You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Where are VASIs located on a field that doesn't have an ILS ? Is it a certain number of feet from end of runway ? Does it depend on runway length ? If you want to land on a short runway when is it safe to dip below VASI ? Must there be a certain number of hundreds of feet from the threshold clear of obstructions ? Clearly you don't want to cross the threshold at 50 feet if you are flying , e.g. a Mooney onto a 2300 foot field, you'll waste the first 1000 feet...
Sam Spade
unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 4:33:55 PM1/12/13
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
On 12/25/2012 3:26 PM, epsa...@gmail.com wrote:
> Where are VASIs located on a field that doesn't have an ILS ? Is it a certain number of feet from end of runway ? Does it depend on runway length ? If you want to land on a short runway when is it safe to dip below VASI ? Must there be a certain number of hundreds of feet from the threshold clear of obstructions ? Clearly you don't want to cross the threshold at 50 feet if you are flying , e.g. a Mooney onto a 2300 foot field, you'll waste the first 1000 feet...
>
Do the math using the TCH and the angle.
brian whatcott
unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 9:02:02 PM1/12/13
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Here we go then: X / TCH = arc cot (glide slope angle)
X = TCH*arc cot(glide slope angle) = 50 * arc cot(3deg)
X = 50 * Arc cot (3 deg) = 922ft
He said 1000 ft. You were making which point again?