Stuck behind a slow truck

larry_s...@yahoo.com

unread,

May 19, 2008, 3:42:39 PM5/19/08

to

So there I was in the right lane with my left turn signal flashing,
stuck behind a slow truck, as faster traffic streamed by in the left
lane.

Then I saw my salvation, a car in the left lane with its right turn
signal flashing. I moved to the left and was nearly rear-ended by the
car with its right turn signal flashing. It turns out that the driver
had no intention of moving to the right and may have been driving with
his right turn signal flashing for miles.

If we had indeed collided, how would you have assessed fault.

Dave Head

unread,

May 19, 2008, 4:12:58 PM5/19/08

to

On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:42:39 -0700 (PDT), larry_s...@yahoo.com wrote:

>So there I was in the right lane with my left turn signal flashing,
>stuck behind a slow truck, as faster traffic streamed by in the left
>lane.
>
>Then I saw my salvation, a car in the left lane with its right turn
>signal flashing. I moved to the left and was nearly rear-ended by the
>car with its right turn signal flashing.

Yeah, risky move. Never underestimate the boneheadedness of the next driver.

>It turns out that the driver
>had no intention of moving to the right and may have been driving with
>his right turn signal flashing for miles.
>
>If we had indeed collided, how would you have assessed fault.

You had the last opportunity to avoid the accident.

Alexander Rogge

unread,

May 19, 2008, 4:30:00 PM5/19/08

to

I would have blamed you for the collision, and blamed the other driver
for misusing a turn signal. If the left lane is the passing lane,
flash-to-pass is done with the left-turn signal. A right-turn signal
should only apply to the drivers behind the first driver in the passing
lane. I use the right-turn signal to show that I will be yielding the
passing lane to the driver behind me. I often do not bother to signal
when there is nobody else passing behind me, because it is assumed that
I will be moving back to the right lane.

Your turn signal does not require passing traffic to accommodate you.
You are required to accelerate to the speed of traffic before moving
into the passing lane. When I am stuck behind a slow truck or a Sloth
in a small car, I decelerate to make a gap, wait for an opening in the
traffic on my left, and accelerate to pass before moving into the left lane.

Jim Yanik

unread,

May 19, 2008, 6:11:53 PM5/19/08

to

Dave Head <rall...@att.net> wrote in
news:ttn33491vo26dsjt1...@4ax.com:

yes,an improper lane change;when it was not safe to change lanes.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

Eeyore

unread,

May 19, 2008, 8:31:22 PM5/19/08

to

larry_s...@yahoo.com wrote:

In the UK any driver who hits the rear of another car is generally held to
be at fault. You'd have had to pull out right in front of him for the
other driver to claim it was your fault but you don't mention distances.

Graham

Brent P

unread,

May 19, 2008, 9:10:20 PM5/19/08

to

On 2008-05-19, larry_s...@yahoo.com <larry_s...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> If we had indeed collided, how would you have assessed fault.

Me? I would have blamed you 75% them 25%.
Insurance company would have blamed them 100% but not because of the
turn signal. But because they rear-ended you and the doctrine in this
country is you must drive slow enough that no matter what some idiot
does you won't hit them. Of course that is a) impossible. b) complete
idiotcy from a congestion prevention pov.

Studemania

unread,

May 19, 2008, 10:32:39 PM5/19/08

to

On May 19, 6:10 pm, Brent P <tetraethylleadREMOVET...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

California has a law that says slow vehicles must pull over at a safe
place if holding up more than four vehicles.
Suggest this to your rule writers along wwith your tale.
,
From a safety point of view, I would drop back a bit if someone else
tried to pass and might have to squeeze to the right to avoid a head-
on, forcing you off the road and into a ditch, as I saw on the
Tammiami Trail in 1952. No a pretty sight!