Message from discussion
54% of Americans say global warming man's fault, gummer thinks he's being picked on for being stupid..
Received: by 10.66.86.130 with SMTP id p2mr5604459paz.22.1352578175537;
Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:09:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: 6ni73683pbd.1!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:09:33 -0600
From: Gunner <gunnera...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,talk.politics.guns,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.arts.tv,alt.politics.democrats
Subject: Re: 54% of Americans say global warming man's fault, gummer thinks he's being picked on for being stupid..
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:08:39 -0800
Organization: Coyote Engineering
Reply-To: gunnerNOS...@gmail.com
Message-ID: <i1dt98lf9p33vjbj26g0d85vd5bgdajlk8@4ax.com>
References: <OvudnT56r4XbZQfNnZ2dnUVZ_rqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <XnsA105143DBA2DWereofftoseethewizrd@88.198.244.100> <C5SdnWTpTNHVMgbNnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@mchsi.com> <XnsA105DCD943427Wereofftoseethewizrd@88.198.244.100> <zYednSJJyI74dAHNnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@mchsi.com> <3b4a50b0-1000-4121-abd8-32f02d5cdfec@k20g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> <7crq98d5dj1bl4rnberstn9835fh8h92ea@4ax.com> <k7keq0$un6$1@dont-email.me> <4ftr989amms0f7hiachvt6o2e1rt5o0dj7@4ax.com> <k7lrpg$r0v$1@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 147
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-nbeAMk5YQFjoBGC6emdFiJllDilhzbQ726387qKmwhby5I7H/QJ2jxdsLyJYtie36xSQT17hHgclspE!3gn/iL8AyWr58oFxpS4wuYFJDNFwp5XqdUriygSClUjaCUEZm6bZO7YWYkBH2HNAcUS0C2Bc
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 8855
X-Original-Bytes: 8794
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 09:28:09 -0600, Man of Mind
<baron.von.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Says the little fucktard that resorts to veiled threats of
>a "great cull" when his panting and ranting is proven to be
>but the bluster and spit from an immature posturing primate..
>
>--Your surrender is noted and laughed at, again..
http://www.standupamericaus.org/politics-ii/voter-id-laws-obama-lost-in-every-state-that-had-them/
Crooked Politics: Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law
By The American Third Position
November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be
produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections
with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include:
Minnesota (10),
Iowa (6),
Wisconsin (10),
Nevada (6),
Colorado (9),
New Mexico (5) and,
Pennsylvania (20).
This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s
total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral
votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.
Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him,
which don’t require photo IDs. Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a
library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require
it.
So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien
Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?
Add to all this, electronic vote fraud. An article from the Blaze
reports “Last week, TheBlaze brought you a story from a North Carolina
voting precinct using electronic voting machines that was already
experiencing issues where votes for GOP candidate Mitt Romney were
being changed to Democratic candidate Barack Obama. Now, it’s
allegedly happening again, this time in both Kansas and Ohio — and we
talked to a vendor supporting the machines about the issue.
Nancy from Topeka, Kan., who asked that her last name not be used for
reasons pertaining to her husband’s work, told The Blaze she fears if
voters aren’t double checking their selections, they’ll be ‘robbed of
their vote.’ Nancy explained that while her husband was casting a vote
for Romney, the touchscreen highlighted Obama.
“He played around with the field a little and realized that in order
to vote for Romney, his finger had to be exactly on the mark,” Nancy
wrote in an email. She said ‘the invisible Obama field came down about
1/4 [of an inch]‘ into what should technically have been the Romney
area”
Funny how this “glitch” only benefited Obama while stealing votes from
Romney. I wonder how many other “glitches” were out there and how big
a role they played in Obama’s “victory”.
No incumbent president in the last 60 years has won reelection
with the unemployment rate as high as it currently is. The only way
left for the Democrats to keep Obama in office was to steal the
election. Obama failed to win ANY states with photo ID laws for
voters, but he did win all the swing states which require no voter ID.
Add to this electronic “glitches” that gave Obama votes meant for
Romney, and it’s pretty obvious what happened on November 6th, 2012.
We just became a Third World country.
In Chicago, Obama shows his ID before voting. (Illinois has no Voter
ID Law.) (See Obama voting video here.)
* New voter ID law has not yet been implemented; state presently has
no voter ID law in effect.
** New voter ID law has not yet been implemented; an older voter ID
law remains in effect.
In Alabama, South Carolina and Texas, current non-photo voter ID
laws stay in effect for the time being. The new photo voter ID
requirements will take effect after receiving preclearance under
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. South Carolina and Texas were
denied pre-clearance in December 2011 and March 2012, respectively.
Alabama’s new photo ID law has a 2014 effective date, and the state
has not yet applied for pre-clearance. The Texas law was recently
denied pre-clearance by a federal court in D.C.; a similar court is
currently considering South Carolina’s law.
Wisconsin’s voter ID law was declared unconstitutional on March
12, 2012. Dane County Circuit Judge Richard Niess issued a permanent
injunction barring enforcement of the law, which the state has said it
will appeal. Read the March 6 injunction and the March 12 injunction.
There are some who prefer to call Oklahoma a photo voter ID state,
because most voters will show a photo ID before voting. However,
Oklahoma law also permits a voter registration card issued by the
appropriate county elections board to serve as proof of identity in
lieu of photo ID.
Rhode Island’s voter ID law takes effect in two stages. The first
stage, requiring a non-photo ID, took effect on January 1, 2012. On
January 1, 2014, a photo ID requirement will replace the non-photo ID
law.
Alabama’s new photo ID requirement takes effect with the 2014
statewide primary election. The new law also requires preclearance.
The delayed implementation date was intended to ensure that the timing
of preclearance did not occur between the primary and general
elections of 2012, thus creating voter confusion.
Mississippi’s new voter ID law was passed via the citizen
initiative process. However, the language in constitutional amendment
passed by MS voters on Nov. 8 is very general, and implementing
legislation will be required before the amendment can take effect. The
MS provision will also require pre-clearance under Section 5 of the
Voting Rights Act before it can take effect.
A state judge temporarily blocked enforcement of Pennsylvania’s
new voter ID law. It will not be in effect for the November 2012
election, and a trial on its permanent status will begin after the
election.
--
""The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have
to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. That’s why I
became an operative working with Democrats. With Democrats all you
have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to
use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.
Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don’t have
a clue as to political reality.
What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard
workers and convince them that they should support social programs
that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a
little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you
want.
The voter is basically dumb and lazy. The reason I became a Democratic
operative instead of a Republican was because there were more
Democrats that didn’t have a clue than there were Republicans."
James Carvell, DNC operative