Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Some confirmed data, from Alonso

68 views
Skip to first unread message

Shevek

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 9:34:52 AM9/7/07
to
Today, in the sport news of the Spanish channel Telecinco, the
commentator Antonio Lobato -personal friend of Alonso and De la Rosa-
told the events after a conversation with Fernando Alonso.

Alonso told Lobato that on Friday, he, Hamilton and PDLR received
Mosley's letter asking for any information available. After thinking
about it and consulting the team, Alonso sent all the e-mails he had
with McLaren's people.

After reviewing this information, the FIA thought that there were new
proofs and summoned McLaren for the 13th of September, as we know.

He also confirmed that Hamilton didn't send any e-mail or information to
the FIA.

--
Shevek

Message has been deleted

Trust No One®

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 10:24:25 AM9/7/07
to

"noone" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:noone-0A4528....@free.teranews.com...
>
> Hamilton impeded the FIA investigation for personal gain and must be
> permanently banned.
>
Perhaps Hambone (no disrespect - I just love the nickname) didn't send any
information or emails because he didn't have any to send?

Accusing him, based on this one thing, of impeding the FIA investigation for
personal gain is surely a bit rash! I certainly hope his lawyers aren't
monitoring the newsgroup :)


--
Peter <X-Files fan>


gs

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 10:47:01 AM9/7/07
to
On 7 Sep, 15:24, "Trust No One®" <dana.scu...@usa.xnet> wrote:
> "noone" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:noone-0A4528....@free.teranews.com...
>
> > Hamilton impeded the FIA investigation for personal gain and must be
> > permanently banned.
>
> Perhaps Hambone (no disrespect - I just love the nickname) didn't send any
> information or emails because he didn't have any to send?

But that would not fit in with the hatred people like noone have for
real F1 drivers, nor with their agenda of having any real competition
in the sport, for people like noone winning by default or any means
possible is easier sometimes.

> I certainly hope his lawyers aren't
> monitoring the newsgroup

If they are, they like many other I'm sure would not be too concerned
on the viewpoint of an idiot.

John Briggs

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 10:53:46 AM9/7/07
to
Trust No One® wrote:
> "noone" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:noone-0A4528....@free.teranews.com...
>>
>> Hamilton impeded the FIA investigation for personal gain and must be
>> permanently banned.
>>
> Perhaps Hambone (no disrespect - I just love the nickname) didn't
> send any information or emails because he didn't have any to send?

Perhaps he doesn't speak Spanish?
--
John Briggs


a_Frank

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 11:51:45 AM9/7/07
to

If they were, they'd be still gasping for air, trambling and in tears
as they were cleaning all kinds of beverages off their monitor,
keyboard, clothes, etc... :)

--

Regards, Frank

Paul-B

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 12:47:11 PM9/7/07
to
Trust No One. wrote:

You forget, you'replying to rasf1's premier pervert... "noone" hangs
around schoolyards with his paedophile buddies. He knows nothing at all
about F1, but just about all there is to know about child pornography.

--

ocea

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 12:50:28 PM9/7/07
to

Yeah... LOL.

Hal S.

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 1:28:32 PM9/7/07
to

"Trust No One®" <dana....@usa.xnet> wrote in message
news:5kd5amF...@mid.individual.net...
>-------------------------------------

Do you really think his lawyers' give a fig as to what goes on in this
electronic playpen? Get serious.

--
Hal S.


RdKetchup

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 1:40:10 PM9/7/07
to


Paul, seriously, weren't you proven most probably wrong on that count?

I mean, there is so much wrong with this moron, why do you need to
invent additional flaws to his character?

Phil Carmody

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 2:30:43 PM9/7/07
to
RdKetchup <na...@niet.com.invalid> writes:
> Paul-B wrote:
> > Trust No One. wrote:
> >
> >> "noone" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >> news:noone-0A4528....@free.teranews.com...
> >>> Hamilton impeded the FIA investigation for personal gain and must be
> >>> permanently banned.
> >>>
> >> Perhaps Hambone (no disrespect - I just love the nickname) didn't
> >> send any information or emails because he didn't have any to send?
> >>
> >> Accusing him, based on this one thing, of impeding the FIA
> >> investigation for personal gain is surely a bit rash! I certainly
> >> hope his lawyers aren't monitoring the newsgroup :)
> > You forget, you'replying to rasf1's premier pervert... "noone" hangs
> > around schoolyards with his paedophile buddies. He knows nothing at all
> > about F1, but just about all there is to know about child pornography.
>
> Paul, seriously, weren't you proven most probably wrong on that count?

He was. I don't keep my posts, but google may have some hope of
dredging it up. I guarantee that it contains the string "4ax" as
I explicitly remember that the porn dude used that news server.

Ric got the brunt of my rant, as he was playing sidekick at
the wrong time. He racanted most graciously. My venting should
have been directed primarily at Paul-B.

Phil
--
Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.
-- Microsoft voice recognition live demonstration

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Paul-B

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 6:58:14 PM9/7/07
to
RdKetchup wrote:

The evidence of noone's perversion is far stronger than the "evidence"
of what he claims McLaren have been guilty of, yes?

Go figure.

--

Paul-B

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 7:00:08 PM9/7/07
to
Phil Carmody wrote:

My proof is stronger than the idiot Brain's "proof" of McLaren's guilt.

I'm merely using Brain's own yardstick.

--

Phil Carmody

unread,
Sep 8, 2007, 6:00:30 AM9/8/07
to
"Paul-B" <pa...@rasf1.net> writes:

> Phil Carmody wrote:
> My proof is stronger than the idiot Brain's "proof" of McLaren's guilt.
>
> I'm merely using Brain's own yardstick.

Bullcrap. First of all, you have no proof, and to call your
ill-founded ravings "proof" is an insult to anyone who knows
what well-reasoned logic is. Secondly, your gabbering is
_less_ well founded than Brians, not "stronger" in any way.

There *is* evidence, agreed by all parties, that at least one
member of McLaren has had knowledge of Ferrari internals
which he should not have had, and that other members of McLaren
knew this, even if they didn't know the Ferrari internals.
Brian sees a splash of oil and thinks he's found an oil well.

There is no evidence at all, and it is disputed by everyone
who has a brain and knows how to read NNTP headers, that
Brian has ever had any involvement or interest in anything
prurient on usenet. You've not even seen a splash of oil,
you're just making crap up.

I notice, as might be expected from either an ignoramus or a
coward, there was a tumbleweed/crickets.wav-combo in response
to my polite request in:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.sport.f1/msg/f9434b9e1a902820?output=gplain

See also my response to Ric in that same thread for my evidence
that the 5 or more posters using that nym are entirely different
people.

Until you drop the subject, you are _below_ Brian. In simple
terms, that would be below the complete fucking idiot level.

Now, far less politely than before, put up, or shut up.

0 new messages