So, how does the Super-Hornet/AIM-120D combo compare to the now-
defunct Tomcat/Phoenix combo?
Keith W
unread,
Jan 25, 2013, 4:01:59 AM1/25/13
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Its in service and is affordable. The F-14 was a one trick pony with
a high maintenance requirement and the Phoenix was of dubious
utility against anything more agile than a Backfire.
The main advantage of the Phoenix was not its range as
the rules of engagement rarely permitted usage at anything
like that. Being semi-active it did not required the launcher
to illuminate the target as did AIM-7 Sparrow.
AIM-120 is also semi-active and the D version has a range
thats close to the practical range of the Phoenix.
Keith
Keith
dump...@hotmail.com
unread,
Jan 25, 2013, 2:08:03 PM1/25/13
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
> So, how does the Super-Hornet/AIM-120D combo compare to the now-
> defunct Tomcat/Phoenix combo?
well, if you have solid evidence on the Tomcat/Phoenix being fully
defunct, I guess is your patriotic duty to present said evidences to the
Pentagon...