Why on Earth is that brain damaged NY governor
Pataki praising bush senate intelligence
committee meetings ?? This is crazy.
The Hallmark of Foreign Intelligence Ability is
getting well informed people in countries to do
your will.
Who in ANY country on EARTH would even do bother
to do sh!t for the drunk bush or his stupid little
bush senate committee friends ??
This is a total crock. I can't believe this. The
Bush Senate Intelligence Committee has no compelling
international contacts anywhere. Everyone knows
that the bush senate is total bowlsh!t. They all
know to stay clear of it.
Thankfully, Kerry does too !!
The record is clear: from his anti-Vietnam war activities, to
hissupport of the brutal Sandinista regime in Nicaragua and his
participation in the Soviet created and supported "nuclear freeze"
movement, John Kerry has most always been on the other side,
campaigning vigorously for anti-American causes. Indeed, had he
succeeded in his various attacks on the interests of his country, a
defenseless U.S. would have faced a grim future of living under Soviet
nuclear blackmail. And the people of Nicaragua would still be captives
of a communist dictatorship once run by a murderous child molester
with whom Kerry had hobnobbed.
Tragically, Kerry succeeded brilliantly in one of his signature
campaigns, helping to condemn the people of South Vietnam to the
horrors of life under a communist dictatorship which today still
honors him as one of their war heroes.
As he preens himself in the glow of misplaced admiration for his
alleged heroism during his four months in combat in Vietnam, he
carefully shies away from any real discussion of his sordid
anti-American activities. He doesn't like to discuss how he slandered
his comrades still fighting in the jungles and rice paddies in
Vietnam, calling them war criminals and baby killers. For his valiant
service on behalf of the Communist Vietnamese government, Kerry was
awarded a special commendation as a "Hero" of communist victory in
1983 when he was Lt. Governor of Massachusetts. The record of Kerry
and fellow pro-Communist North Vietnam comrades was cited by General
Vo Nguyen Giap, the military commander of North Vietnamese forces, in
his 1985 memoir. Giap wrote that, "if it were not for the disunity
created by... stateside protests, Hanoi would have ultimately
surrendered."
Kerry earned the award, having aided and abetted the enemy, helped to
prolong the war, and create more American casualties. Today, a
photograph of Kerry being greeted by Do Muoi, General Secretary of the
Communist Party of Vietnam, is displayed in a room dedicated to the
anti-war protesters in the Vietnamese Communist War Remnants Museum
(formerly known as the "War Crimes Museum") in Ho Chi Minh City.
During the Reagan administration, Kerry got another chance to turn on
his country.
In the fall of 1983 the KGB launched an all-out "peace offensive"
through a welter of front organizations in the U.S. and Europe. A
nuclear freeze at that moment would have meant permanently freezing
the Soviet advantage in troops and weapons - precisely the Kremlin's
main objective.
As Kenneth Timmerman wrote in "The French Betrayal of America," in the
United States "the nuclear freeze movement won the support of key
Democrats in Congress as well as that of political gadfly Jesse
Jackson. Jackson's Operation PUSH joined forces with the Communist
Party USA and the Soviet-backed U.S. Peace Council in demanding
nothing less than the unilateral dismantling of the entire U.S.
Military."
The entire nuclear freeze moment was a Soviet initiated and financed
attempt to undermine President Reagan's nuclear strategy, which even
then was beginning to drive the Soviet Union into an arms race that it
could not win and would eventually bankrupt them. And John Kerry
reported for duty in the movement.
In 1985, Kerry, elected to the Senate with the help of a nuclear
freeze PAC, spoke at a nuclear freeze conference in Geneva. There he
pandered to European pacifists with the absurd claim, "if it were not
for the freeze movement, I am confident that the government of the
United States would not be in Geneva today talking with its Soviet
counterparts."
As an early backer of the nuclear freeze movement, Kerry climbed into
bed with European leftists who denounced Reagan as a reckless cowboy
for daring to counter Soviet SS-20 missile emplacements in Eastern
Europe with U.S. Pershing IIs.
In 1985 Kerry introduced The Comprehensive Nuclear Freeze Bill, and
sponsored two amendments to freeze the Strategic Defense Initiative-
related nuclear development. All of this was in complete opposition to
the policies of the Reagan White House, which was actively pursuing a
strategy of keeping the pressure up on the evil Soviet Empire. This
strategy ultimately succeeded despite Kerry's and the KGB's efforts to
derail it. If Kerry's legislation had passed it would have completely
undermined the policies being pursued by the White House, prolonging
the Cold War very likely to this very day.
Had Kerry been in charge of fighting the Cold War against Communism,
the Soviet Union would still exist. Once again he ended up backing the
other side at one of the most crucial moments in the Cold War. This is
the man who wants the American people to put the conduct of the War on
Terrorism into his hands. This is the man now backed by the Communist
Party USA.
Throughout his career Kerry's attitude towards communism has been as
wooly minded as his current approach to terrorism. Communist
terrorists, such as the Sandinistas in Nicaragua, could always count
on his liberal gullibility, as when Daniel Ortega met with Kerry in
Managua. Ortega promised to obey the Contadora Act for Peace and
Cooperation in Central America, and then a few days after meeting with
Kerry flew off to Moscow to get a check for $200 million from his
Soviet masters. Incredibly, even as Ortega was pocketing his Soviet
check, Kerry was on the Senate floor telling his colleagues that they
didn't need to support the Contras since Nicaragua was free of Soviet
influence.
For a full account of Kerry's shameful conduct see Dave Eberhart's May
20, 2004 story in NewsMax.com Kerry Went to Extreme Lengths to Back
Communist Ortega and Undermine U.S. It's no wonder that Kerry has been
endorsed by Tómas Borge, a terrorist-friendly Sandinista leader
notorious for his brutality when
his old communist regime still ruled Nicaragua. "The most eye-popping
Kerry endorsement last week came from Tómas Borge, one of the nine
commandantes of Nicaragua's famed Sandinista revolution and perhaps
the most feared," reported the Wall Street Journal's Mary Anastasia
O'Grady just hours after Kerry accepted his party's nomination in
Boston.
During a 25th anniversary celebration of the Sandinista revolution
last week, Borge declared that President Bush was "demented, crazy and
paranoid." But Kerry, on the other hand, is somebody he looked forward
to doing business with as president of the United States, calling him
"a more sensible and balanced man, [who] would improve relations
between the U.S. and us."
Borge's warm feeling toward Kerry undoubtedly emanates from the trip
Kerry and Sen. Tom Harkin made to Nicaragua in 1986, to urge
then-Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega not to knuckle under to Reagan
administration pressure on their communist regime. A week later,
Ortega traveled to Moscow to get his marching orders from the
Politburo.
In 1998, Ortega's stepdaughter accused him of sexually molesting and
raping her since she was 11 years old. She said the abuse began in
1979, when Ortega and the Sandinistas took power. Years after the
Sandinstas were voted out of office in U.S.-backed elections, Borge
was still arming for a return to power and was discovered with a cache
of surface-to-air missiles in 1993, in apparent preparation for a new
war. The new Kerry backer also ran a kidnap ring and has ties to
Basque terrorists in Spain, the Wall Street Journal reported.
When Kerry went to Managua, Nicaragua, with Senator Harkin to offer
his personal support to Ortega on April 18, 1985 a congressional vote
on aid to the Contras was just days away. Kerry wanted to negotiate
with the communists in Nicaragua and "give peace a chance." Like
Neville Chamberlain waving a printed statement hailing "peace for our
time" with Hitler, Kerry brought back a peace proposal to derail
Reagan's request for Contra aid.
John Kerry has been accused by his critics of being a "flip-flopper."
But in one respect you can always count on his consistency - to
support America's enemies over America. It's no wonder the Communist
Party is backing him - he tends to flip in their direction.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/8/3/160248.shtml
Kerry: Service Should Not Be "Litmus Test" For Leadership. Mr.
President, you and I know that if
support or opposition to the war were to become a litmus test for
leadership, America would never
have leaders or recover from the divisions created by that war. You
and I know that if service or
nonservice in the war is to become a test of qualification for high
office, you would not have
a Vice President, nor would you have a Secretary of Defense and our
Nation would never recover from
the divisions created by that war. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional
Record, 10/08/92, p. S17709)
But Now Kerry Constantly Challenges The Stature Of His Democratic
Opponents Over Their Lack Of Military Service. And more than ever,
Mr. Kerry is invoking his stature as a Vietnam veteran as he
challenges the stature of his Democratic opponents -- none of whom, he
frequently points out, have ‘worn the uniform of our country’ -- to
withstand a debate with Mr. Bush on national security. (Adam
Nagourney, As Campaign Tightens, Kerry Sharpens Message, The New York
Times, 8/10/03)
Terrorists for Kerry
By Neal Boortz
March 15, 2004
192 DEAD; 1,200 WOUNDED. SO, WAS IT AL-QAEDA?
Have you seen those images on television yesterday? Did you see those
trains in Spain blown to bits? Now ... can you picture that same
scene somewhere in the United States ... maybe in the Northeast
corridor or in
Chicago where tens of thousands of people commute by rail?
So, you think this election is about jobs and health care? There are
about 200 people in Spain who will no longer benefit from any health
care, and another 1,200 who probably won't be going to work for today
... or for a while ... or maybe never. Is al-Qaeda back? Maybe they
never left! The supposedly peaceful religion of Islam has struck
again, brutally murdering 192 people, and wounding more than 1,200. If
you think the war on terror isn't important, then it's time to get
your head out of the sand, or whatever dark region you have it stored.
Unless you have been living under a rock, by now you have heard what
happened. Ten backpack bombs exploded within a 15-minute span,
starting at about 7:40 a.m. yesterday aboard commuter trains. Police
also detonated three more bombs. A stolen van was found near Madrid
containing seven detonators and an Arabic tape with Koran verses on
it. The Spanish government initially pointed the finger at a
separatist group, but then a letter was faxed to Reuters by an
al-Qaeda-backed group. They referred to the attack as "operation death
trains." The attack occurred 911 days after September 11th. Another
letter was faxed to the Associated Press office in Cairo warning that
America was next. That's right; al-Qaeda says America is
next.
You have a role to play here. You have a decision to make ... and that
decision will be made on November 2nd. You will decide who is going to
lead this country in this time of peril ... this era of Islamic
terrorism. Maybe you'll want to chose someone who has proven that he
will use the American military and whatever resources are available to
him to hunt these terrorists down and kill them. Or maybe you'll want
to chose the man who says that this is all a law enforcement problem;
someone who, if he does manage to catch these Islamic predators with
his glorified police force, will then turn them over to some
international tribunal for trial. As the great Og Mandino once said,
"Use wisely your power of choice."
Who do you think the thousands of people who have died at the hands of
al-Qaeda would choose? And who do you think the al-Qaeda supporters
and sympathizers in the United States will chose?
We've already reported how Communist Party USA has endorsed John Kerry
for president, and now we're pleased to note that Democratic
Socialists (isn't that redundant?) of America has chimed in as well.
"Kerry was hardly the first choice of our members. Most supported
Dennis Kucinich or Howard Dean in the Democratic primary elections and
would be very critical of Senator Kerry's voting record on trade
issues, as well as his support for the resolution authorizing the use
of force in Iraq; but the most important concern of our members now is
to defeat Bush," said Frank Llewellyn, the socialists' national
director.
What? They've now concluded that Kucinich can't bag the nomination?
With friends such as these, Kerry won't need any enemies
The Democratic party-Proudly Celebrating 60 Years of Aid & Comfort for
America's Enemies.
Luckily, the Nazi party is defunct or they would be sure to hop on the
Kerry bandwagon.
John Kerry has gained the support of the largest political party in
the world. The official online news outlet for communist China, the
People's Daily, endorsed the Senator from Massachusetts for President
of the United States.
"Comparatively speaking, Kerry is noted for being friendly with China.
He was once firmly against linking the most-favored-nation status to
China with human rights," stated an article on the U.S. Presidential
race posted by the official Chinese Central Communist Party news
outlet. "From a long-term view, a Democratic administration, which
stresses international cooperation, pursues 'multilateralism' and
stands for a policy of contacts, will be better for both world peace
and Sino-U.S. relations," noted the People's Daily article.
According to the communist Chinese, Kerry looks "squarely at China's
position and influence in Asia and the world at large" and that the
Democrat candidate opposes "containment of China and stand for
contacts with the country."
"He said: We need cooperation with China and cannot push Sino-U.S.
relationship back to the Cold War period," states the Chinese news
site. According to the communist officials, Kerry supports the
"one-China" principle and opposes "Taiwan independence."
"At a broadcasting debate held in January this year, he alarmingly
expressed support for the solution of the Taiwan issue by the method
of 'one country, two systems' which triggered strong repercussion.
Although this maybe a remark made at the spur of the moment, it
reflected that his attitude toward the Taiwan issue is different from
that of Bush," noted the People's Daily.
"There are no 'neo-cons' in Kerry's campaign team, and most of his men
can rationally approach the common interests and actual differences
between the two countries," stated the report.
------------
Democrats support NAMBLA
The Gay and Lesbian Organizations that fully support NAMBLA
are Democrates because Bill Clinton needed their votes to win.
Check it out, it is on their website,
http://www.nambla.org supports John Kerry!!!!!
--------
Liberals Hate America!
THANKS FOR YOUR POST. John Kerry is an unquestionable criminal who is trying
to masquerade himself as a patriot and fighter for popular causes. It is
amazing how the Democrats of 2004 appear to be totally blind to his antics.
You mean like evacuating all the bin Laden family members from the US
before they could be questioned in the aftermath of 9/11 when every
American citizen was grounded?
--
Take Back America
Vote Libertarian
Elect Mike Badnarik
http://www.badnarik.org/
That outrageous claim has been investigated and refuted in all detail. You
probably do not remember but an alert observer could notice a high
concentration of Mideastern travelers at America's airports in months before
Sept 11, 2004. I traveled during that time and was utterly shocked. All
security agents at the checkpoints were Arabs or other Mideasterners. They
all disappeared shortly after Sept 11. I presume they all gone back to their
countries since most of them were, perhaps on expired or forged visas here
and sensed the palpable anger in the air.
In one of the buildings in my hometown there was an Arab firm specialized,
as I was told before Sept 11, in *chemicals.* A few young bearded men would
come and go as they please. I spoke with the management about them just to
arise their suspicion. I simply did not have a good premonition about those
guys. The manager rebuked me, stupid cow. She said that they have the same
rights as everyone else, typical liberal bullshit. She also was quite happy
that they stayed in their offices well past 5 PM and served like and
additional security element for the building, since their windows were
lighted and some shadows were moving in them. Those people cleared out in
the first week after Sept 11, leaving the manager under the impression that
they "moved to Texas." Well, I suspect their Texas is in the Saudi Arabia.
My point is that thousands of Arabs got their pants full of shit and left
the country in a hurry. Perhaps some of them escaped to Canada, I do not
know. The bin Laden relatives did precisely the same thing. It was a herd
instinct. G.W. Bush had nothing to do with this exodus. It is assumed that
the FBI had to give them all clearances to leave the country but since
nobody had any files on them, who could say anything. The liberals like
Frank Church and John Kerry have spent decades eviscerating American
Intelligence Services. What do you expect them to say against bin Ladens
leaving? Would you act differently? Quote me a law in the books which would
allow the authorities to detain people who were leaving without specific
charges and a court order? It is a court jurisdiction not the president's
prerogative to determine such things.
You are an inferior, low life asshole for saying things like this. G.W. Bush
had nothing to do with it. It is all Michael Moore's puke and insinuation.
He counts on stupid assholes like you.
That outrageous claim has been investigated and refuted in all detail. You
That outrageous claim has been investigated and refuted in all detail. You
>
> "George W. Bush, Traitor" <bio_dud...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> message news:Xns95577E6D2BA3Fbi...@130.133.1.4...
>> "alexV" <alex...@comcast.net> wrote in
>> >
>> You mean like evacuating all the bin Laden family members from the US
>> before they could be questioned in the aftermath of 9/11 when every
>> American citizen was grounded?
>>
>
> That outrageous claim has been investigated and refuted in all detail.
You are a liar.
From the Moonie Times no less:
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040609-101254-9910r.htm
Tampa airport confirms mystery flight
Tampa, FL, Jun. 9 (UPI) -- Tampa (Fla.) International Airport has
confirmed three young Saudi men were flown out of the facility two days
after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The men, one of them believed to be a member of the Saudi royal family,
were flown out although most of the nation's air traffic was grounded,
the St. Petersburg Times reported Wednesday.
For nearly three years, the White House and law enforcement officials
have insisted the flight never took place, denying published reports.
But this week, airport officials confirmed the flight at the request of
the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks.
The flight is a part of a larger controversy over the departure from the
United States of members of the Saudi royal family and relatives of Osama
bin Laden.
The commission has said it was aware of six flights with 142 people
aboard that left the United States Sept. 14-24, 2001. It said it knew
nothing of the Tampa flight until it asked airport officials about it in
April.
Here are several links. Educate yourself:
http://www.publicedcenter.org/stories/saudi-evacuation/
> You are an inferior, low life asshole for saying things like this.
Why are you so scared of the truth?
> G.W. Bush had nothing to do with it. It is all Michael Moore's puke
> and insinuation. He counts on stupid assholes like you.
>
No, it's actual, documented fact. Deal with it.
You better read this:
"By NBC News
MSNBC
Sept. 7 - This is a rush transcript provided for the information and
convenience of the press. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
"
ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED, you fucking asshole.
I find it very telling that you snipped almost the entirety of my post
and then tacked on some unattributed bullshit allegedly from MSNBC. What
is this a "rush transcript" of? How does it relate to my post *proving*
that bin Laden family members, Saudi royals and possible Al Qaeda
operatives were allowed to fly out of the United States when all other
air traffic was grounded? Why are you so scared of the truth that you
can't even reply to documented facts I showed you and instead you cut and
run? It isn't healthy to live in fear. But then, your fuhrer has only one
chance to win reelection and that is to scare the living shit out of you.
Enjoy.
Reposted for the record:
"alexV" <alex...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:4cidnU3xq5K...@comcast.com:
>
> "George W. Bush, Traitor" <bio_dud...@hotmail.com> wrote in
You are a liar.
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040609-101254-9910r.htm
http://www.publicedcenter.org/stories/saudi-evacuation/
No, it's actual, documented fact. Deal with it.
--
[on s'en fout]
Commencez à sérieusement casser les couilles, bande
de branleurs. Les nôtres, à sci.lang, et sans doute
celles de alt.fan.barbra.streisand, rec.aviation et
j'en passe. Si on veut discuter politique, on discutera
où ça nous chante. On n'est pas à la botte de petits
cons comme vozigues. Allora, stronzinetti belli mei,
andate a maneggiarvela nella tasca.
Jacques Guy wrote:
> George W. Bush, Traitor wrote:
>
> [on s'en fout]
>
> Commencez a sorieusement casser les couilles, bande
> de branleurs. Les nrtres, a sci.lang, et sans doute
> celles de alt.fan.barbra.streisand, rec.aviation et
> j'en passe. Si on veut discuter politique, on discutera
> o. ta nous chante. On n'est pas a la botte de petits
> cons comme vozigues. Allora, stronzinetti belli mei,
> andate a maneggiarvela nella tasca.
> --- Synchronet 3.11c-Linux NewsLink 1.76
--- Synchronet 3.11c-Linux NewsLink 1.76
Access Provided by PEAKNET telnet://peaknet.isptoolz.com
When the Cole was attacked, which candidate benefitted?
--
FF
al-a'natur Al Gore