Nope, 5 of 30, but for those who are sufficiently confident
of that 1:4 ratio pretense, I'm more than willing to wager
that there will be more than twenty cars at Indy this year.
Any of you born liars and cowards have the courage of
your convictions? Of course not, never have, never will.
As always, you're (plural) all mouth.
This shit's just TOOOO easy!
What are you betting; that AGR will be 5 of 30 entries? Or just your
schoolboy timidity, 'there will be more than twenty cars at Indy?'
Not betting the juggernaut IRL will make the traditional thirty-three
entries, eh? If you haven't the conviction and balls to bet that
TG's IRL will make the traditional number, your spinelessness
presents you and the IRL as whining failures. If you don't bet the
traditional thirty-three you've been reduced to elemental abject
cowardice, and subsequently you should just slink off to whatever
elemental scum from whence you hail. Thanks for playing, born liar and
cowardly dot!
.
"Allan Pagan" <allan...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141192709....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The offered wager couldn't have been more clear, but the obsessed
bullshit artist responds, as easily goaded and fully expected, with his
inimitable, pathetically feeble attempts at obfuscation, with even more
supplemental "blah, blah blah" and the rantings and ravings of a lunatic.
Irrespective of their always wrong (but never contrite), pitifully failed
track record, we can all be certain that next year at this time, as with
former seasons, the tired claims that the IRL: will never roll a wheel,
will be dead, won't field 33 cars for the 500, will merge with whatever
the other series calls itself at the time..., will be trotted out yet again.
What a shocking surprise! What thoroughly effortless prey!!
It's hilariously entertaining and endlessly rewarding witnessing
how powerfully and successfully my undeniable arguments have
once again silenced the weasels, except for that one true lunatic.
While he certainly comes off as someone steeped in the most bitter
and jealous of rages, that's not the entire story. Truth be told, like
any parrot, he's truly unaware of what he's actually saying. He just
spouts the same old continuous diet of "fowl" rote - tired lines. At
other times, unlike the tropical bird, he also employs a repeated
nonsensical stringing together of individual words he's observed
others using (as well evidenced by his continued and growing list
of errors in grammar, syntax, diction, spelling ...), all the while
wholly oblivious to his demonstrations of consummate
buffoonery by his clumsy attempts at their usage.
But apparently that, married with his ongoing obsession with
me, keeps him occupied long enough to preclude his doing any
real damage during the same time period, and for that at least,
the remainder of the populace might rest more comfortably.
news:1141333947.9...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> Three paragraphs of bullshit and still no balls; you've proved to be a
> fixated and cowardly nothing. You're a cowardly moron, dot. Maybe
> mommy can kiss your little, boo-boo.
>
And to think, I wouldn't have imagined how his responses
might have become more sophomoric or farcical. Silly me.
You never posted a line, any form of odds, or terms? Yet you're
still spewing nonsense, three replies later. You're truly a mental
incompetent, dot. Your posts and you are the embodiment of imbecellic.
news:1141333947.9...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> Three paragraphs of bullshit and still no balls; you've proved to be a
> fixated and cowardly nothing. You're a cowardly moron, dot. Maybe
> mommy can kiss your little, boo-boo.
>
And to think, I wouldn't have imagined how his responses
might have become more sophomoric or farcical. Silly me.
"Allan Pagan" <allan...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141339140.9...@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
>
> . repeated his message of cowardice, in error, clear stupidity and
> surrender:
>
To reiterate: "... he also employs a repeated nonsensical stringing
together of individual words he's observed others using (as well
evidenced by his continued and growing list of errors in grammar,
syntax, diction, spelling ...), all the while wholly oblivious to his
demonstrations of consummate buffoonery by his clumsy attempts
at their usage."
Gaffes in continuity, punctuation, attribution, quoting, clarity,
case ... also could have been easily and explicity included.
His leg-humping, droning obsession continues in perpetuity.
His ineptitude, and the entertainment it provides, never ceases.
It can't respond directly to a challenge. It can't handle the
humiliation of being proven incompetent nor will it be able to respond
coherently if proven even possibly wrong.
When cornered, a sick animal will lash out in every directin rather then
address the threat.
So I wouldn't put much faith in the dot responding more than in its
usual drug-induced ramblings.