> > > > ARE YOU A TERRORIST?
> > I neither play with bombs nor do I drive an SUV, so the answer in "NO!"-
>
>
> whatever that means-
It means they are both terrorists. SUVs terrorize me on my bicycle,
thus I remain in my cage. Besides wasting energy feeds INJUSTICE and
TERRORISM, right?
WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
According to you... Me and my bike are a conspiracy against the raging
machine.
>
> > thus I remain in my cage.
>
> That probably best for everyone. Thanks.
So I can share my enlightenment in the Internet.
Not really. Today's terrorism is mainly a function of radical Islam's
drive to dominate the entire world.
Vs. the American will to control its resources.
Today's terrorism is mainly performed by government forces and
government backed paramilitaries to back multi-national corporate
neo-colonialism. The NGO terrorists are mainly those fighting back.
--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
"After all, people in the Middle East already know how
Palestinians have been mistreated for decades; how Washington
has propped up Arab dictatorships; how Muslims have been locked
away at Guantanamo without charges; how the U.S. military has
killed civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere; how U.S.
mercenaries have escaped punishment for slaughtering innocents."
- Retired CIA Intelligence Officer Ray McGovern
That's a nice way to put it. We are also protecting the elites of the
world in exchange for unfair trade.
UK, Germany, France, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Italy,
Austria, Russia, Japan, China would never think of
doing that!
SMH
Radical islamic groups are hardly backed by corporations or
governments. That's the problem in dealing with them; there's
no one to directly take to task for their actions.
Certainly Syria and Iran don't have problems with Hamas or
Hezbollah, but these organizations aren't really comparable
with Al Qaeda or the various groups inspired by them.
I think there's a stronger link to be made between drug
consumption (of the illegal kind) and terrorism rather than
energy use.
If you're a terrorist for driving an SUV, you must surely be
in the Al Qaeda or Taliban leadership if you consume anything
poppy-based!
SMH
Actually the Taliban was quite anti-drug until the US invasion. Then,
needing more money, they allowed the population to go back to growing
poppies. Although I've read that they still don't allow it and that
such talk is just propaganda to push the war effort. It's hard to know
what to believe.
Aren't they all part of the Club? But my data says the USA is twice as
wasteful as Germany and Japan.
Some of those names though sound funny in a list of predators.
WHOEVER FEEDS THE LION IS FEEDING THE PROBLEM.
Whoever consumes drugs while not fighting to legalize it (the obvious
solution to it), it's a PREDATOR. Someone is being killed in Mexico or
Afghanistan for you to have that pleasure.
Now, your CONSUMPTION IS ALSO AN ADDICTION that has consequences
around the world. Ironically consumption is not a crime while drug
addiction is.
I smell something funny, like "Christian morality"...
> Actually the Taliban was quite anti-drug until the US invasion. Then,
> needing more money, they allowed the population to go back to growing
> poppies. Although I've read that they still don't allow it and that
> such talk is just propaganda to push the war effort. It's hard to know
> what to believe.
No shortage of poppy fields around Marjah.
That area had been under Taliban control for some time.
SMH
> WHOEVER FEEDS THE LION IS FEEDING THE PROBLEM.
>
> Whoever consumes drugs while not fighting to legalize it (the obvious
> solution to it), it's a PREDATOR. Someone is being killed in Mexico or
> Afghanistan for you to have that pleasure.
>
> Now, your CONSUMPTION IS ALSO AN ADDICTION that has consequences
> around the world. Ironically consumption is not a crime while drug
> addiction is.
>
> I smell something funny, like "Christian morality"...
Or perhaps a lack of it.
SMH
It may all be a game of deceit... Just like they want "democracy" for
the Arab world. ;)