Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Signs of progress
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Joe Riel  
View profile  
 More options Jul 28 2012, 4:14 pm
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech, rec.bicycles.misc
From: Joe Riel <j...@san.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:14:50 -0700
Local: Sat, Jul 28 2012 4:14 pm
Subject: Re: Signs of progress
Phil W Lee <p...@lee-family.me.uk> writes:

> Frank Krygowski <frkrygowREM...@gEEmail.com> considered Sat, 28 Jul
> 2012 11:39:30 -0400 the perfect time to write:

>>(PeteCresswell) wrote:
>>> Per Dan O:

>>>> ... from a progressive city:

>>>> http://bikeportland.org/2012/07/26/pbot-set-to-roll-out-new-20-mph-si...

>>> In the areas I drive, nobody.... that is *NOBODY* drives at the
>>> speed limit.

>>> Ok, occasionally one sees somebody that is either obviously
>>> impaired and/or is driving a defective vehicle... but that's 1 on
>>> a thousand.

>>> The slowest drivers are holding 5 mph over the posted limit.

>>> That being the case, it seems to me like what they really want
>>> there is 15 mph limits.

>>Seems to me that speed limit signs wouldn't work as well as traffic
>>calming devices like, say, speed humps.  As discussed around here in
>>years past, they seem to work in a couple residential neighborhoods
>>around here that used to suffer from fast cut-through traffic. And I saw
>>quite a few similar things recently in France.  They didn't cause me any
>>grief while cycling.

>>Anybody here with more experience with them?

> Humps and chicanes lead to drivers swerving around endangering more
> vulnerable road users.
> Cameras (particularly the average speed variety) are better by far,
> and are quickly paid for by voluntary contribution :)

Why swerve for a speed bump?  The ones I've seen go completely across
the road; anything else would ludicrous.  They do seem more effective
than a sign/fine for reducing the effective speed limit, however, I'm
not wild about them.  There were a few on a commute I cycled for a few
years and riding over them was a minor nuisance.  I might appreciate
them more if I lived near one.

--
Joe Riel


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.