Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
After Lance is stripped of 'wins' what will they rename Mellow Johnnys ?
111 views
Skip to first unread message
Anton Berlin
Jul 1, 2012, 10:03:25 AM7/1/12
to
.
thirty-six
Jul 1, 2012, 4:05:35 PM7/1/12
to
On Jul 1, 3:03 pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> .
Wtf does he need johnnies for, the amount of roids he's taken, he
should be sterile.
> .
Wtf does he need johnnies for, the amount of roids he's taken, he
should be sterile.
Fred Flintstein
Jul 2, 2012, 11:01:05 AM7/2/12
to
Not paying attention, are you?
F
thirty-six
Jul 2, 2012, 5:11:40 PM7/2/12
to
On Jul 2, 4:01 pm, Fred Flintstein <bob.schwa...@sbcremoveglobal.net>
wrote:
http://youtu.be/bJd1RktjYTU
wrote:
zeissg...@gmail.com
Jul 3, 2012, 7:17:30 AM7/3/12
to
Uniball's Unicycle and Clown Supply
Simply Fred
Jul 4, 2012, 6:50:16 AM7/4/12
to
On 07/01/2012 04:03 PM, Anton Berlin wrote:
> .
I wonder if Prudhomme will be able to keep a straight face while
awarding the wins to Ullrich (or perhaps even Ulrich), Basso (Birillo)
and Klöden (Freiburg).
> .
I wonder if Prudhomme will be able to keep a straight face while
awarding the wins to Ullrich (or perhaps even Ulrich), Basso (Birillo)
and Klöden (Freiburg).
Phil H
Jul 4, 2012, 5:07:29 PM7/4/12
to
did show that all testing was worthless.
Combined with the suspicious blood list that L'Equipe dropped before
last years tour, Prudhomme shouldn't be able to keep a straight face
no matter who gets awarded the race.
Phil H
birdbrain
Jul 5, 2012, 9:07:53 AM7/5/12
to
thirty-six
Jul 5, 2012, 7:31:35 PM7/5/12
to
thirty-six
Jul 5, 2012, 7:41:16 PM7/5/12
to
On Jul 4, 10:07 pm, Phil H <pholma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 3:50 am, Simply Fred <simplyf...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
> > On 07/01/2012 04:03 PM, Anton Berlin wrote:
>
> > > .
>
> > I wonder if Prudhomme will be able to keep a straight face while
> > awarding the wins to Ullrich (or perhaps even Ulrich), Basso (Birillo)
> > and Klöden (Freiburg).
>
> It'll go deeper than that. If they bust Lance then the 500 tests they
> did show that all testing was worthless.
Prednisone/prednisolone can't be directly tested and permits the user
> On Jul 4, 3:50 am, Simply Fred <simplyf...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
> > On 07/01/2012 04:03 PM, Anton Berlin wrote:
>
> > > .
>
> > I wonder if Prudhomme will be able to keep a straight face while
> > awarding the wins to Ullrich (or perhaps even Ulrich), Basso (Birillo)
> > and Klöden (Freiburg).
>
> It'll go deeper than that. If they bust Lance then the 500 tests they
> did show that all testing was worthless.
to ride beyond himself for consequetive days. It's use would likely
be common in the three days before rest days and through the last week
of the tour in the team leaders. .
birdbrain
Jul 8, 2012, 7:47:30 AM7/8/12
to
But.. isn't it epo, blood doping, or corticoid steroids smoke that
dogs him?
Or are you breaking news?
Anton Berlin
Jul 8, 2012, 9:27:12 AM7/8/12
to
supposed to be a secret.
Even I wouldn't divulge that Lance abandoned his genetically flawed
children but now that the cat's out of the bag.
http://youtu.be/JghkG4WydNk?t=7s
mike
Jul 9, 2012, 11:20:45 AM7/9/12
to
On Jul 4, 10:07 pm, Phil H <pholma...@gmail.com> wrote:
cycling obituary yet: he has a lot of influence in the US. The
criminal charges were dropped remember?
It seems all his former teamates except Landis are
too scared to testify publicly against him. And if the
Republicans win in November I suspect that the FBI
and Novitsky will come under a lot of pressure to drop
the whole matter "for lack of evidence". And no doubt if
he was nailed, he would like Landis try too take a lot
of people down with him. It would blow the sport to bits,
not just the TDF. He won other races as well.
mike
RicodJour
Jul 9, 2012, 12:52:53 PM7/9/12
to
R
Anton Berlin
Jul 9, 2012, 5:11:36 PM7/9/12
to
that Lance and pals like to normally attend.
Fredmaster of Brainerd
Jul 10, 2012, 4:37:41 AM7/10/12
to
On Monday, July 9, 2012 8:20:45 AM UTC-7, mike wrote:
>
> havnt they got to 'bust' him first? I wouldnt write his
The criminal case was dropped because it was weak
and indirect, because doping is not a crime. Not
due to supernatural influence LANCE might have on
the FedGov. Unfortunately for him, the "not a crime"
part is irrelevant to USADA, just like the rules
of evidence.
LANCE's lawyers blew it with the "kangaroo court" filing.
They did well enough against the Novitsky investigation
by keeping their filings legitimate and saving the bluster
for their press releases (no matter how much Lafferty
hates Fabiani, he doesn't seem to have been as big an
idiot then as everyone assumed).
Whether LANCE gets off of this one has nothing to do
with Republicans and November. They don't care much
compared to all their other "domestic priorities"
(featherbedding) and the FBI and Novitsky are long out
of the picture - the criminal case was dropped, remember?
Novitsky is hopefully back investigating tainted meat,
where he might actually do some good. The Dept
of Justice or other political organization has
very little sway over USADA.
Tygart doesn't care how many race results have to be
rewritten if he nails LANCE. The viability of the sport
is not one of his mandates, nor is providing the suspect
with the evidence or an un-stacked deck. It isn't a criminal
trial, so he doesn't have to play by those rules. He does
remind me a little of that dialogue in "A Man for All Seasons"
where the young man says "Why, I'd strike down every law
in England to get at the Devil!"
to which Thomas More replies, "And when the last law was down,
and the Devil turned on you?"
But hey, what's a little collateral damage in the name
of cleaning up sport? The real Thomas More was a genocidel
religious fanatic, so who's counting.
Fredmaster Ben
>
> havnt they got to 'bust' him first? I wouldnt write his
> cycling obituary yet: he has a lot of influence in the US. The
> criminal charges were dropped remember?
>
> It seems all his former teamates except Landis are
> too scared to testify publicly against him. And if the
> Republicans win in November I suspect that the FBI
> and Novitsky will come under a lot of pressure to drop
> the whole matter "for lack of evidence". And no doubt if
> criminal charges were dropped remember?
>
> It seems all his former teamates except Landis are
> too scared to testify publicly against him. And if the
> Republicans win in November I suspect that the FBI
> and Novitsky will come under a lot of pressure to drop
> he was nailed, he would like Landis try too take a lot
> of people down with him. It would blow the sport to bits,
> not just the TDF. He won other races as well.
Dumbass,
> of people down with him. It would blow the sport to bits,
> not just the TDF. He won other races as well.
The criminal case was dropped because it was weak
and indirect, because doping is not a crime. Not
due to supernatural influence LANCE might have on
the FedGov. Unfortunately for him, the "not a crime"
part is irrelevant to USADA, just like the rules
of evidence.
LANCE's lawyers blew it with the "kangaroo court" filing.
They did well enough against the Novitsky investigation
by keeping their filings legitimate and saving the bluster
for their press releases (no matter how much Lafferty
hates Fabiani, he doesn't seem to have been as big an
idiot then as everyone assumed).
Whether LANCE gets off of this one has nothing to do
with Republicans and November. They don't care much
compared to all their other "domestic priorities"
(featherbedding) and the FBI and Novitsky are long out
of the picture - the criminal case was dropped, remember?
Novitsky is hopefully back investigating tainted meat,
where he might actually do some good. The Dept
of Justice or other political organization has
very little sway over USADA.
Tygart doesn't care how many race results have to be
rewritten if he nails LANCE. The viability of the sport
is not one of his mandates, nor is providing the suspect
with the evidence or an un-stacked deck. It isn't a criminal
trial, so he doesn't have to play by those rules. He does
remind me a little of that dialogue in "A Man for All Seasons"
where the young man says "Why, I'd strike down every law
in England to get at the Devil!"
to which Thomas More replies, "And when the last law was down,
and the Devil turned on you?"
But hey, what's a little collateral damage in the name
of cleaning up sport? The real Thomas More was a genocidel
religious fanatic, so who's counting.
Fredmaster Ben
atriage
Jul 10, 2012, 7:03:39 AM7/10/12
to
On 10/07/2012 09:37, Fredmaster of Brainerd wrote:
> But hey, what's a little collateral damage in the name
> of cleaning up sport? The real Thomas More was a genocidel
> religious fanatic, so who's counting.
>
Hey so he liked personally interrogating 'heretics' but that was a European
> But hey, what's a little collateral damage in the name
> of cleaning up sport? The real Thomas More was a genocidel
> religious fanatic, so who's counting.
>
tradition at the time. I suppose Bush didn't personally watch anyone being
waterboarded so in that respect things have moved on in the current era unless
Tygart has a mandate to personally supervise the uniballer's questioning...on a
rack possibly?
--
thirty-six
Jul 10, 2012, 11:10:06 AM7/10/12
to
your destiny.
Michael Press
Jul 13, 2012, 8:36:22 PM7/13/12
to
In article
<f585c082-b705-4960...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
"It's like Mardi Gras for retards who were admitted
into mensa as a prank."
--
Michael Press
<f585c082-b705-4960...@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
into mensa as a prank."
--
Michael Press
Mineral Water
Jul 15, 2012, 10:40:18 AM7/15/12
to
On Sunday, July 1, 2012 10:03:25 AM UTC-4, Anton Berlin wrote:
> .
Tugboat's Rest
> .
Tugboat's Rest
0 new messages