Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Laura, this is my view from NYC

5 views
Skip to first unread message

James

unread,
Dec 28, 2002, 8:13:28 PM12/28/02
to
Nice circular logic and thus appropriate for a rotary engine newsgroup.

"Allahdad Satam al-Haji" <gas...@hipnojaj.com.in> wrote in message
news:4ky3ul$4vy$3...@news.ono.com...
> a very skillful attack
>
> who profits?
>
> -Israeli incursions in two P.A. towns
> -the largest British fleet organized in eighteen years
> "coincidentally" has been on route for days nearing the
> Middle East for "maneuvers"
> -America asking for coalition of global powers for
> new "counter-insurgent" war... a planetary Vietnam.
>
> Rather then seriously ask why people would kill
> themselves and so many others, "we" put an answer in
> their mouths and say, -Prez-"they attack us because we
> are the bastion of freedom in the world." period....
> Some introspection? No. Respect for the enemy? No.
> Understanding the enemy? No. That is why the forces of
> reaction do not know what the terms are or what to do.
> These are the fruits of the politics of denial. We deny
> the complaints of our victims, even deny they are our
> victims, and blind ourselves to a planet of enmity.
> Understanding this, as I have long fruitlessly preached
> as a "lunatic", one must take one of three possible
> courses: X) Understand ones position of domination, take
> every defensive measure, and terrorize the dominated. Y)
> Deny ones imperial position and be over run by a million
> cuts Z) Discard past paradigms worn thin since times
> before pharaoh, make a detente for all humankind and all
> the rest of nature, including a transformation in our
> relationships to the Earth and human to human.
>
> The standing "American authorities" want solution Y with
> a big war on the dispossessed, Islam, and the rest. It
> would be the fourth world war since the sheep in America
> seem to have missed the third one. Our "leaders"
> are inept, impotent, and culpable in one of two ways.
> First: For a second "hijacked" commercial jet to strike
> the most critical concentration in the global capitalist
> economy, twenty minutes after the first, and with no
> military response, is profound negligence. Particularly
> in the wake of the 1993 WTC attack, the success of this
> attack is pure negligence...or... complicity. If it is
> simple puerile negligence, then the governor of NY, and
> the mayor of NYC, who are so busy congratulating and
> patting each other on the back for what a great job they
> have done, should resign in shame and utter humiliation
> for their total failure. Also former governor Cuomo
> should beg the forgiveness of his constituents and the
> greater public. The joint chiefs of staff, as well as
> all regional military and air commanders should resign
> or be court-martialed for negligence. The current
> administration as well as members of senate and house
> intelligence and military committees should be removed
> from office and placed under house arrest for extensive
> questioning. The former administration should be
> likewise detained. All planning staffs for civil
> defense and air security should be detained and
> questioned, if not court marshaled. That is if an enemy
> attacked us. If there was, however, foreknowledge by any
> elements of our government, there should be a grand
> jury, and also a global response. There have been many
> comparisons today and since the annihilation of the WTC
> with Pearl Harbor, the attack on Hawaii in 1941. Years
> of speculation over the absence of our vital air-craft
> carriers at that attack, as well as myriad evidence,
> points to a foreknowledge by F.D.R. which is confirmed
> by a decade of public study of the code breaking facts
> of Ultra Mega. Many times after Pearl Harbor the
> British and Americans allowed their own troop ships to
> go to the bottom rather than reveal to the enemy that
> all their codes were useless. This was rationalized
> then and now as expedient both to motivate the American
> public to eagerness for war and to help finally win it.
> Today what would be the motive? In a world that should
> head for peace we have a threatened way of life, the
> global capitalist military industrial "complex". In
> need of perceived enemies and great battles, and willing
> to accept at least a police state "counter-insurgency"
> planetary domination system, would they sacrifice the
> WTC? Symbolically it will inspire hundreds of thousands
> of those disenfranchised with western freedom to fight
> and seek training and organizations that can help them
> achieve something so grand. There is our enemy, since
> realistically China has not invaded its neighbors
> significantly for a thousand year and is not likely to
> threaten the U.S.(only Tibet, and maybe one of
> Siberia.... wait and see-either way the U.S. never even
> did anything about Tibet) So now around the world we
> will have tight security which will not stop anything
> and the police state planet NWO will attempt to take
> control and will, basically if they are not stopped
> here. Guilty or innocent the current authorities have
> to go, for America and the Earth
>
> Feel free to distribute my views...
>
> What was it an attack against?
>
> a view from NYC: 14sep2001
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It sowed, you judged, yet Ziad never amazingly changed at the room.
>


Budd Cochran

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 12:45:28 AM1/3/03
to
Isn't this the guy that was found throwing himself at outhouses in rural
Indiana while holding toy airplanes?

The sad part is he's about 50 years too late to find many outhouses in
Indiana to throw himself at.

Budd Cochran

"James" <ja...@Kairoff.com> wrote in message
news:Y_rP9.544697$NH2.36488@sccrnsc01...

0 new messages