Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
So what the hell happened, exactly?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  14 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Alessandro D. Petaccia  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2012, 3:22 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: Alessandro D. Petaccia <ale...@despammed.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 21:23:00 +0200
Subject: So what the hell happened, exactly?

...But first, let me quote Nico Rosberg: "Yeah, Grosjean hit Webber
and Mark was sideways on the track, so we all had to brake rather hard
and some of the guys behind me obviously didn't realize what was
happening and one of them hit me. So it was all Grosjean's fault.
Again."

Wow, the kid's building himself a reputation amongst his peers, isn't
he. But having said that, back to the original q: what happened to
McLaren being the best car? What happened to RBR being probably second
if not third best? I've concluded that when Lewis complains about the
tyres only to set a quick lap right afterwards it's because he simply
doesn't like the car, and Jenson's message about the gearbox sounded
similar, so both McLaren clearly had problems; meanwhile, Vettel made
it look like it was 2011 all over again. Was it the odd track? Have
the RBR evil geniuses come up with yet another trick? Is the
championship over?

...Blimey. Vettel again? I doubt if I could stand it - the man has too
many teeth!

ADP.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Noj  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2012, 3:30 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: Noj <m...@privacy.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 20:30:25 +0100
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 3:30 pm
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?
Alessandro D. Petaccia wrote ...

Nico was hit by Senna - another clown who can't be long for F1.
RB have sorted a version of the Double DRS and it seems to have gained
them a second.
McLaren have failed under pressure - like they do every year.  LH said
his car was shit for the first 10 laps - then something went bang and
the handling improved!

www.jamesallenonf1.com/2012/10/red-bull-double-drs-revealed-in-suzuka/


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
AC  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2012, 3:53 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: AC <x...@xxx.xxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 20:53:31 +0100
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 3:53 pm
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?

Same was said of Kobyashi, worse if memory serves. How long has he had
compared to Grosjean?

IMHO, he is just having one of those nightmare runs where the more he
thinks about it, the worse it gets.

McLaren wise, in a sport of 100th's of a second, it doesnt take a lot to
know teams off, as it were. Seems to me they are merely on a bit of a
hangover from the Lewis moving stuff.

This track has been a RBR type track for sometime, and that car was
never bad, it just needed recovering from rule changes. They are well
down the road of recovery and with the track, they kicked ass.

WDC excitement wise, the big problem is that Ferrari's run of luck has
ended and its evening out.

--
AC


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bobster  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 2:11 am
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: Bobster <megap...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 23:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 2:11 am
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?
On 7 Oct, 21:22, Alessandro D. Petaccia <ale...@despammed.com> wrote:
> But having said that, back to the original q: what happened to
> McLaren being the best car? What happened to RBR being probably second
> if not third best?

Development. McLaren started off as the fastest, then went backwards
for a while (well.... not really, they just didn't advance as fast as
others) then found something that gave them an edge again. Now RBR
have found that something. Development amongst the top teams is
usually relentless and RBR have a very good engineering team.

Also RBR have opted out of the RRA and McLaren have not. So RBR have
less constraints on budget, wind tunnel time and so on.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bigbird  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 6:28 am
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: "Bigbird" <Bigbird.usenetNOS...@Gmail.com>
Date: 8 Oct 2012 10:28:47 GMT
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 6:28 am
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?

Alessandro D. Petaccia wrote:

> back to the original q: what happened to
> McLaren being the best car?

For me that notion was looking suspect many months ago.

This season has not been as simple as having the best car but making
the best of what you have.

> What happened to RBR being probably second
> if not third best? I've concluded that when Lewis complains about the
> tyres only to set a quick lap right afterwards it's because he simply
> doesn't like the car, and Jenson's message about the gearbox sounded
> similar,

There was mention of a brake fire which may have damaged some sensors
giving gearbox problems or false data.

> so both McLaren clearly had problems; meanwhile, Vettel made
> it look like it was 2011 all over again. Was it the odd track?

It has all been about hitting the sweet spot this season. RBR both had
their cars tuned in to the track and the track suited their strength.
Massa showed that Ferrari, yet again, had a very good car on the Sunday.

> Have
> the RBR evil geniuses come up with yet another trick?

Yes, that too.
http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2012/878/1012.html

> Is the
> championship over?

Do you hear singing?

> ...Blimey. Vettel again? I doubt if I could stand it - the man has too
> many teeth!

"In the end it will probably be about which of the bigger teams drop the
ball less...but nobody owns the ball this year."

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mike P  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 10:07 am
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: Mike P <n...@here.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 14:07:28 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 10:07 am
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?

On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 21:23:00 +0200, Alessandro D. Petaccia wrote:
> ...But first, let me quote Nico Rosberg: "Yeah, Grosjean hit Webber and
> Mark was sideways on the track, so we all had to brake rather hard and
> some of the guys behind me obviously didn't realize what was happening
> and one of them hit me. So it was all Grosjean's fault. Again."

> Wow, the kid's building himself a reputation amongst his peers, isn't
> he. But having said that, back to the original q: what happened to
> McLaren being the best car?

Nothing. This season has been swinging backwards and forwards between the
top two or three teams. Lewis was just at Singapore as RBR were here.
It'll change again in Korea.

--
Mike P


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Oliver Crawford  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 2:14 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: "Oliver Crawford" <send yourspamh...@nowhere.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 19:14:50 +0100
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 2:14 pm
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?

I haven't been a big fan of Vettel's personality but I enjoyed his post race
interview on BBC, he was far more relaxed than usual yet really thrilled
about the performance of the car - he said "David will know what I mean ...
when a car just hits a sweet spot - I wasn't trying to do anything silly,
the car just kept going faster and faster ..." (not his exact words but near
enough) - it seemed that he enjoyed the drive even more than the victory - a
sign of a true driver IMO!

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Noj  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 3:10 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: Noj <m...@privacy.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:10:21 +0100
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 3:10 pm
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?
"Oliver Crawford" wrote ...

Drive is right - he certainly wasn't racing.  And he seldom does race.  
There are times when F1 is more like a time trial and Sunday was one of
those times.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mower Man  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 5:36 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: Mower Man <chrislov...@nospamf2s.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:37:43 +0100
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 5:37 pm
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?
On 08/10/2012 8:10 PM, Noj wrote:

...an obvious difference being that a time trial has the fastest staring
last.

Any time trial where the fastest finish first is just - boring. :-(

--
Chris

'Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it
every six months.'

(Oscar Wilde.)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Noj  
View profile  
 More options Oct 8 2012, 6:01 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: Noj <m...@privacy.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 23:01:49 +0100
Local: Mon, Oct 8 2012 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?
Mower Man wrote ...

I was thinking of bike racing on the Isle of Man.

> Any time trial where the fastest finish first is just - boring. :-(

Dunno.  Did you watch the last BTTC race at Silverstone yesterday?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
CatharticF1  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 1:36 am
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: CatharticF1 <rasf1pos...@gmail.com>
Date: 9 Oct 2012 16:36:14 +1000
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 2:36 am
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?
Alessandro D. Petaccia <ale...@despammed.com> wrote in
news:2gk378thkaittd2j73eeon8pv433kv71tq@4ax.com:

> q: what happened to McLaren being the best car?

Well the FIA _did_ change the test which made the bendy (rotating) FW
illegal.

> What happened to RBR being probably second if not third best?

They maintain their race and particularly qualifying pace advantage over
Ferrari. I think McLaren have moved back again.

> ...Blimey. Vettel again? I doubt if I could stand it - the man has too
> many teeth!

I think the pace advantage is likely to give it to him, yeah. Pity - not
much Alonso can do.

--
CatharticF1

I can't resist no crossing signs


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bigbird  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 4:35 am
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: "Bigbird" <Bigbird.usenetNOS...@Gmail.com>
Date: 9 Oct 2012 08:35:26 GMT
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 4:35 am
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?

CatharticF1 wrote:
> Alessandro D. Petaccia <ale...@despammed.com> wrote in
> news:2gk378thkaittd2j73eeon8pv433kv71tq@4ax.com:

> > q: what happened to McLaren being the best car?

> Well the FIA did change the test which made the bendy (rotating) FW
> illegal.

> > What happened to RBR being probably second if not third best?

> They maintain their race and particularly qualifying pace advantage
> over Ferrari.

The Ferrari has often had better race pace. That has been it's
advantage.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
build  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 5:55 am
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: build <bui...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 02:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 5:55 am
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?

On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 3:36:30 PM UTC+10, CatharticF1 wrote:
> Alessandro D. Petaccia <ale...@despammed.com> wrote in
> news:2gk378thkaittd2j73eeon8pv433kv71tq@4ax.com:
> > q: what happened to McLaren being the best car?
> Well the FIA _did_ change the test which made the bendy (rotating) FW
> illegal.
> > What happened to RBR being probably second if not third best?
> They maintain their race and particularly qualifying pace advantage over
> Ferrari. I think McLaren have moved back again.
> > ...Blimey. Vettel again? I doubt if I could stand it - the man has too
> > many teeth!
> I think the pace advantage is likely to give it to him, yeah. Pity - not

> much Alonso can do.
> CatharticF1

or the track changed?

We'll see.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
build  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 5:58 am
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: build <bui...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 02:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 5:58 am
Subject: Re: So what the hell happened, exactly?

On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 6:35:27 PM UTC+10, Bigbird wrote:
> CatharticF1 wrote:
> > Alessandro D. Petaccia <ale...@despammed.com> wrote in
> > news:2gk378thkaittd2j73eeon8pv433kv71tq@4ax.com:
> > > q: what happened to McLaren being the best car?
> > Well the FIA did change the test which made the bendy (rotating) FW
> > illegal.
> > > What happened to RBR being probably second if not third best?
> > They maintain their race and particularly qualifying pace advantage
> > over Ferrari.
> The Ferrari has often had better race pace. That has been it's
> advantage.

I agree. After Japan that can't be disputed.

beers,


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »