Note to Chevdo, Bob Cain
soundhaspriority
McCarty:
"How dare you insist I'm wrong in my scientific analysis. I have years and
years of scientific and engineering training - even though the bastards
wouldn't give me a degree. I've almost invented stuff. I've almost made
movies. I've almost done lots of things, and now I have joined the IEEE.
Clearly that makes my knowledge superior to yours!"
"Well, that's very obvious, Pooh Bear. "soundhas...@goodscientist.com"
is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as
he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics."
With respect to the first, I would never write such a thing.
With respect to the second, my father has never used usenet.
It is a pleasure to interact with both of you.
Regards,
Bob Morein
soundhas...@yahoo.com
forgeries, and pleads for reason:
> "Crazy" Bob Morein
You know Psycho Bob, you really have no place whining about forgeries,
since your entire post is a forgery of my identity.
With respect to the first, I agree you would never write such a thing,
since its too honest for you. You're more apt to lie and threaten
people with grevious harm. One could spend the next 10 years counting
the lies you publicly wrote in the last 5 weeks. You didn't get the
degree you sought, you crow about your 7 phds and yet I've shown the
entire world in the last few weeks in post after post, just what kind
of a moron you actually are. Despite your dogged insistence that you're
smarter than the rest of us. You've "almost" done a lot of things, like
patent an idea, but the only career you ever succeded at is being a
usenet troll.
With respect to the second, what's not true about that either? I mean
you DO have a "new stalking name" ever since you so lamely copied mine,
and you -have- ruined your father's once good name, with your trolling,
threatening, netstalking "desperate crazy-bastard" antics. I'm sure
your father would be turning in his grave right now, if he weren't
having to support your loser ass living in his basement.
I don't have to have a crystal ball to come back here 10 years later
and still see you apologizing to people for the forgeries others post
of you. You are the American dream turned into an American nightmare,
on account of hard drugs. In a way, you're an inspiration to desparate,
pathetic losers all over the world....to get clean and sober, and make
a proper life for themselves.
kwsj
the conversation have anything to do with screenplays?
-kent
<soundhas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1146592179.3...@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bob Cain
> The posts which contain the following text are forgeries by Brian L.
> McCarty:
My sympathies. I too have a psycho stalker. I find him rather
entertaining but I'm pretty much alone in that perception. :-)
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
soundhas...@yahoo.com
> why do you people insist on these discussions of insulting each other? Does
> the conversation have anything to do with screenplays?
> -kent
As a matter of fact, yes. Yes, it does. Everyone's favourite
psychostalker and usenet's most famous FAILED movie director, "Crazy
Robert Morein", is writing a screenplay for a new movie.
It's about a failed movie director, coincidentally, who garnered 7 phds
and is now living in his father's basement, spending his days and
nights netstalking a participant on an audio group. Whom he thinks is
an adolescent psychiatrist and shill, as well as a St. Bernard, a crack
addict, a cocaine fiend, and a murderer. As well as Frankenstein the
2nd. Interesting script, isn't it? The tentative title is: "Robert
Morein's Excuse For A Life".
As you might have guessed, its actually Morein's autobiography of his
psychotic obsessions netstalking me, forging a false identity from my
name (soundhaspriority), and basically being "out to lunch" on a
permanent schedule. Are you interested in investing in the project? It
may be as likely to lose as much money as his previous projects but on
the plus side, it could be Morein's last picture before the men in
white come to take him away.....
soundhas...@yahoo.com
> soundhaspriority wrote:
> > The posts which contain the following text are forgeries by Brian L.
> > McCarty:
>
> My sympathies. I too have a psycho stalker. I find him rather
> entertaining but I'm pretty much alone in that perception. :-)
>
>
> Bob
Ironically, I have a psycho stalker as well, and its the very person
you just gave your sympathies to! (Robert Morein, aka "Psycho Bob" aka
"Crazy Bob Morein" aka "Mad Morein"). He's a much more obsessive and
deeply disturbed psycho stalker than his own netstalker, McCarty. For
example, he now thinks he's me, and as such, forges my identity in all
of his posts. When I stopped posting for 24 hours recently, he went
berserk, looking for signs of me, and openly speculating all kinds of
his typical wild theories as to what the truth might be (in this case,
for my absence). I find my psycho stalker rather entertaining, which is
why I like dangling carrots in front of him all the time. I just wanted
you to know that you are definitely not alone in the perception of
finding yourself flattered and entertained by a psycho netstalker. I'll
bet my stalker is a -lot- more entertaining than -your- stalker! And a
lot more obsessive too. Robert Morein has been psycho stalking for
almost 8 years straight, and he's promised me another 8 years!
Now THAT is what I call an obsessive psycho stalker.
Gary Sokolich
news:1146668715.7...@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
I too have my own personal psycho stalker, and, even more ironically, his
name is Bob Cain.
Bob Cain has been stalking me on the internet for about five years.
Bob Cain has gone so far as to carry his stalking campaign to the point of
attempting to portray me, the victim of his stalking, as someone who has
been stalking him. That, however, is not quite as surprising as it might
seem because Bob Cain has a long-standing and well-documented (posting)
record which clearly demonstrates that he regularly criticizes/condemns
others for the very behavior in which he himself engages.
More recently, as with your stalker, Bob Cain has also begun forging my
identity in his posts. He has all of the characteristics of one sick and
twisted sociopath (my opinion, of course).
I am by no means the only one to recognize Bob Cain for who/what he really
is. A quick review of the Google record will reveal that Bob Cain has been
repeatedly referred to as a hypocrite, a boaster and troll, a slanderer, a
grandiose liar and a pathological narcissist....and that's only the short
list.
soundhaspriority
"Gary Sokolich" <soko...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sGb6g.84884$2g2....@fe07.news.easynews.com...
I'm no one to judge, but Bob Cain knows system theory extremely well --
like a high Masters or Ph.D level. While that does not rule out the
possibility that he could be your stalker, people that smart have other
things to think about. There is a whole world of theory that could occupy
Bob Cain's mind. Generally, the stalker is someone who either has mediocre
intelligence, or is just plain maladjusted. I am actually fortunate to have
two stalkers.
The one of historical record is Brian L. McCarty, who some of you may
recognize as Jeff Wexler's former coworker/partner. He does the
impersonations of "Sylvan Morein", "Official Ram Bluebook", and runs an
atttempted investment scam at http://www.coralseastudios.com, which to this
day makes false claims of partnerships and agreements that do not exist. He
runs another one at http://www.worldjazz.com, which at this moment contains
the completely ripped off webpage of http://www.rocketstockpicks.com/ It
appears that he wants to funnel Rocket Stocks's traffic through his url, and
then change the page to toute the fraudulent Coralseas offering.
The more recent one is a person who I believe to be Dr. Richard Graham,
a London psychiatrist specializing in truculent adolescents, whose second
job appears to be writing the newsletter for PWB Electronics,
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/. This company offers hfi tweaks that include
genuine "snake oil", in the form of an "electret cream" which, when rubbed
onto audio equipment, cabinetry, wires, etc., is claimed to improve the
sound. Another product is an embossed aluminum sticker, with the message
"Sound has priority". It is claimed that by affixing the sticker to multiple
locations of the listener's equipment, the sound is improved.
Dr. Graham recently attempted to take up residence in rec.audio.opinion,
where he used intimidation, incredibly self-contradictory statements,
general insults (such as addressing the group of us as "pigs"), and so
forth, in order to brainwash the r.a.o. readers into becoming customers of
PWB Electronics. For me, the last straw was when he attempted to use the
phrase "quantum mechanics" as a splatter gun explanation of how the tweaks
work. Since I observed that Dr. Graham's mojo was his posting name,
"soundhaspriority", I resolved to take it from him. Since he refuses to
identify himself, other than insisting he is not Dr. Graham, his only resort
was a torrent of expletives and perjoratives "psycho wacko Bob", etc. in
order to discredit me.
It could be said that I have brought this upon myself, because I choose
not to allow the likes of these bullies to rule usenet newsgroups. Sometimes
it's worth it, to do a little good in the world.
Bob Morein
Gary Sokolich
news:1rqdnQR-86iszcTZ...@giganews.com:
snip....snip
> Gary,
> I'm no one to judge, but Bob Cain knows system theory extremely
> well --
> like a high Masters or Ph.D level. While that does not rule out the
> possibility that he could be your stalker, people that smart have
> other things to think about. There is a whole world of theory that
> could occupy Bob Cain's mind.
At least you're correct about one thing. Being smart/knowledgeable in
systems theory and being a stalker are not mutually exclusive. In my
opinion, Bob Cain is a textbook example of an educated sociopath.
> Generally, the stalker is someone who
> either has mediocre intelligence, or is just plain maladjusted.
>snip....snip
> Bob Morein
The jails are filled with criminals who are both intelligent and
maladjusted. Ted Bundy was one classic example. In my opinion, Bob Cain
and Ted Bundy share the very same sociopathic mentality.
paul packer
>kwsj wrote:
>> why do you people insist on these discussions of insulting each other? Does
>> the conversation have anything to do with screenplays?
>> -kent
>
>As a matter of fact, yes. Yes, it does. Everyone's favourite
>psychostalker and usenet's most famous FAILED movie director, "Crazy
>Robert Morein", is writing a screenplay for a new movie.
>
>It's about a failed movie director, coincidentally, who garnered 7 phds
>and is now living in his father's basement, spending his days and
>nights netstalking a participant on an audio group. Whom he thinks is
>an adolescent psychiatrist and shill, as well as a St. Bernard, a crack
>addict, a cocaine fiend, and a murderer. As well as Frankenstein the
>2nd. Interesting script, isn't it? The tentative title is: "Robert
>Morein's Excuse For A Life".
>As you might have guessed, its actually Morein's autobiography of his
>psychotic obsessions netstalking me, forging a false identity from my
>name (soundhaspriority), and basically being "out to lunch" on a
>permanent schedule. Are you interested in investing in the project? It
>may be as likely to lose as much money as his previous projects but on
>the plus side, it could be Morein's last picture before the men in
>white come to take him away.....
If it plays as well in 70mm as it has here on RAO you can put me down
for a few million.
Bob Cain
> Gary,
Bob, that's him. He's pretty well known hereabouts. Unusual, however, for
him to use his real name this way. Trust me you do not wish to engage in
_any_ form of dialog with him lest you attract another pathological
stalker. He's attached himself to others who dared express anything
positive toward me either personally or with respect to my technical input.
oldp...@bellsouth.net
horseshit out of r.a.p. and leave it in r.a.o. where your
ilk seems to congregate?
None of the rest of us r.a.p. regulars really give a rat's
ass about your schoolyard games. Please grow up.
soundhaspriority
"Bob Cain" <arc...@arcanemethods.com> wrote in message
news:y_-dnfsaFrh...@giganews.com...
> soundhaspriority wrote:
>
>> Gary,
>
> Bob, that's him. He's pretty well known hereabouts. Unusual, however,
> for
> him to use his real name this way. Trust me you do not wish to engage in
> _any_ form of dialog with him lest you attract another pathological
> stalker. He's attached himself to others who dared express anything
> positive toward me either personally or with respect to my technical
> input.
>
>
claiming to be dogged by stalkers. This, of course, robs us of credibility
with each, as in Groucho Marx's quote, "I wouldn't belong to any club that
would have me as a member."
:):):)
Bob, all I can say is that your knowledge and comport were exemplary in the
recent thread. Gary, I haven't had a chance to see the problem in action,
but I hope for the best.
Bob Morein
soundhas...@mad.scientist.com
Robert Morein aka "Dr. Richard Graham", wrote:
> The posts which contain the following text are forgeries by Brian L.
> McCarty:
>
> "How dare you insist I'm wrong in my scientific analysis. I have years and
> years of scientific and engineering training - even though the bastards
> wouldn't give me a degree. I've almost invented stuff. I've almost made
> movies. I've almost done lots of things, and now I have joined the IEEE.
> Clearly that makes my knowledge superior to yours!"
>
> "Well, that's very obvious, Pooh Bear. "soundhas...@goodscientist.com"
> is in fact my sick son Robert Morein, who's now got a new stalking name as
> he's ruined his and MY good name with his antics."
>
> With respect to the first, I would never write such a thing.
Of course you wouldn't. You're a well known proven pathological liar,
and it's too honest for you. But you can't say it isn't true. You DO
have a "new psychostalking name", which you forged out of mine. You DID
have "years of scientific and engineering training" and your
university, Drexel, wouldn't give you the degree because you never
earned it. You DID almost do a lot of things, and you HAVE joined the
IEEE. But you haven't actually done anything with your life, because if
you had, you wouldn't be spending your life psychostalking me all day
and night, every single day for the last 3 months. Would you?
(I'd like to thank "Impeccable Logic Inc.", the sponsor for this last
paragaph...)
> With respect to the second, my father has never used usenet.
Since you're a known pathological liar, I'm gonna have to ask you to
prove that.
> It is a pleasure to interact with both of you.
>
> Regards,
> Doctor Richard Graham
Still pretending that you're Doctor Graham?
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Robert Mad Morein, the Psychostalking Nutcase, has another brain fart
and defines "humourous irony":
> "Bob Cain" <arc...@arcanemethods.com> wrote in message
> news:y_-dnfsaFrh...@giganews.com...
> > soundhaspriority wrote:
> >
> >> Gary,
> >
> > Bob, that's him. He's pretty well known hereabouts. Unusual, however,
> > for
> > him to use his real name this way. Trust me you do not wish to engage in
> > _any_ form of dialog with him lest you attract another pathological
> > stalker. He's attached himself to others who dared express anything
> > positive toward me either personally or with respect to my technical
> > input.
> >
> >
> This has a certain humorous irony about it. Here we are, three guys, each
> claiming to be dogged by stalkers. This, of course, robs us of credibility
Hey Crazy Bob, you know what has even more of a humourous irony about
it? The fact that YOU are the most obsessive psychostalker the audio
groups have ever known, and the fact that you overlooked that fact with
your "we three guys" comment, along with the fact that you are MY
"obsessive psychostalker".
But who's being robbed of credibility here? Only you. Showing what an
obsessive stalker you are is real easy. Here's 14,000 of your obsessive
psychostalking trolls not done under your usual sockpuppets, and that's
only a small sampling from the last 8 years, in which you never left
Usenet for over a day:
> with each, as in Groucho Marx's quote, "I wouldn't belong to any club that
> would have me as a member."
> :):):)
Hence you are not a member of the "Psychostalking Victim's Club". You
can't be, since you're the psychostalker, and have been since the 20th
century!
> Bob, all I can say is that your knowledge and comport were exemplary in the
> recent thread. Gary, I haven't had a chance to see the problem in action,
> but I hope for the best.
>
> Psycho Bob Morein
Gary Sokolich
news:vYWdnRxvFsjzusfZ...@giganews.com:
No need for hope. For a variety of numerous reasons, the likelihood of a
problem developing between us is zip to none. You can take that to the
bank.
Given that Bob Cain has taken this thread as yet another opportunity to
slam me one more time, I will take this opportunity to tell you a little
bit about the "real" Bob Cain.
As you infer, Bob Cain is indeed knowledgeable in certain areas.
Additionally, more often than not, his posts reflect a very pleasant and
professional demeanor. That is the Dr. Jekyll side of Bob Cain, and that
is the side that you and others will see as long as you and others continue
to stroke him.
The "real" Bob Cain, however, is a pathological narcissist who is addicted
to the admiration and attention of others. In order to feed and satisfy
that addiction, Bob Cain will occasionally step outside of the boundaries
of his areas of technical expertise and will make technical assertions that
are blatantly incorrect. Unfortunately, there is no room for either
correction or criticism inside Bob Cain's swollen head. Consequently, when
someone like myself comes along and calls attention to Bob Cain's
technically-incorrect assertions, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Cain emerges
with a vengeance.
Bob Cain is also a hypocrite, and often criticizes others for the very
behavior in which he repeatedly engages. Since Bob Cain is in total denial
of his own pathological behavior, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Cain also
emerges with a vengeance whenever someone like myself calls attention to
his blatant hypocrisy.
Last but not least, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Cain is a congenital liar and
sociopath. As a result, there is no level below which Bob Cain will not
stoop, and no lies that Bob Cain will not post in order to get revenge
against someone, like me, who would dare to call attention to the truth
about the psychotic and sadistic dark side of the "real" Bob Cain.
go...@scientist.com
Gary Sokolich wrote:
And while you're there, bank on the fact that there will never be a
problem developing between you and me. Me and your new friend Bob
Morein, that's another story. But I'm glad you're seated, because I
will tell you the Story of Bob Morein. It goes like this:
As you infer, Bob Morein is indeed knowledgeable in certain areas.
Additionally, more often than not, his posts reflect a very pleasant
and
professional demeanor. That is the Dr. Jekyll side of Bob Morein, and
that
is the side that you and others will see as long as you and others
continue
to stroke him.
The "real" Bob Morein, however, is a pathological narcissist who is
addicted
to the admiration and attention of others. In order to feed and
satisfy
that addiction, Bob Morein will occasionally step outside of the
boundaries
of his areas of technical expertise and will make technical assertions
that
are blatantly incorrect. Unfortunately, there is no room for either
correction or criticism inside Bob Morein's swollen head.
Consequently, when
someone like myself comes along and calls attention to Bob Morein's
technically-incorrect assertions, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein
emerges
with a vengeance.
Bob Morein is also a hypocrite, and often criticizes others for the
very
behavior in which he repeatedly engages. Since Bob Morein is in total
denial
of his own pathological behavior, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein also
emerges with a vengeance whenever someone like myself calls attention
to
his blatant hypocrisy.
Last but not least, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein is a congenital
liar and
sociopath. As a result, there is no level below which Bob Morein will
not
stoop, and no lies that Bob Morein will not post in order to get
revenge
against someone, like me, who would dare to call attention to the
truth
about the psychotic and sadistic dark side of the "real" Bob Morein.
paul packer
So you don't like him. We'll take that as a given.
Bob Cain
[garbage]
You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.
go...@scientist.com
Bob Cain wrote:
> go...@scientist.com wrote:
>
> [garbage]
>
> You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
> while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.
>
> Bob
Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature. However,
I suspected you were Bob Morein, from the similarity of your psycho
rants. You know what? Don't explain it to me, I don't think I want to
know whether you're Gary, or whatever silly name games you're playing
at. I'm not interested.
go...@scientist.com
paul packer wrote:
No, I like him. Even though he's a lying psychopath, is killing himself
to defame someone he mistakenly thinks I am, and recently made violent
death threats against me, doesn't mean that I don't like my funny bunny
friend, Robert "Psycho Bob" Morein.
How could you not like someone who works so hard to be a
self-diminishing clown and provide so much for your entertainment
dollar?
> We'll take that as a given.
Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
not to take anything as a "given", Paul. You're not that bright to
begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.
go...@scientist.com
Bob Cain wrote:
Well, you piqued my curiousity, Bob. Found that you have over 7,000
posts on Usenet. I guess you're quite proud of your "usenet career", in
comparison with the couple of hundred I have made. Then I found how so
many of them were "psycho rants", only one of which I have reprinted
below, since you seem to have forgotten what a psychotic troll you are.
Judging by your usenet record, I don't think me and Gary could fit in a
room together, what with him and your massively inflated psycho-ego
already in that room......
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Einstein Procrusteanizes Time Dilation - Response to Gary
Sokolich
From: Bob Cain - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 9:20 pm
Email: Bob Cain <arc...@arcanemethods.com>
Groups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
>> kenseto wrote:
> The mindless discussions of Doppler distortion, which you led in the audio
> groups last year, demonstrate that you don't understand Doppler shift
> either. Your most recent posts on the issue demonstrate that you still
> don't understand it. Nonetheless, you still pretend that you do, and,
> worse yet, you criticize others for doing the same thing. At least you are
> consistent and true to your long-standing and well-documented reputation as
> a fraud and a hypocrite.
Idiot (and delusional psychopath.) At the end of the day I was the one
with the answer in hand. You didn't even try; you just spewed all over
the efforts to get to the bottom of it contributing nothing but bitter
bile. To say that I didn't have the answer or that you or anyone else
did is an easily demonstrable lie like everything you have to spew.
go...@scientist.com
<snip - who cares?>
Bob, you piqued my curiousity here. I did a background check on your
profile and found you had some 7,000 posts to your name. Most of which
were psycho rants like the one below, mostly aimed at what appears to
be your arch enemy and stalking victim, Gary. Here you're calling
someone an "idiot" and a "psychopath" for "spewing out bitter bile", in
a post in which you're "spewing out bitter bile". Can you see why I
mistook you for Bob Morein? He has that same sense of deluded irony
that you do.
You must be proud of your usenet career in comparison to my paltry
couple of hundred posts. But I don't think there's enough room in that
room for me, you and your stalking victim. Because with him and your
massively inflated ego, I can't get even get a foot in. Maybe if you
ever managed to pry yourself off his ankles, someone else might be able
to join you two. But since you're having so much fun together, better
you stay that way......
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Einstein Procrusteanizes Time Dilation - Response to Gary Sokolich
From: Bob Cain - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 9:20 pm
Email: Bob Cain <arc...@arcanemethods.com>
Groups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
>> kenseto wrote:
> The mindless discussions of Doppler distortion, which you led in the audio
> groups last year, demonstrate that you don't understand Doppler shift
> either. Your most recent posts on the issue demonstrate that you still
> don't understand it. Nonetheless, you still pretend that you do, and,
> worse yet, you criticize others for doing the same thing. At least you are
> consistent and true to your long-standing and well-documented reputation as
> a fraud and a hypocrite.
Idiot (and delusional psychopath.) At the end of the day I was the one
with the answer in hand. You didn't even try; you just spewed all over
the efforts to get to the bottom of it contributing nothing but bitter
bile. To say that I didn't have the answer or that you or anyone else
did is an easily demonstrable lie like everything you have to spew.
Bob
Bob Cain
> Bob Cain wrote:
>> go...@scientist.com wrote:
>>
>> [garbage]
>>
>> You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
>> while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.
>>
>> Bob
>
> Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
> seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature.
You've got the wrong Guy. Gary Sokolich has begun attaching mine and
other's names to his psychopathic babble. Do you ever do that?
Bob Cain
Yeah, that's mine and it's absolutely accurate. Whoever you are, and I
suspect you are the person my post is in response to, Gary Sokolich. Your
lies about my posting history are all too familiar as is your mention of
searching usenet for me. You are obsessed. It must be hell being you.
Outa Here,
go...@scientist.com
Bob Cain wrote:
> go...@scientist.com wrote:
> > Bob Cain wrote:
> >> go...@scientist.com wrote:
> >>
> >> [garbage]
> >>
> >> You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
> >> while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.
> >>
> >> Bob
> >
> > Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
> > seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature.
>
> You've got the wrong Guy. Gary Sokolich has begun attaching mine and
> other's names to his psychopathic babble. Do you ever do that?
Attach my name to your psychopathic babble? Er, no. But I know someone
who does do just that. I think you know him, his name is "Robert
Morein", but you may know him better under the name "Psycho Bob". Of
course, he has begun attaching my name (soundhaspriority) to all of HIS
"psychopathic babble". And trust me, "psychopathic babble" is -exactly-
what it can be described as.
We have a lot more in common than you know, apparently.
go...@scientist.com
Bob Cain wrote:
No sorry, I'm Bob Morein. But a lot of people get me and Gary confused,
so I don't blame you.
> Your lies about my posting history are all too familiar
Excuse me? You just finished telling me that it was "absolutely
accurate"? Please let us know when the worms have stopped messing with
your brain, will you?
> as is your mention of
> searching usenet for me. You are obsessed.
For clicking on your profile in Google, which takes half a second? If
that's obsessed, then what do you call writing 7,000 posts on usenet,
most of which are obsessing about a guy named "Gary Sokovich" or
whatever? How about "psychotically obsessed", will that do?
>It must be hell being you.
No, its pretty sweet being me. You know what my secret is? I don't
spend half my freaking life on usenet writing thousands of posts
against a guy I never met named "Gary Sokoslich". I have something you
could never hope to get beg, steal or borrow: it's called "a real
life".
paul packer
>> We'll take that as a given.
>
>Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
>adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
>not to take anything as a "given", Paul.
And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham?
Because I referred to you as such, due to a lack of alternatives? I've
seen no evidence to support that contention and it never seemed very
plausible--still less so now, when you spend hours and hours (even at
your average speed of 150wpm) doing nothing but posting and appear to
be close to meltdown in every thread. Or maybe that's just your style.
> You're not that bright to
>begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.
Why is your closet full of dunce's caps, Mr. Sound? Be a little
generous: buy a packet of sparkly stars. We littlies appreciate stuff
like that.
Gary Sokolich
> go...@scientist.com wrote:
>> Bob Cain wrote:
>>> go...@scientist.com wrote:
>>>
>>> [garbage]
>>>
>>> You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other.
>>> For a while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of
>>> your psycho rants.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>
>> Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
>> seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature.
>
> You've got the wrong Guy. Gary Sokolich has begun attaching mine and
> other's names to his psychopathic babble. Do you ever do that?
> Bob
Yet another example of Bob Cain's unbounded hypocrisy in action.
The real question is does Bob Cain ever do that? Do bears shit in the
woods? Is the pope Catholic? The answer to all three is, of course.
A quick google search will readily reveal numerous recent posts, under my
name and with my signature, that are being made by an imposter who posts
via giganews using Thunderbird 1.5.0.2. I post via easynews using Xnews
5.04.25, and I NEVER sign my posts.
Given that psycho Bob Cain recently started posting via giganews using
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2., you don't need to be a rocket scientist to realize
that psycho Bob Cain is my stalking imposter.
Given
Gary Sokolich
snip....snip
> Yeah, that's mine and it's absolutely accurate. Whoever you are, and
> I suspect you are the person my post is in response to, Gary Sokolich.
> Your lies about my posting history are all too familiar as is your
> mention of searching usenet for me. You are obsessed. It must be
> hell being you.
>
>
> Outa Here,
> Bob
Outa Here? Apparently, with none of his lab dogs available to mindlessly
support him, Bob Cain isn't just a lying, hypocritical sociopath. Bob Cain
is a lying, hypocritical sociopathic coward.
soundhas...@yahoo.com
paul packer wrote:
> On 5 May 2006 10:04:06 -0700, go...@scientist.com wrote:
>
>
> >> We'll take that as a given.
> >
> >Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
> >adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
> >not to take anything as a "given", Paul.
>
> And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham?
> Because I referred to you as such
Yes, but that's generally the accepted standard for "accepting who
someone is".
> due to a lack of alternatives?
Well I don't call you "Bugs Fucking Bunny" because I find there aren't
enough alternatives to "Paul Packer", do I?
>I've
> seen no evidence to support that contention and it never seemed very
> plausible--still less so now
A reasonable conclusion. But I already know I'm not Richard Graham...
why aren't you explaining this to Psycho Bob?
> Or maybe that's just your style.
That's just my style. Interpret it as you wish. You look like a moron
to me judging some of the things you write but maybe you're not. Maybe
that's just "your" style.
>
> > You're not that bright to
> >begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.
>
> Why is your closet full of dunce's caps, Mr. Sound?
It's "dunce caps" Mr. Packer, and it's full of them because when I
leave, I'm going to be handing out one to every member here, for their
thrilling participation in my amusement. Don't worry, I've already got
your size.
> Be a little
> generous: buy a packet of sparkly stars. We littlies appreciate stuff
> like that.
Hmmm.... "sparkly stars"..... I wonder if that might improve the sound
of my audio system.....
soundhas...@yahoo.com
Gary Sokolich wrote:
Sorry, but I've already registered "Psycho Bob" for -my- psychostalking
troll, "Psycho Bob Morein". You can't use it for your psychostalking
troll, Psycho Bob Cain. I mean "Bob Cain". Not without my permission
and that's going to require copyright payments.
paul packer
soundhas...@yahoo.com wrote:
> paul packer wrote:
> > On 5 May 2006 10:04:06 -0700, go...@scientist.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > >> We'll take that as a given.
> > >
> > >Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
> > >adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
> > >not to take anything as a "given", Paul.
> >
> > And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham?
> > Because I referred to you as such
>
> Yes, but that's generally the accepted standard for "accepting who
> someone is".
Not really. "Soundhaspriority" is not a monicker. It's kind of
pretentious really. No, actually it is pretentious. I was just glad to
have an actual human being-type name for you.
> > due to a lack of alternatives?
>
> Well I don't call you "Bugs Fucking Bunny" because I find there aren't
> enough alternatives to "Paul Packer", do I?
Stupid answer. If someone provides you a name you call them by that. If
someone says, "My name's Doodlypoo," you generally smile and avoid
calling them anything, because you assume they're an idiot.
"Soundhaspriority" wasn't much better in my opinion.
> >I've
> > seen no evidence to support that contention and it never seemed very
> > plausible--still less so now
>
> A reasonable conclusion. But I already know I'm not Richard Graham...
> why aren't you explaining this to Psycho Bob?
Hey, this's a newsgroup. Here's a flash---Robert will probably read
this.
> > Or maybe that's just your style.
>
> That's just my style. Interpret it as you wish. You look like a moron
> to me judging some of the things you write but maybe you're not. Maybe
> that's just "your" style.
Cheap shot. A bit Krueger-like actually. Which means (here's a
backhanded compliment coming up)....which means it's beneath you.
> > > You're not that bright to
> > >begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.
> >
> > Why is your closet full of dunce's caps, Mr. Sound?
>
> It's "dunce caps" Mr. Packer, and it's full of them because when I
> leave, I'm going to be handing out one to every member here, for their
> thrilling participation in my amusement. Don't worry, I've already got
> your size.
So in this little pond, which nevertheless has quite a few fish waving
a number of impressive degrees and certificates, you're the only one
with two brain cells to rub together, is that it? Well,
well...."meglomania" hardly fits. And where will you move to from
here---the domination of all Usenet? the invasion of Poland? (No, I
didn't say "Hitler"). I'm worried about you, Mr. Sound. Your fingers
must be bleeding from all this typing but it's the blood on your
forehead that worries me more. How long can this mania go on? How
contemptuous of his fellow creatures can one man get? How much abuse
can one individual scream at a sitting, in a day, a week? All this
negativity is cumulative, don't you know? Very soon, probably now,
you'll start growing strange appendages from each side of your
forehead...strange, horn-like appendages which will prove to be a real
handicap to combing your fringe across. I would be wary of these, Mr.
Sound--they're a bad sign. It will be Nature's way of telling you it's
time to move on, but because you're a meglomaniac who believes he
bestrides this NG like a collossus you won't be able to move on.
You'll continue with bloodied brow shurning out your 150wpm until one
day you look in the mirror and realize the appendages are full-blown
horns, your eyes have turned a spooky, glowing green and there's an
evil smell about you. Then of course you'll have to buy a Darth Vader
helmet and turn fully to the Dark Side in order to get any work....and
all this because you wouldn't desist from your abuse on RAO when you
knew in your heart it was time to do so. Think about it, Mr. Sound.
There's still time for repentance and, if we're all agreed,
forgiveness. I'm sure even Robert would forgive you if you approached
him the right way, like on your knees, grovelling. But it has to be
now, Mr. Sound. One more day of these wild, ranting posts and you may
be too far gone.....
>
> > Be a little
> > generous: buy a packet of sparkly stars. We littlies appreciate stuff
> > like that.
>
> Hmmm.... "sparkly stars"..... I wonder if that might improve the sound
> of my audio system.....
No, but it could do wonders for your temperament.
soundhas...@yahoo.com
paul packer wrote:
> soundhas...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > paul packer wrote:
> > > On 5 May 2006 10:04:06 -0700, go...@scientist.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >> We'll take that as a given.
> > > >
> > > >Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
> > > >adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
> > > >not to take anything as a "given", Paul.
> > >
> > > And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham?
> > > Because I referred to you as such
> >
> > Yes, but that's generally the accepted standard for "accepting who
> > someone is".
>
> Not really. "Soundhaspriority" is not a monicker.
I agree. It was never meant to be. It's more of a morphic message,
actually.
> It's kind of
> pretentious really. No, actually it is pretentious.
No, Morein adopting it is pretentious. It's fine.
> I was just glad to
> have an actual human being-type name for you.
Then maybe you should have chosen one that *isn't already taken*, fool.
> > > due to a lack of alternatives?
> >
> > Well I don't call you "Bugs Fucking Bunny" because I find there aren't
> > enough alternatives to "Paul Packer", do I?
>
> Stupid answer.
No, that was a very -smart- answer, actually. The problem here is,
you're stupid for not understanding it. You're even stupider for having
made the question that prompted my answer. No one else here ever told
me they need to steal the name of a London psychiatrist because they
needed "alternatives" to address me. Krueger has no problem addressing
me, why should you, Bugsy?
> If someone provides you a name you call them by that. If
> someone says, "My name's Doodlypoo," you generally smile and avoid
> calling them anything, because you assume they're an idiot.
Then avoid calling me anything and assume I'm an idiot. That's fine
with me too.
> "Soundhaspriority" wasn't much better in my opinion.
I never asked for your opinion about that, did I? Westpase??? has an
email address, so does "nyob???", so does elmir????, so do many people
here. You don't seem to be calling all of them "Richard Graham", I
noticed. Fact is, I don't have a name, per se, and you don't have to
use any name when speaking to me. But if you insist that my email
address isn't good enough to use as a name when you wish, then you ask
what you may call me. To address me as someone who does exist but isn't
me, is fraudulent, and disrespectful of the person who isn't here to
defend their name. Robert Morein does so because he's a lowlife POS
without any sense of ethics -whatsoever-.
> > >I've
> > > seen no evidence to support that contention and it never seemed very
> > > plausible--still less so now
> >
> > A reasonable conclusion. But I already know I'm not Richard Graham...
> > why aren't you explaining this to Psycho Bob?
>
> Hey, this's a newsgroup. Here's a flash---Robert will probably read
> this.
No, he's thicker than that. You must have missed his recent forays into
RAP. It doesn't sink into his head unless you actually tell him.
Besides, when I was taking a vote on whether I was Graham or not, seems
to me that you were equally shy then about admitting I wasn't.
> > > Or maybe that's just your style.
> >
> > That's just my style. Interpret it as you wish. You look like a moron
> > to me judging some of the things you write but maybe you're not. Maybe
> > that's just "your" style.
>
> Cheap shot. A bit Krueger-like actually. Which means (here's a
> backhanded compliment coming up)....which means it's beneath you.
Well obviously not since I wrote it. And why should you hold me to a
higher standard than you hold yourself, pray tell? Was it beneath
Mumbles to tell me that I "grind glass in my anus" yesterday? I don't
recall you telling him that, strangely enough. So it seems that we can
now look to Mumbles Middius to set the moral standard on RAO. So long
as people don't object to what Middius or Morein do or say around here,
then their lowlife behaviour sets the norms of acceptance on RAO. Well
they both went much lower in their standards than anything I've ever
done.
> > > > You're not that bright to
> > > >begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.
> > >
> > > Why is your closet full of dunce's caps, Mr. Sound?
> >
> > It's "dunce caps" Mr. Packer, and it's full of them because when I
> > leave, I'm going to be handing out one to every member here, for their
> > thrilling participation in my amusement. Don't worry, I've already got
> > your size.
>
> So in this little pond, which nevertheless has quite a few fish waving
> a number of impressive degrees and certificates, you're the only one
> with two brain cells to rub together, is that it?
No, I never said that, actually, but I agree, it is an interesting
observation - one I made many times. Take Morein, who's no doubt the
most educated if not degreed person here. And yet... this is the very
same MORON who's brilliant deductive reasoning tells him that despite
posting all day every day, I have to be a full time London-based
psychiatrist, newsletter editor and maths professor and family man, who
has so many responsibilities he doesn't have time to chat in his own
discussion group or edit his own newsletters. That plus the fact that I
provided zillions of incontrovertible evidence that I couldn't be
Graham. Despite that, the MORON insists I am in every post of his. Why?
Because he found the term "soundhaspriority" in one of Graham's
newsletters.
Conclusion: YES, my chump friend, I'm here to say you CAN have a half a
thousand degrees and certificates, and STILL be a moron. All that means
is that you are highly educated in "certain" areas of study and
presumably intelligent in "certain" matters. You could be a flaming
retard when it comes to many things nevertheless, and Moreon is a
flaming retard when it comes to -many- things, as I have shown these
last few weeks. Not just in his idiotic theories about how he has
briliantly discovered my name is Richard Graham. Even though one of his
degrees is in audio engineering, you have only to look at his recent
arrogance on RAP and his meandering pretentious stabs at understanding
quantum mechanics relating to audio on this group to realize, this
clown really doesn't know audio as well as he "thinks" he does. Again,
that doesn't mean he's a clueless boob about all audio. But he
certainly doesn't seem to have ever impressed me or anyone else
whenever he opens his mouth on the subject, come to think of it.
When I see you and half the rest of the group trying to "rub your brain
cells together" to figure out who I am, what I am, where I come from,
etc.... and the paths of logic that you follow to reach your "brilliant
conclusions" about me... I'm sorry, but I'd be a fool to conclude that
you're anything but complete imbeciles. You're imbeciles to even TRY to
figure out who, what or where I am, when that is simply not possible,
and not even relevant if it were. But the logic used by every single
person I've seen trying to deduce these and other "burning questions",
including Morein, tells me that there really aren't any deep thinkers
on this group. You'd be surprised probably, if I told you who I think
is the brightest thinker in this area. He too, no doubt.
> well...."meglomania" hardly fits. And where will you move to from
> here---the domination of all Usenet? the invasion of Poland? (No, I
> didn't say "Hitler").
Hitler? For bringing up the name "Hitler", I invoke upon thee Godwin's
law, which means I win this debate. <clap clap> Thank you. Thank you.
>I'm worried about you, Mr. Sound. Your fingers
> must be bleeding from all this typing
I told you, stop worrying, you're going to hurt yourself. I rarely ever
type. Do try to keep up, Mr. Packer, you seem to have a problem
acknowledging anything but the voices in your squiggly head.
> How long can this mania go on?
This mania has been going on for about 20 years, I think. Probably
won't go on that much longer. Some major ISPs are cutting off Usenet
service simply because its waning in popularity and significance,
thanks to IM and blogs and web based forums.
> How contemptuous of his fellow creatures can one man get?
Oh God, I think I'm going to be sick........ Jesus man, don't ever call
these pigs my "fellow creatures" again, alright?
> How much abuse
> can one individual scream at a sitting, in a day, a week?
Judging my Mumbles posts, I'd say 570, roughly.
> All this negativity is cumulative, don't you know?
I know it all too well, which is why I don't accumulate it. Whom you
need to be worried about here are Morein, Middius and Krueger. Those
losers each have 8 or more years of trolling this group on a daily
basis, pumping out negativity EVERY day. Mumbles is the worst of the
three, in this regard, since he puts out the most negativity.
I take stock of my spiritual health, but only because I know it is in
line with the sound quality from my stereo. So no need to worry about
me accumulating all this negativity. I won't even be around here long
enough to do so. Promise you that.
> Very soon, probably now,
> you'll start growing strange appendages from each side of your
> forehead...strange, horn-like appendages which will prove to be a real
> handicap to combing your fringe across. I would be wary of these, Mr.
> Sound--they're a bad sign.
Yes, I've seen them on Morein, and I've seen them on Mumbles. Both are
proud of it even, and of their pitchforks. But you won't see that on me
because.... *I* recycle.
> It will be Nature's way of telling you it's
> time to move on,
For me, "boredom" is Nature's way of telling me to move on.
> but because you're a meglomaniac who believes he
> bestrides this NG like a collossus you won't be able to move on.
No, that's what you believe. But I can see why you get that impression
since people insist on making me the top topic of conversation around
here for some reason. Every time I turn my back, some jagoff has got a
new attack thread about me up. Me, I'm just trying to keep a low
profile, keep to myself as much as possible, and talk audio. You know,
without all that silly flaming and stuff. But I'm finding that the
ignorant pigs won't allow me to do that.
> You'll continue with bloodied brow shurning out your 150wpm until one
> day you look in the mirror and realize the appendages are full-blown
> horns, your eyes have turned a spooky, glowing green and there's an
> evil smell about you. Then of course you'll have to buy a Darth Vader
> helmet and turn fully to the Dark Side in order to get any work....and
> all this because you wouldn't desist from your abuse on RAO when you
> knew in your heart it was time to do so.
"Abuse"? What on earth are you yammering about? Do you have a vision
problem, perhaps someone punched you in the eye so hard once and
blindsided you, that you can only see a fraction of what is out there?
When you talk about "abuse", you seem to have overlooked people
threatening to put a bullet in my head, Morein threatening to cut my
balls off, Middius talking about grinding glass in my anus, Westpase
also threatening me with his gun, Morein threatening me with a lawsuit
for mentioning that he tried my l-shape tweak in email, Morein
threatening the man he thinks that I am, and harassing his colleagues
at work, Weil making up a zillion treacherous lies....
in fact, from the day I first posted here to the present, not a day has
gone by when I did not suffer some form of "abuse" by those here. In
return, I sometimes gave back as good as I got. Neither you nor anyone
else who whined about the fact that I decided to sometimes return my
attacks, EVER, and I mean EVER ONCE complained to my abusers for
attacking me. That makes you a hypocrite, just like everyone else here.
Join the club of whiners.
> Think about it, Mr. Sound.
> There's still time for repentance and, if we're all agreed,
> forgiveness.
Okay, I'm all ears. Let mine enemies and all those who attacked me
begin their repentance and beg for my forgiveness. If impressed, who
knows, I might grant them that.
> One more day of these wild, ranting posts and you may
> be too far gone.....
I've never written a wild, ranting post. I don't know what your problem
is, but you must have me confused with Mumbles or someone.
soundhaspriority
<soundhas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1146979436.2...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
>
> paul packer wrote:
>> soundhas...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> > paul packer wrote:
>> > > On 5 May 2006 10:04:06 -0700, go...@scientist.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >> We'll take that as a given.
>> > > >
>> > > >Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
>> > > >adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should
>> > > >learn
>> > > >not to take anything as a "given", Paul.
>> > >
>> > > And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham?
>> > > Because I referred to you as such
>> >
>> > Yes, but that's generally the accepted standard for "accepting who
>> > someone is".
>>
>> Not really. "Soundhaspriority" is not a monicker.
>
> I agree. It was never meant to be. It's more of a morphic message,
> actually.
>
message of "soundhaspriority", will be pain, anguish, the shrieking of souls
in the desperation of eternal agony.
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhas...@mad.scientist.com
Robert Morein, aka soundhaspriority, writes about his pain:
Here psycho goat-fucker Bob, let me help you with that:
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
soundhaspriority=pain
Know why I did that? Cuz it makes no difference. You could write it out
a thousand times, it would not matter a thousand times over. First of
all, you don't even know how to do it right, Flatlander. So what you're
actually telling us here, is that you are in terrible pain, since you
post under the name "soundhaspriority".
But, I can tell you without doubt, that -my- morphic message is
-stronger than ever-! Not only does it sound better on my stereo, but
it completely negates anything you could possibly think to do with it,
with your non-existent Flatlander powers. Ever see The Matrix? Remember
at the end where Neo had the confidence to dodge bullets from the bad
"borgs"? Well, guess what.... you're the borgs, I'm Neo. Your posts fly
right by me like those virtual bullets, no matter how many times you
try to fire them at me. I'm just laughing at you, cyborg! As Neo would.
That's why your posts are just dissolving into thin air and going
nowhere. No one's reading them, no one cares about you.So you could do
your "Doctor Richard Graham" dance a thousand times, and it won't do a
damn thing but waste your time (thank God you have so much time to
waste....).
Sound has priority, you don't got squat. Mojo "this", MF. <grabs
gonads>
Gary Sokolich
news:1146965069....@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
snip....snip>
> Sorry, but I've already registered "Psycho Bob" for -my-
> psychostalking troll, "Psycho Bob Morein". You can't use it for your
> psychostalking troll, Psycho Bob Cain. I mean "Bob Cain". Not without
> my permission and that's going to require copyright payments.
No problem. I'm not intersted in stepping on your toes or on your dick. In
the future I will do my best to avoid referring to Bob Cain as "Psycho
Bob." In the event that I accidentally/unintentionally refer to Bob Cain as
"Psycho Bob" in the future, what sort of copyright payment would you
require?
George M. Middius
Gary Sokolich said:
> In the event that I accidentally/unintentionally refer to Bob Cain as "Psycho Bob"
> in the future, what sort of copyright payment would you require?
You will be required to buy a case of Shovels' Magic Electric Tweak
cream and abuse yourself with it.
--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.
Gary Sokolich
wrote in news:m9uc625p1t3lbjppn...@4ax.com:
>
>
> Gary Sokolich said:
>
>> In the event that I accidentally/unintentionally refer to Bob Cain as
>> "Psycho Bob" in the future, what sort of copyright payment would you
>> require?
>
> You will be required to buy a case of Shovels' Magic Electric Tweak
> cream and abuse yourself with it.
Sorry, but I am not familiar with that particular product. Is it one that
you use to abuse yourself on a regular basis? Also, do you abuse yourself
with the cream or with the case, or with both? Just curious!