> "News" <N...@Group.Name> wrote in message news:k7pima$n5k$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 11/11/2012 7:53 PM, John Briggs wrote:
> might be one of those places where
>>> there are exciting support races...)
>> And WAY too much paint on WAY too much paved surface off track. Another
>> Tilkedrome skidpadring where Seb will take four-off over the limit.
> India had shit-loads of paved and painted off-track areas - and that was a
> fantastic race ...
> geoff
Another Tilkedrome skidpadring where Seb took four-off over the limit.
>>> John wrote:
>>>> So will the new GP track in Austin be any good, or just another
>>>> parade ground?
>>> Well, it look interesting. The pundits are all excited. You wont get
>>> more than that until Friday.
>> I can't remember the last time a circuit was panned before a wheel was
>> turned. Shit, some still get excited about Singasnore. I agree, that it
>> will be interesting to see what it's like but there is little value to
>> the speculation.
> Indeed. On top of that I have my Hungarian thing. Looks shite, has no
> business being there (well, you know), yet more often than not, an
> interesting race. On the other hand, Silverstone looks like it should be
> a classic every year, but often a boring race. Mean while, the majority
> of fans are only too happy to accept Monaco.
> There is no way to predict this. And even if this first race is poor,
> there is not reason it might not produce a storming race next season.
> I've got my fingers crossed for it, I want a great race in the US. It
> looks like they have done what they can to help that happen. What more
> can be asked?
Remarkable progress since January 2012. Just hope it isn't a Potemkin Village.
>> > > The continuance of your laughably inappropriate pretentious
>> > > superciliousness comes as no surprise whatsoever, nor would
>> > > I suspect that anyone, myself included, possibly care less as to
>> > > what your minor intellect so incompetently, pathetically, feebly,
>> > > repeatedly and unsuccessfully attempted yet failed to relate.
>> > Can we have the URL of your bullshit generator ?
>> A large quantity of putrid horseshit eminates from here:
>> SUIVRWlILYJT5ZL6UFd8hg.user.speranza.aioe.org
> Mummy should have told you not to share your address on a public forum.
Wholly unsurprisingly, that too flew higher than the exosphere
over his miniscule pinhead.
> >>> > The continuance of your laughably inappropriate pretentious
> >>> > superciliousness comes as no surprise whatsoever, nor would
> >>> > I suspect that anyone, myself included, possibly care less as to
> >>> > what your minor intellect so incompetently, pathetically,
> feebly, >>> > repeatedly and unsuccessfully attempted yet failed to
> relate.
> >>> Can we have the URL of your bullshit generator ?
> > > A large quantity of putrid horseshit eminates from here:
> > > SUIVRWlILYJT5ZL6UFd8hg.user.speranza.aioe.org
> > Mummy should have told you not to share your address on a public
> > forum.
> Wholly unsurprisingly, that too flew higher than the exosphere
> over his miniscule pinhead.
One can't help but be surprised that you are unable to comprehend the
nature of the simplest utterance when you are struggling with both
spelling and grammar to such an extent as to make your flowery
utterances nonsensical.
You are but a pretentious windbag who is so given over to making a fool
of himself as to have forgotten what he was entirely wrong about in the
first place.
> >>>>> The continuance of your laughably inappropriate pretentious
> >>>>> superciliousness comes as no surprise whatsoever, nor would
> >>>>> I suspect that anyone, myself included, possibly care less as to
> >>>>> what your minor intellect so incompetently, pathetically,
> feebly, >>>>> repeatedly and unsuccessfully attempted yet failed to
> relate.
> >>>> Can we have the URL of your bullshit generator ?
> >>> LOL
> >>> (I see much fun ahead with this guy!)
> >>> -- > Henry Birkin, Bt.
> > > The pleasure of course undoubtedly continuing to be all mine.
> > Banging one off whilst reading a thesaurus. Suppose there's a
> > first for everything.
> Thanx
Oh, when the veil of pretention slips.
> for the update on your current activities and all, but
> what is it that motivates one to inform others (although I most
> sincerely doubt that it's a first time for someone of your ilk).
I take it you live near an airport...or more correctly, think that you
do.
>> >>> > The continuance of your laughably inappropriate pretentious
>> >>> > superciliousness comes as no surprise whatsoever, nor would
>> >>> > I suspect that anyone, myself included, possibly care less as to
>> >>> > what your minor intellect so incompetently, pathetically,
>> feebly, >>> > repeatedly and unsuccessfully attempted yet failed to
>> relate.
>> >>> Can we have the URL of your bullshit generator ?
>> > > A large quantity of putrid horseshit eminates from here:
>> > > SUIVRWlILYJT5ZL6UFd8hg.user.speranza.aioe.org
>> > Mummy should have told you not to share your address on a public
>> > forum.
>> Wholly unsurprisingly, that too flew higher than the exosphere
>> over his miniscule pinhead.
> One can't help but be surprised that you are unable to comprehend the
> nature of the simplest utterance
Is that yet another pathetically feeble attempt at an intelligible
explanation for your continuing, always incoherent screeds?
> when you are struggling with both
> spelling and grammar to such an extent as to make your flowery
> utterances nonsensical.
I unabashedly make mistakes due to my difficulties typing
while roaring at your unintentionally hilarious responses. But
if in fact your otherwise empty, miserable existence is so
conspicuously impoverished, wanting and devoid of actual
meaning that for it to afford you any value whatsoever you
desperately resort to cruising newsgroups for superciliously
perceived errors in spelling, grammar, diction or punctuation
(therewith providing your sole raison d'etre), then far be it
from me to deny you that crucial, pretentious perquisite.
> I'm but a pretentious windbag who is so given over to making a fool
> of myself as to have forgotten what I was entirely wrong about in the
> first place.
>>> > > A large quantity of putrid horseshit eminates from here:
>>> > > SUIVRWlILYJT5ZL6UFd8hg.user.speranza.aioe.org
>>> > Mummy should have told you not to share your address on a public
>>> > forum.
>>> Wholly unsurprisingly, that too flew higher than the exosphere
>>> over his miniscule pinhead.
>> One can't help but be surprised that you are unable to comprehend the
>> nature of the simplest utterance
> Is that yet another pathetically feeble attempt at an intelligible
> explanation for your continuing, always incoherent screeds?
>> when you are struggling with both
>> spelling and grammar to such an extent as to make your flowery
>> utterances nonsensical.
> I unabashedly make mistakes due to my difficulties typing
> while roaring at your unintentionally hilarious responses. But
> if in fact your otherwise empty, miserable existence is so
> conspicuously impoverished, wanting and devoid of actual
> meaning that for it to afford you any value whatsoever you
> desperately resort to cruising newsgroups for superciliously
> perceived errors in spelling, grammar, diction or punctuation
> (therewith providing your sole raison d'etre), then far be it
> from me to deny you that crucial, pretentious perquisite.
>> I'm but a pretentious windbag who is so given over to making a fool
>> of myself as to have forgotten what I was entirely wrong about in the
>> first place.
> Fixed it for you.
(Now to asee if he's again totally flummoxed, this time by a nym shift).
> Noj <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>> George wrote ...
>>> The continuance of your laughably inappropriate pretentious
>>> superciliousness comes as no surprise whatsoever, nor would
>>> I suspect that anyone, myself included, possibly care less as to
>>> what your minor intellect so incompetently, pathetically, feebly,
>>> repeatedly and unsuccessfully attempted yet failed to relate.
>> Can we have the URL of your bullshit generator ?
> LOL
> (I see much fun ahead with this guy!)
> -- > Henry Birkin, Bt.
So NOj, your moribund quiescence is leading me in the
direction of thinking that like Paul, despite his protestations
otherwise, you're actually, unlike me, neither entertained
nor having all that much fun.
> I'm but a pretentious windbag who is so given over to making a fool
> of myself as to have forgotten what I was entirely wrong about in
> the first place.
> George Gender Bender
Your honesty is disarming. I shall leave you to enjoy your humilated
state.
That is why you do this isn't it, masochistic machination designed to
satisfy an urge to be publically humiliated.
> >>> The continuance of your laughably inappropriate pretentious
> >>> superciliousness comes as no surprise whatsoever, nor would
> >>> I suspect that anyone, myself included, possibly care less as to
> >>> what your minor intellect so incompetently, pathetically, feebly,
> >>> repeatedly and unsuccessfully attempted yet failed to relate.
> >> Can we have the URL of your bullshit generator ?
> > LOL
> > (I see much fun ahead with this guy!)
> > -- > > Henry Birkin, Bt.
> So NOj, your moribund quiescence is leading me in the
> direction of thinking that like Paul, despite his protestations
> otherwise, you're actually, unlike me, neither entertained
> nor having all that much fun.
"Do not argue with an idiot they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."
My but that's an imaginably clever sobriquet, for a 3rd grader.
>> I'm but a pretentious windbag who is so given over to making a fool
>> of myself as to have forgotten what I was entirely wrong about in
>> the first place.
>> George Gender Bender
Again with the sexual innuendo, is that all you can muster?
That obsession seems to be an ongoing theme with those
of your ilk.
> Your honesty is disarming. I shall leave you to enjoy your humilated
> state.
> That is why you do this isn't it, masochistic machination designed to
> satisfy an urge to be publically humiliated.
... unlike you, I will not stoop to the desperate, miscreant level
of so transparently and pathetically attempting to fraudulently
impersonate the headers of the very person from whom you
continue to receive such an inarguably embarrassing drubbing.
Btw, neither George, nor Payne, nor Gene, nor Yuss, nor
any part of any substring of those monikers have anything
whatsoever to do with my given name, so do continue
to knock yourself out with that empty exercise as well.
>> >>> The continuance of your laughably inappropriate pretentious
>> >>> superciliousness comes as no surprise whatsoever, nor would
>> >>> I suspect that anyone, myself included, possibly care less as to
>> >>> what your minor intellect so incompetently, pathetically, feebly,
>> >>> repeatedly and unsuccessfully attempted yet failed to relate.
>> >> Can we have the URL of your bullshit generator ?
>> > LOL
>> > (I see much fun ahead with this guy!)
>> > -- >> > Henry Birkin, Bt.
>> So NOj, your moribund quiescence is leading me in the
>> direction of thinking that like Paul, despite his protestations
>> otherwise, you're actually, unlike me, neither entertained
>> nor having all that much fun.
> "Do not argue with an idiot they drag you down to their level and beat >
> you with experience."
When you find yourself in a hole (in which you are so
clearly buried) stop digging (with apologies to W.Rogers).
Sorry to see that you've so easily caved on your promise
to have "much fun". Perhaps the reaon you've so readily
succumbed is due to the bruises you've encurred and your
oh so weak constitution.
George Payne Gene Yuss Mary build Anonymous wrote:
> Btw, neither George, nor Payne, nor Gene, nor Yuss, nor
> any part of any substring of those monikers have anything
> whatsoever to do with my given name, so do continue
> to knock yourself out with that empty exercise as well.
Nym shifting is a pointless excercise; *you* clearly cannot escape the
inferences that follow you like a bad smell; your shame is an open
secret.
Like those of your ilk you are soon exposed as the fraud you evidently
wish to disclaim.
As with the scorpion that stung the frog you are the victim of your own
repugnant nature.
>>> With all due respect to Andretti he is not in a position to know what
>>> it's going to be like on that track with 24 F1 cars heading for the
>>> first corner, or with another driver up your jacksie trying hard to
>>> get past.
>>> *********************************************
>>> F'n better position to know than you or I.
>> Not necessarily - a track can be fantastic to drive on, but be imposible
>> to overtake on in the race.
> To name just one other variable, that's also dependent
> upon the cars themselves. And in that regard, where
> would F1 be today without KERS and DRS?
DRS is just doing what KERS was supposed to do.
-- John Briggs
> > So will the new GP track in Austin be any good, or just another parade
> > ground?
> Andretti: Austin circuit is > phenomenalhttp://www.racer.com/andretti-austin-circuit-is-phenomenal/article/26...
> With all due respect to Andretti he is not in a position to know what
>it's going to be like on that track with 24 F1 cars heading for the
>first corner, or with another driver up your jacksie trying hard to
>get past. He's never driven anything as fast as a modern F1 car, and
>even if he got a drive in a 2 year old F1 car he wouldn't be giving it
>full beans and, at his age and with his current driving experience,
>probably wouldn't be able to.
But he's an all around winner - F1, Indycar, NASCAR, etc... If you are going to take anyones opinion Mario would not
be a bad choice. Then again, maybe he's just giving lip service. We have to remember it's F1 - most likely it will be a boring
track.
>> No reason they shouldn't have. Surrounding residents still be >> foooooooked.
> Haven't the circuit owners already stolen the water supplies from
> surrounding owners?
> Great Democracy - my arse.
I wonder how many years this race will last. How healthy is Bernie? Will he be alive in five or six years? Maybe if he kicks the money bucket the new F1 leadership will lower the hosting price and Austin might make it to ten years or more.
>>> No reason they shouldn't have. Surrounding residents still be
>>> foooooooked.
>> Haven't the circuit owners already stolen the water supplies from
>> surrounding owners?
>> Great Democracy - my arse.
> I wonder how many years this race will last. How healthy is Bernie?
> Will he be alive in five or six years? Maybe if he kicks the money bucket
> the new F1 leadership will lower the hosting price and Austin might make it
> to ten years or more.
My guess is they will make more money hosting other series and events, and eventually conclude they can't afford to disrupt their schedule with an annual gorge-fest for furriners (except those Texan-like Aussies and their whiney V8s).
>>>> No reason they shouldn't have. Surrounding residents still be
>>>> foooooooked.
>>> Haven't the circuit owners already stolen the water supplies from
>>> surrounding owners?
>>> Great Democracy - my arse.
>> I wonder how many years this race will last. How healthy is Bernie?
>> Will he be alive in five or six years? Maybe if he kicks the money
>> bucket
>> the new F1 leadership will lower the hosting price and Austin might make
>> it
>> to ten years or more.
> My guess is they will make more money hosting other series and events, and
> eventually conclude they can't afford to disrupt their schedule with an
> annual gorge-fest for furriners (except those Texan-like Aussies and their
> whiney V8s).
Well that's certainly been the more recent history of F1
tracks and events in the U.S.
>>>>> No reason they shouldn't have. Surrounding residents still be
>>>>> foooooooked.
>>>> Haven't the circuit owners already stolen the water supplies from
>>>> surrounding owners?
>>>> Great Democracy - my arse.
>>> I wonder how many years this race will last. How healthy is Bernie?
>>> Will he be alive in five or six years? Maybe if he kicks the money
>>> bucket
>>> the new F1 leadership will lower the hosting price and Austin might make
>>> it
>>> to ten years or more.
>> My guess is they will make more money hosting other series and events, and
>> eventually conclude they can't afford to disrupt their schedule with an
>> annual gorge-fest for furriners (except those Texan-like Aussies and their
>> whiney V8s).
> Well that's certainly been the more recent history of F1
> tracks and events in the U.S.
And while past performance is no guarantee of future returns...
> With all due respect to Andretti he is not in a position to know what
> it's going to be like on that track with 24 F1 cars heading for the
> first corner, or with another driver up your jacksie trying hard to
> get past. He's never driven anything as fast as a modern F1 car, and
> even if he got a drive in a 2 year old F1 car he wouldn't be giving it
> full beans and, at his age and with his current driving experience,
> probably wouldn't be able to.
> *****************************
> Correct, he doesn't have the experience, knowledge
> that conditions are not the same and hence the insight
> of a pretentiously supercilious usenet poster. I'm sure
> that he, as would the designers of the (not a modified
> street course, but) newly built, single purpose track, no
> doubt be most appreciative of such invaluable tutelage.
Tutelage?. He's an "ambassador" for COA. Now how do you think he came
to be in that position? Did he just wake up one morning and decide
that he'd go and give those nice people at COA some free insights and
advice?
