On Thu, 30 May 2013 08:32:50 +0100, "Keith W"
<
keithnosp...@demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Bill wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 May 2013 03:18:12 +0100, Andrew Swallow
>> <
am.sw...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/05/2013 20:58, Bill wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2013 20:51:18 +0100, Andrew Swallow
>>>> <
am.sw...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 29/05/2013 20:46, Bill wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2013 09:16:01 -0700 (PDT),
dump...@hotmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> US drone reportedly kills No. 2 Taliban in Pakistan:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
http://news.msn.com/world/us-drone-reportedly-kills-no-2-taliban-in-pakistan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many 'second in command' is this now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When we kill one the next one get promoted. Video games with real
>>>>> weapons.
>>>>
>>>> What if they're using the old Soviet trick of placing a figurehead
>>>> in charge and as 2IC and the real boss is at about number 6 in the
>>>> pecking order?
>>>>
>>>
>>> SIGINT analysis should be able to identify the HQ building. Destroy
>>> the entire building and everyone in it.
>>
>> Oh great.
>>
>> Isn't that what they did when they rammed the Twin Towers?
>
>Well no, the Twin Towers were not a military HQ building.