Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
rec.arts.tv
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Warp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Daniel47@teranews.com  
View profile  
 More options Oct 12 2012, 9:09 am
Newsgroups: alt.tv.star-trek.tos, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.tv, sci.physics
From: "Danie...@teranews.com" <d...@albury.nospam.net.au>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:09:14 +1100
Local: Fri, Oct 12 2012 9:09 am
Subject: Re: Warp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

William December Starr wrote:
> In article <WlZ5s.1291$TA5....@newsfe05.iad>,
> "Danie...@teranews.com" <d...@albury.nospam.net.au> said:

>> What intrigues me is what happens when space is being warped by
>> several space ships travelling in different directions *at* *the*
>> *same* *time!!* e.g. if one space ship wanted to travel from the
>> bottom of one of the spiral arms of our galaxy to the top, and at
>> the same time a second space ship wanted to travel from the centre
>> of our galaxy to the outer edge along the spiral arm, and a third
>> space ship wanted to travel from the inner edge of one of the
>> spiral arms of our galaxy to its outer edge, i.e. in three
>> dimensions at the same time.

>> Space must be warped really, really, strangely!!

> I thought relativity meant that you can't say "at the same time."

> -- wds

Well.....it's all relative, isn't it??

Daniel


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google