Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Straightening an Aluminum wheel

2 views
Skip to first unread message

phaeton

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 11:46:50 AM12/8/09
to
On the way to school this morning, I got into an understeer situation
in the snow. Fortunately I was only doing about 20mph, but
nonetheless it resulted in a pretty righteous curb shot. I'm pretty
sure my alignment is hosed, but I know that's (probably) going to be
an easy/inexpensive fix. Of course the wheel took a hit too. They
are aluminum American Racing AR23s. The lip has a nice bend to it,
but I can't tell if the inner landing (where the bead of the tire
goes) is bent or not. It's still holding air, so far.

Can tire shops straighten bent wheels? What does it cost, typically?
I could buy another wheel out of the summit catalog for just over
$100, but if I can salvage what's on it for less, maybe that's a
better choice.

Thanks for any suggestions. This ruined my day.

-J

Steve W.

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 12:41:05 PM12/8/09
to


Buy a new one. 150-200 to repair the current one.
http://www.jegs.com/p/American-Racing/American-Racing-AR-23-Wheels/832547/10002/-1

--
Steve W.

N8N

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 1:09:28 PM12/8/09
to

I have had aluminum wheels repaired, but your average tire shop won't
do it, and it'll still cost you about $100-ish a wheel (at least
around here.) Only one place in my area that will even attempt it
(likely for good reason - you better know what you're doing so the
aluminum doesn't fracture at high speed, the liability on such a
repair has to be fairly substantial.) I once had some BBSes given to
me for free because two were bent, so in my case it made financial
sense to have those two repaired. In your case I would say that it is
not - you might as well order a new one if the pattern/size you have
is still available.

nate

fred

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 1:31:08 PM12/8/09
to
phaeton <blahb...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:6b6a9ca9-9b04-4b6c...@r31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com:

Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using snow
tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius (40ish F).

Kevin

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 3:14:12 PM12/10/09
to
fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDB891...@127.0.0.1:

> phaeton <blahb...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:6b6a9ca9-9b04-4b6c-803c-34d06376d7e7
@r31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com:

and 90 percent of all staticits are made up on the spot. besides
where do you find non radial snow tires these days??? KB

--
THUNDERSNAKE #9

Protect your rights or "Lose" them
The 2nd Admendment guarantees the others

fred

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 4:41:18 PM12/10/09
to
Kevin <kevyN...@netins.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CDD90D81B420k...@167.142.225.136:

Where there's snow and the temperature goes below zero perhaps? That
number comes directly from the companies that do the towing. Accident
was perhaps the wrong word - called for a tow truck would be completely
accurate.


Kevin

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 4:46:42 PM12/10/09
to
fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDDA6...@127.0.0.1:

>> fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDB89126B583fred@

now that sounds more likely KB

fred

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 6:25:57 PM12/10/09
to
Kevin <kevyN...@netins.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CDDA086ED25Ek...@167.142.225.136:

> fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDDA6...@127.0.0.1:
>

>>>>> Thanks for any suggestions. This ruined my day.
>>>>>
>>>> Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using
>>>> snow tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius
>>>> (40ish F).
>>>>
>>>
>>> and 90 percent of all staticits are made up on the spot. besides
>>> where do you find non radial snow tires these days??? KB
>>>
>> Where there's snow and the temperature goes below zero perhaps? That
>> number comes directly from the companies that do the towing. Accident
>> was perhaps the wrong word - called for a tow truck would be
> completely
>> accurate.
>>

> now that sounds more likely KB
>

And a virtually trivial difference. Now where's your proof that you
can't get snowtires where *you* are?


Steve Austin

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 7:46:50 AM12/11/09
to


How old are these statistics? Did these people call for a tow truck on
their CB radio?

N8N

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 8:38:38 AM12/11/09
to
On Dec 10, 6:25 pm, fred <f...@bedrock.rock> wrote:
> Kevin <kevyNOS...@netins.net> wrote innews:Xns9CDDA086ED25Ek...@167.142.225.136:
>
>
>
>
>
> > fred <f...@bedrock.rock> wrote innews:Xns9CDDA6...@127.0.0.1:

>
> >>>>> Thanks for any suggestions.  This ruined my day.
>
> >>>> Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using
> >>>> snow tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius
> >>>> (40ish F).
>
> >>>   and 90 percent of all staticits are made up on the spot.  besides
> >>> where do you find non radial snow tires these days???   KB
>
> >> Where there's snow and the temperature goes below zero perhaps? That
> >> number comes directly from the companies that do the towing. Accident
> >> was perhaps the wrong word - called for a tow truck would be
> > completely
> >> accurate.
>
> >   now that sounds more likely    KB
>
> And a virtually trivial difference. Now where's your proof that you
> can't get snowtires where *you* are?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Got mine from the Tire Rack... of course they are radials...

Also got a set of all terrain tires for my pickemup truck from the
same source... also radials...

nate

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 9:14:13 AM12/11/09
to
Check the auto junkyards, cash for clunkers wheels.
cuhulin

fred

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 11:48:21 AM12/11/09
to
Steve Austin <sau...@northnet.org> wrote in
news:4b223f17$0$26141$38ce...@news.westelcom.com:


>>>> Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using
>>>> snow tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius
>>>> (40ish F).
>>>>
>>> and 90 percent of all staticits are made up on the spot. besides
>>> where do you find non radial snow tires these days??? KB
>>>
>> Where there's snow and the temperature goes below zero perhaps? That
>> number comes directly from the companies that do the towing. Accident
>> was perhaps the wrong word - called for a tow truck would be
>> completely accurate.
>>
>>
>
>
> How old are these statistics? Did these people call for a tow truck
> on their CB radio?
>

No, heard it this week on the CBC news as a matter of fact.


fred

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 11:48:26 AM12/11/09
to
N8N <njn...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:acbe3627-d5cb-4974...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:

> On Dec 10, 6:25�pm, fred <f...@bedrock.rock> wrote:
>> Kevin <kevyNOS...@netins.net> wrote

>> innews:Xns9CDDA086ED25EkevyNOSPAMneti
> ns...@167.142.225.136:


>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > fred <f...@bedrock.rock> wrote
>> > innews:Xns9CDDA6...@127.0.0.1:
>>
>> >>>>> Thanks for any suggestions. �This ruined my day.
>>
>> >>>> Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not
>> >>>> using snow tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero
>> >>>> celcius (40ish F).
>>

>> >>> � and 90 percent of all staticits are made up on the spot. �besid


> es
>> >>> where do you find non radial snow tires these days??? � KB
>>
>> >> Where there's snow and the temperature goes below zero perhaps?
>> >> That number comes directly from the companies that do the towing.
>> >> Accident was perhaps the wrong word - called for a tow truck would
>> >> be
>> > completely
>> >> accurate.
>>
>> > � now that sounds more likely � �KB
>>
>> And a virtually trivial difference. Now where's your proof that you
>> can't get snowtires where *you* are?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Got mine from the Tire Rack... of course they are radials...
>

Then they're all season radials, *not* snowtires. They're only good for
rain in cool weather at best.


Tegger

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 12:48:08 PM12/11/09
to
fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDE73A...@127.0.0.1:

>>

>> Got mine from the Tire Rack... of course they are radials...
>>
> Then they're all season radials, *not* snowtires. They're only good for
> rain in cool weather at best.
>
>


Tire Rack sells winter tires. All are radials.

<http://www.tirerack.com/winter/index.jsp?camefrom=&fromIndex=true&index=xx>


--
Tegger

N8N

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 2:52:59 PM12/11/09
to
On Dec 11, 11:48 am, fred <f...@bedrock.rock> wrote:

> N8N <njna...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:acbe3627-d5cb-4974...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 10, 6:25 pm, fred <f...@bedrock.rock> wrote:
> >> Kevin <kevyNOS...@netins.net> wrote
> >> innews:Xns9CDDA086ED25EkevyNOSPAMneti
> > ns...@167.142.225.136:
>
> >> > fred <f...@bedrock.rock> wrote
> >> > innews:Xns9CDDA6...@127.0.0.1:
>
> >> >>>>> Thanks for any suggestions.  This ruined my day.
>
> >> >>>> Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not
> >> >>>> using snow tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero
> >> >>>> celcius (40ish F).
>
> >> >>>   and 90 percent of all staticits are made up on the spot.  besid
> > es
> >> >>> where do you find non radial snow tires these days???   KB
>
> >> >> Where there's snow and the temperature goes below zero perhaps?
> >> >> That number comes directly from the companies that do the towing.
> >> >> Accident was perhaps the wrong word - called for a tow truck would
> >> >> be
> >> > completely
> >> >> accurate.
>
> >> >   now that sounds more likely    KB
>
> >> And a virtually trivial difference. Now where's your proof that you
> >> can't get snowtires where *you* are?
>
> > Got mine from the Tire Rack...  of course they are radials...
>
> Then they're all season radials, *not* snowtires. They're only good for
> rain in cool weather at best.

Nope. Dunlop Winter Sport 195/65R15. Apparently sadly now
discontinued in that size.

http://www.dunloptires.com/dunlop/display_tire.jsp?prodline=DUN+Winter+Sport+M3&mrktarea=Winter

They work great, BTW, although I do not live in a heavy snow area so I
can't comment on deep loose snow traction. They work fine on slush
and packed snow.

nate

fred

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 3:44:33 PM12/11/09
to
Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
news:Xns9CDE822D...@208.90.168.18:

Ok. Fair enough - as I found after looking at their FAQ. Specifically
the first two questions. There *is* some ambiguity between the terms
winter tires, all season radials and winter radials.

http://www.tirerack.com/winter/tech/techpage.jsp?techid=120

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 3:49:29 PM12/11/09
to
I wouldn't doubt you can buy winter tires in Miami.
cuhulin

Ad absurdum per aspera

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 4:33:25 PM12/11/09
to
> > >>>> 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using snow tires.

I'm not sure how you'd really quantify that, but they do make quite a
difference. (So does having good remaining tread depth.)


> > >>>> Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius
> > >>>> (40ish F).

Umm. There *is* a common recommendation that in snow country, at a
time in the fall when you start seeing temperatures in the low single
figures C, you should change to your winter tires, but the reasoning
is that you don't want to get pantsed by the season's first big
storm. (You don't want to change too early, or keep them on after the
risk has passed in the spring, because those tread compounds wear very
fast on warm dry roads.) I don't think that's meant as a statement
that a decent all-season radial is no longer doing a good job at
ambient temperatures of 7 /40 F.

> > >>> where do you find non radial snow tires these days???  

> Got mine from the Tire Rack...  of course they are radials...

A Tire Rack article in their "winter" series even states that (other
factors being more or less apples-to-apples) the early radials were
quickly noted for their superiority in winter. Anyway, the point is,
if not truly moot, at least close to it in the US and probably other
industrialized nations. Bias and bias belted tires are still made
-- users include heavy trucks/buses, severe off-roading, certain kinds
of racing, and correct-looking restoration of antique cars -- but
radials have made great inroads in most of those areas and only the
last one is really ironclad.

As for the original question, I'd do a web search and ask some of the
places that specialize in repairing bent or broken alloy rims. It can
be done (depending on the nature and severity of the damage) but it
isn't a job for just anyone. You need a place that has skill and can
look for hidden damage and true it up right.

--Joe


Nate Nagel

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 5:48:57 PM12/11/09
to
Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:

> As for the original question, I'd do a web search and ask some of the
> places that specialize in repairing bent or broken alloy rims. It can
> be done (depending on the nature and severity of the damage) but it
> isn't a job for just anyone. You need a place that has skill and can
> look for hidden damage and true it up right.

I can recommend one (Ye Olde Wheel Shop in Elkridge) but as I posted
long ago, if the wheel is still available new for less than $150 or so
it'd probably be best to just buy a whole new wheel. Only reason to
repair an alloy wheel is if it's a discontinued or very expensive wheel.
You won't save any money by repairing an alloy wheel that is still
available for a reasonable price, and you can't repair a wheel *better*
than new.

nate

--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

Tegger

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 6:03:47 PM12/11/09
to
fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDE8F...@127.0.0.1:


>>
> Ok. Fair enough - as I found after looking at their FAQ. Specifically
> the first two questions. There *is* some ambiguity between the terms
> winter tires, all season radials and winter radials.
>
> http://www.tirerack.com/winter/tech/techpage.jsp?techid=120
>
>


You do know what "radial" means and refers to, yes?


--
Tegger

Tegger

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 6:06:54 PM12/11/09
to
Ad absurdum per aspera <jtc...@gmail.com> wrote in news:678d6f08-5122-
4bd1-93e3-a...@y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com:

>> > >>>> 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using snow tires.
>
> I'm not sure how you'd really quantify that, but they do make quite a
> difference. (So does having good remaining tread depth.)
>
>
>> > >>>> Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius
>> > >>>> (40ish F).
>
> Umm. There *is* a common recommendation that in snow country, at a
> time in the fall when you start seeing temperatures in the low single
> figures C,

Depends where you live. In my area we generally get our first snowfall in
late November or early December, so most people have their snows on by the
middle of November. The rest end up stuck on a hill or in the ditch.

We can take them off early-mid April.


--
Tegger

fred

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 6:11:29 PM12/11/09
to
cuh...@webtv.net wrote in
news:29132-4B2...@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net:

> I wouldn't doubt you can buy winter tires in Miami.
> cuhulin
>

Just in case my point wasn't clear, I was going under the expectation
that people from snow free states wouldn't know of there being a fourth
type of tire made specifically for snow.


fred

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 6:11:31 PM12/11/09
to
Ad absurdum per aspera <jtc...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:678d6f08-5122-4bd1...@y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com:

>> > >>>> 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using snow tires.
>
> I'm not sure how you'd really quantify that, but they do make quite a
> difference. (So does having good remaining tread depth.)
>
>
>> > >>>> Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius
>> > >>>> (40ish F).
>
> Umm. There *is* a common recommendation that in snow country, at a
> time in the fall when you start seeing temperatures in the low single
> figures C, you should change to your winter tires, but the reasoning
> is that you don't want to get pantsed by the season's first big
> storm. (You don't want to change too early, or keep them on after the
> risk has passed in the spring, because those tread compounds wear very
> fast on warm dry roads.) I don't think that's meant as a statement
> that a decent all-season radial is no longer doing a good job at
> ambient temperatures of 7 /40 F.
>

In Quebec, you are now required by law to have snow tires on your car
during the winter BTW.

fred

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 6:43:09 PM12/11/09
to
Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
news:Xns9CDEB7B1...@208.90.168.18:

Yes. I was only referring to the nomenclature and at least around here
when people talk about winter tires and radials, more often than not,
they're actually talking about all season radials. Such is the average
person <g>.


cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 6:42:38 PM12/11/09
to
A heck of a lot of winter clothing thingys are sold in Miami clothing
stores, because some people from Europe and other countries plan on
heading up North after touring around in Miami.

Heh, a married Irish woman who lives in Bognor Regis,England, (she and
meself have been friends since around the year of 2000) she and her
hubby visited Disneyworld and Universal City near Orlando a few years
ago in November.She was supprised it can get cold in Florida.She went to
a store and bought a sweater.
cuhulin

Tegger

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 8:30:37 PM12/11/09
to
fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDEBDA...@127.0.0.1:

> Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in

>>
>> You do know what "radial" means and refers to, yes?
>>
>
>
> Yes.


Then what, specifically, does "radial" mean?


--
Tegger

fred

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 11:11:45 PM12/11/09
to
cuh...@webtv.net wrote in
news:29104-4B2...@storefull-3173.bay.webtv.net:

I found that out the first time I stepped into the gulf during march
break one year in Clearwater. "What's the point?" I thought. This is
worse than Peggy's Cove's tidal pool. At least there it was a
confortable air temperature.

fred

unread,
Dec 11, 2009, 11:11:56 PM12/11/09
to
Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
news:Xns9CDED096...@208.90.168.18:

It means you need to get more sleep and drink less coffee. Is there some
reason you think I would lie about knowing the meaning of such a simple
word?

You *did* ask what "radial" meant just now, *not* what a radial tire
is anyways. *I* was the one that suggested winter tires originally anyways.

Tegger

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 8:32:05 AM12/12/09
to
fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDEE98...@127.0.0.1:

> Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
> news:Xns9CDED096...@208.90.168.18:
>

>>

>> Then what, specifically, does "radial" mean?
>>
> It means you need to get more sleep and drink less coffee. Is there
> some reason you think I would lie about knowing the meaning of such a
> simple word?
>
> You *did* ask what "radial" meant just now, *not* what a radial tire
> is anyways. *I* was the one that suggested winter tires originally
> anyways.

I sense vigorous backing-and-filling going on here. You /don't/ know, and
won't admit it.

You originally said,


"Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using snow
tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius (40ish F)."

You seem to have the impression that "radials" are summer or all-season
tires, which implies that you do not know what the term means.

--
Tegger

AMuzi

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 2:13:49 PM12/12/09
to
>> Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
>>> You do know what "radial" means and refers to, yes?

> fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote
>> Yes.

Tegger wrote:
> Then what, specifically, does "radial" mean?

Spokes do not cross:
http://www.astounding.org.uk/ian/wheel/patterns.html

--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

fred

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 4:30:28 PM12/12/09
to
Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
news:Xns9CDF56C3...@208.90.168.18:

> fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDEE98...@127.0.0.1:
>
>> Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
>> news:Xns9CDED096...@208.90.168.18:
>>
>
>>>
>>> Then what, specifically, does "radial" mean?
>>>
>> It means you need to get more sleep and drink less coffee. Is there
>> some reason you think I would lie about knowing the meaning of such a
>> simple word?
>>
>> You *did* ask what "radial" meant just now, *not* what a radial tire
>> is anyways. *I* was the one that suggested winter tires originally
>> anyways.
>
>
>
> I sense vigorous backing-and-filling going on here. You /don't/ know,
> and won't admit it.
>

Now you're making serious assumptions. I chose not to answer a question that
wasn't worded in context in any case. The meaning of the word radial alone
has a very different meaning than radial tire.

> You originally said,
> "Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using
> snow tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius (40ish
> F)."
>
> You seem to have the impression that "radials" are summer or
> all-season tires, which implies that you do not know what the term
> means.
>

Then you apparently didn't read my other post about the naming
conventions around here. Besides the radial snow tires on that site look
marketly different than the one I see here. The treads were far less
pronuonced for one.


Nate Nagel

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 4:48:03 PM12/12/09
to

is this what you're talking about?

http://www.stausaonline.com/bias-ply-passenger/traxion-70-tires.html

I haven't seen any of those in 15 years or more. I don't particularly
miss 'em either. Loud and rumbly...

Tegger

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 4:54:48 PM12/12/09
to
fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDFA6B...@127.0.0.1:

> Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
> news:Xns9CDF56C3...@208.90.168.18:
>

>>

>> You seem to have the impression that "radials" are summer or
>> all-season tires, which implies that you do not know what the term
>> means.
>>
> Then you apparently didn't read my other post about the naming
> conventions around here.
> Besides the radial snow tires on that site
> look marketly different than the one I see here. The treads were far
> less pronuonced for one.
>
>

"Radial" simply means that the fabric belts that make up the tire's carcass
are not wound on an angle the way they are in the older bias-ply design.
Instead they are wound straight from one bead to the other, as though they
were "radiating" outwards from the tire's centerline.

The construction of the carcass has nothing to do with the tread design or
the tire's intended weather use. Automotive road-going winter tires in
Canada are identical to winter tires sold elsewhere in the world, and ALL
are of radial construction.

Differentiating between radial and non-radial was important up to about the
mid-'80s, when it was still possible to purchase either kind, and there
were many vehicles still on the road with suspensions designed for bias-ply
tires.

When you compare tires on a Website, make sure you're comparing snow to
snow, and ice to ice. Both are winter tires, but they have slightly
different intended uses and slightly different tread architectures.


--
Tegger

Tegger

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 4:55:35 PM12/12/09
to
AMuzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote in news:hg0q1d$2ef$1...@news.eternal-
september.org:


> Tegger wrote:
>> Then what, specifically, does "radial" mean?
>
> Spokes do not cross:
> http://www.astounding.org.uk/ian/wheel/patterns.html
>

We're not talking about wheels.


--
Tegger

Tegger

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 5:04:29 PM12/12/09
to
Nate Nagel <njn...@roosters.net> wrote in
news:hg132...@news1.newsguy.com:

>
>
>
> is this what you're talking about?
>
> http://www.stausaonline.com/bias-ply-passenger/traxion-70-tires.html
>
> I haven't seen any of those in 15 years or more. I don't particularly
> miss 'em either. Loud and rumbly...

When I bought my '76 Dodge Coronet (used), the previous owner had installed
bias-ply tires, probably to save money. They were awful. A replacement with
radials brought an instant and obvious improvement in straight-ahead
stability and in cornering quietness.

However, I neglected to replace the bias-ply that was on the spare wheel,
so the next time I got a flat, I discovered very emphatically why they
always told you not to mix radials and bias-plys on the same axle.


--
Tegger

Steve W.

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 5:45:43 PM12/12/09
to
Ad absurdum per aspera wrote:
>>>>>>> 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using snow tires.
>
> I'm not sure how you'd really quantify that, but they do make quite a
> difference. (So does having good remaining tread depth.)
>
>
>>>>>>> Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius
>>>>>>> (40ish F).
>
> Umm. There *is* a common recommendation that in snow country, at a
> time in the fall when you start seeing temperatures in the low single
> figures C, you should change to your winter tires, but the reasoning
> is that you don't want to get pantsed by the season's first big
> storm. (You don't want to change too early, or keep them on after the
> risk has passed in the spring, because those tread compounds wear very
> fast on warm dry roads.) I don't think that's meant as a statement
> that a decent all-season radial is no longer doing a good job at
> ambient temperatures of 7 /40 F.
>
>
>
>>>>>> where do you find non radial snow tires these days???
>
>> Got mine from the Tire Rack... of course they are radials...
>
> A Tire Rack article in their "winter" series even states that (other
> factors being more or less apples-to-apples) the early radials were
> quickly noted for their superiority in winter. Anyway, the point is,
> if not truly moot, at least close to it in the US and probably other
> industrialized nations. Bias and bias belted tires are still made
> -- users include heavy trucks/buses,

Actually most heavy trucks and buses use radials. Have been since the
late 80's. You have to look at tires from the 70's to find bias plies
any longer.

severe off-roading, certain kinds
> of racing, and correct-looking restoration of antique cars

Actually you can also get the correct looking tires in radial
construction, and that is actually the main reason you can get the
correct ones. The people wanted the better radial tire construction but
also wanted correct looking tires.

-- but
> radials have made great inroads in most of those areas and only the
> last one is really ironclad.
>
> As for the original question, I'd do a web search and ask some of the
> places that specialize in repairing bent or broken alloy rims. It can
> be done (depending on the nature and severity of the damage) but it
> isn't a job for just anyone. You need a place that has skill and can
> look for hidden damage and true it up right.
>
> --Joe
>
>


--
Steve W.

Steve W.

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 5:48:33 PM12/12/09
to

There are FAR more than 4 types of tires out there.

--
Steve W.

Kevin

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 8:21:01 PM12/12/09
to
fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDDBAF...@127.0.0.1:

> Kevin <kevyN...@netins.net> wrote in
> news:Xns9CDDA086ED25Ek...@167.142.225.136:
>
>> fred <fr...@bedrock.rock> wrote in news:Xns9CDDA6...@127.0.0.1:


>>
>>>>>> Thanks for any suggestions. This ruined my day.
>>>>>>

>>>>> Buy snow tires. 70% of winter accidents are due to cars not using
>>>>> snow tires. Radials are only good to about 7 above zero celcius
>>>>> (40ish F).
>>>>>
>>>>

>>>> and 90 percent of all staticits are made up on the spot. besides
>>>> where do you find non radial snow tires these days??? KB
>>>>
>>> Where there's snow and the temperature goes below zero perhaps? That
>>> number comes directly from the companies that do the towing.
Accident
>>> was perhaps the wrong word - called for a tow truck would be
>> completely
>>> accurate.
>>>
>
>> now that sounds more likely KB
>>
> And a virtually trivial difference. Now where's your proof that you
> can't get snowtires where *you* are?
>
>
>

no buddy said I couldn`t get them, I was pointing out there are almost
no bias ply tires any more. KB

--
THUNDERSNAKE #9

Protect your rights or "Lose" them
The 2nd Admendment guarantees the others

phaeton

unread,
Dec 12, 2009, 10:25:20 PM12/12/09
to
about 15 years ago I picked up an old Schwinn cruiser from the
mid-50s. It had the original (dry rotted) tires on them. I wonder if
they were bias-ply.


Otherwise, I don't think i've seen nor even heard anyone say "snow
tires" in about 15 years, and that includes the last 8 years that I've
lived in Wisconsin.


*shrug*


-J

aemeijers

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 12:28:31 AM12/13/09
to
That is about when RWD vanished from most people's worlds, unless they
drive a truck or a retro-rod. I haven't owned a traditional RWD car
since about 1993 or so. Around here in SW MI, even the cops don't use
traditional snow tires on the crown vics any more, just an aggressive
'all season' tire on all 4.

Having said that, I'm tempted to start doing what I used to do, until
about 3 cars ago- buy another set of rims (if the local yard has any
cash-for-clunkers carcasses left), and a set of taller skinnier
all-season tires for winter usage. 215-65 x16 Goodrich TAs, supposedly
M&S rated, don't do so hot on the frozen stuff, and the damn aluminum
rims like to leak down in cold weather. I'd have to look it up, but I
think 215-70s on 15" steel would be about the same diameter, and
all-seasons would probably have a narrower contact patch.

--
aem sends...

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 12:26:28 AM12/13/09
to
On the web,
How Radial Tires are made

How about studded tires, are they still being sold?
cuhulin

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 1:19:58 AM12/13/09
to
The only vehicle I own which has front wheel drive (and also rear wheel
drive) is my 1948 Willys Jeep.I don't think I want any front wheel drive
only vehicles, I prefer rear wheel drive.
cuhulin

phaeton

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 12:09:38 PM12/13/09
to

Same here. My next vehicle will likely be a Subaru (AWD), but I never
have bought into the whole FWD hype. Making the steering wheels also
the driving wheels is just str8 up dangerous. The only time the
"front wheel drive has superior traction!" argument is true is in a
straight line at low speed. Any other time, the opposite is true.

But what do I know? I'm not an engineer.

-J

Vic Smith

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 12:45:34 PM12/13/09
to

Easier to work on the drive train, but you don't have that engine
weight over the drive wheels.
I always put 3 or 4 hundred pound sacks of sand in the trunk of my
RWD's cars when snow came along, and that worked wonders.
Never got stuck, or had the back end breaking loose.
Took about 500 lbs in the bed of my F-150 to make a notable
difference.
I never ever bought snow tires for any of my vehicles, and drove
around many stuck cars in snow storms. Didn't pay any attention to
what tires the stuck cars had on them.
Of course if you drive a car onto a snowbank where the snow is holding
the undercarriage up and not allowing the tires to grip, get out the
shovel. Did that once because it was the only place to park and I
wanted to get inside and sleep. Took me and a son an hour to dig it
out the next day. Still haven't decided if I regret that move.
Easiest way to get a RWD unstuck from snow and ice was not pushing and
sliding on your feet, and getting a shot of slush whipped onto your
face, but just get a few guys standing on the back bumper.
Trouble is, I think bumpers disappeared faster than RWD.
And then you are hauling around all that extra weight, costing gas.

--Vic

Nate Nagel

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 1:37:33 PM12/13/09
to

IME FWD often does have superior traction in terms of getting you moving
in low traction conditions. However, the same can also be said of rear
engine/RWD cars, e.g. VW Beetle, Porsche 911, Chevy Corvair etc.

I find FWD more difficult to *handle* in low traction conditions,
although it is more "fail safe" - RWD cars may oversteer but FWD almost
always understeer which is considered safer for unskilled drivers.
(note: I know that this is not a fundamental characteristic of the two
drive layouts, but merely how they are most often implemented.)

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 2:02:36 PM12/13/09
to
That is an old ''Trick'', putting sand bags in the trunk, or the bed of
pickup trucks.
cuhulin

fred

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 2:23:21 PM12/13/09
to

> fred wrote:


>> Tegger <inv...@invalid.inv> wrote in
>> news:Xns9CDF56C3...@208.90.168.18:

>

Yes, that's more what they look like up here.

> I haven't seen any of those in 15 years or more. I don't particularly
> miss 'em either. Loud and rumbly...
>

Snow, hard packed even isn't exactly known for transmitting sound very
well. If there's no snow or ice on the road, you don't need snow tires.
However here, anywhere but the major roads is covered in a layer of it
for most of the winter.

Nate Nagel

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 2:42:33 PM12/13/09
to

yep, I remember living up north and roads simply were packed snow.
Around here more often it's just slushy, the only reason you need snow
tires is so that you can get around on those few days when there is
actual snow on the ground - maybe a week or so out of the year.
Unfortunately, you don't know when those days are going to be so the
snow tires stay on december through march. The newer "winter tires" do
me fine although I wouldn't try getting through a winter without them
(Porsche 944, no all-season tires available to fit it anymore even if I
wanted to try it.)

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 5:18:02 PM12/13/09
to
I lived in Martinsville,Indiana for a year in 1947 and Bozeman,Montana
for about six months in 1956 and Salina,Kansas for a few months in 1957
(in the Summertime) and at Scott Air Force Base,Illinois (when I was in
the Army) for about ten months in 1963.

I never could get used to that freezing cold weather and slipping and
sliding on those icey sidewalks and my fingers and toes feeling like
Birdseye frozen peas.Suppose to get up to 71 degrees here tomorrow.
cuhulin

AMuzi

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 6:11:50 PM12/13/09
to


They are bias play as are all bicycle tires.

A short lived Radial series from Panasonic (premium supplier
in bicycle tires) showed poor handling and rapid wear for
bicycle applications.

From Sheldon Brown:
"The Panaracer radials turned out to be extremely unpleasant
to ride (they are fast and efficient, but they always feel
flat, there is a lateral floppiness that is just intolerable..."

http://sheldonbrown.com/otb.html

More from Jobst Brandt:
http://yarchive.net/bike/bias_ply.html

Nate Nagel

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 6:18:53 PM12/13/09
to

Getting real off topic... I always thought that Panasonic (the bicycle
mfgr - presumably part of Matsushita?) and Panaracer (tire mfgr -
formerly National Tire Co.) were two different companies, albeit both
Japanese. Not so?

AMuzi

unread,
Dec 13, 2009, 6:23:00 PM12/13/09
to


Divisions of the same company, Matsushita in Osaka Japan
(been there!). In Japan, most of their products are marked
"National" which can't be trademarked here.

phaeton

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 10:53:40 AM12/14/09
to

Interesting!

Thanks for the links!

-J

phaeton

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 12:52:59 PM12/20/09
to
Alrighty then... I took it in for an alignment. I thought $90 was
kind of high for that, but you tell me. However, they won't align it
because I've got a worn upper ball joint. Quoted $380/side to
replace.

NAPA stocks the ball joints for about $25, (and the whole upper
control arm assy for $75), so for that kind of money maybe I can make
a whole front end rebuild a spring-time parking lot project. I'll
just need to figure out whether I can just replace the ball joints or
if I have to go the whole arm, etc.

I've got some scrub tires on the front right now, and (you guys might
call me names for this, but) maybe I can double check the toe-
adjustment with a tape measure for now. I don't drive it much in the
winter and the roads are all icy/snowy anyways. I don't think I'll
wear these tires down too bad if I the toe isn't too far off.

Thanks.

-J


Nate Nagel

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 1:04:47 PM12/20/09
to

You probably can just replace the ball joint, but if it is a screw-in
type you will need a special tool and a very beefy breaker bar. What
kind of vehicle is this again?

If you plan on keeping it forever investing in the tool may not be
unreasonable.

Scott Dorsey

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 2:48:41 PM12/20/09
to
phaeton <blahb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Alrighty then... I took it in for an alignment. I thought $90 was
>kind of high for that, but you tell me.

If they're doing a real alignment with a real technician who knows what he
is doing, that's fair. You can get an alignment for half of that prcie at a
chain tire shop, by a kid who just puts it on the machine, presses a button,
and does what the machine tells him. It's WELL worth the extra money to get
someone competent to do it instead.

>However, they won't align it
>because I've got a worn upper ball joint. Quoted $380/side to
>replace.

Excellent. See, if you'd taken it into the tire store, they would just have
set the alignment anyway and if anything probably made the problem worse.

>NAPA stocks the ball joints for about $25, (and the whole upper
>control arm assy for $75), so for that kind of money maybe I can make
>a whole front end rebuild a spring-time parking lot project. I'll
>just need to figure out whether I can just replace the ball joints or
>if I have to go the whole arm, etc.

Depends on the car. In a lot of cases, it's so much easier to replace
the whole arm that it's well worth the additional money. Especially
if you don't have an arbor press.

>I've got some scrub tires on the front right now, and (you guys might
>call me names for this, but) maybe I can double check the toe-
>adjustment with a tape measure for now. I don't drive it much in the
>winter and the roads are all icy/snowy anyways. I don't think I'll
>wear these tires down too bad if I the toe isn't too far off.

If the ball joints are bad, it's not even worth your time to check with
a tape measure.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

phaeton

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 3:07:32 PM12/20/09
to
On Dec 20, 1:48 pm, klu...@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

Oh right.... sorry i forgot to mention- it is a 99 Ford Ranger 2WD
(coil spring SLA in front). The shop I took it to was a Tires Plus,
which is a tire chain.

-J

Nate Nagel

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 4:17:47 PM12/20/09
to

Looks like they may be press-in, in which case you're probably better
off just having someone replace them for you, unless you *enjoy*
inventing new cuss words.

I just did a quick search on rockauto and looked at the pics, so I may
be mistaken.

Steve W.

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 9:07:00 PM12/20/09
to

It's a press in and the early 99s were NOT replaceable. You replaced the
entire arm. (Which is actually a better way anyway).

The only real way to tell is to either run the VIN or pull it apart and
look. Personally I would get the new arms and start there.

--
Steve W.

phaeton

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 9:30:00 PM12/20/09
to

Why is it better to replace the arm? Is it because you can also do
the upper bushings, too?

-J

Scott Dorsey

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 10:38:56 PM12/20/09
to
phaeton <blahb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Why is it better to replace the arm? Is it because you can also do
>the upper bushings, too?

It is a LOT less effort.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 11:22:51 PM12/20/09
to
I would check the auto junkyards for a good wheel.If not available in
the local area, some local area junkyards can get one from another
junkyard.
cuhulin

Steve W.

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 1:25:29 AM12/21/09
to
phaeton wrote:

>> It's a press in and the early 99s were NOT replaceable. You replaced the
>> entire arm. (Which is actually a better way anyway).
>>
>> The only real way to tell is to either run the VIN or pull it apart and
>> look. Personally I would get the new arms and start there.
>>
>> --
>> Steve W.
>
> Why is it better to replace the arm? Is it because you can also do
> the upper bushings, too?
>
> -J

With the press in style joints it is easy to damage the arm if you don't
use the correct tools and have practice with them.
Then there are the bushings, plus the new arms will save close to an
hour time wise.


--
Steve W.

phaeton

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 1:39:34 AM12/21/09
to

I see. I should probably do both sides at the same time, huh?

-J

Steve W.

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 5:16:44 AM12/21/09
to

If you intend to keep the vehicle for a while I would do both sides,
uppers AND lowers, plus the tie rods. I would also check/replace the
lower A-arm bushings. Then get it aligned by a good shop.
Use joints that you can grease and grease it at every oil change and the
front end will hold up a LOT longer.

Gets rid of the old parts and gives you a clean slate on maintainance of
that end.

--
Steve W.

Scott Dorsey

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 10:48:37 AM12/21/09
to
In article <hgn4b3$s0e$1...@aioe.org>, Steve W. <csr...@NOTyahoo.com> wrote:
>phaeton wrote:
>>
>> Why is it better to replace the arm? Is it because you can also do
>> the upper bushings, too?
>
>With the press in style joints it is easy to damage the arm if you don't
> use the correct tools and have practice with them.
>Then there are the bushings, plus the new arms will save close to an
>hour time wise.

They aren't THAT bad. You take the old arms out completely, then you
press the old joints out and the new joints in on an arbor press. You
don't try and do them in place.

If you don't have an arbor press, a drill press with a piece of rod stock
in it can do the job, but you do have to be careful that you're applying
force only around the edge of the bushing and never in the center.

If you're a poor starving student with more time than money (and access to
the shop at school), I recommend doing it yourself. Otherwise replace the
whole arms.

phaeton

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 5:09:49 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 9:48 am, klu...@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

I see. Thanks.

As far as keeping the truck forever... well, it's paid for, and as
long as its monthly repair bills are less than a new car payment, it's
what I've got. My plan is keep it together long enough so that I can
finish college, which (at this rate) is going to be about 4 or 5
years. It's 10 years old, is pushing 167K miles, and I probably could
have taken a little better care of it than I have, but I think it'll
do it. It's got the 2.5L stroked Pinto engine and a T-5, both of
which should be either long-lasting or inexpensive to keep working,
even if the rest of the truck rots away around them.

-J

0 new messages