Free tweaks?
Goofball_star_dot_etal
George M. Middius
Goofy said:
> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html
The text pages behind the price list sounds like a New Age version of Joly
tripping on some kind of designer psychedelic. It's even more difficult to
follow than Krooglish!
Robert Morein
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" <w...@needs.email.anyhow> wrote in message
news:4il612ho8sdd23gtj...@4ax.com...
> http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html
Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?
westpas...@hotmail.com
A pound certainly doesn't buy what it used to.
Definitely no ulterior motives in those previous threads.
Clyde Slick
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message news:3ao612t619kg2mmje...@4ax.com...
I am Zakhann, and I am on your Jolly ass.
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
elm...@pacificcoast.net
The price list especially 11 pounds for standard RCA
plug, puts the last few days debates where
they belong- in the Alice in Wonderland country.
No if someone published this spoof here here
all our audio thinkers would open their college textbooks and
start contributing solemnly.
The idea makes one
laugh hahaha or or feel nauseated depending on mood.
When will someone start a serious high end audio opinion
forum without a constant chorus of Best BUY lovers to whom
all music sounds the same as the supermarket tinkle-tinkle,
the home-grown politicians venting on the captive RAO
audience the latest newspaper
editorial they managed to understand and the self-nominated
RAO scientists telling the
conductors and performers what music is all about.
Ludovic Mirabel .
Goofball_star_dot_etal
I can't help thinking that you missed my posts...
When I posted this:
'"**We** therefore chose the words "Sound has Priority" to 'tap into'
that
specific Morphic resonance energy pattern which existed before the
sense of sight developed." - May Belt.
soundhas...@yahoo.com via a proxy server replied:
"I told you that my name had meaning, didn't I, goofball? I told you
that it's a self-contained tweak, that alone can help improve your
sound, if you have the right materials. I find it interesting that you
would go to all the trouble to research **my** name, but you wouldn't
bother to take 30 seconds to see if any of **my** tweaks actually
work!
And you wonder why I call you an ignorant sheep? Hmm....."
**s added by me.
I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
May Belt posting as soundhas...@yahoo.com has not been disputed
by soundhas...@yahoo.com
There is stuff about *L-shapes* on there too, which is what I googled
for when I found "Sound has Priority".
May Belt seems to be the most active part of the Belt dynasty at
present. She signed the most recent P.W.B spam here.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
If you prefer dollars:
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/priceus.html
or Euros:
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/priceeu.html
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Goofball (aka Brian Peppers) wrote:
> I can't help thinking that you missed my posts...
God forbid, we wouldn't want to do that, and miss out on all the vital
factual information you provide to the group! You must be the offical
group "fact checker".
Seriously, you people are really and truly "freaks of nature". You
should not have survived the evolution process, but somehow, did. And
perhaps that's why you ended up here in this dungheap that respectable
audiophiles have long since abandoned, buzzing about spewing pointless
crap every day, on the topic of almost everything but audio. When I
start posting some of the few threads that actually purport to bring up
the subject of audio, all the trolls on the group immediately start the
personal attacks, followed by the most insane paranoid conspiracy
conjecture I've seen in one place. But you do make me laugh. Large,
hearty, bellyfull laughs. Particularly after seeing threads like this.
And I feel infinitely more intelligent, simply from reading all the
infinitely stupid things that people write and think on this group.
I stop reading for but a few hours, and when I come back, there are
three new threads talking about me, and over 60 messages combined in
those threads alone. So much for trying to keep a low profile. You RAO
rowdies just adore your kitchen sink dramas, don't you? I'm starting to
see that this newsgroup is a substitute for the exciting lives that
none of you regulars have. And since I'm constantly being accused of
being a troll, to that I say, why on earth are so many people
responding?? Something doesn't jibe in what you boys are saying, do you
realize that? Now let's see what this cretin has to say for himself....
> When I posted this:
>
> '"**We** therefore chose the words "Sound has Priority" to 'tap into'
> that
> specific Morphic resonance energy pattern which existed before the
> sense of sight developed." - May Belt.
>
> soundhas...@yahoo.com via a proxy server replied:
>
> "I told you that my name had meaning, didn't I, goofball? I told you
> that it's a self-contained tweak, that alone can help improve your
> sound, if you have the right materials. I find it interesting that you
> would go to all the trouble to research my name, but you wouldn't
> bother to take 30 seconds to see if any of my tweaks actually
> work!
> And you wonder why I call you an ignorant sheep? Hmm....."
>
>
> I don't think it is rocket science.
To type a phrase into Google, find the phrase in question, and then
find a photo on a site somewhere and then conclude it must be me? No,
it certainly isn't rocket science. You got that much right. Which is
exactly why even a moron like you can accomplish that task. However, so
far as it having any meaning evidence-wise, its only evidence that
you're a moron. Thank you for proving it for me once again. You make
that SO easy to do.
Admit it. You really thought that was a brilliant move on your part,
didn't you Goofball? Type the phrase into Google, and whatever comes
up, that's our guy! No, our gal! Or other! And you actually sit there
and wonder why I call you a bleeding imbecile??
And with all this time to trace IPs, research internet sites, comb the
web in the hopes of finding dirt on me, and trolling me all over the
newgroup, how on earth _do_ you find the time for all this sailing you
lied about doing? Oh. I just answered my own question, didn't I?
> Note that my conclusion that it is
> May Belt posting as soundhas...@yahoo.com has not been disputed
> by soundhas...@yahoo.com
Ho! There we have it folks! An undisputed conclusion does not mean the
target in question hasn't yet responded, or has decided not to respond
, or has perhaps died. No, it means that the undisputed conclusion,
after 30 minutes, becomes indisputable FACT, on RAO! As was exemplified
by all the other members in subsequent posts, who took this idiot's
conclusion on his say-so. Blind adherence to popular conjecture,
without questioning it. By both objectivists and subjectivists alike!
Gee, and you wonder why I say that I have proved the group is filled
with non-thinking sheep, and you're simply one of them?
> There is stuff about *L-shapes* on there too, which is what I googled
> for when I found "Sound has Priority".
Good for you, boy! Here's a lollipop for being such a clever little
Goofball rascal! You'll find even more stuff about my L-shapes on my
site: www.biogeometry.com. As I'm sure you will have already
"concluded", I'm all the people you read about on **my** site. I'm also
everyone here and everyone else on the web. But that's another story.
Now you know I can't be as good a net detective as you are, but I did
do some "brilliant Goofball Googling" like you, and I concluded that
this sex offender, was you:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp
Given that its been 30 seconds now and you haven't disputed this fact,
note that it has been concluded as RAO FACT now, that you are the
Goofball in the picture, and that your real name is "Brian Peppers". I
don't know whether to call you he, she or "it", because I don't know
what the hell you are. But no way are you getting near my children, you
disgusting creature.
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Robert Morein wrote:
I think he's working for the government, spying on ALL of us! Be
careful what you say! He might reveal your deepest secrets! Like you
having tried his tweaks, and liked it!
LOL! What a maroon. I would tell you to go back on your meds Robert,
because the paranoia monster is creeping out again. Except I don't
think it would do any good on this group, since everyone else in this
squirrel factory appears to be even more paranoid than you, judging by
all the people (and genders!) I was supposed to have been, thus far.
This may be a moot point but.... does anyone actually hold down a job
on this group?
Goofball_star_dot_etal
>
>Goofball (aka Brian Peppers) wrote:
No I am not Brian Peppers, whoever he is.
>Good for you, boy! Here's a lollipop for being such a clever little
>Goofball rascal! You'll find even more stuff about my L-shapes on my
>site: www.biogeometry.com.
Are you claiming to be Dr I****** K****?
George M. Middius
soundhas...@yahoo.com said:
> This may be a moot point but.... does anyone actually hold down a job
> on this group?
We all have ordinary jobs. For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
until now. Welcome!
Robert Morein
<elm...@pacificcoast.net> wrote in message
news:1142147383.3...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
you to reply:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/browse_thread/thread/86252ca7914266c2/632e690b34f62608?lnk=st&q=group%3Arec.audio.opinion+insubject%3Aconcert+author%3ARobert+author%3AMorein&rnum=1&hl=en#632e690b34f62608
Sander deWaal
>I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
>May Belt posting as soundhas...@yahoo.com has not been disputed
>by soundhas...@yahoo.com
Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.
So far, all references to any Belt products were made by others.
IIRC, I was the first to mention the name "Peter Belt" in a
conversation with SHP.
Furthermore, I have not seen him (or her) "selling" anything.
The tweaks posted here, can be done with material that everybody
already has at his disposal, and cost very little time to implement.
No references to commercial products were made by SHP.
So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.
--
- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -
Sander deWaal
>site: www.biogeometry.com.
Thanks for the link, that's an interesting site!
Goofball_star_dot_etal
I am very proud of you, George for "just saying no to quackery". I
cannot say how much this means to me and I forgive you for calling me
a "purse-swinger" when my back was turned.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
wrote:
"Sound Has Priority" Label "Sound Has Priority" Label Each
100 GBP
Close enough.
"not proven" I agree. It does sound more like a Benchimol than a
little old lady. SHP seems to have admitted to selling tweaks and has
mentioned sevaral tweaks also mentioned on the PWB site. Do you think
it is promoting a competitor's products or trying to discredit the
nice Belt family. If it sells it must advertise and probably, these
days, has a web site. Go find another site so full of crap.
Sander deWaal
>>So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
>>the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.
>"Sound Has Priority" Label "Sound Has Priority" Label Each
>100 GBP
>Close enough.
So anyone logging onto RAO with an address like
"Krell...@hotmail.com " must be an employee of, or at least
affiliated with, the Krell company?
I'm sorry, but that seems to be stretching things a bit too far IMO.
ScottW
<soundhas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1142157807....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Goofball (aka Brian Peppers) wrote:
>
>> I can't help thinking that you missed my posts...
>
> God forbid, we wouldn't want to do that, and miss out on all the vital
> factual information you provide to the group! You must be the offical
> group "fact checker".
>
> Seriously, you people are really and truly "freaks of nature". You
> should not have survived the evolution process, but somehow, did.
Evolution and man are taking separate paths.
ScottW
Goofball_star_dot_etal
wrote:
>Goofball_star_dot_etal <w...@needs.email.anyhow> said:
>
>
>>>So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
>>>the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.
>
>
>>"Sound Has Priority" Label "Sound Has Priority" Label Each
>>100 GBP
>
>>Close enough.
>
>
>So anyone logging onto RAO with an address like
>"Krell...@hotmail.com " must be an employee of, or at least
>affiliated with, the Krell company?
>
No, when people deliberately lie and decieve, all bets are off.
I am disappointed that you snipped the 'I agree" bit.
>I'm sorry, but that seems to be stretching things a bit too far IMO.
If there is no connection between SHP and the Belt empire I am very
sorry and will apologize profusely. I perhaps have too much faith in
my intuition but it has a 99% success rate.
Keep an open mind.
elm...@pacificcoast.net
opinion
. "Undeserved" is not just false modesty figure of speech..
I did admire your erudite impressions but could add very little of my
own.
My experience of concert halls is very limited. As a kid I first heard
"serious"
music from the back rows of the upper gallery of Warsaw Philharmonic
which was as much as I could afford at that time. After that Vancouver
venues became the limit of my concert hall experience.
Much as I love this city I can not claim it to be of major world
musical interest.
One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be
ridiculing
what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
aspirine
under their loudspeakers. He went on for years about the green marking
pen rims for cds.
Ludovic Mirabel
experience
Goofball_star_dot_etal
> One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be ridiculing
>what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
>aspirine under their loudspeakers.
And a good thing too. It is insane.
George M. Middius
Goofy said:
> > One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be ridiculing
> >what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
> >aspirine under their loudspeakers.
> And a good thing too. It is insane.
I thought the aspirin was supposed to go on top of the loudspeaker. Does
this mean my results were invalid and I have to start over from the
beginning?
Clyde Slick
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
But once we had a witch!!!
Robert Morein
"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
hand ;)
Sander deWaal
>If there is no connection between SHP and the Belt empire I am very
>sorry and will apologize profusely. I perhaps have too much faith in
>my intuition but it has a 99% success rate.
>Keep an open mind.
I have probably too much faith in people, and so far, that "flaw" in
my character has been a mixed blessing.
I wouldn't have it any other way, though.
I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)
Goofball_star_dot_etal
wrote:
>Goofball_star_dot_etal <w...@needs.email.anyhow> said:
>
>
>>I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
>>May Belt posting as soundhas...@yahoo.com has not been disputed
>>by soundhas...@yahoo.com
>
>
>Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
>SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.
" In my last article, I mentioned a new free Belt ‘device,’ a small
rectangle of white paper (pin-pricked with small holes in each corner
and another at the intersection of the diagonals) but have now taken
its use a step or two further. When the pin-pricked rectangle was
applied to the wood of one of my loudspeakers, it initially changed
the perceived sound of the whole audio system for the better. But the
next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
the rectangle's centre pin-prick. There is no doubt in either my mind
or my wife’s that this extraordinary process did make a perceptible
difference to overall performance of our home audio system, even
though the Belts’ explanation for it does take a fair amount grappling
with…well, for me at least. "
http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2005/Sep05/Snark.htm
Goofball_star_dot_etal
wrote:
>Goofball_star_dot_etal <w...@needs.email.anyhow> said:
>
>
>>If there is no connection between SHP and the Belt empire I am very
>>sorry and will apologize profusely. I perhaps have too much faith in
>>my intuition but it has a 99% success rate.
>>Keep an open mind.
>
>
>I have probably too much faith in people, and so far, that "flaw" in
>my character has been a mixed blessing.
Me too...until...
>
>I wouldn't have it any other way, though.
>
>I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)
Sometimes you just have to ping and see what happens.
Sander deWaal
>On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:26:39 +0100, Sander deWaal <nos...@wanadoo.nl>
>wrote:
>>Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
>>SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.
>" In my last article, I mentioned a new free Belt ‘device,’ a small
>rectangle of white paper (pin-pricked with small holes in each corner
>and another at the intersection of the diagonals) but have now taken
>its use a step or two further. When the pin-pricked rectangle was
>applied to the wood of one of my loudspeakers, it initially changed
>the perceived sound of the whole audio system for the better. But the
>next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
>enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
>legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
>placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
>the rectangle's centre pin-prick. There is no doubt in either my mind
>or my wife’s that this extraordinary process did make a perceptible
>difference to overall performance of our home audio system, even
>though the Belts’ explanation for it does take a fair amount grappling
>with…well, for me at least. "
>http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2005/Sep05/Snark.htm
Yep, that's what it says on the above webpage.
However, I have not seen any mention of Belt *in this newsgroup* by
SHP, before *I* mentioned him in one of my replies.
Obviously, you're on some crusade, and if you search long enough, you
might even be able to prove that SHP *is* attached in any way to the
"Belt Imperium". Or not.
I wish you good luck, but sure you don't mind me not joining you in
this quest?
Goofball_star_dot_etal
"ping" as in give something a knock or impulse not as in IP ping,
note.
Sander deWaal
>>>I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)
>>Sometimes you just have to ping and see what happens.
>"ping" as in give something a knock or impulse not as in IP ping,
>note.
I got that the first time, you will note.
I may be Dutch, and even a (dark) blonde, but some neurotransmitters
are still firing.
Maybe this is a good moment to tell you that "Belt" is the Dutch word
for "junkyard" or "scrapheap".
Make of that what you will :-)
George M. Middius
Sander deWaal said:
> I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)
Thanks Mr. Sander for admitting your to bigotted to appreciate CD is
perfect. LOL Mr. dWala its like you went fishing and, caught a bottle of
aspirin Mr. Dewwal. ;-)
Goofball_star_dot_etal
wrote:
So..
>Obviously, you're on some crusade, and if you search long enough, you
>might even be able to prove that SHP *is* attached in any way to the
>"Belt Imperium". Or not.
Don't cry for SHP too much:
"
By the way, I had my "guys" check into it, and found that your real
name is Brian Peppers. Although you LOOK just like your fake usenet
name, "Goofball". And your picture has been posted here:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp "
>
>I wish you good luck, but sure you don't mind me not joining you in
>this quest?
Not at all but I would rather you did not call it "some crusade" or
"quest"
Sander deWaal
>>However, I have not seen any mention of Belt *in this newsgroup* by
>>SHP, before *I* mentioned him in one of my replies.
>So..
Well, that's what started this argument.
My opinion still stands that SHP didn't shill "Belt" products on this
newsgroup.
He might have the ideas of some of his tweaks from that website
though.
Still not selling anything on RAO as far as I can see, and that was
the claim.
>Not at all but I would rather you did not call it "some crusade" or
>"quest"
OK, how about "a pastime" then? ;-)
Sander deWaal
To be honest, I could use one or two of them at the moment.
Keeping your mind open is guaranteed to get you a headache with
temperatures like this outside.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
wrote:
>OK, how about "a pastime" then? ;-)
Much better, thanks!
westpas...@hotmail.com
>
> http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2005/Sep05/Snark.htm
Oh no, I've time warped back to my teen years as a scout,
going on a hunt for the illusive snark.
Is the more successful method snark bait or trapping using snark lure?
George M. Middius
Goofy quoted Shovels' shilling:
> "next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
> enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
> legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
> placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
> the rectangle's centre pin-prick."
I would like to observe that no comparisons are listed with pictures of
other kinds of animals or other types of medications. How about a
caterpillar paired with a Valium? A ladybug combined with a frozen dollop
of Pepto-Bismol? These alleged "tweaks" are seriously under-researched,
science-wise. I think we should all take a step back and wait for Shovels
to provide some credible credentials for his alleged "research".
Steven Sullivan
> >site: www.biogeometry.com.
> Thanks for the link, that's an interesting site!
in a crackpot kind of way.
--
-S
"If men were angels, no government would be necessary." - James Madison (1788)
soundhas...@yahoo.com
George M. Middius wrote:
> soundhas...@yahoo.com said:
>
> > This may be a moot point but.... does anyone actually hold down a job
> > on this group?
>
> We all have ordinary jobs. For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
> until now. Welcome!
Thanks! In the small undeveloped village where I come from, I was the
local hifi audio guru. (We were too superstitious to engage a witch
doctor). With the lack of medical facilities, or the experts to run
them, people often died of all kinds of treacherous diseases and the
like. But they had the finest sounding hifi systems on the island to
listen to whilst they were dying. And that's thanks to me. And now the
good "employable" quote unquote "people" of RAO, can "enjoy the magic".
Again, thanks to me divulging some of my powerful audio medicine magic.
Once the threats have died down, I'm sure I will be receiving many
thanks and praises for that.... Say George... what are them there tar
and feathers for?
soundhas...@yahoo.com
George M. Middius wrote:
Don't call me "Shovels". It's stupid and it's childish of you. I could
call you a lot of things, but I'm not doing that, am I? Do you want to
be taken seriously, or do you just want to be taken seriously as being
a fool? If you want to be something more than an audio dilletante who
prefers spending his life arguing politics than learning things about
the hobby you pretend to have an interest in, then don't observe. Do.
Otherwise, you don't know any more about audio than Kreuger does, and
have no right to be attacking him for his infinite ignorance.
How about a caterpillar with a valium? Try it yourself, instead of
asking questions, or even pretending to. I've never tried it, but I
won't ridicule you if you wish to, as you would me. I will say from my
experience, I think it's not likely to do anything; same with your
stupid Pepto Bismol idea. Both are attempts on your part to invalidate
someone else's intelligence and experience. All they do however, is
prove your lack of intelligence and experience, George.
I will agree with your otherwise facetious statement that the tweaks
are seriously under-researched, science wise, and as is evident from
the flock of RAO sheep, otherwise. But nothing's stopping you, is
there. I've already taken my "step back" and I'm waiting for you or one
of you Flatlanders to try the techniques. If you're not interested in
them, then don't talk about "credible credentials", and pretend you're
interested. You wouldn't understand the foundation of the techniques
even if I explained them to you. You especially, George.
George M. Middius
Shovels said:
> > For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
> > until now. Welcome!
[snip]
> Once the threats have died down, I'm sure I will be receiving many
> thanks and praises for that.... Say George... what are them there tar
> and feathers for?
I'm glad you're able to have a laugh at your own expense. Perhaps you
could give a lesson or two in that sort of magic to Krooger and the other
'borgs. I expect you'll be leaving us soon, just as you did last time, and
it would be nice if you left behind a meaningful legacy. Other than the
tweaks, I mean.
George M. Middius
Shovels, you need to chlll.
> > I would like to observe that no comparisons are listed with pictures of
> > other kinds of animals or other types of medications. How about a
> > caterpillar paired with a Valium? A ladybug combined with a frozen dollop
> > of Pepto-Bismol? These alleged "tweaks" are seriously under-researched,
> > science-wise. I think we should all take a step back and wait for Shovels
> > to provide some credible credentials for his alleged "research".
> Don't call me "Shovels". It's stupid and it's childish of you. I could
> call you a lot of things, but I'm not doing that, am I? Do you want to
> be taken seriously, or do you just want to be taken seriously as being
> a fool?
I'd rather not be taken seriously at all, thank you, Shovels.
> If you want to be something more than an audio dilletante who
> prefers spending his life arguing politics than learning things about
> the hobby you pretend to have an interest in, then don't observe. Do.
> Otherwise, you don't know any more about audio than Kreuger does, and
> have no right to be attacking him for his infinite ignorance.
No, sorry, that won't cut it. Everything you post is fair game. If you
don't like me mocking you, you're free to ignore me.
> How about a caterpillar with a valium? Try it yourself, instead of
> asking questions, or even pretending to. I've never tried it, but I
> won't ridicule you if you wish to, as you would me. I will say from my
> experience, I think it's not likely to do anything; same with your
> stupid Pepto Bismol idea. Both are attempts on your part to invalidate
> someone else's intelligence and experience. All they do however, is
> prove your lack of intelligence and experience, George.
Uh, right. Hey, a unicorn has a tail, right? Can I use a drawing of a
unicorn? It might be difficult to find a photograph of one in my
dimension.
> I will agree with your otherwise facetious statement that the tweaks
> are seriously under-researched, science wise, and as is evident from
> the flock of RAO sheep, otherwise. But nothing's stopping you, is
> there.
Not physically, no. Only my better judgment, and my desire to use my
available time for earning a living or having fun. You're the witch doctor
here, Shovels, and I defer to your leadership.
> I've already taken my "step back" and I'm waiting for you or one
> of you Flatlanders to try the techniques. If you're not interested in
> them, then don't talk about "credible credentials", and pretend you're
> interested. You wouldn't understand the foundation of the techniques
> even if I explained them to you. You especially, George.
I agree -- I probably would not. Unless you share whatever it is you
smoked before you dreamt them up. Want to share, Shovels?
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2006 10:40:04 -0800, elm...@pacificcoast.net wrote:
>
>
> > One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be ridiculing
> >what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
> >aspirine under their loudspeakers.
No fool, the aspirin doesn't go under the loudspeakers. And who but
idiots like you cares if Dick Pierce ridicules aspirins, green pens, or
whatever? He's just another fool like you, with foolish uninformed
opinions about audio.
> And a good thing too. It is insane.
Prove that it is insane, and that it isn't you that's insane.
Otherwise, you've only proven you're ignorant sheep. Remember when you
said you weren't? Now's your chance to prove me wrong, Little Bo-Peep.
BTW, I'm still waiting for signs of when you will find the courage to
elaborate on the commercial tweak you failed to successfully market.
Maybe you were run out of town for being a tweak crook?
soundhas...@yahoo.com
George M. Middius wrote:
You'd have to try it in the first place. So what's stopping you,
George? Hypothetically speaking, if you tried it and found it
effective, would you even have the guts to admit it?
Or would you do a Robert Morein, and go on a hissy fit rampage all over
the group, denying that you ever tried it or that it ever worked?
My guess? You're a "No guts" type.
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2006 02:03:27 -0800, soundhas...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >
> >Goofball (aka Brian Peppers) wrote:
>
> No I am not Brian Peppers, whoever he is.
So YOU say. I've offered as much proof as you have given that I'm the
lady in a photo you found on the net. Yet when they weren't listening
to your stupid fabrications strongly enough for you, you insisted to
people that this was a fact. Prove that its a fact.
And prove that you're not Brian Peppers.
> >Good for you, boy! Here's a lollipop for being such a clever little
> >Goofball rascal! You'll find even more stuff about my L-shapes on my
> >site: www.biogeometry.com.
>
> Are you claiming to be Dr I****** K****?
Are you claiming to be a deliberate liar? If not, then show valid
evidence that I am the lady in the photo. Otherwise, you've proven
you're a liar, just like Morein has lied about having tried the L-shape
tweak.
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Sander deWaal wrote:
> soundhas...@yahoo.com said:
>
>
> >site: www.biogeometry.com.
>
>
> Thanks for the link, that's an interesting site!
I thought so as well. Note that they don't claim the L-shape holds any
special properties for audio, if you draw it on CDs or whatever.
They've tested everything but using this shape, and I've tested it with
nothing but audio. Apparently, the side benefits of improving my audio
system by exploiting the shape's benefits extend beyond good sound, but
it's supposed to make you feel better as well. (Though they are careful
not to claim medical benefits... you don't want the FDA messing with
you!)
I'm sure that the researchers associated with those shapes and symbols,
no matter how much research they may have done, have to endure no less
ridicule from their scientific associates, or agriculturalists, or
anyone that might have a dismissive opinion but has never applied the
science or properly evaluated the research. Such is the fate of the
scientific pioneer....
soundhas...@mad.scientist.com
George M. Middius wrote:
> Shovels, you need to chlll.
You need to grow a brain and get a life, Middiot. And don't call me
"Shovels".
> I'd rather not be taken seriously at all, thank you, Shovels.
Wish granted. Once a fool, always a fool.
> > If you want to be something more than an audio dilletante who
> > prefers spending his life arguing politics than learning things about
> > the hobby you pretend to have an interest in, then don't observe. Do.
> > Otherwise, you don't know any more about audio than Kreuger does, and
> > have no right to be attacking him for his infinite ignorance.
>
> No, sorry, that won't cut it. Everything you post is fair game. If you
> don't like me mocking you, you're free to ignore me.
I thought I did ignore you, until you started attacking me. Of course,
you are free to mock and post personal attacks against me, and be as
much of an ignorant dork as you want to be, regardless of whether your
attacks on me are provoked or not. Such are the vagaries of usenet.
Trolls like you are about as common as crabgrass. Engaging in that sort
of mindless mockery that you do however, you're proving my point that
you're no different than the objectivists you've spent half your life
attacking. Either way, I get to be right about you. Just don't make the
mistaken assumption that your little dweeb paste-eating escapades have
any power over me. That would only make you more of an insecure,
insignificant clown, wouldn't it.
> > How about a caterpillar with a valium? Try it yourself, instead of
> > asking questions, or even pretending to. I've never tried it, but I
> > won't ridicule you if you wish to, as you would me. I will say from my
> > experience, I think it's not likely to do anything; same with your
> > stupid Pepto Bismol idea. Both are attempts on your part to invalidate
> > someone else's intelligence and experience. All they do however, is
> > prove your lack of intelligence and experience, George.
>
> Uh, right. Hey, a unicorn has a tail, right? Can I use a drawing of a
> unicorn? It might be difficult to find a photograph of one in my
> dimension.
And this is what you offer? More of the same ignorant ridicule, as
though you're presenting something I haven't seen 10,000 times before?
Are you trying to impress me with how clever and witty you are, George?
Well I'm sorry to have to tell you, but I find your mockery is
unimaginative, stale, trite, predictable, mindless and for all these
reasons, not funny. I kind of wonder how someone so articulate, can be
otherwise so damn stupid. Usually, intelligence follows, but it seems,
not in your case. Did your pa hit you in the face with a dictionary
throughout your childhood, until you learned to memorize it?
> > I will agree with your otherwise facetious statement that the tweaks
> > are seriously under-researched, science wise, and as is evident from
> > the flock of RAO sheep, otherwise. But nothing's stopping you, is
> > there.
>
> Not physically, no. Only my better judgment, and my desire to use my
> available time for earning a living or having fun.
Interesting. I just finished reading how you've amassed eight years of
posts, over 52,000 on this group alone. I don't know how you find time
to earn a living, with a posting history like that, but I do know what
you consider "having fun". Making direct or mostly indirect
ankle-biting attacks on anyone and everyone that comes on this group,
and upsets your delicate sensibilities. That means you consider flame
wars and politics more fun than audio. I don't have a problem with
that, but what are you doing on this group, exactly? What aren't you a
wart on alt.flame or alt.politics? This group is for audio hobbyists.
> You're the witch doctor here, Shovels, and I defer to your leadership.
Well I think we both know that I am a far greater leader than you are
or could ever hope to be, but I'm not a witch doctor. I'm a scientist.
I don't engage in witch doctoring rituals, nor do I believe in
superstition. Nor am I an intolerant bigot, a willfull ignorant, a
presumptious fool, or an insecure, fearful coward like you.
> > I've already taken my "step back" and I'm waiting for you or one
> > of you Flatlanders to try the techniques. If you're not interested in
> > them, then don't talk about "credible credentials", and pretend you're
> > interested. You wouldn't understand the foundation of the techniques
> > even if I explained them to you. You especially, George.
>
> I agree -- I probably would not. Unless you share whatever it is you
> smoked before you dreamt them up. Want to share, Shovels?
Sure. I don't smoke, and I didn't dream anything up - most of the
tweaks are not mine. They were developed by an engineer with 45 years
of experience in the audio industry, who pioneered numerous
technologies during that time. A guy so much more intelligent than you
George, that you're too stupid to park his car. I'll share something
else with you, since we're being so chummy here, for these precious
moments (before we begin being total enemies forever). Like all
mindless lemmings of your "ilk", you're not only a whole lot stupider
than you think you are, but you're very, very predictable. I can
manipulate you like a puppet on a string, if I so choose. All I have to
do, for example, is say "Don't call me shovels". And then your little
boy that never grew up mind takes over.... And you start to hear your
mother telling you what to do, and feeling powerless... Being an
anonymous entity behind a computer, no one can tell you what to do, can
they? Isn't that why you're so addicted to this newsgroup... because
you feel powerful, slinging words and insults, without thought? And if
someone tells you to behave when you've crossed a line well... little
Georgie is going to rebel, isn't he? Yes he is. Oh yes he is.... Little
George is gonna call you "Shovels" until he's blue in the face, he
will. He's gonna scream it at the top of his lungs, hoping to get under
your skin. "Shovels! Hey, Shovels! You're just a Shovelhead, na na na
na na na!"
Yes, you really showed me what a powerful little man you are, Little
Georgie. But your power, your perceived knowledge and intelligence,
your insight... it's all a self-deluding trick of yours. I asked you
not to call me "Shovels" because I knew 100% that you would. You went
exactly where I wanted to direct you. The reason I prefer you to call
me "Shovels", is because the tactic confuses all of those not familiar
with its origins, and they then have no idea whom you're referring to.
Then your dumb little comments attributed to "Shovels", become about as
effective as you farting in the wind.
Did you like that little story, Georgie boy? I thought you would. Now
do you want to share what is lacking in your life that having an
addiction to flaming people on an internet newsgroup makes you feel so
good about yourself, that it is more important than giving time to your
family, or doing otherwise positive things with your life? Or even just
positive things with your stereo, assuming you even have one?
Steven Sullivan
> George M. Middius wrote:
Congratulations, SHP. You're the first RAO poster I've seen whom
*everyone* agrees on.
___
-S
"Excuse me? What solid proof do you have that I'm insane?" - soundhaspriority
Steven Sullivan
> Well I think we both know that I am a far greater leader than you are
> or could ever hope to be, but I'm not a witch doctor. I'm a scientist.
Wanna bet?
> Sure. I don't smoke, and I didn't dream anything up - most of the
> tweaks are not mine. They were developed by an engineer with 45 years
> of experience in the audio industry, who pioneered numerous
> technologies during that time.
Name of ...Belt, perhaps? He's nuts too...or nutty like a fox.
> than you think you are, but you're very, very predictable. I can
> manipulate you like a puppet on a string, if I so choose. All I have to
> do, for example, is say "Don't call me shovels". And then your little
> boy that never grew up mind takes over.... And you start to hear your
> mother telling you what to do, and feeling powerless... Being an
> anonymous entity behind a computer, no one can tell you what to do, can
> they? Isn't that why you're so addicted to this newsgroup... because
> you feel powerful, slinging words and insults, without thought? And if
> someone tells you to behave when you've crossed a line well... little
> Georgie is going to rebel, isn't he? Yes he is. Oh yes he is.... Little
> George is gonna call you "Shovels" until he's blue in the face, he
> will. He's gonna scream it at the top of his lungs, hoping to get under
> your skin. "Shovels! Hey, Shovels! You're just a Shovelhead, na na na
> na na na!"
Well, now you've gone and done it, SHP. You've got me rooting for
*Middius*. Unprecedented.
> Yes, you really showed me what a powerful little man you are, Little
> Georgie. But your power, your perceived knowledge and intelligence,
> your insight... it's all a self-deluding trick of yours. I asked you
> not to call me "Shovels" because I knew 100% that you would. You went
> exactly where I wanted to direct you. The reason I prefer you to call
> me "Shovels", is because the tactic confuses all of those not familiar
> with its origins, and they then have no idea whom you're referring to.
> Then your dumb little comments attributed to "Shovels", become about as
> effective as you farting in the wind.
Like Wile E. Coyote, you are a *super* genius.
And quite mad, you know.
George M. Middius
ZeroBorg reminds us that part of his programming is pure borgma.
> Congratulations, SHP. You're the first RAO poster I've seen whom
> *everyone* agrees on.
Are you actually admitting, in public, that you have fond feelings for the
Bug Eater and the Krooborg?
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Steven Sullivan wrote:
> Like Wile E. Coyote, you are a *super* genius.
>
> And quite mad, you know.
No, I don't know this, and neither do you, because we've never met and
you've never proved it. It's simply another unproven contention that
you have. It seems that name calling, ad hominem attacks and groundless
opinions is all that you and your objectivists colleagues can hope to
make on this group. So being the rabid objectivist extremist you are,
thank you for proving that your unfounded opinions and attack posts are
no different or more closer to the truth than those of the
subjectivists you decry every single day.
I will say this though: I'm as mad as you are ignorant.
soundhas...@yahoo.com
George M. Middius wrote:
> Shovels said:
>
> > > For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
> > > until now. Welcome!
> [snip]
> > Once the threats have died down, I'm sure I will be receiving many
> > thanks and praises for that.... Say George... what are them there tar
> > and feathers for?
>
> I'm glad you're able to have a laugh at your own expense.
Actually, the laughs I'm having are at your expense. I know it doesn't
look that way to you but trust me, it does from where I'm standing...
> Perhaps you
> could give a lesson or two in that sort of magic to Krooger and the other
> 'borgs.
What a wilfully ignorant man does not want to learn, you can not teach.
I've proven that with you and your mates, as I've proven that with
Kreuger and his.
> I expect you'll be leaving us soon, just as you did last time, and
> it would be nice if you left behind a meaningful legacy. Other than the
> tweaks, I mean.
The tweaks are the meaningful legacy. I wish the bounty to remain
untouched as it stands now.... as a sort of ode to the age-old human
rituals of fear and ignorance.
Well, excuse me, I have some heads to shrink...
Robert Morein
<soundhas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1142273776.2...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Steven Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Like Wile E. Coyote, you are a *super* genius.
>>
>> And quite mad, you know.
>
> No, I don't know this, and neither do you, because we've never met and
> you've never proved it. It's simply another unproven contention that
> you have. It seems that name calling, ad hominem attacks and groundless
> opinions is all that you and your objectivists colleagues can hope to
> make on this group.
Mr. Richard Graham, you are simply a liar. You have put yourself in a
position where you cannot criticize anyone in this group.
Robert Morein
<soundhas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1142276024.7...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>> Shovels said:
>>
>> > > For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
>> > > until now. Welcome!
>> [snip]
>> > Once the threats have died down, I'm sure I will be receiving many
>> > thanks and praises for that.... Say George... what are them there tar
>> > and feathers for?
>>
>> I'm glad you're able to have a laugh at your own expense.
>
> Actually, the laughs I'm having are at your expense. I know it doesn't
> look that way to you but trust me, it does from where I'm standing...
>
>> Perhaps you
>> could give a lesson or two in that sort of magic to Krooger and the other
>> 'borgs.
>
> What a wilfully ignorant man does not want to learn, you can not teach.
Yes, even your lie about my alleged endorsement doesn't seem to do the
trick.
Clyde Slick
>
Good luck!!!
Maybe now you will be able
to extricate it from your ass
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Sander deWaal wrote:
> Goofball_star_dot_etal <w...@needs.email.anyhow> said:
>
>
> >I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
> >May Belt posting as soundhas...@yahoo.com has not been disputed
> >by soundhas...@yahoo.com
>
>
> Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
> SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.
Oh, you are SO naive and gullible Mr. deWaal. If two or more people on
RAO agree on something about someone, it's an official fact. If 5 or
more people on RAO agree on something about someone, then THE WHOLE
WORLD AGREES. And it's an official global fact. Are you SURE that you
are an official "regular" on this group? You CAN have your membership
revoked you know. I hear George is considering that right this moment.
> So far, all references to any Belt products were made by others.
Please! This is RAO! Let us not be prisoners of logic.
> IIRC, I was the first to mention the name "Peter Belt" in a
> conversation with SHP.
So? Did you think she was just going to "reveal" the fact that she was
Peter Belt's wife, while she was slowly, insidiously trying to lure you
into buying her husband's quackery?
> Furthermore, I have not seen him (or her) "selling" anything.
Don't you understand ANYTHING? He was trying to "sell" us the tweaks.
Just because he didn't charge money for it, that don't mean anything!
He's still trying to sell something! Get _outta_ here with your stewpid
"factual" crap, will ya?! This is RAO! Facts not warranted! ***FACTS
NOT WARRANTED**
> The tweaks posted here, can be done with material that everybody
> already has at his disposal, and cost very little time to implement.
So? It costs about 50 cents to buy a fork to poke your eyes out, you
stewpid fourner? You think we're gonna take 30 seconds out of our busy
day to try this insane nutbar's insane tweaks, when we already know
from where we're standing, that it would be a waste of 30 seconds? Gee,
do they have schools in the Netherlands? Are you THAT naive, stupid and
gullible, that you can't tell a farce when you see one? He's a
NUTBAR!! End of story.
> No references to commercial products were made by SHP.
WRONG! He (or she) advised someone to buy a Sonic Impact T2 amplifier.
Are you THAT stupid, naive and gullible as to believe he (or she) does
NOT have market shares in Sonic Impact? What were you, born yesterday?
You're a foreigner, aren't you? I'm not so sure you should be here with
us. Don't they have a foreigner's audio group where you come from?
> So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
> the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.
Ha! Too bad your humble opinion ain't worth pork grit around this neck
o' the Usenet woods....
Since when is "proof" on RAO a prerequisite to make any half-assed
claim we want to make about someone or something? You don't sound like
a RAO regular to me. You're obviously a shill for the Belt EMPIRE as
well. Didn't you say that maybe some day, after you get around to
setting up your Maggies, and you have nothing better to do, you might
try one his INSANE TWEAKS?!
Ha! What a fool!! And you call yourself an "engineer"? What do you
engineer? "Foolishness"? Ha! Ha! Ha!
> - Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -
(NOW you tell me! When it's too late!)
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Sander deWaal wrote:
> Goofball_star_dot_etal <w...@needs.email.anyhow> said:
>
>
> >>So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
> >>the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.
>
>
> >"Sound Has Priority" Label "Sound Has Priority" Label Each
> >100 GBP
>
> >Close enough.
>
>
> So anyone logging onto RAO with an address like
> "Krell...@hotmail.com " must be an employee of, or at least
> affiliated with, the Krell company?
>
> I'm sorry, but that seems to be stretching things a bit too far IMO.
Come on! Are you _that_ naive, stupid and gullible? "Goofball" here is
a self-professed "genius". His intuition is 99% right. Didn't you know
that already?? So if he says "soundhaspriority" is May Belt, then the
guy is May Belt!!! Stop arguing with a genius, for pete's sake! It's
"close enough". That's all a net detective genius ever needs!
>
> --
>
> - Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -
(What other fun is there?)
soundhas...@yahoo.com
The Goofball they call "Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:21:15 +0100, Sander deWaal <nos...@wanadoo.nl>
> wrote:
>
> >So anyone logging onto RAO with an address like
> >"Krell...@hotmail.com " must be an employee of, or at least
> >affiliated with, the Krell company?
> >
>
> No, when people deliberately lie and decieve, all bets are off.
Does that mean you're not taking any more bets, because you
deliberately lied and deceived on this group?
> I am disappointed that you snipped the 'I agree" bit.
I agree that you're a lying, deceitful hypocrite, Goofoff.
> If there is no connection between SHP and the Belt empire I am very
> sorry and will apologize profusely.
So? I'm _waiting_ for the profuse apology!
> I perhaps have too much faith in
> my intuition but it has a 99% success rate.
How many hits do you have to take off your bong before you reach those
numbers, Goofup?
> Keep an open mind.
Ha! That's precious. Now what exactly would an ignorant pig like
yourself know about "keeping an open mind", hmm? Tell me, how many of
my tweaks have you tried again? And if none, why none?
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2006 10:40:04 -0800, elm...@pacificcoast.net wrote:
>
>
> > One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be ridiculing
> >what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
> >aspirine under their loudspeakers.
>
> And a good thing too. It is insane.
Prove that the aspirin tweak is insane, and that it isn't you that's
insane. Otherwise, you've proven nothing but your ignorance.
-------
SHP
"I am 100% certain that Soundhaspriority is Wallace, of Wallace &
Gromit fame" - Goofball_star_dot_etal
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Sander deWaal wrote:
>
> I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)
If so, you'd be the only one on this group who did. Then you'd be asked
to leave....
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Sander deWaal wrote:
> Goofball_star_dot_etal <w...@needs.email.anyhow> said:
>
> >On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:26:39 +0100, Sander deWaal <nos...@wanadoo.nl>
> >wrote:
>
>
> >>Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
> >>SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.
>
>
> >" In my last article, I mentioned a new free Belt 'device,' a small
> >rectangle of white paper (pin-pricked with small holes in each corner
> >and another at the intersection of the diagonals) but have now taken
> >its use a step or two further. When the pin-pricked rectangle was
> >applied to the wood of one of my loudspeakers, it initially changed
> >the perceived sound of the whole audio system for the better. But the
> >next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
> >enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
> >legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
> >placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
> >the rectangle's centre pin-prick. There is no doubt in either my mind
> >or my wife's that this extraordinary process did make a perceptible
> >difference to overall performance of our home audio system, even
> >though the Belts' explanation for it does take a fair amount grappling
> >with...well, for me at least. "
There ya go! Told ya! Even though it wasn't his tweak just like he said
it wasn't, the fact that it is mentioned on a commercial site MEANS
HE'S A SHILL!! By RAO standards, anyway. So what more proof do you
want? The fact that he has delivered us the tweaks for free? Don't be a
prisoner of logic! No more proof around here is needed! The man (or
woman) is a SHILL! Goofball The Genius has spoken.
> Yep, that's what it says on the above webpage.
> However, I have not seen any mention of Belt *in this newsgroup* by
> SHP, before *I* mentioned him in one of my replies.
Oh really? I didn't know that. Sorry. So then YOU'RE THE SHILL! Get
outta here, YOU DAMNED SHILL!!! Don't be selling US your shilling
quackery, SHILL! We're much too smart for the likes of you! We know
better than to buy tweak products that we don't understand and have
never tried before... you stinking SHILL!
> Obviously, you're on some crusade,
It's not a "crusade" Sander. It's just plain old obsessive stalking. My
wife kicked me out of the house and I have to sleep in my car and the
dog has to sleep with me and I haven't showered in 3 weeks. What else
is there to do in life but obsessively stalk SHP? Besides going sailing
in my imaginary sailboat I mean.....
> and if you search long enough, you
> might even be able to prove that SHP *is* attached in any way to the
> "Belt Imperium". Or not.
>
> I wish you good luck, but sure you don't mind me not joining you in
> this quest?
No. I'm having second thoughts... plus, it says "press any key", and I
don't know where the "any key" is on this stupid computer. It looks
like I'm going to need your help with the net detective thing for my
obsessive stalking of SHP. Won't YOU be an obsessive stalker-loser
alongside me? It's fun, and we can tell each other bedtime stories?
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Goofball aka "Brian Peppers" wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:48:25 +0100, Sander deWaal <nos...@wanadoo.nl>
> wrote:
>
> >Yep, that's what it says on the above webpage.
> >However, I have not seen any mention of Belt *in this newsgroup* by
> >SHP, before *I* mentioned him in one of my replies.
> >
>
> So..
So.. that means you're what they call a "deceitful liar" Goofball.
>
> >Obviously, you're on some crusade, and if you search long enough, you
> >might even be able to prove that SHP *is* attached in any way to the
> >"Belt Imperium". Or not.
>
> Don't cry for SHP too much
Thanks for just admitting that you maliciously make up false "facts"
about people.
> >I wish you good luck, but sure you don't mind me not joining you in
> >this quest?
>
> Not at all but I would rather you did not call it "some crusade" or
> "quest"
Is that right? Would "obsessive stalking" do, lowlife?
Where's that picture of you again, Brian... oh yeah, here it is:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp "
------
SHP
"I am 100% certain that Soundhaspriority is Wallace, of Wallace &
Gromit fame". - Goofball
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Clyde Slick wrote:
> <soundhas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1142276024.7...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> >
> Good luck!!!
> Maybe now I will be able
> to extricate it from my ass
Good luck with that yourself.
Sander deWaal
> Are you SURE that you
>are an official "regular" on this group?
Some say I'm just a sockpuppet.
I prefer to think of myself as RAO's court jester and part-time
devil's advocate.
>> No references to commercial products were made by SHP.
>WRONG! He (or she) advised someone to buy a Sonic Impact T2 amplifier.
>Are you THAT stupid, naive and gullible as to believe he (or she) does
>NOT have market shares in Sonic Impact? What were you, born yesterday?
>You're a foreigner, aren't you? I'm not so sure you should be here with
>us. Don't they have a foreigner's audio group where you come from?
I must admit that the quality of our education system isn't what it
used to be.
However, how would I know, I just took a soldering iron some day and
started tinkering.
About 10 naive employers in a row actually believed that I have skills
of some sort, the fools!
>Ha! What a fool!! And you call yourself an "engineer"? What do you
>engineer? "Foolishness"? Ha! Ha! Ha!
"Engineer" is what it says on my business cards.
I'll inform my employer immediately that it has to be removed at once.
>> - Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -
>(NOW you tell me! When it's too late!)
I learned that lesson in kindergarten, and adapted very quickly.
--
Arny Krueger
news:bt0e12di32ba0ibpt...@4ax.com
> soundhas...@yahoo.com said:
>
>> Are you SURE that you
>> are an official "regular" on this group?
>
>
> Some say I'm just a sockpuppet.
> I prefer to think of myself as RAO's court jester and
> part-time devil's advocate.
Pun much?
;-)
Sander deWaal
>>> Are you SURE that you
>>> are an official "regular" on this group?
>> Some say I'm just a sockpuppet.
>> I prefer to think of myself as RAO's court jester and
>> part-time devil's advocate.
>Pun much?
>;-)
Don't quit your day job just yet, Arny.
;-)
Goofball_star_dot_etal
Snipped..
---
>SHP
>"I am 100% certain that Soundhaspriority is Wallace, of Wallace &
>Gromit fame". - Goofball
That would be a terrible thing to say, even on RAO. You must have
dreamt it. I would never say such vicious thing.
As for (mis?)associating you and May, I would have thought she would
have been chuffed to bits. You are like blood brothers/sisters or
perhaps "thick as theives", "Dr. Graham".
Ruud Broens
"Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:t6ednWpsoNzzk4rZ...@comcast.com...
: "Sander deWaal" <nos...@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
this was the nearest to Krooglish translation
the babelfish came up with:
Very Ig flesh?
hm, still don't gettit
Ruud Broens
"Ruud Broens" <bro...@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:44176517$0$35137$dbd4...@news.wanadoo.nl...
:
: "Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote in message
flash of in site
aha a chinese ~joke~
so
very grid current fresh
hm, sounds like an endorsement,
i can live with that, Arn
;-)
Rudy
second courtj
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote::
I'll take that as an admission to me that you're a stupid twat for
having convinced yourself and others here that you're a brilliant net
detective, and that I'm May Belt.
Nice going, yet again, you earned your name.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
Yes.
elm...@pacificcoast.net
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2006 10:40:04 -0800, elm...@pacificcoast.net wrote:
>
>
> > One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be ridiculing
> >what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
> >aspirine under their loudspeakers.
>
> And a good thing too. It is insane.
Quite. It is even more insane (or Kindergarten mental level of argument
if you prefer) to attribute what one idiot wrote to all those one
disapproves of and who never had anything to do with the idiot
proposal.
Especially if one goes on for years about it.
Especially if it is one of the main arguments one has in a supposdly
serious discussion.
Ludovic Mirabel
Don't forget to tell me in a year's time that I wanted L-shaped aspirin
under every speaker.