- BRUSSELS, Belgium — America’s top generals and
- intelligence officers openly admit that they’ve got no way
- of keeping up with the onslaught of attacks on U.S. networks. But a
- visit to NATO Headquarters makes the American brass look totally l33t.
[snip]
- Part of the problem: NATO’s an organization consisting of
- diplomats and military officers with deep experience in traditional
- geopolitics and defense — who don’t really know
- how the internet works, just that they should be amorphously wary of
- its vulnerabilities.
-
- Add another obstacle: NATO’s primary mission for its 63
- year history is to deter attacks on its members —
- especially a nuclear attack. The language of traditional military
- deterrence is everywhere here. But how can you really speak of
- deterring people whom you fear are already, persistently pwning you?
- And how can you say for sure who’s sitting at the keyboard
- of the computer that’s directing those online attacks?
[snip]
- Right now, NATO’s in education mode — and
- building new social networks to get its head around the problem. Most
- countries’ civilian CIOs haven’t ever interacted
- with the alliance. Nor have the executives and bureaucrats
- who’ve built the online and data infrastructures for
- NATO’s member countries. So NATO’s hosting more
- meetings with unfamiliar faces over calorie-rich Belgian lunches.
I hope they actually talk to experts and get serious answers.
- It’s also thinking through what kind of cyber-mitigation it
- can lend to an ally that gets hit with a DDOS or other cyberattack.
- Additional server space? Analytic sleuthing to track down the
- malefactors? Still TBD. And that’s before an actual
- response to the attack would kick in.
-
- Much of this unfamiliarity is totally understandable. Cybersecurity is
- a new challenge to militaries across the world. The U.S. military
- command established to protect defense networks is barely a year old,
- and it’s still getting its head around the difficulties
- inherent to its mission. And at least no one here talks about unlikely
- scenarios like a Cyber Pearl Harbor.
That would be silly. By whom? Aliens?
- But one thing appears to be off the table. “I
- don’t see NATO developing offensive cyber doctrine for the
- time being,” Shea says. They’re too busy trying
- to figure out how to play defense.
Perhaps someone could direct them to the existing literature on
computer systems security so they can do their homework first.
Regards,
Uncle Steve
--
I don't even want the Charter back, as it was clearly 'used' by a big
blue dude when he ran out of toilet paper. And the Criminal Code of
Canada is of course now officially listed in Jane's Miscellaneous
Munitions under the Anti-Personnel section.