From: James Durkin <j...@graphics.cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Audio Alchemy's EDR*S Processing Impressions
Date: 1996/06/19
Message-ID: <4q9qv9$nn9@agate.berkeley.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 161096522
references: <4q69bj$fb3@tolstoy.lerc.nasa.gov> <4q9e7u$egm@tolstoy.lerc.nasa.gov>
organization: Program of Computer Graphics -- Cornell University
newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
originator: rdre...@jacobi.berkeley.edu


tommor...@aol.com (TomMorley) writes:

> ogi...@imec.be (Werner Ogiers) writes:

>> You can't increase the resolution of a given recording.

> But music is not random bits. The same is true of images. This is
> why image compression can work.

Would you care to elaborate on this?  This statement, in and of
itself, doesn't seem to say a heck of lot.  Just because music isn't
random, doesn't imply that you know enough about the underlying
continuous signal, given a limited resolution approximation, to
reconstruct it at some higher resolution.

[[    James W. Durkin -- j...@graphics.cornell.edu     ]]
[[ Program of Computer Graphics -- Cornell University ]]