It's fun on the Chargers group!
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
(2pid)
>Cam was asked if the Raven's are getting his system now in his second year.
(Other poster)
Don't put apostrophes in plural nouns.
Sincerely,
Third Grade
MiNe 109
<ce5744bf-ce9e-4946...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
Oh noez! He probably excused his rao spelling as ironic or deliberately
irritating.
Stephen
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
> In article
> <ce5744bf-ce9e-4946-8943-56d013a6e...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Look what one of the posters just said to 2pid:
>
> > (2pid)
>
> > >Cam was asked if the Raven's are getting his system now in his second year.
>
> > (Other poster)
>
> > Don't put apostrophes in plural nouns.
>
> > Sincerely,
> > Third Grade
>
> Oh noez! He probably excused his rao spelling as ironic or deliberately
> irritating.
They just loooooove 2pid over there. You can tell.
2pid also told the other posters to ignore me "because [I] proclaimed
myself to be an Army major and [I] said anti-Christian things". They
seem to be ignoring him more. LOL!
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Look what one of the posters just said to 2pid:
>
> > (2pid)
>
> > >Cam was asked if the Raven's are getting his system now in his second year.
>
> > (Other poster)
>
> > Don't put apostrophes in plural nouns.
>
> > Sincerely,
> > Third Grade
>
> Oh noez! He probably excused his rao spelling as ironic or deliberately
> irritating.
2pid's response:
Is that all you got? An Apostrophe.
Only the trolls are amused.
Sincerely,
The bored
Boon
<artygu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 6:53 am, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <ce5744bf-ce9e-4946-8943-56d013a6e...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Look what one of the posters just said to 2pid:
>
> > > (2pid)
>
> > > >Cam was asked if the Raven's are getting his system now in his second year.
>
> > > (Other poster)
>
> > > Don't put apostrophes in plural nouns.
>
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Third Grade
>
> > Oh noez! He probably excused his rao spelling as ironic or deliberately
> > irritating.
>
> 2pid's response:
>
> Is that all you got? An Apostrophe.
> Only the trolls are amused.
>
> Sincerely,
I may have to make a visit. I'm a football fan, after all.
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
Some of the posters there are intelligent and don't seem to mind a
scrap with a Vikings fan.
And then there's 2pid. LoL.
Boon
Are you LoLing at your own comment? LoL.
I think it's funny how Scott uses "LoS" for line of scrimmage. What
would Napo and Soto think?
George M. Middius
Shhhh! said:
> Some of the posters there are intelligent and don't seem to mind a
> scrap with a Vikings fan.
How about cross-posting one of Witless's little confrontations?
Boon
wrote:
Even better...we should start cross-posting some of Scott's brain-dead
RAO postings over there.
hophead
cmndr_...@comcast.net says...
Here's one.
To make it fun, I'm not going to identify who is who. See if you can
guess which is Yapper and which is his tormentor before any names are
mentioned (note: this is like the freebie "bonus question" on the final
exam).
================================================================
> So did you miss all the postgame and highlight shows where Merriman
> picked as one of this week's defensive MVPs?
LoL. Is that how judge good play? Merrimans' anointments continue.
English played at least as well.
Jammer played better.
> Face it, you said something ignorant and you look foolish because of it.
LoL Should I defer to your expertise in foolishness and selfishness?
> Trying to retroactively contort yourself into a position of correctness
> isn't going to work, but I know you'll sure as hell try.
I'm ok with not agreeing with you.
But apparently you can't handle it.
> I mean seriously, what the fuck game were you watching?
The one where taking a knee wouldn't burn off the game clock.
Talk about a stupid statement. That one is easily verifiable
ignorance on your part.
The Merriman argument is subjective so the only thing that is beyond
dispute is how tightly wadded your panties are at the moment.
> Scott's journey through the wastebasket of tired old flames continues
> unabated.
Let me just say....I'm glad Norv is managing the game clock and your
not :).
> I didn't know my not needed managing.
You need a timeout or two or three.
> Cut it out, your being silly.
George M. Middius
hophead said:
> > How about cross-posting one of Witless's little confrontations?
>
> Here's one.
You didn't cross-post it, but not to worry -- I took care of that detail.
hophead
cmndr_...@comcast.net says...
Ah, my apologies: I misinterpreted your intent.
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
> In article <i06og5pih7jfn0m10s7bkk83imb61uv...@4ax.com>,
> cmndr_geo...@comcast.net says...
You made that up. You had to have.
MiNe 109
hophead <al...@dev.nul> wrote:
> Here's one.
>
> To make it fun, I'm not going to identify who is who. See if you can
> guess which is Yapper and which is his tormentor before any names are
> mentioned (note: this is like the freebie "bonus question" on the final
> exam).
<snip>
Good Lord! Call the ghost of Steve Allen; we have a meeting of minds!
Stephen
hophead
@f10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, arty...@hotmail.com says...
> You made that up. You had to have.
Sadly, I did not make any of it up. Search alt.sports.football.pro.sd-
chargers for the topic titled: "And with that sack, SM says" and read
the full exchange.
George M. Middius
hophead said:
> > You made that up. You had to have.
>
> Sadly, I did not make any of it up. Search alt.sports.football.pro.sd-
> chargers for the topic titled: "And with that sack, SM says" and read
> the full exchange.
My reading is that the other poster was making fun of Scottie. The final
"your" for "you're" was clearly mockery.
hophead
cmndr_...@comcast.net says...
> My reading is that the other poster was making fun of Scottie. The final
> "your" for "you're" was clearly mockery.
Definitely. A third poster continued the mockery at the very end of the
thread as well.
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
> In article <95bfc04b-7667-4db5-88f2-5dd9ce0defc4
>
> > You made that up. You had to have.
>
> Sadly, I did not make any of it up.
You are right. How sad.
Boon
<artygu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 6:53 am, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <ce5744bf-ce9e-4946-8943-56d013a6e...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Look what one of the posters just said to 2pid:
>
> > > (2pid)
>
> > > >Cam was asked if the Raven's are getting his system now in his second year.
>
> > > (Other poster)
>
> > > Don't put apostrophes in plural nouns.
>
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Third Grade
>
> > Oh noez! He probably excused his rao spelling as ironic or deliberately
> > irritating.
>
> They just loooooove 2pid over there. You can tell.
>
> 2pid also told the other posters to ignore me "because [I] proclaimed
> myself to be an Army major and [I] said anti-Christian things". They
> seem to be ignoring him more. LOL!
I love the new thread there titled "Hey, Scott W." It's just a post
that says "nice job," presumably for bringing all of us with him.