According to Alexa: Calrog.com has a traffic rank of: 4,029,323
he's getting one unique page view per day per user(is this a unique user
count?)-prolly by accident, or it's me mining his site for boffo laffs.
His site is visited by 0.00013% of internet users; down 80% over the
last 3 mos. Page hits are down 74%. Can you say tanking?
--
Comrade Otto The Duke Of Yamamoto
http://mryamamoto.50megs.com
'The Quality goes in before the Name goes on'
> he's getting one unique page view per day per user(is this a unique user
> count?)
No, they don't track "unique users" as a raw statistic, at least for
sites outside the top 100k, nor do they track page views themselves.
However... hawhaw... a "page views per user" count of *exactly* one
means that every person who's visited the site has gone there and turned
right back around and left. Nobody is browsing the site. (At least,
nobody who's using Alexa Toolbar).
--
Jon Morse
Herndon, VA
<snip>
There is, but we have too many mentally ill idiots on this newsgroup
for this to work. It was a good idea, and I had high hopes, but "those
people" are just too plentiful.
Exhibit one: My Land Of Misery just *cannot* help himself but to reply
to a Carl-initiated thread. He has to. Because his self-identity (a
psychologist phrase!) requires him to let everyone know he is anti-
Carl at all times - otherwise, how would we know he is Anti-Carl?
Exhibit two: Disgustingly obese Charles Slater (East Coast Hive Mind)
just HAS to post something about Carl in his blog. Then he has to
advertise his blog link. Why? Well, I have quite a few theories about
fatfuck Chuckie but I'll let you draw your own conclusion.
>On 18 Apr 2008 18:47:52 -0700, H.B. Elkins
><hbel...@mis.net.restrictorplate> wrote:
>
>>The Pearl Jam and Google Maps posts are getting responses.
>>
>>NO responses, folks. No matter how over the top the post, let it lie.
>
>Has anyone noticed the sharp increase in both frequency and intensity
>in response to Operation Starve?
>
>It *must* be working, because the trolls are trying even more
>desperately to get a rise out of us! WE *ARE* HAVING AN EFFECT! THE
>TROLLS ARE PANICKING! THEY'RE THROWING EVERYTHING THEY HAVE AT US IN A
>PAROXYSM OF EXASPERATION!!!
>
>Keep up the good work, everyone!! Together we're turning the tide!!
Curious, would a similar operation work on S&DDAM, you think? ;)
--
"The people who cast the votes don't decide an election,
the people who count the votes do."
--Joseph Stalin
What a fucking dumbass.
In your original "Starve the troll" post you wrote, "Don't talk about
him at all."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.driving/msg/a0cf2e751b6d8d81?dmode=source
Now look at ya, doing what you have advised others not to do, in order
to solve *your* "problem" of being too stupid to operate a killfile.
"Not your fault", huh...?
-----
- gpsman
Another troll makes a pathetic plea for attention.
nate
--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
Can't hurt to try. Only problem is its prolific cross-posting. I
suggest simply posting a one-liner along the lines of "another pathetic
troll looks for the love and attention it didn't receive as a small
child" or something like that as a first reply to every thread it
starts, and then leave it at that. Then those in the other NG's might
get the hint and get on board with the program.
1. "Ad hominem".
2. "Killfile"
http://www.google.com/
-----
- gpsman
No, none of this will work at all as already been demonstrated. It was
a good idea but we have just way too many people who can't control
themselves. It's not accidental replies to these threads, either, its
intentional replies by people like East Coast Hive Mind because he's
too stupid to understand that one response jeopardizes the whole thing.
>On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:25:45 -0400, necromancer
><55_sux@worldofnecromancer_no_spam_no_way.org> wrote:
>
>>Curious, would a similar operation work on S&DDAM, you think? ;)
>
>It would work on most any troll as long as everyone participates.
Sounds like its worth a try.
For the filters, the following additions helped kill off SFB's posts
and replies:
Author: Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS
and for a subject kill:
Subject: beaner
note: I've noted that with Agent, that a subject kill will kill any
message with the search term in it. i.e in the above all messages with
the word, "beaner," in the subject were killed. Don't kow if this
might be a problem for some as legitimate posts with the word are
theoretically possible.
--
"Are you asking something of me, Jean Luc??'
-- Q
>
>Can't hurt to try. Only problem is its prolific cross-posting.
True. One thing I used to like about Gravity was that you could set up
a filter to automatically kill any message crossposted to more than a
set number of groups. Haven't found a way to do that with Agent
yet....
3. Don't "forget" he OP, so stupid he attempts to organize a boycott,
then 4 days later violates its conditions himself. Pretty stupid,
but so was the idea to begin with, and his violation seems to
additionally imply this is not the most patient or reasonable person
on the planet.
AAR, a contributing factor to any lack of success might be that ol'
Cal ain't really a troll.
His posts are boring, his site is boring, and he posts about it here.
That hardly makes him a real troll, he just annoys some people.
Apparently, quite a number of people too stupid to operate a killfile
and solve their own "problem".
"I don't like what goes on at Bed Bath & Beyond, so you know what I
do?
I don't go to Bed Bath & Beyond".- Auggie Smith
-----
- gpsman
>Exhibit two: Disgustingly obese Charles Slater (East Coast Hive Mind)
>just HAS to post something about Carl in his blog. Then he has to
>advertise his blog link. Why? Well, I have quite a few theories about
>fatfuck Chuckie but I'll let you draw your own conclusion.
Uhh ... Jason. You're getting all Randy-esque and making up crap without
knowing.
I've met Mr. Yamamoto. He ain't fat.
--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictor plate"
>Subject: beaner
>
>note: I've noted that with Agent, that a subject kill will kill any
>message with the search term in it. i.e in the above all messages with
>the word, "beaner," in the subject were killed. Don't kow if this
>might be a problem for some as legitimate posts with the word are
>theoretically possible.
LOL, that brings back memories. Years ago on rec.autos.sport.nascar, one of the
biggest trolls posted under the handle of "beaner." In that case, the author
"beaner" was in a lot of ^K's.
I recommend you read the paragraph on the main page of the site: the
site name was set up as a mockery of one town.
BTW, given the length of this thread, WE ARE ALL F***ING HYPOCRITES
just by continuing to mention the operation. I'm one, you are one, CC
is one, Scott is one. No damn surprise, america (sic) is a nation of
hypocrites and crooks. Look at our gov't.
You want further proof that the operation is not working? *This*
thread, continuing to discuss the so-called *operation*.
I have serious doubts about your conclusion. Case in point:
The thread is still active after 3 days!
HB's OP in this thread. See later on that Calrot and Erika have both
seen it as they have added comments.
Your announcement earlier of initiating OSTT, and in your .sig.
CC responding to CalRot and Erika, and his blog (which I found
humorous).
Necromancer inquiring about possible effectiveness against Aunt Judy.
Jason objecting to a couple of minor violations of OSTT.
My responses to Jason. Yes, I'm as much a f'up as the rest of the
group.
Hell, even Nate and GPSTroll got in on the act.
You want this to work? We should all STFU, even in this thread.
I too fail to see how he can be called a troll, which I've always
thought to mean someone who posts inflammatory material just to get a
rise out of people. Not to be confused with a loon, who posts crazy
material because he thinks he's right, or an agitprop dispenser, who
grinds his axe in whatever forum happens to be at hand (and whose
material might be crazy, inflammatory, or wrong) but which he thinks
is right. Lord knows we get a few people with one or more of those
attributes on Usenet.
This guy, in my limited experience, is a prolific poster with
singleminded devotion to a subject I don't much care about, but which
seems to be at least vaguely on charter for the groups that I see it
on (usually rec.autos.driving). In short, <shrug> <blockignore>
<script=liveandletlive>.
Cheers,
--Joe
I agree, but I think that making an effort to not reply to his posts is
worthwhile, because he does flood several NG's with daily updates on
minor tweaks to his website that nobody cares about. Maybe he'd then
get the message that such is annoying, and be better off for it.
Certainly he might even get some measure of acceptance and respect if he
weren't so f'ing obnoxious and repetitive.
Might as well extend the policy to the real trolls of the NG as well
while we're at it. Lord knows RAD is borderline unreadable lately, and
we've got some real persistent trolls who have been around for years
despite having several regulars take turns using them as punching bags.
And that is my last word on the subject... I agree with whoever posted
that even posting to this thread might be ebough to make someone posting
just for the attention hang on a little longer.
Hey Jason: go tell your mama she wants you.