Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling.   D.C. lost on all
of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
Willys Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
D.J.

         www.SpecialOps4x4.com