My book by Floyd
coterock
defrauded because, on his own admission, the book that I bought "
Positively False" is full of lies. If he is going to profit by being a
vindictive bottom feeder, then I want my money back.
I was deceived, and I want compensation.
Davey Crockett
Get Laffery to file a Class Action ;)
--
Davey Crockett
Mr. Slate
Maybe Floyd going to use the money he gets from his whistleblower lawsuit to
pay them back? Act of conscious?
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/cycling/news/story?id=5529667
coterock
>
> | I was deceived, and I want compensation.
>
> Get Laffery to file a Class Action ;)
>
> --
> Davey Crockett
I seriously doubt that he would. Brian is quietly cheering on Landis
on this issue. He is a means to an end. The end of Armstrong, that
is. Any other lawyers here?
Magilla Gorilla
Just because someone lies to you doesn't mean you were "defrauded."
Magilla
Michael Press
"Mr. Slate" <Like...@NoSpammers.com> wrote:
Looks as if Floyd Landis will never give up. This ride
of his continues to get more interesting; and he cannot
be busted for wearing a patch.
--
Michael Press
drmofe
The title of the book was "Positively False", you say it contained
false information and you wish to complain about this?
Choppy Warburton
Go on Oprah and become a victim. It's the american way pal.
Kurgan Gringioni
"Magilla Gorilla" <m.go...@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
news:4C823BB3...@sandiegozoo.org...
Dumbass -
I would say that the $1million+ obtained by the Floyd Fairness Fund was by
means of fraud.
The money was raised on the pretense that he was clean and the victim of a
false positive.
thanks,
Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
RicodJour
wrote:
> "Magilla Gorilla" <m.gori...@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
And the money was to help defray the costs of his legal defense,
right? That's insult to in-jury.
R
Rik Van Slick
Hang on a tick,
The money raised for his defense against a positive test for
testosterone, right? The Floydster pretty much admitted to getting
jacked up on all the other good stuff, but maintains there was no T-
patch on his nether regions, so the French lab rats busted him for the
wrong PED. So, the FFF mislead nobody, it was all about the
Testosterone positive,
DA74
>
> - Show quoted text -
This is a correct analysis by the Slikster.
Magilla Gorilla
No, the money was raised to pay his legal team to give him a fair trial.
This actual innocence foundation people are no claiming although articulated
by Fraud, was not contractually bound by way of those donations. Surely the
donors knew there was a serious likelihood that he was guilty and was lying
given that so many pros who fight their doping positives ultimately end up
being found guilty.
Also, there was no contract or explicit terms offered by Landis to donors.
There was simply a website that asked people to donate. Where is the fraud?
Fraud implies there was a contract term violated by one party to another..
But there was no contract between Fraud and his stupid, gullible donors.
So you might have a breach of personal integrity issue here, but no legal
case of fraud.
Thanks,
Magilla
Amit Ghosh
> So you might have a breach of personal integrity issue here, but no legal
> case of fraud.
dumbass,
to determine if it is fraud requires a closer examination of the
applicable laws.
there was a case here recently where a woman pretended to have cancer
and was able raise thousands of dollars in donations. she was charged
with fraud the verdict is still pending but i imagine she will be
found guilty.
the FFF is analogous. if landis had stated his current version of the
truth ("I doped my entire euro career but didn't take T during the
tour") he would not have gotten the same level of support. so it's
likely there's a basis for criminal charges.
Mark J.
Heh, yeah, Floyd is working a pretty tight angle there to avoid having
to admit to lying re the T positive. Heh^2 - trying to preserve his
"reputation"??? "How's that workin' out for yah?"
Mark J.
BLafferty
Kurgan Gringioni
"Amit Ghosh" <amit....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6bc73864-62b8-42c0...@j18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
Dumbass -
Not only would he not have gotten the same level of support - he would not
have received any support whatsoever.
Beloved Fred No. 1
> Indeed, the fund helped Floyd get a fair hearing which he lost.
Does that mean he wouldn't have got a fair hearing if he was poor. A bit
like the US Justice system.
BLafferty
Interesting question. The hearing may have been "fair," but he
certainly would have been at a disadvantage. In an arbitration he has
no right to counsel as he would in a criminal proceeding.