <d7b91f70-c19b-453e-b282-90f985d7a02f@googlegroups.com>, threepont...@live.com says...
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00:38 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
> > How is another robbery in Oakland "news".
> > Does anyone really care?
> This is a blue city in a blue state. The Democrat's voting base, performing smash and grabs on news crews in the street. That should make the liberals in this NG proud.
> At least news crews here in red, backward, hickville South Carolina don't need armed guards.
> You reap what you sow.
Is every damned thing right or left with you? Can't think outside of that narrow box you're in, eh?
> > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00:38 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
> > > How is another robbery in Oakland "news".
> > > Does anyone really care?
> > This is a blue city in a blue state. The Democrat's voting base, performing smash and grabs on news crews in the street. That should make the liberals in this NG proud.
> > At least news crews here in red, backward, hickville South Carolina don't need armed guards.
> > You reap what you sow.
> Is every damned thing right or left with you? Can't think outside of > that narrow box you're in, eh?
Take a look in the mirror. You're boxed in by FOX.
> > > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00:38 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
> > > > How is another robbery in Oakland "news".
> > > > Does anyone really care?
> > > This is a blue city in a blue state. The Democrat's voting base, performing smash and grabs on news crews in the street. That should make the liberals in this NG proud.
> > > At least news crews here in red, backward, hickville South Carolina don't need armed guards.
> > > You reap what you sow.
> > Is every damned thing right or left with you? Can't think outside of > > that narrow box you're in, eh?
> Take a look in the mirror. You're boxed in by FOX.
>>>> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00:38 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
>>>>> How is another robbery in Oakland "news".
>>>>> Does anyone really care?
>>>> This is a blue city in a blue state. The Democrat's voting base,
>>>> performing smash and grabs on news crews in the street. That should
>>>> make the liberals in this NG proud.
>>>> At least news crews here in red, backward, hickville South Carolina
>>>> don't need armed guards.
>>>> You reap what you sow.
>>> Is every damned thing right or left with you? Can't think outside of >>> that narrow box you're in, eh?
>> Take a look in the mirror. You're boxed in by FOX.
> I rarely ever watch FOX. Except when Cops is on.
>>> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00:38 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
>>>> How is another robbery in Oakland "news".
>>>> Does anyone really care?
>>> This is a blue city in a blue state. The Democrat's voting base, performing smash and grabs on news crews in the street. That should make the liberals in this NG proud.
>>> At least news crews here in red, backward, hickville South Carolina don't need armed guards.
>>> You reap what you sow.
>> Is every damned thing right or left with you? Can't think outside of
>> that narrow box you're in, eh?
> Take a look in the mirror. You're boxed in by FOX.
bullshit... I am probably the only one here who watches nearly equal amounts of MSNBC and Fox, cause I really want to know what I am talking about. Say what you want about "insane" but most of what I predict here comes true despite the name calling. Anybody who says "I don't/won't watch Fox" for any reason has no desire to know anything but a party line... Almost all of the hard core libs I know, get their news from Jon Stewart and Cobert... Lie as you will, but when you talk to them and I assume most of the lefty libs here, is that is all they care to know...
JustWait <motodad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 9:42 AM, threepont...@live.com wrote:
>> On Friday, November 16, 2012 9:36:12 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
>>> In article <d7b91f70-c19b-453e-b282-90f985d7a02f@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00:38 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
>>>>> How is another robbery in Oakland "news".
>>>>> Does anyone really care?
>>>> This is a blue city in a blue state. The Democrat's voting base,
>>>> performing smash and grabs on news crews in the street. That should
>>>> make the liberals in this NG proud.
>>>> At least news crews here in red, backward, hickville South Carolina
>>>> don't need armed guards.
>>>> You reap what you sow.
>>> Is every damned thing right or left with you? Can't think outside of
>>> that narrow box you're in, eh?
>> Take a look in the mirror. You're boxed in by FOX.
> bullshit... I am probably the only one here who watches nearly equal
> amounts of MSNBC and Fox, cause I really want to know what I am talking
> about. Say what you want about "insane" but most of what I predict here
> comes true despite the name calling. Anybody who says "I don't/won't
> watch Fox" for any reason has no desire to know anything but a party
> line... Almost all of the hard core libs I know, get their news from Jon
> Stewart and Cobert... Lie as you will, but when you talk to them and I
> assume most of the lefty libs here, is that is all they care to know...
You don't know what you are talking about. Ever.
-- Sent from my iPhone 5
> bullshit... I am probably the only one here who watches nearly equal
> amounts of MSNBC and Fox, cause I really want to know what I am talking
> about. Say what you want about "insane" but most of what I predict here
> comes true despite the name calling. Anybody who says "I don't/won't
> watch Fox" for any reason has no desire to know anything but a party
> line... Almost all of the hard core libs I know, get their news from Jon
> Stewart and Cobert... Lie as you will, but when you talk to them and I
> assume most of the lefty libs here, is that is all they care to know...
What you are neglecting is that Fox actively misinforms it's audience. GIGO
>> bullshit... I am probably the only one here who watches nearly equal
>> amounts of MSNBC and Fox, cause I really want to know what I am talking
>> about. Say what you want about "insane" but most of what I predict here
>> comes true despite the name calling. Anybody who says "I don't/won't
>> watch Fox" for any reason has no desire to know anything but a party
>> line... Almost all of the hard core libs I know, get their news from Jon
>> Stewart and Cobert... Lie as you will, but when you talk to them and I
>> assume most of the lefty libs here, is that is all they care to know...
> What you are neglecting is that Fox actively misinforms it's audience.
> GIGO
No, they allow both sides. MSNBC is a joke, five deomcrats like Sharpton sitting around a table, trying to see who can say the "coolest" nasty line about Republicans....
> On 11/16/2012 9:42 AM, threepont...@live.com wrote:
> > On Friday, November 16, 2012 9:36:12 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
> >> In article <d7b91f70-c19b-453e-b282-90f985d7a02f@googlegroups.com>,
> >>> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00:38 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
> >>>> How is another robbery in Oakland "news".
> >>>> Does anyone really care?
> >>> This is a blue city in a blue state. The Democrat's voting base, performing smash and grabs on news crews in the street. That should make the liberals in this NG proud.
> >>> At least news crews here in red, backward, hickville South Carolina don't need armed guards.
> >>> You reap what you sow.
> >> Is every damned thing right or left with you? Can't think outside of
> >> that narrow box you're in, eh?
> > Take a look in the mirror. You're boxed in by FOX.
> bullshit... I am probably the only one here who watches nearly equal > amounts of MSNBC and Fox, cause I really want to know what I am talking > about. Say what you want about "insane" but most of what I predict here > comes true despite the name calling. Anybody who says "I don't/won't > watch Fox" for any reason has no desire to know anything but a party > line... Almost all of the hard core libs I know, get their news from Jon > Stewart and Cobert... Lie as you will, but when you talk to them and I > assume most of the lefty libs here, is that is all they care to know...
> On 11/16/2012 1:37 PM, thumper wrote:
> > On 11/16/2012 10:06 AM, JustWait wrote:
> >> bullshit... I am probably the only one here who watches nearly equal
> >> amounts of MSNBC and Fox, cause I really want to know what I am talking
> >> about. Say what you want about "insane" but most of what I predict here
> >> comes true despite the name calling. Anybody who says "I don't/won't
> >> watch Fox" for any reason has no desire to know anything but a party
> >> line... Almost all of the hard core libs I know, get their news from Jon
> >> Stewart and Cobert... Lie as you will, but when you talk to them and I
> >> assume most of the lefty libs here, is that is all they care to know...
> > What you are neglecting is that Fox actively misinforms it's audience.
> > GIGO
> No, they allow both sides. MSNBC is a joke, five deomcrats like Sharpton > sitting around a table, trying to see who can say the "coolest" nasty > line about Republicans....
FOX "allows both sides".... Now THAT'S insanity!!!
