Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Warp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Daniel47@teranews.com  
View profile  
 More options Oct 12 2012, 9:15 am
Newsgroups: alt.tv.star-trek.tos, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.tv, sci.physics
From: "Danie...@teranews.com" <d...@albury.nospam.net.au>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:15:42 +1100
Local: Fri, Oct 12 2012 9:15 am
Subject: Re: Warp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say

KalElFan wrote:
> "Danie...@teranews.com"  wrote in message
> news:WlZ5s.1291$TA5.365@newsfe05.iad...

>> What intrigues me is what happens when space is being warped
>> by several space ships travelling in different directions *at* *the*
>> *same* *time!!* ...

> By then they'll have built the Intragalactic Highway System, with
> appropriate warp drive on- and off-ramps, and bridges where their
> paths intersect and so on.  :-)

> My last response to Wayne got sent out with some typos and a
> few edits missing, but for example at one point I said science
> fiction is not science fact and never will be.  That holds, because
> by definition "fiction" at any given time isn't fact.  But the fiction,
> if it's proves prescient enough, might become fact and my last
> draft would have made that point.

> The way you've described it evokes space being manipulated
> over large distances.  I've always assumed the tech wouldn't
> have that problem.  If space is being warped ahead of and
> behind the ship, I conceptualize that as propagation of the
> warped space and the bubble within it.  So normal space is
> restored in the wake.

So you're suggesting that, rather than warping from point A to point Z
in one jump, a "ship" warps from point A to point b, then from b to c,
and from c to d, etc, etc and finally from point y to point Z.

Awfully messy, IMHO!!

Daniel


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.