Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Skull Study Proves Bike Helmets Work
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bill C  
View profile  
 More options May 1 2006, 4:14 pm
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.racing
From: "Bill C" <tritonri...@verizon.net>
Date: 1 May 2006 13:14:56 -0700
Local: Mon, May 1 2006 4:14 pm
Subject: Re: Skull Study Proves Bike Helmets Work

Curtis L. Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:00:59 -0400, "Charles" <h90...@hotmail.commie>
> wrote:

> >Helmets create jobs. Someome has to design and manufacture the things. Well
> >on second thought, maybe not. We will need fewer doctors and Paramedics.

> No, not really. We occasionally get a psuedo-EMT on the lists that
> tells about all of the helmetless bicycle riders he or she hauls into
> the emergency room, but I've found no emergency clinic that claims
> such stats. Talk to an EMT at the next bike race and ask him how many
> of his or her runs are for bike riders. Check out the traffic in the
> local area - see how many are for bike riders. Stop at a sports or
> long term treatment facility and see how many are there due to
> helmetless bike riding. Damn few.

> No, the EMTs are rushing to auto accidents, heart attacks, falls in
> the bathtub, failure to breathes, on and on. Most of the bike
> incidents? Small kids, helmet or no.

> Long term care? Auto accidents, seizures, brain damage as a secondary
> or tertiary situation of another medical incident. Damn few from
> riding without a helmet.

> Go back to your war, but try real targets.

> Curtis L. Russell
> Odenton, MD (USA)

 Hey Curtis
 You need a time penalty or something. Intelligent discussion is NOT
allowed in helmet threads. You have to be a raving, flaming, looney of
either persuasion. Rational people have been punted out of this
forever. They don't want to hear from us because they're on a Crusade
for your own good, Damnit!
 Glad to see you posting and hope the weekend went well.
Bill C

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.