Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

London can Take it

21 views
Skip to first unread message

Daryl

unread,
May 17, 2012, 1:23:23 PM5/17/12
to
Found this little jewel. It was originally produced to try and
get the US into the War. Showing down trodden and defeated
people is not what the British Government wanted America to see.
Take this one at face value but remember, it was a whole hell
of a lot more terrible than this depicts.
http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/british-government/london-can-take-it-video_21e37213e.html

Eunometic

unread,
May 17, 2012, 9:36:05 PM5/17/12
to
> of a lot more terrible than this depicts.http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/british-government/london-can-take-it-...

London is now an Asian-Afro-Carabeic city, Heathrow looks like Karachi
and Asian-Muslim sex predators have groomed into drug addiction and
prostitution over 100 'vulnerable' underage White girls. Vulnerable
means orphans, broken family those with a drug addicted parent and in
care of leftoid social workers who won't warn them of double standards
against Whites. The judge noted that "you exploited them because they
were not part of your community" Recent Londistan riotes were
predominantly Black.

I guess those 1940s Londoners can't really take it because they are
heading towards non existence.

Daryl

unread,
May 17, 2012, 10:02:43 PM5/17/12
to
You forget, once again, that the 40s Londoners are from the
greatest generation that has ever lived and probably ever will
live. The Americans, Free French and many others also fall into
that generation. Hell, even many Germans fall into that as well
when you look at what they accomplished for so long on so little.
You can also mention the Japanese for the same reasons that one
would Germans.

You are attempting to belittle this great generation. I am proud
that my Father served for 3 years in NA, Italy and South France.
What do you have to be proud of in this area?


--
http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and
programs.

Bob Martin

unread,
May 18, 2012, 1:34:21 AM5/18/12
to
in 912165 20120518 023605 Eunometic <euno...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>On May 18, 3:23=A0am, Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:
>> Found this little jewel. =A0It was originally produced to try and
>> get the US into the War. =A0Showing down trodden and defeated
>> people is not what the British Government wanted America to see.
>> =A0 Take this one at face value but remember, it was a whole hell
>> of a lot more terrible than this depicts.http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/b=
>ritish-government/london-can-take-it-...
>
>London is now an Asian-Afro-Carabeic city, Heathrow looks like Karachi
>and Asian-Muslim sex predators have groomed into drug addiction and
>prostitution over 100 'vulnerable' underage White girls. Vulnerable
>means orphans, broken family those with a drug addicted parent and in
>care of leftoid social workers who won't warn them of double standards
>against Whites. The judge noted that "you exploited them because they
>were not part of your community" Recent Londistan riotes were
>predominantly Black.
>
>I guess those 1940s Londoners can't really take it because they are
>heading towards non existence.

When were you last in London?

Daryl

unread,
May 18, 2012, 2:38:20 AM5/18/12
to
He hasn't been. He's an Aussie. He hasn't been to Germany
either yet he's a world class Xpert in it.

Eunometic

unread,
May 18, 2012, 2:42:47 AM5/18/12
to
On May 18, 12:02 pm, Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:
> On 5/17/2012 7:36 PM, Eunometic wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 18, 3:23 am, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com>  wrote:
> >> Found this little jewel.  It was originally produced to try and
> >> get the US into the War.  Showing down trodden and defeated
> >> people is not what the British Government wanted America to see.
> >>    Take this one at face value but remember, it was a whole hell
> >> of a lot more terrible than this depicts.http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/british-government/london-can-take-it-...
>
> > London is now an Asian-Afro-Carabeic city, Heathrow looks like Karachi
> > and Asian-Muslim sex predators have groomed into drug addiction and
> > prostitution over 100 'vulnerable' underage White girls.  Vulnerable
> > means orphans, broken family those with a drug addicted parent and in
> > care of leftoid social workers who won't warn them of double standards
> > against Whites.  The judge noted that "you exploited them because they
> > were not part of your community" Recent Londistan riotes were
> > predominantly Black.
>
> > I guess those 1940s Londoners can't really take it because they are
> > heading towards non existence.
>
> You forget, once again, that the 40s Londoners are from the
> greatest generation that has ever lived and probably ever will
> live.

When you consider the White genocide that is happening now that might
be correct.

Perhaps we aren't ready yet to accept that they ultimatly fought in
vain.

Eunometic

unread,
May 18, 2012, 2:46:34 AM5/18/12
to
On May 18, 4:34 pm, Bob Martin <bob.mar...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> >I guess those 1940s Londoners can't really take it because they are
> >heading towards non existence.
>
> When were you last in London?- Hide quoted text -
>

Clearly more recently than you.

Daryl

unread,
May 18, 2012, 2:55:00 AM5/18/12
to
If we use the word, Genocide, as it's really meant, it means that
Blacks, Browns, Asians, Native Americans and all other sorts are
taking Whites out back and hanging them, shooting them, knifing
them with the intent of wiping them out since they are white.
Get a grip, no one has tried to do any of the above to me in at
least 40 years.

>
> Perhaps we aren't ready yet to accept that they ultimatly fought in
> vain.

You aren't but your "Adopted Side that you never met" did try the
Genocide routine and was defeated. Yes, in Europe, there were
Blacks, Asians, Native Americans all fighting to end that. And
there were Brown, Middle Eastern, etc. all fighting to end your
heroes. Your Adopted side that you have never met or even
visited where they lived was defeated. Will you get over it all
ready?

Daryl

unread,
May 18, 2012, 2:56:24 AM5/18/12
to
I plan on going next year. I'll let you know if you are right.
But I doubt it since Britain would be a burning whole in the
ground if you are right.

Keith W

unread,
May 18, 2012, 3:58:28 AM5/18/12
to
You are out of your tiny racist mind.

London has ALWAYS been a multi-cultural city in modern times,
Chinatown is hardly a new phenomenom and the east end of
1940 was as mixed as it is now. But what really burns your
boat is that many of those Londoners of 1940 were jewish and
they were among the Commonwealth forces who liberated
Germany in 1945 along with contingents from those same asian
countries you look down on.

The lesson of WW2 is that racist white supremacists are far
more dangerous than any supposed yellow or brown peril.
It was white men who attempted the great genocides of
the 20th century and killed millions of europeans, people like
you in fact.

Keith


Keith W

unread,
May 18, 2012, 3:59:08 AM5/18/12
to
Sorry the headquarters of the BNP doesnt count.

Keith


Dean

unread,
May 18, 2012, 8:08:17 AM5/18/12
to
Ahhh, there's racist Euno again.

Bob Martin

unread,
May 19, 2012, 1:05:03 AM5/19/12
to
in 912176 20120518 074634 Eunometic <euno...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Answer the question!
I live an hour away by train and go there frequently.

Daryl

unread,
May 19, 2012, 2:46:32 AM5/19/12
to
Bob, how far from Moldyhole are you? Is the Bird in Hand still
there? I really enjoyed the Saturday Open Market there.

Andrew Chaplin

unread,
May 19, 2012, 9:09:14 AM5/19/12
to
On May 17, 9:36 pm, Eunometic <eunome...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
My, what a stupid, cheap shot, but not a unexpected: as my English
gran
(whose mother was born near the Arsenal in Woolwich) would have said,
"What can you expect from a pig but a grunt?"

My cousins will be surprised to learn of their impending extinction.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO

Eunometic

unread,
May 20, 2012, 8:28:10 AM5/20/12
to
On May 19, 4:05 pm, Bob Martin <bob.mar...@excite.com> wrote:
You are either delusional or a liar. I would say the latter.

Greater London Poulation 7,000,000

Indians 500,000 (UK total 1.6 million) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Indian
Pakistani 170,000 (UK total 1 million)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistani_community_of_London
Bangladeshi 200,000 (UK total 300,000)
Jamaican 250,000
Black British 1,100,000 (UK total 1.6 million) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_British


So without even going on to other groups such as the Chinese, Turks,
Malays we already have
already 2 million out of 7 million being Asian or Black.

Each census in the UK shows a 2.1% drop in Whites and this will only
accelerate as the Whites of
London are an aging population with most White women above child
bearing age.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_London
London, England, United Kingdom, population 7,556,900 in 2007 claims
to be one of the most ethnically
diverse cities on earth, with over 300 languages spoken in it and more
than 50 non-indigenous
communities which have a population of more than 10,000.[1] According
to 2007 estimates,
31.0 per cent of London's population is from an ethnic minority
(defined as non-white)


Not to many white Londoners have any balls left. All they can do is
try and flee to better suburbs.

London has multiple bombings by Pakistani Muslims.

Underage Working class White girls often in care are racially targeted
for grooming and prostitution.
A classic way of degrading an ethnic group is to sexually abuse its
women. Too much money spent on
'diversity' many of whom would be regarded as retarded or as hideously
inbred if White.

The last visit to London was 2002, I stayed with Friends at the
Dickensian town of Rochester for a week and then went to Wrexham and
Chester sadly not visit to a hoped for Mosquito museum. I've been to
London since, but only at Heathrow in transit. I was there several
times in the 1990s.

The Asians make London boring and ruin its historic value for a
tourist.







Eunometic

unread,
May 20, 2012, 8:34:25 AM5/20/12
to
Jewish people don't like the BNP although they have never said
anything against Jews and have even several Jewish members. I guess
its simply that most members of the Jewish tribe (who still think and
act tribal whether left or right) want massive non White immigration
so as to minoritize the Whites and Christians they have a traditional
barely subverted hate/fear of.

Is it that why you hate the BNP Keith, tribal reasons? Will I get an
answer?

Eunometic

unread,
May 20, 2012, 8:40:09 AM5/20/12
to
On May 19, 11:09 pm, Andrew Chaplin <ab.chap...@rogers.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 9:36 pm, Eunometic <eunome...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 18, 3:23 am, Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:
>
> > > Found this little jewel.  It was originally produced to try and
> > > get the US into the War.  Showing down trodden and defeated
> > > people is not what the British Government wanted America to see.
> > >   Take this one at face value but remember, it was a whole hell
> > > of a lot more terrible than this depicts.http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/british-government/london-can-take-it-...
>
> > London is now an Asian-Afro-Carabeic city, Heathrow looks like Karachi
> > and Asian-Muslim sex predators have groomed into drug addiction and
> > prostitution over 100 'vulnerable' underage White girls.  Vulnerable
> > means orphans, broken family those with a drug addicted parent and in
> > care of leftoid social workers who won't warn them of double standards
> > against Whites.  The judge noted that "you exploited them because they
> > were not part of your community" Recent Londistan riotes were
> > predominantly Black.
>
> > I guess those 1940s Londoners can't really take it because they are
> > heading towards non existence.
>
> My, what a stupid, cheap shot, but not a unexpected: as my English
> gran

I don't know what your other racial antecedents are but London is now
32% Asian or Black by census. If women of child bearing age are
considered London is effectively 50% Asian/Africa already and far gone
considering higher non White fertillity and immigraion.

A White in London, especially a young one, will be a rare sight in 20
years time.

Thanks to nasty shits like you.

Incidentally less than 50% of children born in the USA are now White a
far cry from 1965 when it was 90% and the flood gates to 3rd world
doom were opened.

Hope a flash mob mugs you. You'd deserve it.





Eunometic

unread,
May 20, 2012, 8:55:33 AM5/20/12
to
Anti-racist is anti-White.

Keith W

unread,
May 20, 2012, 9:28:59 AM5/20/12
to
I just hate racists and while I am not jewish they have more reason
to be wary of racism than any one.

My father was one of the British troops who liberated Bergen Belsen.
He had nightmares about that place all his life. That is where your
flavour of racism takes us, true genocide.

Keith



Alistair Gunn

unread,
May 20, 2012, 1:46:07 PM5/20/12
to
Eunometic twisted the electrons to say:
> Jewish people don't like the BNP although they have never said
> anything against Jews

So "We do have a quarrel with certain Jews" isn't saying anything against
Jews???
--
These opinions might not even be mine ...
Let alone connected with my employer ...

Halmyre

unread,
May 20, 2012, 2:41:33 PM5/20/12
to
Point 1. Why bring the Jews into this?

Point 2. You're full of shit.

--
Halmyre

Keith W

unread,
May 20, 2012, 4:23:56 PM5/20/12
to
He's a Nazi - its all a jewish conspiracy

> Point 2. You're full of shit.

Fuller than a Christmas Turkey

Keith


Eunometic

unread,
May 20, 2012, 8:34:02 PM5/20/12
to
On May 20, 11:28 pm, "Keith W" <keithnospoofsple...@demon.co.uk>
When Britain decided to invade Sth Africa , it decided that to combat
the Boers it would arrest Women, Children, Grandparents of farms in
which they suspected a man or son may have been a freedom fighter..

The result was hundreds of deaths from Typhoid fever of a similar kind
as seen at Bergen Belsen. There are plenty of these disgracefull
photographs about.

They look as bad as Bergen Belsen and I have spoken to elderly Sth
African people whose parents and grandparents survived.

Immagine if the Naz's had done that?

Kaiser Wilhelm II was outraged at the British atrocities and wanted to
help the Boers with aid in the form of non military supplies but when
he looked at the transport situation they realised that 4 German
cruisers were no match for 120 British battleships and cruisers. This
was the start of the buildup of the German navy that knee jerked
Britain into war in WW1 (that and the fact that the waring powers of
France and Russia had Navies each 3 times bigger navies than peacefull
Germany)

The greatest idiot Britian every produced, Churchill, embellished his
'adventures' in Sth Africa pretending he'd been arrested by Botha
himself.

In fact Churchill had incompetantly ensured his armoured train was
abushed. The British awa that the Boers had seen the train but
foolishly continued. The Boers fired at the train, the train reversed
onto rocks the Boers had placed. 54 British died and 4 boers and
Churchills talent for clever embellishment began.

Eunometic

unread,
May 20, 2012, 8:39:55 PM5/20/12
to
The general Jewish community bring themselves into any debate around
immigration because their organisations invarariably support massive
non-Whtie immigration into White countries. If you oppose them they
bring up the holohype and start smearing around the word Nazi, racist
and funding all sorts of thinktanks and violent left wing groups.
Eventually after this kind of abuse and maleveolence many people
unsurpisingly come to the conclusion that the Nazis got certain things
right in regards to Jews being an agent of decomposition.

Daryl

unread,
May 20, 2012, 8:53:38 PM5/20/12
to
They did and worse.


>
> Kaiser Wilhelm II was outraged at the British atrocities and wanted to
> help the Boers with aid in the form of non military supplies but when
> he looked at the transport situation they realised that 4 German
> cruisers were no match for 120 British battleships and cruisers. This
> was the start of the buildup of the German navy that knee jerked
> Britain into war in WW1 (that and the fact that the waring powers of
> France and Russia had Navies each 3 times bigger navies than peacefull
> Germany)

He wasn't outraged one bit. He was outraged that he didn't
control the Triangle of land that kept changing hands forever and
ever with all the neat resources in it. Currently, France
controlled it and those bloody English were siding with France.


>
> The greatest idiot Britian every produced, Churchill, embellished his
> 'adventures' in Sth Africa pretending he'd been arrested by Botha
> himself.
>
> In fact Churchill had incompetantly ensured his armoured train was
> abushed. The British awa that the Boers had seen the train but
> foolishly continued. The Boers fired at the train, the train reversed
> onto rocks the Boers had placed. 54 British died and 4 boers and
> Churchills talent for clever embellishment began.

Crap happened. I believe that all countries growing up had
atrocities of one kind or another. Not a single one was spared.
Just that some were better at the atrocities and others were a
bit weak. In what is supposed to be the "Civilized" World, only
two stand out, Germany (Not WWI, but WWII), Japan (WWII).

Brian Colwell

unread,
May 21, 2012, 12:16:36 AM5/21/12
to

"Eunometic" <euno...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:422107bc-2882-48bf...@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...
You really should change your medication, you are beginning to hallucinate !

bmc


Keith W

unread,
May 21, 2012, 4:30:06 AM5/21/12
to
Indeed but at Bergen Belsen the deaths were not simply the
result of disease they were part of a deliberate policy. It
should be noted that over 14,000 British soldiers also
died of disease during the Boer war. There was appalling
negligence to be sure which affected Boer and British soldier alike

The result was an outcry in Britain and the dispatch of relief
supplies and the transfer of responsibility of running those
camps from the military to the civil authority. This reduced the
death rate to 2% which was typical for any large city of the era.

The Germans however deliberately herded people from camps
that were in danger of being overrun by the allies into Bergen Belsen
until it was grossly overcrowded. An overcrowded camp that had been designed
for
10,000 now had over 60,000 inmates added to its muster


Then just to make life even more dreadful as the British Army approached
they blew up the water supply to the camp while they lived comfortably
in the nearby army training camp. 35 thousand people died in the first few
months
of 1945. When the British Army arrived they found 13,000 unburied
corpses rotting in the camp and over 50,000 living people deprived
of food and water despite the stocks of food in the warehouses.

The death rate at that point was in the 9,000 a month and almost
15,000 more people died before the outbreak was under control
as those concerned were already emaciated

This was not unfortunately not a new problem at Bergen Belsen as by
the end of 1942 approx 41,000 Soviet POW's had died there.

Your apologia for the actions of the 3rd Reich is duly noted.

The German Naval buildup had NOTHING to do with the Boers beginning as
it did in 1898 with the First Fleet Act. As the Kaiser himself
wrote in his autobiography.

"I had a peculiar passion for the navy. It sprang to no small
extent from my English blood. When I was a little boy...

I admired the proud British ships. There awoke in me the
will to build ships of my own like these some day, and when
I was grown up to possess a fine navy as the English."

Keith


Dean

unread,
May 21, 2012, 9:16:35 AM5/21/12
to
> --http://tvmoviesforfree.com
> for free movies and Nostalgic TV.  Tons of Military shows and
> programs.

You might want to add the USSR and PRC to that list considering all of
the people those regimes extinguished.

Dean

unread,
May 21, 2012, 9:18:22 AM5/21/12
to
On May 21, 4:30 am, "Keith W" <keithnospoofsple...@demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Brian Colwell wrote:
> > "Eunometic" <eunome...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
The Kaiser had a peculiar form of penis envy, then?

Keith W

unread,
May 21, 2012, 10:13:52 AM5/21/12
to
I think it was more infantile than that. He just wanted a set of
toy boats to play with. But for that WW1 would just have been
the second Franco Prussian war

Keith


Ramsman

unread,
May 21, 2012, 10:43:25 AM5/21/12
to
He probably had a complex about his withered left arm rather than any
penis envy (he fathered seven children), and he blamed English doctors
for his arm and for the death of his father. There was also mental
illness on both sides of his family.

A complicated man, but all in all Kaiser Bill was not a happy bunny. His
Wikipedia entry is interesting.

--
Peter

Eunometic

unread,
May 22, 2012, 9:46:11 AM5/22/12
to
On May 21, 2:16 pm, "Brian Colwell" <bmcolw...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> "Eunometic" <eunome...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
You should spend more time tossing off rather than making a fool of
yourself on the internet. You're not that bright at hurling insults.

smharding

unread,
May 26, 2012, 9:21:36 AM5/26/12
to
Keith W wrote:

> The lesson of WW2 is that racist white supremacists are far
> more dangerous than any supposed yellow or brown peril.
> It was white men who attempted the great genocides of
> the 20th century and killed millions of europeans, people like
> you in fact.

Well, Pol Pot and Mao Zedong and Idi Amin and Japanese militarists
and Hutus and Turks didn't do too badly in the genocide efforts of
the 20th century either.

Of course they largely restricted their depredations to their own
populations, while the likes of Hitler and Stalin practiced their
skills on peoples beyond their own nations.


SMH
0 new messages