Armstrong Hires More Lawyers
BL
He's clearly very worried about the Euro lab specimens coming int to
evidence. He's shooting impotent blanks and has no other option but to
go after Novitsky. Sadly, for Gunderson, the case against him is far
more extensive that blood and unine samples obtained by the Feds from
Europe. Anyway, Gunderson has no 4th Amendment privacy rights as to
those samples--so attack Novitsky instead. Gunderson is getting very
desperate. I'll wager he's gotten a target letter and a subpoena to the
Grand JJry.
Anton Berlin
> http://www.sacbee.com/2011/05/26/3656261/armstrong-adds-to-legal-team...
>
> He's clearly very worried about the Euro lab specimens coming int to
> evidence. He's shooting impotent blanks and has no other option but to
> go after Novitsky. Sadly, for Gunderson, the case against him is far
> more extensive that blood and unine samples obtained by the Feds from
> Europe. Anyway, Gunderson has no 4th Amendment privacy rights as to
> those samples--so attack Novitsky instead. Gunderson is getting very
> desperate. I'll wager he's gotten a target letter and a subpoena to the
> Grand JJry.
The first thing they'll do is fire the idiot Armstrong had in charge
up until now.
BL
Simply Fred
>> The first thing they'll do is fire the idiot Armstrong had in charge
>> up until now.
BL wrote:
> Fabiani has done him no good. The other guy is probably fine.
He can't fire Fabio. How will rbr survive without his cheques ?
Brad Anders
> Sadly, for Gunderson, the case against him is far
> more extensive that blood and unine samples obtained by the Feds from
> Europe.
Other than "he said, she said" testimony from various witnesses, some
who are known doping liars, what physical evidence do you cite to
support your claim that the case against him is "more extensive" than
the samples and tests we already know about? Given the continual leaks
in this case, if there's any paper trail or other records that have
been uncovered, I think we'd have heard about them by now.
Who knows, such records as yet may be found. I'm sure they existed at
one time. Or, perhaps, those records from as much as 10+ years ago
have long been obliterated. Until then, I suspect that LA's new
lawyers will be focusing more on destroying the credibility of Landis,
Hamilton, Hincapie, Mercier, etc.
ilan
In fact, the witness situation inherently favours Armstrong. Any rider
testifying that he saw him dope will contradict previous statements to
the contrary, so will be proved to be an established liar.
-ilan
A. Dumas
> various witnesses, some
> who are known doping liars
Dumbass,
Lying then got them a pay check.
Lying now gets them a jail ticket.
Phil H
An observation and view not shared by the Lance haters. You should
employ their infallible test of the truth. If I say I never doped its
a lie, if I say I doped and implicate Lance its the truth. Someone
should submit this as an infallible truth test.
Thanks
Phil H
harg...@yahoo.com
Lance. There is a 90% conviction rate as someone else stated earlier.
On May 26, 8:30 am, BL <b...@verizon.net> wrote:
> http://www.sacbee.com/2011/05/26/3656261/armstrong-adds-to-legal-team...