Out of interest, one bit puzzles me:
Judge Dowd delivered a victory to both parties in May when he ordered Ewald
to stop using trademarked Jeep parts on his cargo trailers .. and, based on
a precedent called nominative fair use, Judge Dowd granted Ewald the right
to continue to advertise his trailers as "built with authentic new Jeep
parts"
So is that saying you could build it with Jeep bits as long as those parts
don't say "Jeep" on them ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Special Ops" <Specia...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:17724-41...@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pages/stories/mstories02.asp
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
Snow ...
Special Ops wrote:
> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pages/stories/mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
--
___________________________________________________________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
___________________________________________________________
Heh.
The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.
Way to go Dennis!
--
DougW
"DougW" <post.r...@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:ODMgd.92256$tU4.84566@okepread06...
Regards,
--JamesT
"Special Ops" <Specia...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:17724-41...@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/
"Special Ops" <Specia...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-41...@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
--James
"mabar" <ma...@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
news:vsOdnehM7c-...@gbronline.com...
"RocknTJ" <jet...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/
"Matt Macchiarolo" <ma...@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:pZydncLXW8f...@comcast.com...
You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would have
had topless chicks painted on his trailers?
That is interesting.
I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer.
--James
"Jerry Bransford" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05...
There were NO nude girl pics on Rubicon.com and they still took it.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"RocknTJ" <jet...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:OjRgd.192813$a85.185997@fed1read04...
I think you might be getting rubicon.com confused with hardcorejeep.com.
Rubicon.com was Nate's and wasn't even "online" really. Even though Nate had
owned it way before the Rubicon Jeep was introduced DC stold it.
--James
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:U7Sgd.2810$up1....@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
From the man himself (5 May 03)
"i registered jeeprubicon.com/.net/info strictly to build another "i love my
jeep" website
around my rubicon. for the record, jeeprubicon.com/.net/info as well has
hardcorejeep.net/org has NEVER had any questionable material or porn of any
type. only hardcorejeep.com had the babes."
rubicon.com is active (albeit a bit wierd).
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"RocknTJ" <jet...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:VPSgd.192841$a85.85772@fed1read04...
Tom
"Special Ops" <Specia...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-41...@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
I still think the ball is in Jerry's court. LOL
--James
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:35Tgd.2853$up1...@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/
"RocknTJ" <jet...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:nYTgd.192860$a85.117532@fed1read04...
"Jerry Bransford" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05...
"So Jerry,
You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would have
had topless chicks painted on his trailers?
That is interesting.
I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer.
--James
Oh and BTW Jerry,
There were NO nude girl pics on jeeprubicon.com and they still took it."
Now answer the question.
The way I see it is, one you think the outcome would be different for Dennis
or two you are just taking "pot shots" at Nathan. Seeing how Nathan isn't
involved in this conversation personally, if it is option two then Bill has
more than one leg to stand on, with regards to his opinion of you.
"Jerry Bransford" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05...
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/
"RocknTJ" <jet...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04...
2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't reflect
the facts.
Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just has
some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because that's
how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter that
he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark in
his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's to
D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
cybersquatting.
I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter infringing
on my business's name this past summer.
"RocknTJ" <jet...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04...
Where exactly did you get the idea that what JB said was that the results
for Dennis would have been different? You're the only one that said that.
All JB said was he would have sued Nate over the porn if he had been DC.
Shoot, he's not even the one that pulled Nate into the thread. That was
mabar and you.
"Special Ops" <Specia...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:14639-41...@storefull-3233.bay.webtv.net...
>> "Jerry Bransford" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05...
>> > True but he was also posting porn pics on his site....
> Shoot, he's not even the one that pulled Nate into the thread. That was
> mabar and you.
Although you are correct that marbar and I started talking about Nate NO ONE
pulled the porn into this except JB.
I will state it again, there was no porn on jeeprubicon.com so porn has
nothing to do with this. JB choose to bring it up. IMO he is a real cheap
shot expert.
Maybe the guy is obsessed with "show the pink" as he (JB) calls it, he sure
has the discription down. Problem is, it's wasn't being discussed and it had
nothing to do with "rubicon" that was being discussed.
--James
"rubicon" and porn have nothing to do with each other in this conversation.
You didn't "state your opinion" you took a cheap shot at Nathan.
I am thinking more and more Bill is correct. Get some huevos man, if your
going to take a cheap shot, say so.
--James
"Jerry Bransford" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Hc_gd.71029$bk1.69576@fed1read05...
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
> I will state it again, there was no porn on jeeprubicon.com so porn has
many congratulations dennis. im truly happy to see justice done. i
can only imagine your level of personal satisfaction by putting one
person in particular in her place.
> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
thanks james. fwiw, they actually took a total of 6 domains, 5 of
which had _nothing_ to do with the babes.
"settle or cough up $60,000+" was all the advice i needed. :-)
you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
:-)
sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
your heart will consume you.
nice try short-stop. the issue youve clearly tried to avoid answering
was the other 5 URLS having _nothing_ to do with the babes. as for
your prudish opinion on what constitutes porn, no one will deny you
that. you may be offended by simple feminine nudity, but some of us
find it quite beautiful. :-)
Dennis had far more in the way of legal legs to stand on and rightly won
his case. Like it or not, the two cases DO have some similarities as
well as differences. Because of Nathan's case outcome, I feel Dennis'
case is a sweeter victory.
--
___________________________________________________________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
___________________________________________________________
frankly, the jeep was the ONLY chrysler vehicle i've owned and liked..
evertythign from their k cars, to neons, to a durango my brother had were crap
:(
congrats!!!
-Steve, former 98 TJ
> Dennis had far more in the way of legal legs to stand on and rightly won
> his case.
Technically, it was settled...both sides got something they wanted. Though
there was no "victor" per se, I am sure Dennis is very happy with the
outcome.
Like it or not, the two cases DO have some similarities as
> well as differences.
Both cases involved trademark infringement, but that's probably where the
similarities end.
>I am of the opinion Nathan was attacked by D.C. lawyers
>because of Lloyd R. Parker. The babes excuse was just a smoke screen.
>Nathan got into Parker's face, here in this group, and Parker called his
>old student at the law firm, in Atlanta, that represented D.C. She,
>being a fellow tree-hugging liberal, used her position, and D.C.'s money
>and power, to attack Nathan as a personal favor to her old professor.
thanks dennis. some will never accept this due to various reasons having
nothing to do with the case itself, but having personally dealt with these
people i _know_ that what you say is right.
Whatever happened to all those artistic photos, anyway?
L.W.(ßill) Hughes III wrote:
--
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" <billh...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:41853806...@cox.net...
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:H5bhd.3446$up1....@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
As a matter of fact, my question had nothing to do with girls "spreading
themselves to show the pink" as you call it, I think you brought that up. Oh
yeah, you did.
--James
(Maybe I'll catch your reply next week, I am off to SEMA in Vegas.)
"Jerry Bransford" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Hc_gd.71029$bk1.69576@fed1read05...
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"MontanaJeeper" <montan...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041031133044...@mb-m01.aol.com...
http://www.google.com/groups?safe=images&as_uauthors=lloyd%20parker&lr=&hl=e
n
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:scchd.3508$up1....@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" <billh...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4185391D...@cox.net...
--
Will Honea
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Matt Macchiarolo" <ma...@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:SfednYKZZod...@comcast.com...
Dave Milne wrote:
> hmm, he seems politer - someone must have castra*ed him or something.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
--
twaldron wrote:
>
> You, of course, are assuming there was something to remove.
"L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" <billh...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:41859825...@cox.net...
playing around on my own montana mountain side. :-)
http://7slotgrille.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=416 hoping to get my
basement dug before the ground freezes.
Tom
"MontanaJeeper" <montan...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:c1e32590.0410...@posting.google.com...
absolutely. my property has some great off-roading, hunting, fishing,
and some of the most rugged terrain ive ever seen. if youre ever in
the area drop by for some cold bear and hot buffalo steaks. maybe
teach me how to fly fish without hurting myself. :-)
MontanaJeeper wrote:
> absolutely. my property has some great off-roading, hunting, fishing,
> and some of the most rugged terrain ive ever seen. if youre ever in
> the area drop by for some cold bear and hot buffalo steaks. maybe
> teach me how to fly fish without hurting myself. :-)
--
___________________________________________________________
tw
71 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
> "mabar" <ma...@NooSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message news:<9audnZClJu3...@gbronline.com>...
>
>>Beautiful piece of property Nathan! Keep us posted.
>
>
> absolutely. my property has some great off-roading, hunting, fishing,
> and some of the most rugged terrain ive ever seen. if youre ever in
> the area drop by for some cold bear and hot buffalo steaks. maybe
> teach me how to fly fish without hurting myself. :-)
First you find a fish with big fins, ya know, big as wings. Then you
freeze the fish, so the fins and body are nice and stiff. Then, you
throw the thing as hard as you can, first making sure it can't hit
anything and bounce back and hit you anywhere that hurts. Viola, you
have just flown a fish.
As for fly fishing, dirty little secret: all the big ones are usually
caught on worms, grasshoppers, or Pauske's Fireballs.
Ex cow orker moved up to Kalispell just over a year ago....wife gave
edict to move back to California after freezing rear end off last
winter.