Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
radial engine torque
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
superd...@bigpond.com  
View profile
 More options Jul 16, 11:00 pm
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.owning
From: superd...@bigpond.com
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Jul 16 2008 11:00 pm
Subject: radial engine torque
Hi,

I have noticed by watching the videos at http://www.fulldeflection.com
, that the radial engines of the Sukhoi etc, allow more vertical
penetration, but all the Red Bull Air Race planes have boxer engines.

I would have thought that the radials would have more engine torque,
thus pulling the planes around the course quicker.

I look forward to some expert input on this.

Superdoof.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John  
View profile
 More options Jul 17, 12:30 pm
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.owning
From: John <jdupre5...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 17 2008 12:30 pm
Subject: Re: radial engine torque
On Jul 16, 11:00 pm, superd...@bigpond.com wrote:

> Hi,

> I have noticed by watching the videos athttp://www.fulldeflection.com
> , that the radial engines of the Sukhoi etc, allow more vertical
> penetration, but all the Red Bull Air Race planes have boxer engines.

> I would have thought that the radials would have more engine torque,
> thus pulling the planes around the course quicker.

> I look forward to some expert input on this.

> Superdoof.

I'm no expert but I know that during WW2 the USAAF decided to use only
radial engines on primary training aircraft, even those built with
inline engines were redeveloped with radials.  The reason was because
the radial allowed for quicker climbs to altitude because the engines
remained cooler in the climb with all cylinders exposed fairly equally
to cooling air; level flight speed was not important on short training
hops.  I would think the radial engined aerobatic aircraft would have
a similar advantage in climb rate but not so much in level flight due
to drag.  Over the length of the Red Bull course the inline opposed
engines would have a speed advantage compared to the radials.

John Dupre'


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
KaiyureGirl  
View profile
 More options Jul 19, 3:06 am
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.owning
From: KaiyureGirl <1>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:06:54 +0100
Local: Sat, Jul 19 2008 3:06 am
Subject: Re: radial engine torque

would you mind PM your MSN to me? thanks.
___________________________________________________________________________ ____
I want to sell my 'car' (http://www.igeneralcar.info/)  beacause of
serious 'diabetes' (http://www.idiabetes.info/), if you want to buy my
'beauty' (http://www.ilovebeautys.info/)  'Corolla car'
(http://www.icarforum.info/) , pls contact me by kaiyure2...@gmail.com.

--
KaiyureGirl


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
dan_thomas_nos...@yahoo.com  
View profile
 More options Jul 21, 7:43 pm
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.owning
From: Dan_Thomas_nos...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jul 21 2008 7:43 pm
Subject: Re: radial engine torque
On Jul 16, 9:00 pm, superd...@bigpond.com wrote:

> Hi,

> I have noticed by watching the videos athttp://www.fulldeflection.com
> , that the radial engines of the Sukhoi etc, allow more vertical
> penetration, but all the Red Bull Air Race planes have boxer engines.

> I would have thought that the radials would have more engine torque,
> thus pulling the planes around the course quicker.

> I look forward to some expert input on this.

> Superdoof.

          Horsepower is a function of torque and RPM. Radials often
generate their HP at lower RPM so would need higher torque at the
lower RPM to get the same overall HP out of them. The radials you see
doing aerobatics are often the Russian ones, and they're geared so
that the engine runs at a higher RPM to produce more HP from a smaller
engine, while the prop turns fairly slowly and loses less energy to
drag and also allows a larger prop diameter and therefore better
vertical performance. The radial's drawback is its higher frontal drag
that limits forward speed, as someone already mentioned.

        Dan


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google