Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
rec.aviation.military
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Public Support for Gun Control
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Uncle Steve  
View profile  
 More options Sep 13 2012, 9:09 am
Newsgroups: us.military.army, sci.military.naval, alt.war.vietnam, soc.veterans, rec.aviation.military
From: Uncle Steve <stevet...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:04:58 -0400
Local: Thurs, Sep 13 2012 9:04 am
Subject: Re: Public Support for Gun Control
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:10:53AM +0100, Bay Man wrote:

> "Orval Fairbairn" <orfairba...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:orfairbairn-52E3C5.12223212092012@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net...
> >In article <k2pp79$fo...@dont-email.me>,
> >"Bay Man" <xyxbayman...@xyxmailinator.xyxcomnospam> wrote:

> >>Orval Fairbairn wrote:
> >>> In article <k1rj5a$hc...@dont-email.me>,
> >>> "Bay Man" <xyxbayman...@xyxmailinator.xyxcomnospam> wrote:

> >>>> "Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D." <d...@coldine.edu> wrote in message
> >>>> news:99mdnT4D5opebqPNnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@supernews.com...
> >>>>> Bay Man wrote:

> >>>>>> The sooner the USA bans all guns the better they will be.

> >>>>> Nonsense.  A gun for home defense is sagacious.
> >>>>> ;-)

> >>>> Total nonsense. The USA has to stop the sale of guns and ways they
> >>>> can be obtained.  Look at other countries around the world.

> >>> Why? Statistics show that the more liberal (in the traditional sense)
> >>> the lower the crime rate, since criminals don't know who is an who is
> >>> not armed. Being lazy cowards, they avoid armed confrontation.

> >>Total tripe!  Look at the UK.

> >Yes -- look at the UK, where gangs of thugs run rampant, beating up
> >people and burglarizing homes and shops repeatedly, with impunity.

> You amde that up. I noticed you are gun obessed a Yank - so that figures.
> Get your mind seen to.

You'd never suggest that firearms training could, at least
theoretically, be a part of basic public-school education, and that
their proper use could be normalized in the same way that driving a
car is a normalized skill in society.  But for some reason, people
like you think that only police and military personnel should have
firearms.  And yet, the police and military are corrupt organizations
in any country you might care to name, and cannot be trusted to do
their nominal jobs in a responsible and ethical fashion.  The only
conclusion to draw is that government as we have it today requires
that its citizens be reduced to a state of defenseless dependence on
government goodwill.

And we see how well that has worked out.

Regards,

Uncle Steve

--
"Assholes always advertise"
     -- Pat Cadigan


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google