In article <2270254.793.1334944298107.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynfi5>, threepont...@live.com says...
> On Friday, April 20, 2012 8:56:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > In article <ema1p7pmdrqc5n4oqi2u3ftuhd60nmt...@4ax.com>, > > salmonb...@gmail.com says...
Answer? You want an effective solution to gas prices? Nationalize the
oil companies and vote on the prices. Venezuela, $.08/gal.
That is all I know you can do other than elect a party that doesn't
give monopolistic control and corporate welfare to the oil companies.
------------------------------------
And how long do you think we would have ample gas supplies? And where would the subsidy come from to get $0.08 a gallon gas? You also have go be a net exporter of oil.
People might want to get ready for gas lineups and shortages. Like before, only supply/demand balance wins in the end.
Fact is all this USD Bernanke money print has devlaued the USD and more USD is needed to buy oil.
And demand is up as other economics not in the money print for debt Bernake/Obama fold are doing relatively well.
Debt isn't free, just a matter of who and how it is paid for.
0bama is a loser.
-- Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay for it leave, they can all share having nothing.
On 20/04/2012 11:51 AM, threepont...@live.com wrote:
> On Friday, April 20, 2012 8:56:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
>> In article<ema1p7pmdrqc5n4oqi2u3ftuhd60nmt...@4ax.com>,
>> salmonb...@gmail.com says...
>> I've tried to tell many right wingers that the president has little to
>> do with gas prices, thanks for making my point!
> So he's spending $54M of our money on something he has no control over. Not smart.
Flea baggers are not smart, just greedy for debt and other peoples money.
-- Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay for it leave, they can all share having nothing.
