Because most of them pre-dated the UCI banning IV transfusions, making them
irrelevant?
Because they used a different type of plastic then that the current test
doesn't detect?
Because, if he was doping, it wasn't the conventional manner (requiring
blood bags) that others used, since he hasn't been caught?
Time will tell.
There's always a relevant Star Trek quote. Perhaps this one-
Capt. Picard: "We may yet prevail. That's a... a conceit. But... it's a
healthy one. I wonder if the Emperor Honorius watching the Visigoths coming
over the seventh hill truly realized that the Roman Empire was about to
fall. This is just another page in history, isn't it? Will this be the end
of *our* civilization? Turn the page."
--Mike Jacoubowsky
Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReaction.com
Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA
You forgot the biggest and most important reasons; because he knows a
lot more about testing and the condition of the samples than you
(Lafferty).
Phil H
I look at it from a different perspective. If he knows Lance is a
doper and there is a strong possibility that those samples, if
tested, would come up positive, why would he lie about not being
concerned?
Phil H
Because that's his job. Duh.
Lawyer = paid liar. We kind of new that but there are other
possibilities.
Phil H
So Jowls is doing it pro bono? What a stand-up guy.
R
you didn't know? BLaff is getting paid by his bromance partner
Novitsky to lie on rbr.
You may take it personally but Its not about you. Its about
objectively assessing the information you post for its validity in
proving Armstrong doped. I look at it both from a scientific
perspective and from a "would a jury be convinced" perspective and
also speculate somewhat as to the motivations of the people involved.
The jury is simply a crap shoot and any scientific evidence won't be
without its problems either. However, if it wasn't for the obvious
bias in the information you post, I'd probably be a lot less
interested in this topic. As for Armstrong, any uncertainty about
whether he doped or not dissolves pdq with the first scientifically
irretutable piece of evidence and then I'll say no more.
Phil H
Nice try, FuckWit. It's about your obsession with me. Amusing from my
side. Carry on.
Hmmm, foul mouthed language doesn't change what I said and you can
flatter yourself as much as you like.
Phil H
Now that you mention it all of us fuckwits are still waiting for our
untraceable cash from Fabio.
The checks are being cut in alphabetical order, so the fucktards are
getting paid first.
>
> The checks are being cut in alphabetical order, so the fucktards are
> getting paid first.
>
Which is what makes being an assbag so attractive.
--
Bill Fred
Beloved Fred No. 1 wrote:
>> Now that you mention it all of us fuckwits are still waiting for our
>> untraceable cash from Fabio.
Fred Fredburger wrote:
> The checks are being cut in alphabetical order, so the fucktards are
> getting paid first.
Us fuckwits got the short end of the stick. I think we should break
omerta or sue LANCE.