Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

It's the 1987 again

1 view
Skip to first unread message

patrick.m...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 12, 2012, 8:43:18 PM1/12/12
to
Just like the press clippings of 1987, 5-liter Mustangs are once again
being praised for "best bang for the buck."

http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/01/12/msn-autos-ranks-the-2012-mustang-gt-as-the-best-bang-for-the-buck/

Patrick

Scammed Public

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 9:13:06 AM1/24/12
to
On Jan 12, 8:43 pm, "NoOptio...@aol.com"
<patrick.mckenzi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just like the press clippings of 1987, 5-liter Mustangs are once again
> being praised for "best bang for the buck."
>
> http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/01/12/msn-autos-ranks-the-2012-mus...
>
> Patrick

Except you could get a stripped-down LX 5.0L in 1987 for about
$13,000...

patrick.m...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 3:19:28 PM1/24/12
to
On Jan 24, 8:13 am, Scammed Public <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 8:43 pm, "NoOptio...@aol.com"
>
> <patrick.mckenzi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just like the press clippings of 1987, 5-liter Mustangs are once again
> > being praised for "best bang for the buck."
>
> >http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/01/12/msn-autos-ranks-the-2012-mus...

> Except you could get a stripped-down LX 5.0L in 1987 for about
> $13,000...

$10.7K. That's what mine cost.

But then my '87 didn't do what my '11 does.

Patrick


0 new messages