There is very much a feeling that anyone who had anything to do with
Armstrong must be tainted. This despite the fact that (I guess I cant
be bothered to check it out) riders from most teams have been found out
in recent years which indicates what many people suspect - that the
whole barrel is rotten, not just a few yankee apples.
There is also the fact that one might be better off keeping somebody who
admits to having doped/administered doping than somebody who tells you
they haven't. The publicity of one of their team being "outed" as a
doper would surely be more damaging than the admittance that some old
hippy domestique did.
I think the whole Sky "you can't work for us if you doped" thing is
another indication of just how out of touch with its own reality pro
cycling has become. They'd like to think they can do it, but they'll
never be able to prove it...
UD