The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: rec.boats.electronics, uk.rec.sailing, rec.boats.cruising, sci.geo.satellite-nav
From: Wayne.B <waynebatrecdotbo...@hothail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:07:11 -0400
Local: Sun, Jun 27 2010 11:07 pm
Subject: Re: May a "landlubber" comment? - was[Re: Help create better charts]
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 15:50:51 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
<wilburhubb...@thefarm.invallid> wrote: I think the idea has some merit but the process of certifying data >"Richard Owlett" <rowl...@pcnetinc.com> wrote in message >news:OrGdne3__qgZO7rRnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@supernews.com... >> are tides accounted for? ???????????????? >Excellent point. I'm surprised I didn't think of it considering my usual >Tide charts usually display the depth at MLW but these amateur committee gatherers/data loggers needs some work. Clearly there have to be standards if the information is to have value. There are many areas now however that are so poorly charted that almost anything new would be a plus. As long as people are required to put their name to the work in some verifiable fashion, everyone will work hard to produce reliable data, and over time that will be a good thing. There are just not enough governemental and academic resources available to do the job properly as it is. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||