Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech, rec.bicycles.misc
From: Joe Riel <j...@san.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:14:50 -0700
Local: Sat, Jul 28 2012 4:14 pm
Subject: Re: Signs of progress
Phil W Lee <p...@lee-family.me.uk> writes:
> Frank Krygowski <frkrygowREM...@gEEmail.com> considered Sat, 28 Jul
Why swerve for a speed bump? The ones I've seen go completely across
> 2012 11:39:30 -0400 the perfect time to write: >>(PeteCresswell) wrote:
>>>> ... from a progressive city:
>>>> http://bikeportland.org/2012/07/26/pbot-set-to-roll-out-new-20-mph-si...
>>> In the areas I drive, nobody.... that is *NOBODY* drives at the
>>> Ok, occasionally one sees somebody that is either obviously
>>> The slowest drivers are holding 5 mph over the posted limit.
>>> That being the case, it seems to me like what they really want
>>Seems to me that speed limit signs wouldn't work as well as traffic >>Anybody here with more experience with them?
> Humps and chicanes lead to drivers swerving around endangering more
the road; anything else would ludicrous. They do seem more effective than a sign/fine for reducing the effective speed limit, however, I'm not wild about them. There were a few on a commute I cycled for a few years and riding over them was a minor nuisance. I might appreciate them more if I lived near one. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||