Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

TdF GC 10

0 views
Skip to first unread message

ronaldo_jeremiah

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 9:04:48 AM7/2/10
to
1 Contador
2 Evans
3 A Schleck
4 LANCE
5 Basso
6 Wiggins
7 Kloeden
8 Menchov
9 F Schleck
10 Martin

-rj

Andre

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 1:05:47 PM7/2/10
to
On Jul 2, 9:04 am, ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jerem...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

no, this is the way it will be:

1.Contador
2.Menchov
3.A. Shleck
4.Kreuziger
5.VDB
6.Kloden
7.Basso
8.Evans
9.Gesink
10.F. Shleck

Andre

bar

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 1:41:04 PM7/2/10
to

no this

1. Contador
2. Evans
3. Eff Schleck
4. Basso
5. Horner
6. Wiggins
7. A Schleck
8. Menchov
9. Gesink
10. LANCE

Ben Trovato

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 3:56:19 PM7/2/10
to

Getting closer...

1. Contador
2. Evans
3. F Schleck
4. Basso
5. A Schleck
6. Wiggins
7. Vande Velde
8. Gesink
9. LANCE
10. Le Mevel
8. A Sc

ronaldo_jeremiah

unread,
Jul 25, 2010, 12:01:05 PM7/25/10
to
On Jul 2, 8:04 am, ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jerem...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> 1  Contador

bingo

> 2  Evans

way off

> 3  A Schleck

off by only one

> 4  LANCE

way off

> 5  Basso

way off

> 6  Wiggins

way off

> 7  Kloeden

way off

> 8  Menchov

off by five

> 9  F Schleck

way off

10 Martin

way off.

Not my best prognostication ever.

I wonder if any team will be prepared to genuinely back CFE in the
Tour again. Given his age and recent record, I think he probably
needed to finish top three this time around to maintain his status as
a contender.

-rj

ronaldo_jeremiah

unread,
Jul 25, 2010, 12:03:39 PM7/25/10
to
On Jul 2, 12:05 pm, Andre <orade...@gmail.com> wrote:

> no, this is the way it will be:
>

> 1.Contador bingo
> 2.Menchov off one
> 3.A. Shleck off one
> 4.Kreuziger off five
> 5.VDB bingo
> 6.Kloden off a bunch (full GC not available as I type this)
> 7.Basso off a bunch
> 8.Evans off a bunch
> 9.Gesink off three
> 10.F. Shleck DNF
>
> Andre

Dumbass -

Very well done.

-rj

0 new messages