rbr: Aug 1992 - Jun 2005

Robert Chung

unread,

Jul 5, 2005, 4:33:04 AM7/5/05

to

http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/rbr.png

Me

unread,

Jul 5, 2005, 9:31:24 AM7/5/05

to

On 7/5/05 1:33 AM, in article 3iuuu3F...@individual.net, "Robert Chung"
<m...@address.invalid> wrote:

> http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/rbr.png
>
>

Chunk has WAY to much time on his hands..........

Jim Flom

unread,

Jul 5, 2005, 9:55:43 AM7/5/05

to

"Me" <no...@NOTHERE.net> wrote in message
news:BEEFD9DA.12E86B%no...@NOTHERE.net...

It _does_ support the theory that Albright, et al poisoned the waters enough
to drive people away. It's just that the house, finally emptied of its
demons, was left exposed for worse ones, at least one month a year.

Kurgan Gringioni

unread,

Jul 5, 2005, 11:56:09 AM7/5/05

to

Dumbass -

Maybe, but Chung is also smart.

I'll guess it doesn't take him that long. You make the time statement
because someone like you probably couldn't compile that statistic in a
year.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Tom Kunich

unread,

Jul 5, 2005, 12:54:04 PM7/5/05

to

Sorry, but I'm still of the opinion that the absolute july jackasses
that post here are still Trdina, Albright and Palachick.

Whereas the full time asses are Henry and that Canadian doofus.

Stewart Fleming

unread,

Jul 5, 2005, 2:47:00 PM7/5/05

to

You missed the RIP from the subject line.
Stu
(RBR 1992-2005)

Robert Chung wrote:
> http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/rbr.png
>
>

Jay S. Hill

unread,

Jul 5, 2005, 6:29:27 PM7/5/05

to

Robert Chung wrote:
> http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/rbr.png
>
>

Thanks for doing this.

dre...@yahoo.com

unread,

Jul 6, 2005, 12:26:44 AM7/6/05

to

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:33:04 +0200, "Robert Chung" <m...@address.invalid>
wrote:

>http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/rbr.png
>

Would be interesting to compare to a french-speaking group..

amit

unread,

Jul 6, 2005, 2:45:56 AM7/6/05

to

Robert Chung wrote:
> http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/rbr.png

dumbass,

since no one else has asked.

what are the other peaks on that plot ?

Robert Chung

unread,

Jul 6, 2005, 3:17:43 AM7/6/05

to

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/about

Stewart Fleming

unread,

Jul 6, 2005, 3:40:18 AM7/6/05

to

amit wrote:

Palachik and crit pro flame wars.

b...@mambo.ucolick.org

unread,

Jul 6, 2005, 4:03:10 AM7/6/05

to

Jim Flom wrote:

> It _does_ support the theory that Albright, et al poisoned the waters enough
> to drive people away. It's just that the house, finally emptied of its
> demons, was left exposed for worse ones, at least one month a year.

Blaming Albright for everything that happens in rbr is a typical
move that allows other people to avoid responsibility for their
own actions. Other people had to reply to him and let him push their
buttons.

You could as well interpret that graph to mean that rbr activity
outside July has declined or stagnated since Albright left the
building. It's also hard to interpret without knowing what's
happened to Usenet activity as a whole, or what traffic has been
replaced by cyclingnews, velonews, or (cough) cyclingforums.com
(is that still up?)

Kurgan Gringioni

unread,

Jul 6, 2005, 4:45:33 AM7/6/05

to

b...@mambo.ucolick.org wrote:

> It's also hard to interpret without knowing what's
> happened to Usenet activity as a whole,

Dumbass -

That is correct - it seems to me that most traffic on newsgroups these
days is on web-based boards.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Tom Kunich

unread,

Jul 6, 2005, 4:42:25 PM7/6/05

to

Jim, I agree that we shouldn't blame Albright for everything in the
past but the attitude here as exemplified by Henry is ALL ALBRIGHT ALL
THE TIME.