Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Ecclestone facing $650m legal action in USA
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
News  
View profile  
 More options Nov 20 2012, 2:42 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: News <N...@Groups.Post>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:42:55 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 20 2012 2:42 pm
Subject: Ecclestone facing $650m legal action in USA
Nope, not from Tavo Hellemund...

---

Ecclestone facing $650m legal action in USA

New York financial company Bluewaters Communications Holdings has
launched a $650m legal claim against Bernie Ecclestone, his associated
companies and others in relation to the Gerhard Gribkowsky bribe affair.

In essence Bluewaters says it was a potential buyer of the F1 business,
and lost out because of the bribe.

The action, filed in the Supreme Court of New York State, is against
Ecclestone, CVC Capital Partners, Ecclestone-run companies Alpha Prema,
Alpha Topco and Delta Topco, Gribkowsky, and Bayerische Landesbank.

The introduction sums it up thus: “This case arises out of a $44 million
bribe paid by defendant Ecclestone to defendant Gribkowsky using money
supplied by defendants CVC and BayernLB. Gribkowsky was prosecuted and
convicted of taking the bribe and is now serving an eight-and-a-half
year prison sentence. Ecclestone orchestrated and paid the bribe to
preserve his status as head of an automobile-racing empire known as
‘Formula 1.’

“Plaintiff was the high bidder for the purchase of Formula 1, but
Ecclestone bribed Gribkowsky—using CVC’s and BayernLB’s money—to steer
the sale of Formula 1 to CVC for CVC’s and Ecclestone’s benefit.
Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount exceeding $650 million.”

After explaining the details chronology of the affair over some 27
pages, it concludes: “Each of CVC, Alpha Prema, Alpha Topco, and Delta
Topco extracted billions of dollars from Formula 1 that do not
rightfully belong to them. CVC, Alpha Prema, Alpha Topco, and Delta
Topco have profited enormously from CVC’s wrongful acquisition of
Formula 1, which is currently valued at $10 billion.

“Ecclestone was unjustly enriched by receiving an improper ‘finder’s
fee.’ Gribkowsky was unjustly enriched by accepting an improper bribe.
CVC, Alpha Prema, Alpha Topco, Delta Topco, Ecclestone, and Gribkowsky
must disgorge the profits rightfully belonging to Bluewaters.”

http://adamcooperf1.com/2012/11/20/ecclestone-facing-650m-legal-actio...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bobster  
View profile  
 More options Nov 20 2012, 3:02 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: Bobster <megap...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:02:40 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 20 2012 3:02 pm
Subject: Re: Ecclestone facing $650m legal action in USA
On Nov 20, 9:42 pm, News <N...@Groups.Post> wrote:
<snip>
> “Plaintiff was the high bidder for the purchase of Formula 1,

That's the key point right there. Bernie said that it wasn't a bribe
because he had no need to bribe Gribkowsky to deal with the highest
bidder.

So the matter is really simple - did Bluewaters submit a bid or not?

We haven't Bayern mention a higher bid, and until now we haven't heard
anybody else say they bid higher than CVC. Gribkowsky didn't say there
was a higher bid.

Anyway, this should be easily validated. If there was a higher bid
then there's a motive - though it's odd that Gribkowsky doesn't seem
to know anything about it.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
News  
View profile  
 More options Nov 20 2012, 3:23 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
From: News <N...@Groups.Post>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:23:29 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 20 2012 3:23 pm
Subject: Re: Ecclestone facing $650m legal action in USA
On 11/20/2012 3:02 PM, Bobster wrote:

Assuming there was a competing bid, comes down to how bids structures
were valued.  Always does.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »