Edward needs to be suspended or fined for his retaliation. What a
jerk.
nascar's rules have even turned the fans into pussies.... sad...
No kidding.
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
>>> nascar's rules have even turned the fans into pussies.... sad...
> Wondering if your opinion would change had Brad's car actually went
> into the catch fence or the stands and injured some fans (or Brad).
You forgot about bursting into flames before it went into the stands.
So, according to Helton, Carl Edwards' wrecking Brad was o.k., but not
making him airborne, which was the more serious offense. So, Carl,
next time you retaliate, just don't make the car flip, 'kay? A slap
on the wrist (3 race probation), but typical Nascar. I'm with Happy -
he should ask for his fines back. LOL.
N.
> <Anna_...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>> Wondering if your opinion would change had Brad's car
>>> actually went
>>> into the catch fence or the stands and injured some fans (or
>>> Brad).
>>
>>You forgot about bursting into flames before it went into the
>>stands.
> huh?
Why not make the "what if's" REALLY dramatic.
It makes the offense MUCH more serious looking that way..
Gee, maybe it's the wing?
>>Why not make the "what if's" REALLY dramatic.
>>It makes the offense MUCH more serious looking that way..
> Interesting way to dismiss a serious question. Fan safety is
> a
> legitimate concern. No need to make it dramatic. Just answer
> the
> question. We've had two close of fans in two years. Last year
> with
> Edwards hitting the catch fence, and this year with Edwards
> punting
> someone into the wall.
> If you don't want to tell me your answer to my original
> question then
> say nothing.
That was my answer.
I don't care to over dramatize an event to make a point.
In the Talladega incident, the catch fence did it's job.
The 99 car traveling at a high speed went back onto the track.
As did the Allison car or Bodine truck, or the Craven car, years
ago.
The incident with Keselowski was not even close to the same.
If one wants to argue about what Edwards did being wrong, or
right,
and what the penalty should be,
that is fine, but don't bring women and children in to gain
favor.
It didn't happen.
If it had, we could discuss it based on that.
By your reasoning, we shouldn't discuss the underwear
bomber (or tighty-whitey terrorist) because the plane
didn't blow up over Detroit.
I prefer to keep the discussion about racing.
Do the terrorist/bomber shit someplace else.
Everyone is well aware of what "could" have happened.
But you can't always levy a fine/penalty based largely on 'what
if's".
We are discussing cause & effects and my comparison was just that.
> Everyone is well aware of what "could" have happened.
> But you can't always levy a fine/penalty based largely on 'what
> if's".
>
If I do something stupid like shoot someone with a BB-gun,
99% of the time the action will result in a minor flesh wound;
but, I could have put their eye out. That is why we severely
frown on shooting a BB-gun at someone.
Intentionally wrecking another driver on a high speed raceway
should be dealt with seriously. It could have put someone's
eye out. :-)
>If I do something stupid like shoot someone with a BB-gun,
>99% of the time the action will result in a minor flesh wound;
>but, I could have put their eye out. That is why we severely
>frown on shooting a BB-gun at someone.
>Intentionally wrecking another driver on a high speed raceway
>should be dealt with seriously. It could have put someone's
>eye out. :-)
true it *could* have... so "frown" on it and move on... Racing has gone so
far down hill...
-If I do something stupid like shoot someone with a BB-gun,
-99% of the time the action will result in a minor flesh wound;
-but, I could have put their eye out. That is why we severely
-frown on shooting a BB-gun at someone.
It is also why you didn't get charged for the same crime
as actually shooting it out with a 9mm Smith and Wesson.
-Intentionally wrecking another driver on a high speed raceway
-should be dealt with seriously. It could have put someone's
-eye out. :-)
Fortunately for all, it did not.
We will all enjoy a race another day.
The punishment in this case, fit the crime.
Or at least to the drivers it did.
I believe I read this morning in an SI's reporter's column that the
'Dega incident resulted in a woman having a broken jaw. So there was
at least one fan injury.
N.
Kyle Petty sure wasn't happy.
True Nancy, but the fence did it's job of keeping the car out.
The injury came from something attached to the fence,
on the stands side.
> True Nancy, but the fence did it's job of keeping the car out.
> The injury came from something attached to the fence,
> on the stands side.
I don't know if they ever concluded whether it was a loudspeaker
torn off the fence, or the carburator from Edward's engine.
Apparently both were amoung the debris in the vicinity.
John
Try robbing a bank with a BB gun and see what punishment you get.
Yeah that's exactly the same.
I bet that poor woman doesn't care what it was or where it was. All
she knows is that Carl's car flipped and she got hurt. I was just
pointing out that those COT flips aren't exactly harmless....I really
don't have an opinion on Carl and Brad's battle, as I'm not real fond
of either.
N.
On Mar 10, 10:05 am, "Anna Khonda" wrote:>
>> The punishment in this case, fit the crime.
>> Or at least to the drivers it did.
>Really? I don't know if anyone conducted a poll,
>but I'd say that most (i.e. 70%) think at least a
>one race suspension and $fine was called for.
Well, it may have not been an official poll,
but Marty Smith spoke with at least 8 drivers,
off the record yesterday, and the result was 100%
in agreement with the penalty.
Maybe your source had different results.
> Kyle Petty sure wasn't happy.
He's driving which car now?
Which is why I didn't bring up Rusty Wallace's endorsement.
> > True Nancy, but the fence did it's job of keeping the car
> > out.
> > The injury came from something attached to the fence,
> > on the stands side.
I bet that poor woman doesn't care what it was or where it was.
All
she knows is that Carl's car flipped and she got hurt. I was
just
pointing out that those COT flips aren't exactly harmless....
N.
and Nanc, I was only pointing out that a car had never gone
through the fence.
John, I had not heard about the carb. That's a new twist for me.
I had heard speaker..
Please point out to me where I said it was the same.
Where did you hear that at? Site?
I heard that from some people that were there,
that was what the word going around.
I don't know that it was ever on a site or not, tbh.
But regardless, the car didn't go into the stands. That we all
know.
Nascar drivers tend to tow the company line.
> Maybe your source had different results.
>
I went to Jayski and read many/most of the news links
and most of the opinions were that "CE got a wrist slap."
> > Kyle Petty sure wasn't happy.
>
> He's driving which car now?
>
I think you're splitting hairs. Kyle Petty is still an experienced
Nascar driver who wasn't happy with CE, regardless of what
any of us think about his driving skills/success.
Not when it's off the record. One driver that didn't want to be named
said that if the car hadn't gotten airborne, the only thing flying in
the garage area would be high-fives.
Well, I know I saw pieces of the car going into the stands.
Denise Hamlin's opinion doesn't count. The girl is
infatuated with BK.
> Marty Smith spoke with at least 8 drivers,
> off the record yesterday, and the result was 100%
> in agreement with the penalty.
#Nascar drivers tend to tow the company line.
Yeah. On TV maybe.
They talk a pretty different story away from the cameras.
And they do open up to guys they trust.
Marty is pretty well respected.
# Kyle Petty sure wasn't happy.
> He's driving which car now?
#I think you're splitting hairs. Kyle Petty is still an experienced
#Nascar driver who wasn't happy with CE, regardless of what
#any of us think about his driving skills/success.
> Anna Khonda wrote:
>> I heard that from some people that were there,
>> that was what the word going around.
>> I don't know that it was ever on a site or not, tbh.
>> But regardless, the car didn't go into the stands. That we all know.
> Well, I know I saw pieces of the car going into the stands.
Well, that settles that. Thanks.
Did you by chance see if it was car debris, or track stuff that hit the
spectator?
But no matter. The car stayed out.
Which is really what was mentioned many posts ago.
Too many actually. We should let this one die a natural death.
I'm not sure Denny would actually find too many others to slap hands with
when it came to the crunch.
--
Brad
I guess I didn't get your point.
Sorry.
> Anna Khonda wrote:
>> I heard that from some people that were there,
>> that was what the word going around.
>> I don't know that it was ever on a site or not, tbh.
>>
>> But regardless, the car didn't go into the stands. That we all
>> know.
> Well, I know I saw pieces of the car going into the stands.
Well I guess that settles that.
Do you by chance know what piece of the car it was that hit
the spectator? Just curious.
But the 'car' didn't, right?
I guess I didn't get your point.
My error.
Some 17yr olds need their mouth wired shut for a few weeks <G>