Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

$2mil

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 1:00:30 PM10/18/10
to
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/m-fee-for-lance-but-none-for-us/story-e6frea83-1225940386618

LANCE Armstrong's suspected $2 million appearance fee for the Tour
Down Under has been backed up by discrepancies in the state tourism
budget.

Yet despite the taxpayer contribution to Mr Armstrong's personal
wealth, his cancer charity Livestrong has overlooked South Australia
to donate to cancer centres in other states.

Budget papers show the figure for tourism events in 2009-10 was
$15.055 million, which the Government has confirmed does not include
Lance Armstrong's appearance fee.

However, estimated final expenditure for tourism events for the year,
including the fee for the Tour de France champion, was $17.05 million.

In budget estimates questioning, Tourism Minister John Rau hinted the
$1.995 million discrepancy could be attributed to the cost of Mr
Armstrong's appearance.

Opposition tourism spokesman Terry Stephens labelled the fee
"staggering". "At a time where they are cutting through the public
service like an axe, they are obviously embarrassed about Lance
Armstrong's fee," he said.

In Adelaide this year, Mr Armstrong announced he had donated the
Livestrong name to the $27 million Flinders Centre for Innovation in
Cancer, incorporating the Livestrong Cancer Research Centre. But it
has not donated to the centre and the Government could not provide
examples coming to SA from the charity.

Philip W. Moore, Jr.

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 6:55:21 PM10/18/10
to
Who fucking cares? Where do I send the 2 cents that you post is worth?

RicodJour

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 7:05:08 PM10/18/10
to
On Oct 18, 1:00 pm, Plano Dude <tx.wastel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Opposition tourism spokesman Terry Stephens labelled the fee
> "staggering".

Can an opposition spokesman have any other opinion than, "I'm against
it!"...?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtMV44yoXZ0
or, for another classic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT8oGa3XTTw

R

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 7:29:52 PM10/18/10
to
On Oct 18, 5:55 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> Who fucking cares?  Where do I send the 2 cents that you post is worth?

Dumbass,

I posted it because the $2 mil seemed like a pretty significant sum.
Not because of any budgetary shortfall to the Aussies, that's their
problem. But if Armstrong is getting $2M from a relatively podunk off
season race like the Tour Down Under, I wondered what he got as start
money for ATOC and the Tour itself.

Philip W. Moore, Jr.

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 8:03:10 PM10/18/10
to

"Plano Dude" <tx.was...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ce7f4289-2592-4275...@t13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Dumbass,

Then say that, dumbass. Mo bettah for Lance. Free market economy. You got
a problem with a 2 million appearance fee if somebody was willing to pay you
that much? Didn't think so.

Mike Jacoubowsky

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 8:10:54 PM10/18/10
to
"Plano Dude" <tx.was...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ce7f4289-2592-4275...@t13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 18, 5:55 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> Who fucking cares? Where do I send the 2 cents that you post is worth?
======
Dumbass,

I posted it because the $2 mil seemed like a pretty significant sum.
Not because of any budgetary shortfall to the Aussies, that's their
problem. But if Armstrong is getting $2M from a relatively podunk off
season race like the Tour Down Under, I wondered what he got as start
money for ATOC and the Tour itself.

======

I'd think Lance's appearance at an event like th TdU would be worth a lot
more than the TdF. At the TdU, it's going to make a huge difference in
turnout. At the TdF? Yes, some, but it's not going to make the difference
between the race looking like a sucess or not. I'd also think Lance's
appearance at the Tour of California would be worth a lot more than at the
Tour de France. I mean sure, Levi's the 2nd biggest draw in the cycling
world, but...

(OK, did I really have to put a smiley there?)

Whatever, those days are long past. Who's going to pay Lance big $$$ to show
up at a race now? Actually, I can imagine he would have a fair amount of
value to Triathlon events, but he'd better work that angle very quickly,
while he's still got a chance to be more than an age-group phenom.

--Mike Jacoubowsky
Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReaction.com
Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

bar

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 8:29:55 PM10/18/10
to
On Oct 18, 8:03 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> "Plano Dude" <tx.wastel...@gmail.com> wrote in message

please get a decent newsreader, client, etc. so that we can properly
parse your posted wisdom from that of Plano Dude. Reading rbr is hard
enough without this kind of shit, bro ...

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 10:12:47 PM10/18/10
to
On Oct 18, 7:10 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <Mi...@ChainReaction.com>
wrote:
> "Plano Dude" <tx.wastel...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Mike,

Think big. As in TV broadcast rights. How many people watch the Tour
on TV? The TDU? Advertisers are only willing to lay out their dosh to
networks as long as lots of people are watching the show. Armstrong is
someone who transcends cycling in terms of drawing an audience, is
going to pull in a bigger worldwide audience for the Tour, the race he
set as a goal to win, than a training race in Australia. Especially
without the Alps, Contador, etc. TIOOYK.

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 10:24:27 PM10/18/10
to

Sorry to reply to myself, but yes it's the Tour. But compare it to the
World Series. Is MLB more likely to get better TV numbers if Minnesota/
Tampa Bay/Texas play in the Series or if the Yankees do?

Anton Berlin

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 10:32:56 PM10/18/10
to
As long as we all agree that Lance is a self-serving cunt only
interested himself then we can all get along.

RicodJour

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 9:14:42 AM10/19/10
to
On Oct 18, 10:32 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> As long as we all agree that Lance is a self-serving cunt only
> interested himself then we can all get along.

And that differs from, say, you, exactly how? You're not exactly
Gandhi, Tonto.

R

Steve Freides

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 10:29:08 AM10/19/10
to
Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:

> (OK, did I really have to put a smiley there?)

"It's impossible to underestimate the intelligence of your audience."

-S-


Philip W. Moore, Jr.

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 8:19:26 PM10/19/10
to
"Anton Berlin" <truth...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ab161cfa-eb2e-4c4b...@x42g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...

> As long as we all agree that Lance is a self-serving cunt only
> interested himself then we can all get along.

It's bidness, bee-atch! What problem do you have with people making any
amount of money that the market will bear? Supply and demand. What are
you, a fucking commie?

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 8:51:26 PM10/19/10
to
On Oct 19, 7:19 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> "Anton Berlin" <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote in message


Dumbass,

It was discussed that Armstrong received anywhere from $1 to $3
million start money from the Giro in 2009. When you compare the
magnitude of the Giro to that of the TDU, it makes the $2 Aussie money
seem pretty significant.

Second, when Zomegnan wrote Armstong that check, it was from money his
company was earning. Not directly from the pockets of the taxpayers.
Did you miss the part about the South Australian government cutting
public services?

Philip W. Moore, Jr.

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 9:59:40 PM10/19/10
to

"Plano Dude" <tx.was...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:28463165-2fff-4955...@9g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

On Oct 19, 7:19 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> "Anton Berlin" <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ab161cfa-eb2e-4c4b...@x42g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...
>
> > As long as we all agree that Lance is a self-serving cunt only
> > interested himself then we can all get along.
>
> It's bidness, bee-atch! What problem do you have with people making any
> amount of money that the market will bear? Supply and demand. What are
> you, a fucking commie?

Did you miss the point about me not giving a shit if Shaquille O'Neal or
Lance Armstrong makes 100 of 100,000 dollars per event? I just don't care.
Contracts are offer and acceptance. Should Lance have said, nah, I'll take
whatever Plano Dude says is fair and reasonable?

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 10:27:35 PM10/19/10
to
On Oct 19, 8:59 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> "Plano Dude" <tx.wastel...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:28463165-2fff-4955...@9g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 19, 7:19 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
>
> > "Anton Berlin" <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:ab161cfa-eb2e-4c4b...@x42g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > As long as we all agree that Lance is a self-serving cunt only
> > > interested himself then we can all get along.
>
> > It's bidness, bee-atch! What problem do you have with people making any
> > amount of money that the market will bear? Supply and demand. What are
> > you, a fucking commie?
>
> Did you miss the point about me not giving a shit if Shaquille O'Neal or
> Lance Armstrong makes 100 of 100,000 dollars per event?  I just don't care.
> Contracts are offer and acceptance.  Should Lance have said, nah, I'll take
> whatever Plano Dude says is fair and reasonable?
>

Dumbass,

Show where I said or even implied Armstrong should have taken any
other amount.

You're lost. I'm not going to respond to more of your misguided
retorts.

Message has been deleted

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 10:40:07 PM10/19/10
to
On Oct 19, 9:29 pm, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> Are you objecting to the fact that the SA government made a deal
> without your approval, or that they apparently hid it from their
> constituents?  Either way, BFD.
>
> It's pitiful that you feel you need an excuse to rag on someone.  It
> lowers it from an art form to just bitching on Usenet - which is
> slightly lower than bitching in your blog.
>
> R

I have a blog? Awesome! Where is it? Link please.

No. No. No, godammit, no.

My curiosity is, let me make this clear to you and Philip Michael
Thomas over there, the PERCEIVED WORTH OF ARMSTRONG'S PRESENCE VARIOUS
EVENTS.

Holy fuck, do you get it now?

Philip W. Moore, Jr.

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 10:43:47 PM10/19/10
to

"Plano Dude" <tx.was...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7290b406-5d7d-4139...@r4g2000prj.googlegroups.com...

>My curiosity is, let me make this clear to you and Philip Michael
>Thomas over there, the PERCEIVED WORTH OF ARMSTRONG'S PRESENCE VARIOUS
>EVENTS.

Then just say that. The market bears what the market bears. You just have
penis envy.

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 10:47:22 PM10/19/10
to
On Oct 19, 9:43 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> "Plano Dude" <tx.wastel...@gmail.com> wrote in message

I said the fourth post. You just decided it didn't mean what was
written.

That's a YOU problem.

Philip W. Moore, Jr.

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 10:51:49 PM10/19/10
to

"Plano Dude" <tx.was...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7752b4d2-0b87-4885...@g18g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

___________

If YOU say that. How much money do you think Lance should give back to make
the deal "fair" and for him to receive what YOU think his appearance fee
should be?

Philip W. Moore, Jr.

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 10:52:27 PM10/19/10
to

"Plano Dude" <tx.was...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7752b4d2-0b87-4885...@g18g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

On Oct 19, 9:43 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> "Plano Dude" <tx.wastel...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7290b406-5d7d-4139...@r4g2000prj.googlegroups.com...
>
> >My curiosity is, let me make this clear to you and Philip Michael
> >Thomas over there, the PERCEIVED WORTH OF ARMSTRONG'S PRESENCE VARIOUS
> >EVENTS.

If you live in Plano, let's just bitch about this over a bike ride.

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 11:01:04 PM10/19/10
to
On Oct 19, 9:52 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
> "Plano Dude" <tx.wastel...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7752b4d2-0b87-4885...@g18g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 19, 9:43 pm, "Philip W. Moore, Jr." <phi...@pwm-law.com> wrote:
>
> > "Plano Dude" <tx.wastel...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:7290b406-5d7d-4139...@r4g2000prj.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >My curiosity is, let me make this clear to you and Philip Michael
> > >Thomas over there, the PERCEIVED WORTH OF ARMSTRONG'S PRESENCE VARIOUS
> > >EVENTS.
>
> If you live in Plano, let's just bitch about this over a bike ride.

Can you ride? I thought your leg or foot was all jacked up from a
mountain bike wreck.

Philip W. Moore, Jr.

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 11:25:20 PM10/19/10
to

"Plano Dude" <tx.was...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ccfacf4c-c91d-4cce...@x4g2000pre.googlegroups.com...

-----

No, Plano Sports Association basketball game. Ankle/metatarsals are much
mas better. I'm ready to ride. Been on the dirt most of the time lately,
but I wanna get out the Waterford 1200 and ride.

RicodJour

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 12:50:28 AM10/20/10
to
> I have a blog? Awesome! Where is it? Link please.

I won't do that to you - it sucks. :)~

> No.   No.   No, godammit, no.
>
> My curiosity is, let me make this clear to you and Philip Michael
> Thomas over there, the PERCEIVED WORTH OF ARMSTRONG'S PRESENCE VARIOUS
> EVENTS.

So what do you feel is Armstrong's "correct" worth?

> Holy fuck, do you get it now?

Cite?

R

PS I'm just fucking with you - it's kinda slow around here and I need
a diversion.

Beloved Fred No. 1

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 5:09:03 AM10/20/10
to
Philip W. Moore, Jr. wrote:
> What are you, a fucking commie?

At least he's getting laid, even if its in a Lada.

Plano Dude

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 9:48:00 AM10/20/10
to

Dumbassii

From a strictly business standpoint, worth is determined by what
positive revenue or value it will bring in return. So if I am Brian
Lafferty and open up a stand at a local chess tournament called "Meet
My Best Friend For A Dollar", it's not likely that Laff will see much
profit if he pays Armstrong $2M to sit at the stand with him.

Conversely, Zomegnan felt that he would enhance the value of his
business, the 2009 Giro (widely considered the second most prestigious
stage race in the world), by paying Armstrong somewhere between $1-3M
to participate in the event. Weigh the history and importance of the
event, the population base for in-person viewing, the time zones for
live broadcasting, ease of travel to the event, that it is 21 stage/
three week event length of exposure, etc. A cursory check did not find
any comments about the estimated economic impact of the Giro.

The TDU began in 1999. The population of the state of South Australia
is about 1.5 million (Australia is slightly smaller than the US 48
contiguous states and has only 7 states. Australia's total population
is less than 22 million people). South Australia is 8 1/2 hours ahead
of western Europe, so a live broadcast of a 5 hour stage that starts
at 9 am (remember that it is frequently hot as fuck in Adelaide at
that time of year) would be starting at 12:30 AM in Europe and
finishing at 5:30 in the morning.In New York it would be starting at
6:30 the previous evening and ending at 11:30 pm.

The TDU is only a 6 stage race and likely to be considered a training
race at that, especially with it's place on the calendar.

The TDU claims a $41M economic impact for the communities in the area
of the race. By comparison, ATOC claims a $100M economic impact.

It's not my place or interest to tell LANCE what he is worth, or if he
should take less or hold out for more. All I am saying is that $2M
appearance money for the TDU is a significant amount.

0 new messages