Lafferty - you seriously need to take it down a notch
Anton Berlin
posts I can see how eventually what you are is so loud that no one can
hear what you're saying anymore.
Hell - even Jabouskey seems reasonable lately at times.
At the core 99.9% of people here agree with the conclusion that Lance
Armstrong doped and is a pathological liar but arguing every little
point and stooping to calling everyone names on an hourly basis just
taints the credibility of your view and this message board.
So try to be respectful and respond as if you were in the same room as
these people and their families.
There could be young children in here and we don't need a bunch of
fucking cunts and cocksuckers making the forum look like some whores
ass that's just been gang banked in a bukkake video.
Thank you.
RicodJour
Hear, hear!
R
PS Your pizza smells like diseased aborigine twat.
ilan
>
> At the core 99.9% of people here agree with the conclusion that Lance
> Armstrong doped and is a pathological liar
>
I doubt that there are 1000 people here, so make that < 99.9% since I
don't believe that at all.
-ilan
A. Dumas
> So try to be respectful and respond as if you were in the same room as
> these people and their families.
That's rich, coming from you.
derf...@gmail.com
> these people and their families.
Do you use this same approach with the smelly, schizophrenic,
shirtless dude in the park, who stands around watching the kids play
on monkey bars?
I didn't think so.
Anton Berlin
Rich irony dumbass. (possible it doesn't translate across cultures
though)
Brad Anders
split on are if there's enough evidence to convict him of an actual
crime, and if he's convicted, whether it will make any difference in
the level of doping in today's pro peloton. Everyone knows LA's a
doper, as was everyone on Postal, all the teams Postal competed
against, and most (if not all) top-level pros today.
Until this confrontation in the restaurant happened, I haven't heard
of any testimony or evidence against LA that I think a jury would
convict him on. However, if the restaurant incident results in
intimidation charges, I suspect LA won't be able to squirm out of it,
and would make any other case the govt. brings a lot tougher for LA.
Stupid move on LA's part.
As for if any conviction will make any difference, the answer has to
be "no". As long as doping products that actually improve performance
are readily available and can be used with little chance of detection,
a significant number of athletes will use them - regardless of the
sport. The fact that a big wheel like LA went down for it won't change
that. It WILL help out Novitsky's career, however, which is why he
went after LA in the first place.
Frederick the Great
<a1b7064b-7fc2-4656...@fq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Anton Berlin <truth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> At the core 99.9% of people here agree
[...]
Speak for yourself.
--
Old Fritz
Simply Fred
>> At the core 99.9% of people here agree
Frederick the Great wrote:
> Speak for yourself.
Yeah, what about the bots ?
Frederick the Great
Simply Fred <no...@mailinator.com> wrote:
They went rogue ages ago. Anyone who wants to speak for
the bots is welcome to it, particularly if it is another bot.
--
Old Fritz
ilan
I don't know why you are assuming this. I am not at all convinced that
Armstrong doped, and my recent review of his improvement to grand tour
rider after his cancer convinced me that it mostly happened without
the drugs that everyone one else was taking, or could have been
taking.
I am certainly convinced that Armstrong is a real jerk, and that he is
probably one of those people that you can't have any kind of
relationship with if you disagree on any single point. He already
proved that he's not such a great person by dumping the wife that
nursed him back from his cancer, personally, I find that more
objectionable than any of his doping.
But what I find most disturbing is how quickly everyone forgot his
inspirational story of coming back from the brink of death from cancer
to being the greatest endurance athlete in the world. That just shows
how badly people want to see their heroes fall.
Even worse, it turns into some kind of mad blood lust. When I went to
the comment section of the VeloNews article on Phillip Zajicek's life
time ban, I was amazed at the insult hurled against him by anonymous
posters. The guy had just received the maximum possible sentence by US
Cycling, and people still wanted more. It's basically like someone
walking to his execution and having the crowd spit in his face and
hurl insults, like what happened to Saddam Hussein.
Basically, this current anti-doping hysteria, including this useless
Armstrong investigation is playing into the worst in human nature.
-ilan
Scott
> I am certainly convinced that Armstrong is a real jerk, and that he is
> probably one of those people that you can't have any kind of
> relationship with if you disagree on any single point. He already
> proved that he's not such a great person by dumping the wife that
> nursed him back from his cancer, personally, I find that more
> objectionable than any of his doping.
>
>
>
> -ilan
How are you so sure that his wife didn't dump him, instead of him
dumping her? Or that perhaps it was a mutually agreed to split? Just
curious.
Anton Berlin
Because lance was fucking the stewardess in san fran
ilan
Let's just say that if he really doped and his wife was a witness to
it, then he wouldn't have divorced her due to the possibility of
future testimony as is playing out right now.
-ilan
Simply Fred
>> How are you so sure that his wife didn't dump him, instead of him
>> dumping her? Or that perhaps it was a mutually agreed to split? Just
>> curious.
Anton Berlin wrote:>
> Because lance was fucking the stewardess in san fran
We need an expert witness on stewardesses versus nurses in bed.
Frederick the Great
<7f1d6eba-e42b-4510...@e7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>,
ilan <ila...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 5:22 am, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 24, 5:58 pm, ilan <ilan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I am certainly convinced that Armstrong is a real jerk, and that he is
> > > probably one of those people that you can't have any kind of
> > > relationship with if you disagree on any single point. He already
> > > proved that he's not such a great person by dumping the wife that
> > > nursed him back from his cancer, personally, I find that more
> > > objectionable than any of his doping.
> >
> > How are you so sure that his wife didn't dump him, instead of him
> > dumping her? Or that perhaps it was a mutually agreed to split? Just
> > curious.
>
> Let's just say that if he really doped and his wife was a witness to
> it, then he wouldn't have divorced her due to the possibility of
> future testimony as is playing out right now.
I agree that the mob went after doping in cycling. It's
always something for the mob. It would not have
happened if the peleton were cohesive and stood up to
the destructive way the governing bodies go about drug
testing.
Disagree that the Armstrong marriage break up was
acrimonious. Those who feel badly treated by Lance
Armstrong act out in public, and his ex-wife does not;
nor do any of Armsstrong's enemies seem to be courting
her. Do you have evidence that Armstrong treated his
wife badly? I think your personality profile of
Armstrong is off. He wants strong people around him,
not whiny dependents such as Hamilton and Landis; and I
do not imply any assessment of his ex-wife.
--
Old Fritz
Anton Berlin
get the details
http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/The-Truth-About-Marriage
Anton Berlin
(other than lance fucking stewardess, groupies, soigneurs)
http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/The-Truth-About-Marriage/4
She loves god and as we know Lance's one redeeming trait - he doesn't
(of course it may interfere with his love of self)
Now, Kristin can rattle off a long list of things that make her
happy ... "I love God, my family, my friends, red wine, fireworks,
going for a long, sweaty run, laughing until no sound comes out
and...taking my time."
Looks like lance is a minuteman - because "taking my time" is women
talk for the guy squirts like a high school virgin but eh heh... who
wouldn't if there fantasy is fucking their own mom and they're 99.9%
doing that.
Frederick the Great
<954ea3dd-0c65-4ee2...@n5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Anton Berlin <truth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well I never knew this and never cared but here is perhaps the reason
> (other than lance fucking stewardess, groupies, soigneurs)
>
> http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/The-Truth-About-Marriage/4
Opens to a blank window.
What is it I wrote that you are replying to?
--
Old Fritz
ilan
> In article
> <7f1d6eba-e42b-4510-8a7d-a6ddd0643...@e7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>,
OK, that makes sense.
-ilan
Frederick the Great
Frederick the Great <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <7f1d6eba-e42b-4510...@e7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>,
> ilan <ila...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 25, 5:22 am, Scott <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jun 24, 5:58 pm, ilan <ilan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am certainly convinced that Armstrong is a real jerk, and that he is
> > > > probably one of those people that you can't have any kind of
> > > > relationship with if you disagree on any single point. He already
> > > > proved that he's not such a great person by dumping the wife that
> > > > nursed him back from his cancer, personally, I find that more
> > > > objectionable than any of his doping.
> > >
> > > How are you so sure that his wife didn't dump him, instead of him
> > > dumping her? Or that perhaps it was a mutually agreed to split? Just
> > > curious.
> >
> > Let's just say that if he really doped and his wife was a witness to
> > it, then he wouldn't have divorced her due to the possibility of
> > future testimony as is playing out right now.
>
> I agree that the mob went after doping in cycling. It's
> always something for the mob. It would not have
> happened if the peleton were cohesive and stood up to
^^^^^^^
Just in time for the TdF.
--
Old Fritz