The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military
From: "Kyle Boatright" <kboatrig...@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:32:04 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 6 2007 6:32 pm
Subject: Re: F-15 Grounded; A glimpse of the future for the F-22 as well?
news:1194373827.242521.35590@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> Your right about the time from concept to production on the Raptor. I To refute this point, I will argue that the military is forever changing its > believe than many of the promises made about what the manufacturers > could do was done by promise everything we'll deliver what we can when > we can. Over promise under deliver. Secure the contract and hope for > additional money to offset our shortcomings. requirements. Even seemingly minor changes require a tremendous amount of engineering, tooling, and testing work by the manufacturer. Why? Because there is no "extra" space in a modern fighter or attack airframe and when the military changes spec's, usually it causes a domino effect, requiring numerous systems to be reworked to accommodate a fundamental change to one system. Beyond that, funding and schedule are always issues. Congress loves to take <<much snippage>> You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||