Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
**2012 Pool** Race 18, Abu Dhabi GP - Results
14 views
Skip to first unread message
Mark
Nov 5, 2012, 6:08:49 AM11/5/12
to
The top 5 are currently:
1 AC 168
2 Peter 158
3 Sir Tim 156
4 WebSlave 154
5 Claude 144
The people who scored points are:
16 Shaun 12
1 AC 10
20 ceg 10
5 Claude 10
28 EB5AGV 10
10 Hornplayer9599 10
20 Jakub Barbasz 10
16 John 10
12 larkim 10
18 Percy Flage 10
2 Peter 10
15 Phil Carmody 10
19 Roman Figaj 10
3 Sir Tim 10
12 Sreekumar A 10
8 Terry Fields 10
6 FB 8
25 Ar 6
33 Bobster 6
23 CatharticF1 6
26 Dave Baker 6
20 down_hill 6
7 johnh 6
10 Mark 6
12 ric zito 6
4 WebSlave 6
35 kung fu 2
23 Mark Jackson 2
Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
;-)
Mark
The overall table looks like:
1 Sir Tim 10 4 12 0 8 6 0 14 6 6
12 4 4 14 10 18 18 10 156
2 Bobster 14 6 6 2 0 2 6 2 2 10
8 - - - - - - 6 64
3 Hornplayer9599 10 8 10 0 6 6 10 - 4 8
0 6 2 6 - 14 26 10 126
4 CatharticF1 8 4 10 0 4 6 10 4 6 2
6 10 14 18 - - - 6 108
5 AC 10 0 0 4 2 6 10 14 6 6
12 10 18 14 12 18 16 10 168
6 larkim 14 2 10 0 0 2 10 6 6 2
12 - 12 10 0 6 20 10 122
7 Shaun 16 8 6 0 4 (0) 10 8 0 10
12 4 4 8 0 6 10 12 118
8 FB 6 2 0 4 14 4 0 12 10 12
4 12 2 4 12 14 20 8 140
9 Sreekumar A 12 4 2 2 - 4 2 12 14 10
12 4 4 6 12 - 12 10 122
10 Jakub Barbasz 6 6 6 4 6 6 10 2 6 6
10 2 4 2 2 8 14 10 110
11 Francisco 14 2 2 6 (0) 0 - - 10 6
8 12 - 14 2 - - - 76
12 ric zito 4 4 8 0 0 4 10 10 8 2
6 4 14 6 6 18 12 6 122
13 Ed Beroset 2 4 6 6 8 - - 10 (4) 6
- - - - - - - - 42 (46)
14 Phil Carmody 18 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 10 2
(2) 8 2 4 6 12 20 10 120 (122)
15 EB5AGV 4 6 - 2 - 2 6 10 12 12
0 4 8 4 2 2 6 10 90
16 Mark 14 4 4 2 0 4 6 4 8 2
12 4 16 10 2 12 16 6 126
17 Peter 12 4 12 2 6 6 10 4 8 6
8 14 2 8 12 14 20 10 158
18 Ar 2 4 6 0 6 4 0 10 10 10
0 0 8 12 8 10 6 6 102
19 Mower Man 12 4 2 0 0 0 12 6 0 2
10 6 12 10 0 4 4 - 84
20 David Melville 14 - 6 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 20
21 Terry Fields 10 0 6 0 14 4 0 12 8 2
4 8 (8) 18 10 14 16 10 136 (144)
22 Frank Adam 12 0 4 0 4 - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 20
23 News 10 6 6 0 10 2 2 20 10 16
8 14 2 2 6 8 12 (10) 134 (144)
24 Duesenberg - 6 0 0 0 4 6 6 6 10
(2) 8 2 2 12 12 - - 74 (76)
25 Percy Flage 18 4 6 6 0 8 6 0 6 12
0 8 - - 0 14 16 10 114
26 Roman Figaj 6 0 12 2 (0) 0 10 (4) (2) 2
(4) 6 18 - 6 14 26 10 112 (122)
27 John 10 8 14 0 0 2 0 14 8 6
2 0 2 10 6 14 12 10 118
28 down_hill 12 4 10 0 0 0 10 0 6 0
12 10 12 12 2 2 12 6 110
29 ceg 10 4 10 0 0 0 10 8 4 0
2 8 4 6 12 14 8 10 110
30 johnh 20 4 6 0 0 6 10 2 6 10
2 10 18 10 6 16 6 6 138
31 Claude 14 4 10 0 - - 0 12 4 10
0 8 6 26 2 18 20 10 144
32 mairsz 12 (8) 6 - 4 0 10 - - 2
2 4 18 10 6 4 - - 78 (86)
33 build - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 0
34 Brad 10 2 - - - - - - 0 -
8 - - - - - - - 20
35 WebSlave 26 6 6 0 4 0 10 8 6 14
4 10 8 4 6 16 20 6 154
36 Richard Miller - 4 10 6 2 4 10 2 10 -
16 2 12 2 (0) 14 - - 94
37 Mark Jackson - 4 10 0 0 0 10 0 4 6
12 4 16 2 6 12 20 2 108
38 Joseph Jay Bou - - 10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 10
39 Mike P - - - - 10 - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 10
40 Dave Baker - - - - - - - 2 8 10
10 4 2 8 6 24 20 6 100
41 kung fu - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 18 18 2 38
Ordered by points:
1 AC 10 0 0 4 2 6 10 14 6 6
12 10 18 14 12 18 16 10 168
2 Peter 12 4 12 2 6 6 10 4 8 6
8 14 2 8 12 14 20 10 158
3 Sir Tim 10 4 12 0 8 6 0 14 6 6
12 4 4 14 10 18 18 10 156
4 WebSlave 26 6 6 0 4 0 10 8 6 14
4 10 8 4 6 16 20 6 154
5 Claude 14 4 10 0 - - 0 12 4 10
0 8 6 26 2 18 20 10 144
6 FB 6 2 0 4 14 4 0 12 10 12
4 12 2 4 12 14 20 8 140
7 johnh 20 4 6 0 0 6 10 2 6 10
2 10 18 10 6 16 6 6 138
8 Terry Fields 10 0 6 0 14 4 0 12 8 2
4 8 (8) 18 10 14 16 10 136 (144)
9 News 10 6 6 0 10 2 2 20 10 16
8 14 2 2 6 8 12 (10) 134 (144)
10 Hornplayer9599 10 8 10 0 6 6 10 - 4 8
0 6 2 6 - 14 26 10 126
10 Mark 14 4 4 2 0 4 6 4 8 2
12 4 16 10 2 12 16 6 126
12 larkim 14 2 10 0 0 2 10 6 6 2
12 - 12 10 0 6 20 10 122
12 ric zito 4 4 8 0 0 4 10 10 8 2
6 4 14 6 6 18 12 6 122
12 Sreekumar A 12 4 2 2 - 4 2 12 14 10
12 4 4 6 12 - 12 10 122
15 Phil Carmody 18 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 10 2
(2) 8 2 4 6 12 20 10 120 (122)
16 John 10 8 14 0 0 2 0 14 8 6
2 0 2 10 6 14 12 10 118
16 Shaun 16 8 6 0 4 (0) 10 8 0 10
12 4 4 8 0 6 10 12 118
18 Percy Flage 18 4 6 6 0 8 6 0 6 12
0 8 - - 0 14 16 10 114
19 Roman Figaj 6 0 12 2 (0) 0 10 (4) (2) 2
(4) 6 18 - 6 14 26 10 112 (122)
20 ceg 10 4 10 0 0 0 10 8 4 0
2 8 4 6 12 14 8 10 110
20 down_hill 12 4 10 0 0 0 10 0 6 0
12 10 12 12 2 2 12 6 110
20 Jakub Barbasz 6 6 6 4 6 6 10 2 6 6
10 2 4 2 2 8 14 10 110
23 CatharticF1 8 4 10 0 4 6 10 4 6 2
6 10 14 18 - - - 6 108
23 Mark Jackson - 4 10 0 0 0 10 0 4 6
12 4 16 2 6 12 20 2 108
25 Ar 2 4 6 0 6 4 0 10 10 10
0 0 8 12 8 10 6 6 102
26 Dave Baker - - - - - - - 2 8 10
10 4 2 8 6 24 20 6 100
27 Richard Miller - 4 10 6 2 4 10 2 10 -
16 2 12 2 (0) 14 - - 94
28 EB5AGV 4 6 - 2 - 2 6 10 12 12
0 4 8 4 2 2 6 10 90
29 Mower Man 12 4 2 0 0 0 12 6 0 2
10 6 12 10 0 4 4 - 84
30 mairsz 12 (8) 6 - 4 0 10 - - 2
2 4 18 10 6 4 - - 78 (86)
31 Francisco 14 2 2 6 (0) 0 - - 10 6
8 12 - 14 2 - - - 76
32 Duesenberg - 6 0 0 0 4 6 6 6 10
(2) 8 2 2 12 12 - - 74 (76)
33 Bobster 14 6 6 2 0 2 6 2 2 10
8 - - - - - - 6 64
34 Ed Beroset 2 4 6 6 8 - - 10 (4) 6
- - - - - - - - 42 (46)
35 kung fu - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 18 18 2 38
36 Brad 10 2 - - - - - - 0 -
8 - - - - - - - 20
36 David Melville 14 - 6 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 20
36 Frank Adam 12 0 4 0 4 - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 20
39 Joseph Jay Bou - - 10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 10
39 Mike P - - - - 10 - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 10
41 build - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - 0
News
Nov 5, 2012, 7:05:27 AM11/5/12
to
On 11/5/2012 6:08 AM, Mark wrote:
> The people who scored points are:
>
> The people who scored points are:
>
> 23 News 10 6 6 0 10 2 2 20 10 16
> 8 14 2 2 6 8 12 (10) 134 (144)
Guess you elected not to score my slightly tardy, hurricane delayed,
> 8 14 2 2 6 8 12 (10) 134 (144)
Friday night entry.
Mark
Nov 5, 2012, 9:30:59 AM11/5/12
to
If no-one objects, I'm happy to mark as valid.
AC
Nov 5, 2012, 9:48:38 AM11/5/12
to
beats me at the end with those lost points, I really object!!!!!
Like I say, this is F1 related and self interest rules, must be consistent.
Now, I would like to put a smiley in and make out its all jokes, and I
started out like that, but as I type part of me is getting all
competitive. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Mark, you decide, and I'll lynch you if it goes wrong!!! :) There,
smiley!!!
--
AC
News
Nov 5, 2012, 10:02:24 AM11/5/12
to
Message has been deleted
AC
Nov 5, 2012, 11:46:11 AM11/5/12
to
I have not taken any note of how you compare to me, and frankly my
position in the pool suggests Im luckier than Vettel. Its not like I've
been putting some great analytical brain to over use, its pure guess
work. So, TBH, I don't mind if you get your points. Your reason is fair
enough.
I suppose the main thing is some sort of consistency. I cant remember,
but were there Aussies (for example) who missed dead lines because of
their local disasters? Did they get their late entries allowed? Were
there other similar cases? IMHO, fairness dictates that we follow what
ever decision was taken then, which I hope were consistent.
Anyway, given that this is supposed to be fun and nothing else, I think
we should accept reasonable exceptions.
--
AC
AC
Nov 5, 2012, 11:49:54 AM11/5/12
to
Terry Fields wrote:
> I don't object in any way, especially considering the PP's
> circumstances...
>
> ...but I had a late entry some time back (I flagged it up as such) due
> to not knowing what day it was (it happens as you get older!) and was
> then and am happy now to play by the rules.
>
> It's just that the measly 8 points I didn't score would move me from
> 8th to 5=, such has been the volatility of the year!
Yeah, that would be annoying!!!!
>
> I for one am grateful for the pool being run - due to the BBC thing
> I'd abandoned 25 years of interest in F1 late last year, only to be
> thrown a lifeline at the last minute by someone making available a
> slingbox stream - so I had a lot of catching up to do. The pool for me
> adds an interesting extra to F1 weekends.
>
> Terry Fields
>
Always worth confirming our gratitude for this pool. It really does add
to the race weekend. The work that goes in to it is very much appreciated.
--
AC
> circumstances...
>
> ...but I had a late entry some time back (I flagged it up as such) due
> to not knowing what day it was (it happens as you get older!) and was
> then and am happy now to play by the rules.
>
> It's just that the measly 8 points I didn't score would move me from
> 8th to 5=, such has been the volatility of the year!
Yeah, that would be annoying!!!!
>
> I for one am grateful for the pool being run - due to the BBC thing
> I'd abandoned 25 years of interest in F1 late last year, only to be
> thrown a lifeline at the last minute by someone making available a
> slingbox stream - so I had a lot of catching up to do. The pool for me
> adds an interesting extra to F1 weekends.
>
> Terry Fields
>
Always worth confirming our gratitude for this pool. It really does add
to the race weekend. The work that goes in to it is very much appreciated.
--
AC
Message has been deleted
~misfit~
Nov 6, 2012, 2:00:40 AM11/6/12
to
Somewhere on teh intarwebs Terry Fields wrote:
> Just had a thought about next year, if the pool runs (and I hope it
> does): All entrants to set up one default entry, which would stand for
> the season and could only be over-ridden by a legitimate 'normal'
> entry prior to the start of FP1 for each GP.
Which is pretty much what I've done this year (after getting the OK here in
the group - for all to see - from Mark). Therefore I think that, if anyone's
missed a race prediction and *doesn't* have a default set up then they only
have themselves to blame.
--
/Shaun.
"Humans will have advanced a long, long, way when religious belief has a
cozy little classification in the DSM."
David Melville (in r.a.s.f1)
> does): All entrants to set up one default entry, which would stand for
> the season and could only be over-ridden by a legitimate 'normal'
> entry prior to the start of FP1 for each GP.
Which is pretty much what I've done this year (after getting the OK here in
the group - for all to see - from Mark). Therefore I think that, if anyone's
missed a race prediction and *doesn't* have a default set up then they only
have themselves to blame.
--
/Shaun.
"Humans will have advanced a long, long, way when religious belief has a
cozy little classification in the DSM."
David Melville (in r.a.s.f1)
FB
Nov 6, 2012, 1:14:57 PM11/6/12
to
"News" <Ne...@Group.Name> wrote news:k78a29$n5f$1...@dont-email.me...
podium...
FB
Claude
Nov 6, 2012, 6:46:59 PM11/6/12
to
"Mark" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k78ij3$77e$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> The default (if I don't intervene) is to discount late entries.
>
> If no-one objects, I'm happy to mark as valid.
I object. Making an exception is a really bad idea.
> The default (if I don't intervene) is to discount late entries.
>
> If no-one objects, I'm happy to mark as valid.
Ar
Nov 7, 2012, 4:17:58 AM11/7/12
to
On 05/11/12 14:30, Mark wrote:
> The default (if I don't intervene) is to discount late entries.
>
> If no-one objects, I'm happy to mark as valid.
I object, if only fairness to others. Force majeure should not be
> The default (if I don't intervene) is to discount late entries.
>
> If no-one objects, I'm happy to mark as valid.
allowed, short of a posting being successful but shown on a different
USENET news server.
Bigbird
Nov 7, 2012, 6:20:14 AM11/7/12
to
You were given plenty of warning about Sandy and the race. I guess if
you will make not drowning a priority that is your choice. ;)
build
Nov 7, 2012, 6:43:53 AM11/7/12
to
beers,
Percy Flage
Nov 7, 2012, 3:21:48 PM11/7/12
to
fairness to others who have not been allowed to have late entries
allowed, that you don't count this.
Harsh, but fair.
I like the idea of a default entry, or better, unless an entry has been
submitted, you count the latest entry as valid.
Could be a rule for next year.
--
Percy Flage
"Life is too short to have to explain everyday."
Percy Flage
Nov 7, 2012, 3:22:42 PM11/7/12
to
On 05/11/2012 16:49, AC wrote:
>
> Always worth confirming our gratitude for this pool. It really does add
> to the race weekend. The work that goes in to it is very much appreciated.
+1
>
> Always worth confirming our gratitude for this pool. It really does add
> to the race weekend. The work that goes in to it is very much appreciated.
Message has been deleted
0 new messages