On 12/03/2012 18:28, William Black wrote:
> On 12/03/12 16:48,
dump...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> "Hamas is trying to arrange a cease fire, but is unwilling
>> to use force to stop the small terror groups from setting
>> up and firing rockets.
>
> In that case they're not in control and there's no point in doing a deal
> with them.
>
> You don't negotiate with people who haven't yet proved that they can
> deliver what is wanted.
I've heard tell that the Provisional IRA in the mid-to-late 1990s was
killing off certain of its own "Most Wanted" members faster than the
Loyalist scumbags could, let alone any pace at which the security forces
could arrest or kill them.
Why? Well, if you're negotiating a ceasefire, then you need everyone on
your side to *stop shooting*, otherwise your credibility is gone for a
generation and you hand the likes of Ian Paisley a PR triumph... which
means your "no surrender!" hotheads need to be persuaded, disposed of,
or driven out to form Continuity IRA / Real IRA / I Can't Believe It's
Not The IRA.
Adams and McGuinness, bastards though they are, managed it for PIRA.
Nelson Mandela, no saint despite his media canonisation, achieved it for
the ANC. Yasser Arafat failed dismally to do it for the Palestinians,
and they're still suffering from having nobody in charge who can
credibly turn the rockets and suicide bombers off.
--
He thinks too much, such men are dangerous.