On Feb 2, 7:56 pm, "biofilm" <
inva...@invalid.com> wrote:
> "Scammed Public" <
rander3...@gmail.com> wrote in message
These number were obtained because they were stripped-down drag cars
with pro-built motors using racing slicks and pro drivers. Do the
same thing with a modern car, and 11's and even 10s would be child's
play.
> > >>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Pigsta Weight
The old hemi Challengers and 'Cudas were far from lightweights, same
for the big-block Mustangs.
> AND sucky computer program which you can not program to make the car super
> quick.
Like the launch-control systems, the modern automatic transmissions
that can bang off shifts quicker than any hot shoe driving a manual,
or efficiency/amazing HP they can squeeze from small displacement
engines? All are brought to you by computers. As for "super quick"
try on a Nissan GT-R. 0-60 in the mid 2-second range, on street
tires.
> the HP is shifted out to the high RPMs, numbers game now
> (safer, slower saves old ladies lives)
"Safer, slower", like the 180-200+ mph top ends?
Dudes, apparently you're not aware, but we're living in the good ol'
days. Modern performance cars are technological wonders -- the run of
the mill versions absolutely crush their old street going counterparts
in handling, braking, top end, 1/4 mile and 0-60. It's no longer a
contest. Case in point: The new Boss 302 vs the old Boss. Or the new
Boss 302 vs any previous street-going Mustang. The any contest new
Boss isn't just the "boss" it's the CEO.
Patrick